Re-operation rates of arthroscopic management versus arthrotomy in treatment of septic arthritis of native shoulder joint in adults. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIMS: Previous studies have reported concern regarding high reoperation rates when septic arthritis of the native shoulder is treated arthroscopically, compared to open arthrotomy. We aimed to compare re-operation rate between the two strategies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The review was registered prospectively at PROSPERO, (CRD42021226518). We searched common databases and references lists (8 February 2021). The inclusion criteria included interventional or observational studies of adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of native shoulder joint septic arthritis and had either arthroscopy or arthrotomy. The exclusion criteria included patients with periprosthetic or post-surgical infections, patients who had atypical infections, and studies that did not report re-operation rate. Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias (ROBINS-I) was used. RESULTS: Nine studies (retrospective cohort studies) were included that involved 5,643 patients (5,645 shoulders). Mean age ranged from 55.6 to 75.5 years, and follow-up time ranged from 1-41 months. Mean duration of symptoms prior to presentation ranged from 8.3-23.3 days. Metanalysis observed a higher re-operation rate for reinfection at any time point following initial arthroscopy in comparison to arthrotomy, odds ratio 2.61 (95% confidence interval 1.04, 6.56). There was marked heterogeneity (I2 = 78.8%) among studies including surgical techniques and missing data. CONCLUSION: This metanalysis observed a higher reoperation rate in arthroscopy in comparison to arthrotomy for the treatment of native shoulder septic arthritis in adults. The quality of the included evidence is low and the heterogeneity among included studies is marked. Higher quality evidence is still needed that address limitations of previous studies.

Are we staying up too late? Timing of surgery of displaced supracondylar fractures in children. Clinical audit in a paediatric tertiary UK trauma centre and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) guidelines in managing supracondylar humerus fractures in children, outline indications for urgent fixation of these fractures. We present our data from a regional paediatric trauma centre before and after implementing a change in practice as per these guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective clinical audit against BOA guidelines. Radiographs, admission clerking notes, operation notes, and clinic letters were all reviewed. We included all displaced supracondylar fractures of the extension type (Gartland Types 2b and 3). The first audit cycle occurred in 2017, subsequent cycles in 2018 & 2019. RESULTS: 172 patients reviewed across the three audit stages. In the first audit, almost quarter of patients were operated on in the same night without clear indication as per the guidelines. This dropped down to 7% after a change of practice in 2019. Rate of conversion to open reduction and nerve complications did not increase after delayed fixation. CONCLUSION: When there is no indication for same night operating out of hours, delaying treatment until the next day seems to be a safe way of treating these difficult fractures. Our data show that there is no increase in complications when these fractures are managed the next day.

Is releasing pulleys during flexor tendon repair "part and parcel"? Narrative review of the current evidence.

BACKGROUND: The complex hand flexors pulleys system is essential in achieving efficient flexor tendons' function. Previous cadaveric studies demonstrated that A2 and A4 are the crucial pulleys in maintaining normal digits biomechanics. Realistically, the preservation of A2 and A4 pulleys during repairing flexor tendon laceration in zones one and two can be extremely challenging. We review the current published evidence in this article to answer the question of whether releasing the pulleys cause bowstringing or affects clinical outcomes. METHODS: Literature search of the available databases. RESULTS: There was no published comparative evidence. Retrospective case series have reported that no clinical bowstringing was noted after releasing flexor pulleys during flexor tendon repairs. Outcomes have been reported according to Tang and or Strickland criteria to assess range of motion (ROM). No functional hand scores or patients' satisfactions scores have been reported. CONCLUSION: Releasing flexor pulleys during tendon repair to allow access or prevent impingement of the repaired tendon does not seem to cause bowstringing or affect outcome based on the limited available evidence. Future research is needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Treatments for Displaced Radial Head Fractures.

