RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Peptic ulcer disease is the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We sought to establish the epidemiology and hemostasis success rate of the different treatment modalities in this setting. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample. Non-elective adult admissions with a principal diagnosis of ulcer bleeding were included. The primary outcome was endoscopic, radiologic and surgical hemostasis success rate. Secondary outcomes were patients' demographics, in-hospital mortality and resource utilization. On subgroup analysis, gastric and duodenal ulcers were studied separately. Confounders were adjusted for using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 136,425 admissions (55% gastric and 45% duodenal ulcers) were included. The mean patient age was 67 years. The majority of patients were males, Caucasians, of lower income and high comorbidity burden. The endoscopic, radiological and surgical therapy and hemostasis success rates were 33.6, 1.4, 0.1, and 95.1%, 89.1 and 66.7%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.9% overall, but 2.4% after successful and 11.1% after failed endoscopic hemostasis, respectively. Duodenal ulcers were associated with lower adjusted odds of successful endoscopic hemostasis, but higher odds of early and multiple endoscopies, endoscopic therapy, overall and successful radiological therapy, in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay and higher total hospitalization charges and costs. CONCLUSIONS: The ulcer bleeding endoscopic hemostasis success rate is 95.1%. Rescue therapy is associated with lower hemostasis success and more than a ten-fold increase in mortality rate. Duodenal ulcers are associated with worse treatment outcomes and higher resource utilization compared with gastric ulcers.
Assuntos
Hemostase Endoscópica , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/terapia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Péptica Hemorrágica/mortalidade , Hemostase Endoscópica/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Úlcera Duodenal/epidemiologia , Úlcera Duodenal/terapia , Úlcera Duodenal/complicações , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiologia , Úlcera Gástrica/terapia , Úlcera Gástrica/complicações , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Understanding the epidemiology of bleeding and thromboembolism (clotting) in liver cirrhosis provides important data for future studies and policymaking; however, head-to-head comparisons of bleeding and clotting remain limited. METHODS: This is a populational retrospective cohort study using the US National Readmission Database of 2018 to compare the incidence and outcomes of bleeding and clotting events in patients with liver cirrhosis. The primary outcomes were the 11-month incidence proportion of bleeding and clotting events. RESULTS: Of 1 304 815 participants, 26 569 had liver cirrhosis (45.0% women, mean age 57.2 [SD, 12.7] years). During the 11-month follow-up, in patients with cirrhosis, for bleeding and clotting events, the incidence proportions was 15.3% and 6.6%; the risk-standardized all-cause mortality rates were 2.4% and 1.0%; the rates of intensive care intervention were 4.1% and 1.9%; the rates of rehabilitation transfer were .2% and .2%; the cumulative length of stays were 45 100 and 23 566 days; total hospital costs were 147 and 84 million US dollars; total hospital charges were 620 and 365 million US dollars. Compared to non-cirrhosis, liver cirrhosis was associated with higher rates of bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.02 [95% CI, 2.85-3.20]) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) (18.46 [14.86-22.92]), and slightly lower risks of other non-PVT venous thromboembolic events (.82 [.75-.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding is more common than thromboembolism in patients with liver cirrhosis, causes higher morbidity, mortality and resource utilization. Liver cirrhosis is an independent risk factor for bleeding and PVT, but not non-PVT thromboembolism including venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke.
Assuntos
Tromboembolia , Trombose Venosa , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Veia Porta/patologia , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia/complicações , Tromboembolia/patologia , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Cirrose Hepática/patologia , Trombose Venosa/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIM: We aimed to determine the rate of 30-day hospital readmissions of uncomplicated choledocholithiasis and its impact on mortality and health care use in the United States. METHODS: Nonelective admissions for adults with uncomplicated choledocholithiasis were selected from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2016-2018. The primary outcome was the all-cause 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes were reasons for readmission, readmission mortality rate, procedures, and resource use (length of stay and total hospitalization costs and charges). Independent risk factors for readmission were identified using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 30-day rate of readmission was 9.3%. Biliary and pancreatic disorders and postprocedural complications accounted for 36.6% and 10.3% of readmission, respectively. The mortality rate among patients readmitted to the hospital was higher than that for index admissions (2.0% vs. 0.4%, P <0.01). Readmitted patients were less likely to receive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (61% vs. 69%, P <0.01) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (12.5% vs. 26%, P <0.01) during the index admissions. A total of 42,150 hospital days was associated with readmission, and the total health care in-hospital economic burden was $112 million (in costs) and $470 million (in charges). Independent predictors of readmission were male sex, Medicare (compared with private) insurance, higher Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, no endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or laparoscopic cholecystectomy, postprocedural complications of the digestive system, hemodynamic or respiratory support, urban hospitals, and lower hospital volume of uncomplicated choledocholithiasis. CONCLUSIONS: The uncomplicated choledocholithiasis 30-day readmission rate is 9.3%. Readmission was associated with higher mortality, morbidity, and resource use. Multiple independent predictors of readmission were identified.
Assuntos
Coledocolitíase , Readmissão do Paciente , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Tempo de Internação , Coledocolitíase/epidemiologia , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Medicare , Hospitalização , Fatores de Risco , Bases de Dados Factuais , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
GOALS: We sought to evaluate hospital outcomes of cirrhosis patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). BACKGROUND: NVUGIB is common in patients with cirrhosis. However, national outcome studies of these patients are lacking. STUDY: We utilized the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database to evaluate NVUGIB in patients with cirrhosis, further stratified as no cirrhosis (NC), compensated cirrhosis (CC), or decompensated cirrhosis (DC). Validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes captured diagnoses and interventions. Outcomes included 30-day readmission rates, index admission mortality rates, health care utilization, and predictors of readmission and mortality using multivariable regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 13,701 patients with cirrhosis were admitted with NVUGIB. The 30-day readmission rate was 20.8%. Patients with CC were more likely to undergo an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) within 1 calendar day of admission (74.1%) than patients with DC (67.9%) or NC (69.4%). Patients with DC had longer hospitalizations (4.1 d) and higher costs of care ($11,834). The index admission mortality rate was higher in patients with DC (6.2%) than in patients with CC (1.7%, P <0.001) or NC (1.4%, P <0.001). Predictors of 30-day readmission included performing an EGD >1 calendar day from admission (OR: 1.21; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.46) and DC (OR: 1.78; 95% CI, 1.54 to 2.06). DC was a predictor of index admission mortality (OR: 3.68; 95% CI, 2.67 to 5.05). CONCLUSIONS: NVUGIB among patients with DC is associated with higher readmission rates, mortality rates, and health care utilization compared with patients with CC and NC. Early EGD is a modifiable variable associated with reduced readmission rates. Early identification of high-risk patients and adherence to guidelines may improve clinical outcomes.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Cirrose Hepática , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hospitalização , Readmissão do Paciente , Medição de Risco , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The US Preventive Services Task Force lowered the recommended starting age for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in average-risk adults from 50 to 45 years. We aimed to estimate the global burden and trends of colorectal cancer in adults aged 20-49 years (early-onset CRC). METHODS: This is an analysis of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019 (GBD 2019). The GBD 2019 estimation methods were used to describe the incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of early CRC from 1990 to 2019. Data from 204 countries and geographic areas were available. RESULTS: The global incidence rate of early-onset CRC increased from 4.2/100 000 to 6.7/100 000 from 1990 to 2019. Mortality and DALYs of early-onset CRC also increased. The CRC incidence rate increased faster in younger adults (1.6%) than in adults aged 50-74 years (0.6%) as measured by the annual percentage change. The increase in early-onset CRC incidence was consistently observed in all five socio-demographic index (SDI) regions and 190 out of 204 countries and territories. Middle and high-middle SDI regions had faster annual increases in early-onset CRC, which warrants further attention. CONCLUSIONS: The global incidence, mortality, and DALYs of early-onset CRC increased from 1990 to 2019. The increase in early-onset CRC incidence was prevalent worldwide. Several countries were found to have higher incidence rates than the United States or fast increase in early-onset CRC, which warrants further attention.
Assuntos
Carga Global da Doença , Neoplasias , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Risco , Incidência , Saúde GlobalRESUMO
Splenectomy is one of the treatments of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) with a high response rate. However, it is an irreversible procedure that can be associated with morbidity in this setting. Our aim was to study the trends of splenectomy in adults with ITP, and the factors associated with splenectomy and resource utilization during these hospitalizations. We used the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify hospitalizations for adult patients with a principal diagnosis of ITP between 2007 and 2017. The primary outcome was the splenectomy trend. Secondary outcomes were (1) incidence of ITP trend, (2) in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs after splenectomy trend, and (3) independent predictors of splenectomy, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs. A total of 36,141 hospitalizations for ITP were included in the study. The splenectomy rate declined over time (16% in 2007 to 8% in 2017, trend p < 0.01) and so did the in-hospital mortality after splenectomy. Of the independent predictors of splenectomy, the strongest was elective admissions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 22.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]:17.8-27.3, P < 0.01), while recent hospitalization year, older age, and Black (compared to Caucasian) race were associated with lower odds of splenectomy. Splenectomy tends to occur during elective admissions in urban medical centers for patients with private insurance. Despite a stable ITP hospitalization rate over the past decade and despite listing splenectomy as a second-line option for management of ITP in major guidelines, splenectomy rates consistently declined over time.
Assuntos
Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/cirurgia , Esplenectomia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Seguimentos , Número de Leitos em Hospital , Custos Hospitalares , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Utilização de Procedimentos e Técnicas , Púrpura Trombocitopênica Idiopática/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esplenectomia/economia , Esplenectomia/métodos , Esplenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Esplenectomia/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We sought to determine the incidence, risk factors, and treatment outcomes of Dieulafoy's lesion of the upper GI tract (UDL) hemorrhage among adult patients in the United States. METHODS: UDL and non-Dieulafoy upper GI bleeding (UGIB) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Readmission Database using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification and Procedure Coding System codes. Multivariate logistic (binary) and linear (continuous) regressions were used to model dependent variables. RESULTS: The incidence of UDL hemorrhage was 1.6 of 100,000 persons. Patients with UDL and UGIB who required endoscopic therapeutic intervention had similar in-hospital (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], .77; 95% confidence interval [CI], .42-1.43; P = .41) mortality rates. UDL was associated with more severe systemic illness, including higher rates of mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.07-2.15; P < .05), hypovolemic shock (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.08-2.08; P < .05), acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.54; P < .05), and multiple endoscopies (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.28-1.93; P < .05) compared with other UGIB patients who required endoscopic therapeutic intervention. UDL was also associated with higher 30-day all-cause (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.12-1.35; P < .05) and recurrent bleeding-related (aOR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.45-2.06; P < .05) readmissions. The rate of successful endoscopic treatment was 96.81%. CONCLUSIONS: UDL hemorrhage is an uncommon but highly morbid condition. Current UDL treatment modalities are effective in reducing mortality. Further investigations are warranted to lower recurrent bleeding rates.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Trato Gastrointestinal Superior , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Humanos , Razão de Chances , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The care of patients who have undergone bariatric surgery is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. As such, these patients may be prone to fragmentation of care and differences in healthcare outcomes. We aimed to (1) determine the incidence of fragmentation among patients after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG), (2) identify risk factors for readmission, and (3) ascertain whether care fragmentation affects outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the National Readmission Database 2016. Patients were included if they had primary bariatric surgery during the index hospitalization using appropriate ICD-10 CM codes. Fragmentation of care was defined as a readmission to a different hospital within 90 days of the index admission. Primary outcome was incidence of fragmentation. Secondary outcomes were impact of fragmentation on (1) in-hospital mortality; (2) resource utilization (length of stay (LOS), total hospitalization charges and costs, in-hospital upper endoscopy (EGD), and abdominal imaging studies; and (3) independent predictors of readmission using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 136,536 subjects were included. 90-day readmission demonstrated a prevalence of fragmentation of 21.1%. Type of surgery was an independent predictor of fragmentation, with RYGB leading to increased risk (OR 1.90 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61, 2.25]; p-value < 0.0001). RYGB was associated with higher adjusted mean hospitalization costs, which was not explained by increased EGD (OR 0.95, CI 0.68, 1.32) or abdominal imaging (OR 0.52, CI 0.25, 1.06). No differences were found in mortality or LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Over 20% of patients following primary bariatric surgery have inpatient readmissions that are fragmented, driven by patients who have undergone RYGB surgery. This may be due to the complexity of this procedure and the need for a multispecialty approach. Additional efforts targeting fragmentation should be made to better coordinate the management of these complex patients and reduce healthcare costs.
Assuntos
Cirurgia Bariátrica/efeitos adversos , Hospitalização/tendências , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Early readmission in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis leads to an enormous burden on health care use. A retrospective cohort study using the 2013 and 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) was conducted. Patients with a diagnoses of cirrhosis and at least one feature of decompensation were included. The primary outcome was to develop a validated risk model for early readmission. Secondary outcomes were to study the 30-day all-cause readmission rate and the most common reasons for readmission. A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to identify predictors of readmissions. Finally, a risk model, the Mumtaz readmission risk score, was developed for prediction of 30-day readmission based on the 2013 NRD and validated on the 2014 NRD. A total of 123,011 patients were included. The 30-day readmission rate was 27%, with 79.6% of patients readmitted with liver-related diagnoses. Age <65 years; Medicare or Medicaid insurance; nonalcoholic etiology of cirrhosis; ≥3 Elixhauser score; presence of hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatocellular carcinoma, paracentesis, or hemodialysis; and discharge against medical advice were independent predictors of 30-day readmission. This validated model enabled patients with decompensated cirrhosis to be stratified into groups with low (<20%), medium, (20%-30%), and high (>30%) risk of 30-day readmissions. Conclusion: One third of patients with decompensated cirrhosis are readmitted within 30 days of discharge. The use of a simple risk scoring model with high generalizability, based on demographics, clinical features, and interventions, can bring refinement to the prediction of 30-day readmission in high-risk patients; the Mumtaz readmission risk score highlights the need for targeted interventions in order to decrease rates of readmission within this population.
