Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Self-Reported PrEP Use and Risk of Bacterial STIs Among Ontarian Men Who Are Gay or Bisexual or Have Sex With Men.
Tran, Nguyen K; Welles, Seth L; Roy, Jason A; Brennan, David J; Chernak, Esther; Goldstein, Neal D.
Afiliação
  • Tran NK; The PRIDE Study/PRIDEnet, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California.
  • Welles SL; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Roy JA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
  • Brennan DJ; Department Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.
  • Chernak E; Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  • Goldstein ND; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Ann Fam Med ; 2024 Aug 27.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39191461
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may increase rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBM) through risk compensation (eg, an increase in condomless sex or number of partners); however, longitudinal studies exploring the time-dependent nature of PrEP uptake and bacterial STIs are limited. We used marginal structural models to estimate the effect of PrEP uptake on STI incidence.

METHODS:

We analyzed data from the iCruise study, an online longitudinal study of 535 Ontarian GBM from July 2017 to April 2018, to estimate the effects of PrEP uptake on incidence of self-reported bacterial STIs (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) collected with 12 weekly diaries. The incidence rate was calculated as the number of infections per 100 person-months, with evaluation of the STIs overall and individually. We used marginal structural models to account for time-varying confounding and quantitative bias analysis to evaluate the sensitivity of estimates to nondifferential outcome misclassification.

RESULTS:

Participating GBM were followed up for a total of 1,623.5 person-months. Overall, 70 participants (13.1%) took PrEP during the study period. Relative to no uptake, PrEP uptake was associated with an increased incidence rate of gonorrhea (incidence rate ratio = 4.00; 95% CI, 1.67-9.58), but not of chlamydia or syphilis, and not of any bacterial STI overall. Accounting for misclassification, the median incidence rate ratio for gonorrhea was 2.36 (95% simulation interval, 1.08-5.06).

CONCLUSIONS:

We observed an increased incidence rate of gonorrhea associated with PrEP uptake among Ontarian GBM that was robust to misclassification. Although our findings support current guidelines for integrating gonorrhea screening with PrEP services, additional research should consider the long-term impact of PrEP among this population.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Fam Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE FAMILIA E COMUNIDADE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Fam Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA DE FAMILIA E COMUNIDADE Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article