Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sequencing and schedule effects of cisplatin plus etoposide in small-cell lung cancer: results of a North Central Cancer Treatment Group randomized clinical trial.
Maksymiuk, A W; Jett, J R; Earle, J D; Su, J Q; Diegert, F A; Mailliard, J A; Kardinal, C G; Krook, J E; Veeder, M H; Wiesenfeld, M.
Afiliação
  • Maksymiuk AW; Saskatchewan Cancer Foundation-Saskatoon Cancer Centre, Canada.
J Clin Oncol ; 12(1): 70-6, 1994 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8270988
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The combination of etoposide (E) and cisplatin (P) is an accepted standard therapy for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, the optimal sequencing and administration schedule has not been defined. This study was designed to evaluate different sequencing and administration schedules of E and P in the treatment of SCLC. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

Five hundred fifty-two eligible patients with limited-(LD) and extensive-stage (ED) SCLC were randomized to receive one of the following regimens arm A, P 30 mg/m2 by intravenous (IV) bolus followed by E 130 mg/m2 bolus; arm B, E 130 mg/m2 bolus followed by P 30 mg/m2 bolus; arm C, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 30 mg/m2 bolus at the end of each 24-hour infusion of E; arm D, E 130 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion and P 45 mg/m2 by 24-hour infusion on day 2 and 3 only. Two 3-day induction cycles of IV EP were administered 4 weeks apart. Subsequent therapy was the same for all arms, consisting of four cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) at 4-week intervals. Consolidative thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were administered to responders.

RESULTS:

The overall response rate (84%) was similar in all treatment arms. Treatment arm A was associated with the best complete response (CR) rate (52%), the most favorable median survival time (MST) of 15 months, and a 26% 2-year survival rate. Patients with LD on arm A had a MST of 20 months and a 42% 2-year survival rate. Multivariate analysis indicated that extent of disease, performance status, arm of therapy, and sex were significant independent factors influencing survival. Toxicity of the four regimens was similar, except for greater thrombocytopenia on arm D.

CONCLUSION:

The bolus administration of EP with E following P for the first two cycles of chemotherapy was the most effective regimen, with especially encouraging survival for LD patients.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Células Pequenas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 1994 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá
Buscar no Google
Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Células Pequenas / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Oncol Ano de publicação: 1994 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá