Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tobacco Cessation Interventions in Non-Respiratory Cancers: A Systematic Review With Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Dhumal, Trupti; Kelly, Kimberly M; Khadka, Safalta; Kelley, George A; Kamal, Khalid M; Scott, Virginia G; Hogan, Thomas F; Harper, Felicity W K.
Afiliação
  • Dhumal T; Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Kelly KM; Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Khadka S; Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Kelley GA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Kamal KM; School of Public and Population Health and Department of Kinesiology, Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA.
  • Scott VG; Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Hogan TF; Department of Pharmaceutical Systems and Policy, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Harper FWK; Department of Medical Oncology, Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Ann Behav Med ; 58(9): 579-593, 2024 Aug 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38985846
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Considering the high rates of persistent tobacco use, effective cessation interventions are needed for cancer patients and caregivers. Despite the need, there is a significant lack of research on tobacco cessation, especially for non-respiratory cancers (breast, prostate, colorectal, cervical, and bladder cancer).

PURPOSE:

The objective was to evaluate tobacco use and tobacco cessation interventions among patients and caregivers for non-respiratory cancers.

METHODS:

Randomized controlled trials assessing tobacco cessation interventions were identified. Five electronic databases were searched in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines through July 2023. Studies exclusive to lung, oral, thoracic, and head and neck cancers were excluded. Effect sizes were estimated; risk of bias was assessed.

RESULTS:

Of 3,304 studies, 17 were included. Interventions included behavioral (n = 6), pharmacotherapy (n = 2), and a combination (n = 9) treatment. Eight studies included a health behavior model; mean behavioral change techniques were 5.57. Pooled magnitude of the odds of cessation was positive and significant (odds ratio = 1.24, 95% confidence interval [Lower Limit 1.02, Upper Limit 1.51]) relative to usual care/placebo. Cumulative meta-analysis examined the accumulation of results over-time and demonstrated that studies have been significant since 2020. Two studies included caregivers' who were involved in the provision of social support.

CONCLUSIONS:

Current interventions have the potential to reduce tobacco use in non-respiratory cancers. Results may be beneficial for promoting tobacco cessation among non-respiratory cancers. There is a considerable lack of dyadic interventions for cancer survivors and caregivers; researchers are encouraged to explore dyadic approaches.
We aimed to understand effective ways for cancer patients and caregivers to quit using tobacco. We focused on non-respiratory cancers (cancers not related to breathing issues) like breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer. We reviewed 17 randomized controlled trials designed to help people quit tobacco, which included behavioral therapies (e.g., education and counseling), pharmacotherapy (i.e., medicine), and combinations of both. We found that people in these studies quit using tobacco, especially when more than one approach was used. The studies also showed that these approaches have been more successful since 2020. The research highlighted a need for more studies that include both patients and their caregivers together in the quitting process. This approach, called dyadic intervention, could be more effective in supporting patients and their caregivers. Overall, while the current approaches are promising, more research is needed to develop better ways to help cancer patients and caregivers quit smoking for longer.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Abandono do Uso de Tabaco / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Behav Med Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto / Abandono do Uso de Tabaco / Neoplasias Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Behav Med Assunto da revista: CIENCIAS DO COMPORTAMENTO Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos