[Comparison of percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and surgical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute arteriovenous graft thrombosis].

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the efficacy between percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and surgical thrombectomy in the treatment of acute arteriovenous graft thrombosis (AVG). Methods: The clinical data of acute thrombosis AVG patients treated in the Department of Vascular Surgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University from January 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy group and surgical thrombectomy group according to treatment methods. Baseline information, technical success rate, complication rate, and 24-month primary and secondary patency rates of the two groups were analyzed. Results: A total of 130 patients aged (54.1±14.2) years were enrolled in the study, including 66 males and 64 females. There were 78 patients in the percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy group and 52 patients in surgical thrombectomy group. No statistically significant differences in gender, age, comorbidities, and lesion characteristics between the two groups were detected (all P>0.05). The technical success rate in the mechanical thrombectomy group was 98.7% (77/78), and the complication rate was 5.1% (4/78), while the technical success rate in the surgical thrombectomy group was 94.2% (49/52), and the complication rate was 9.6% (5/52). There were no statistically significant differences in the technical success rate and complication rate between the two groups (all P>0.05). The average operation time of mechanical thrombectomy was significantly shorter than that of surgical thrombectomy [(62.8±13.9) min vs (77.0±17.6) min, P<0.001]. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated the primary patency rates of the mechanical thrombectomy group at 12 and 24 months after thrombectomy were 62.8% and 38.5%, respectively, while the primary patency rates of the surgical thrombectomy group at 12 and 24 months were 57.7% and 36.5%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary patency rate between the two groups (P=0.641). The secondary patency rates of the mechanical thrombectomy group at 12 and 24 months were 98.7% and 94.9%, respectively, while the secondary patency rates of the surgical thrombectomy group at 12 and 24 months were 92.3% and 82.7%, respectively. The secondary patency rates of the mechanical thrombectomy group were higher than those of the surgical thrombectomy group (P=0.020). Conclusion: Mechanical thrombectomy is a safe and effective treatment for acute AVG thrombosis, with the advantages of shorter operation time and higher secondary patency rate compared with surgical thrombectomy.