Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Examining aid fragmentation and collaboration opportunities in Cambodia's health sector.
Lee, Suyeon; Park, Eunice Y.
Afiliação
  • Lee S; Graduate School of Public Administration, Korea University, Sejong, South Korea.
  • Park EY; Department of Public Health, College for Community Health, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ, 07043, USA. parke@montclair.edu.
Global Health ; 20(1): 62, 2024 Aug 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095844
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cambodia's health sector faces significant challenges exacerbated by aid fragmentation, where development aid is dispersed among numerous small, uncoordinated projects. This study examines the distribution of health sector aid among Cambodia's principal donors to identify priorities, overlaps, and potential collaboration opportunities, addressing the urgent need for aid efficiency and alignment with national health priorities.

METHODS:

Utilizing OECD datasets and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) for the years 2010-2021, this study quantifies aid fragmentation within Cambodia's health sector. It analyzes aid allocations from the top five donors-United States, Australia, South Korea, Japan, and Germany-across various health projects and initiatives, evaluating the extent of fragmentation and identifying areas for potential donor collaboration.

RESULTS:

This study's findings highlight a pervasive issue of aid fragmentation within Cambodia's health sector, evident through the sector's low HHI score. This indicates a widespread distribution of aid across numerous small-scale initiatives, rather than targeted, unified efforts. A notable example includes Japan and Korea, which exhibit lower HHI scores, indicating a more pronounced fragmentation in their aid allocation. These countries' contributions are spread across various sectors without a dominant focus, contrasting with the United States' significant dedication to infectious disease control. However, beyond this specific area, the US's aid distribution across other priority health areas shows signs of fragmentation. This scattered approach to aid allocation, even amidst instances of focused support, illustrates the overarching challenge of aligning donor contributions with the holistic needs of Cambodia's health infrastructure.

CONCLUSIONS:

This investigation highlights the critical need for enhanced collaboration and strategic harmonization among international donors to mitigate aid fragmentation in Cambodia's health sector. It underscores the importance of adopting integrated and priority-aligned aid strategies to improve the efficiency and impact of health aid. By fostering synergistic partnerships and harmonizing donor efforts, there is a potential to create a more cohesive support framework that resonates with Cambodia's comprehensive health requirements and contributes to sustainable health outcomes. Such harmonization not only aligns with Sustainable Development Goal 3 by optimizing health services and outcomes but also strengthens global partnerships under Sustainable Development Goal 17, fostering a unified approach to international development.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cooperação Internacional Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Global Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cooperação Internacional Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Global Health Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Coréia do Sul