Background: The aim of this study is to compare the surgical and non-operative management of displaced radial head fractures via a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: RCTs comparing management of isolated, displaced radial head fractures in adults were included in our review and statistical analysis. A systematic review of electronic databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library) were screened for comparative RCTs reporting on the management of displaced radial head fractures in August 2021. Two investigators independently reviewed studies for eligibility and an assessment of bias was performed for each study. A Bayesian network meta-analysis of the included RCTs was performed. Results: Five RCTs (326 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. Treatment methods included radial head arthroplasty (RHA), open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with metal implants (ORIF-M), ORIF with biodegradable implants (ORIF-B) and non-operative management. In our network meta-analysis of 'good' or 'excellent' patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), RHA was significantly favourable to ORIF-M (OR: 0.04, CrI: 0.0011, 0.87), ORIF-B (OR: 0.1 CrI: 0.00076, 6.37). Nonoperative treatment was not shown to be significantly worse than RHA (OR: 0.01 CrI: 2.5e-0.5, 3.61). Conclusions: This network meta-analysis shows that in displaced radial head fractures, RHA is associated with significantly superior functional PROMs than ORIF-M based on the evidence available. Nonoperative management has not been shown to be significantly worse. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

The effect of preoperative foot and ankle physiotherapy group on reducing inpatient stay and improving patient care.

BACKGROUND: Benefits of day case foot and ankle surgery include reduced hospital stay, cost savings, high patient satisfaction, quicker recovery with no increased complications. The preoperative foot and ankle group was set up in 2007 to reduce inpatient hospital stays and increase the rate of day case procedures. METHODS: We evaluated length of stay and physiotherapy intervention for all our patients during the first three months of 2007-2011. RESULTS: Median length of stay was statistically significant (p<0.05) in all groups apart from the ankle group. Day case surgery rates increased in all groups apart from hindfoot group but the result was only significant for forefoot and midfoot groups. CONCLUSION: The results show that the setting up our group has resulted in reduced inpatient stay, increase in day case surgery rates with significant cost savings.

Olecranon fractures in the elderly during the COVID-19 pandemic: Is non-operative treatment reasonable? Review of the current evidence.

The current COVID-19 global pandemic presents a major challenge and unprecedented pressures on health systems. The national guidelines in the UK advise non-operative treatment of fractures whenever possible to reduce the risk of surgical intervention to both patient and healthcare staff. The elderly population over 70 years are highlighted as a high-risk group in this pandemic as well as being often high risk for surgery in general due to co-morbidities. This article reviews the current literature regarding treatment of displaced olecranon fractures in the elderly. Literature search of the available databases. One randomised controlled trial has been published, comparing operative versus non-operative treatments of olecranon fractures in this age group. The study was terminated prematurely due to the high complication rate in the operative group. No difference in functional scores was recorded. Other published retrospective case series report good functional outcome scores and high satisfaction rates in the majority of patients in whom olecranon fractures were treated non-operatively. Non-operative treatment of olecranon fractures in elderly patients seems to be safe and an acceptable management option in these unprecedented times.

Total Elbow Arthroplasty Survey 2015: Current Service Provision and Future Improvements (England and Wales).

BACKGROUND: The number of total elbow replacement (TER) procedures conducted is relatively low compared to other joint arthroplasties. We have established a survey about current service provision and possible future improvements in the UK. METHODS: A British Elbow and Shoulder Society (BESS) approved online survey was circulated to its surgical members. RESULTS: In total, 153 members of BESS responded. Almost 31% of respondents performed two to five TER in 2014; 28% performed none and 22.7% performed five to ten. Two-thirds of respondents did not perform any revision surgery. The main indication for TER was rheumatoid arthritis (33%), followed by acute trauma (28.5%). In addition, 67% of surgeons have an available 'network' for advice, either locally or regionally. Most primary procedures (93%) were carried out within the local units. However, 34% of complex primary or revision procedures were referred to another centre. Furthermore, 52% of respondents agree that, to be proficient in TER, a minimum number of procedures per annum should be performed: 62% stated that five procedures per annum should be considered as the minimum required. Suggestions for improvement included a hub and spoke model (48%) and a dedicated TER surgeon within the unit (45%). CONCLUSIONS: The survey highlights the interest in exploring options for improving TER provision in the UK.