Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Deformed wing virus genotypes A and B do not elicit immunologically different responses in naïve honey bee hosts.
Norton, Amanda M; Buchmann, Gabriele; Ashe, Alyson; Watson, Owen T; Beekman, Madeleine; Remnant, Emily J.
Afiliação
  • Norton AM; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Buchmann G; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ashe A; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Watson OT; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Beekman M; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Remnant EJ; School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insect Mol Biol ; 2024 Jul 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39072811
ABSTRACT
Iflavirus aladeformis (Picornavirales Iflaviridae), commonly known as deformed wing virus(DWV), in association with Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Mesostigmata Varroidae), is a leading factor associated with honey bee (Apis mellifera L. [Hymenoptera Apidae]) deaths. The virus and mite have a near global distribution, making it difficult to separate the effect of one from the other. The prevalence of two main DWV genotypes (DWV-A and DWV-B) has changed over time, leading to the possibility that the two strains elicit a different immune response by the host. Here, we use a honey bee population naïve to both the mite and the virus to investigate if honey bees show a different immunological response to DWV genotypes. We examined the expression of 19 immune genes by reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and analysed small RNA after experimental injection with DWV-A and DWV-B. We found no evidence that DWV-A and DWV-B elicit different immune responses in honey bees. RNA interference genes were up-regulated during DWV infection, and small interfering RNA (siRNA) responses were proportional to viral loads yet did not inhibit DWV accumulation. The siRNA response towards DWV was weaker than the response to another honey bee pathogen, Triatovirus nigereginacellulae (Picornavirales Dicistroviridae; black queen cell virus), suggesting that DWV is comparatively better at evading host antiviral defences. There was no evidence for the production of virus-derived Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) in response to DWV. In contrast to previous studies, and in the absence of V. destructor, we found no evidence that DWV has an immunosuppressive effect. Overall, our results advance our understanding of the immunological effect that DWV in isolation elicits in honey bees.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Insect Mol Biol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Insect Mol Biol Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália