Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
'The Norm Is to Not Openly Collaborate': Using the Lens of Co-Production to Evaluate the Development of a COVID-19 ICU Triage Policy.
Scholz, Brett; Grey, Flick; Graham, Joyce; Mitchell, Imogen; Kirk, Lucy; Warner, Terri.
Afiliação
  • Scholz B; School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Grey F; Affiliated along my own idiosyncratic lines, Wurundjeri Country, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Graham J; Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Liaison Service, Canberra Health Services, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Mitchell I; School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Kirk L; Research and Academic Partnerships, Canberra Health Services, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
  • Warner T; School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Ngunnawal and Ngambri Country, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Health Expect ; 27(4): e14159, 2024 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39072847
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In 2020, surging cases of COVID-19 meant that health services had to plan for crisis-level triage. In the Australian Capital Territory, the Clinical Health Emergency Coordination Centre sought to develop a triage policy in collaboration with a range of consumer, carer and community groups. This study aims to map the collaborative development of the COVID-19 ICU triage policy onto the principles of co-production.

METHODS:

Interviews were conducted with facilitators, members of advocacy or consumer groups and clinicians who were involved in the development of the triage policy. Interviews were thematically analysed using both theory- and data-driven approaches to, respectively, draw on the theoretical framework of co-production, and to explore participants' perspectives relevant to but beyond the scope of this theoretical framework.

RESULTS:

The findings suggest that at each stage of the initiative, there were ways in which the principles of co-production were met, and ways in which they were not met. One of the fundamental concerns that arose was about whether trying to solve a problem based on resources was compatible with a solution based on human rights.

CONCLUSION:

Literature about co-production has been critiqued for being limited to aspirational concerns, or implying co-production is easily achievable. The current study contributes to existing research through the application of the theoretical framework of co-production and exploring ways its aims were met and not met within a system-level collaboration developing a high-stakes health policy. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study has been conducted and written by researchers working from lived experience perspectives, and other researchers working from traditionally mainstream health disciplines, including psychology and medicine. Further, the study is about patient and public involvement in the development of a health policy. Thus it both embodies and is about non-tokenistic collaboration between people with lived experience and other health professionals.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triagem / COVID-19 / Política de Saúde Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Triagem / COVID-19 / Política de Saúde Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália