Using OR Black Box Technology to Determine Quality Improvement Outcomes for In-situ Timeout and Debrief Simulation.
Ann Surg
; 2024 Jul 11.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38989569
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to determine quality improvement outcomes following the pilot implementation of an in-situ simulation designed to enhance surgical safety checklist performance.BACKGROUND:
OR Black Box (ORBB) technology allows near real-time assessment for surgical safety checklist performance. Before our study, timeout quality was 73.3%, compliance was 99.9%, and engagement was 89.7% (n=1993 cases); Debrief Quality was 76.0%, compliance was 66.9%, and engagement was 66.7% (n=1842 cases).METHODS:
This IRB-approved study used prospective convergent multi-methods. During 2 months, a 15-minute in-situ simulation, incorporating rapid cycle deliberate practice, was implemented for OR teams. ORBB analytics generated Timeout and Debrief scores for actual operations performed by surgeons who participated in simulation (Sim-group) versus those who did not (No-sim group) over 6 months, including 2 months pre-intervention, during-intervention, and post-intervention. Inductive content analysis was performed based on simulation discussions to determine team member perspectives.RESULTS:
Thirty simulations with 163 interprofessional participants were conducted. ORBB data from 1570 cases were analyzed. Scores were significantly better for the Sim-group compared with the No-sim group for debrief quality (84% vs. 79% P<0.001, during-intervention), compliance (73% vs. 66%, P<0.001, post-intervention), and engagement (80% vs. 73%, P=0.012, during-intervention). There were no between-group differences for Timeout scores. Thematic analysis identified 2 primary categories "culture of safety" and "policy."CONCLUSIONS:
This simulation-based QI intervention created a psychologically safe training environment for OR teams. The novel use of ORBB technology facilitated outcome analysis and showed significantly better Debrief scores for simulation-trained surgeons compared with nontrained surgeons.
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Ann Surg
Ano de publicação:
2024
Tipo de documento:
Article