Assuntos
Cirrose Hepática , Modelos Estatísticos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Previsões , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nonvariceal upper GI hemorrhage (NVUGIH) is a feared adverse event after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to determine the incidence of NVUGIH after PCI for AMI and its impact on mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization over 11 months. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Readmission Database 2014. Inclusion criteria were (1) a principal diagnosis of ST or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, (2) in-hospital PCI, and (3) admission in January. Exclusion criteria were age less than 18 years and elective admission. The primary outcome was the 11-month incidence of NVUGIH. Secondary outcomes were 11-month mortality rate, prolonged mechanical ventilation, shock, upper endoscopy, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs and charges. Independent risk factors for NVUGIH were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22,669 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 63.8 years (range, 63.4-64.1 years), and 31.7% of patients were female. The 11-month incidence of NVUGIH was 1.6%. The onset of NVUGIH was associated with an increase in the 11-month mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.72; P =.04). The upper endoscopy, shock, and prolonged mechanical ventilation rates were 72%, 6.2%, and 1.9%, respectively. In total, 26,532 days were associated with NVUGIH, with a total health care in-hospital economic burden of U.S.$17.6 million. Independent predictors of NVUGIH were female gender, Charlson comorbidity score, and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The 11-month incidence of NVUGIH among patients who undergo PCI for AMI is 1.6%. NVUGIH has a substantial impact on mortality, morbidity, and in-hospital health care resource utilization.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Infarto do Miocárdio , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Both the opioid and gun violence epidemics are recurrent public health issues in the United States. We sought to determine the effect of opioid dependence on gunshot injury treatment outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the 2016 National Readmission Database, patients were included if they had a principal diagnosis of firearm injury. Opioid dependence was identified using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause readmission. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 1-year mortality, resource utilization, and most common reasons for admission and readmission. Confounders were adjusted for using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 31,303 patients were included, 695 of whom were opioid dependent. Opioid-dependent patients were more likely to be young (35.1 y, range: 33.4-36.7 y) and male (89.9%) compared with patients without opioid dependence. Opioid dependence was associated with higher 30-day readmission rates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-2.50, P = 0.01). However, opioid dependence was associated with lower in-hospital (aOR: 0.16, CI: 0.07-0.38, P < 0.01) and 1-year (aOR: 0.15, CI: 0.06-0.38, P < 0.01) mortality, longer mean length of stay (adjusted mean difference [aMD]: 2.09 d, CI: 0.43-3.76, P = 0.03), and total hospitalization costs (aMD: $6,318, CI: $ 257-$12,380, P = 0.04). Both groups had similar total hospitalization charges (aMD: $$10,491, CI: -$12,618-$33,600, P-value = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid dependence leads to higher rates of 30-day readmission and resource utilization among patients with firearm injuries. However, the in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates are lower among patients with opioid dependence secondary to lower injury acuity.
Assuntos
Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Gravidade do Paciente , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/cirurgia , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Violência com Arma de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Epidemia de Opioides/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/complicações , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/diagnóstico , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/economia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidadeRESUMO
AIMS: The authors sought to determine the 30-day readmission rate of patients with esophageal variceal hemorrhage (EVH) and its impact on mortality, morbidity, and health care utilization. BACKGROUND: EVH is a common complication of cirrhosis and leads to substantial morbidity and mortality. STUDY: The 2014 National Readmission Database was used to examine adult patients with urgent/emergent admissions and a principal diagnosis of EVH. The primary outcome was 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital and 30-day mortality rate, most common reasons for readmission, readmission mortality rate, morbidity, and resource utilization. Independent risk factors for readmission were identified using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2003 patients with EVH were included. The mean age was 57 years and 29% of patients were female individuals. The all-cause 30-day readmission rate was 16.6%. EVH was the cause of readmission in only 5% of readmissions. Independent predictors of readmission were age and insurance type. The in-hospital and 30-day mortality rate for index admissions were 7.3% and 8.2%, respectively. For readmitted patients, the mortality rate was 3.9%. Although morbidity was lower during readmissions (prolonged mechanical ventilation: 0.4% vs. 3.5%, P<0.01 and shock: 1.8% vs. 9.9%, P<0.01), the cumulative additional length of stay was substantial at 2054 days with additional total hospitalization charges of US$20 million. CONCLUSIONS: The all-cause 30-day readmission rate after EVH is 16.6%, with most patients being readmitted for diagnoses unrelated to EVH. Readmission was associated with a substantial increase in in-hospital mortality and resource utilization. Risk factors for readmission were identified, which can potentially be used to decrease readmission rates.
Assuntos
Doenças do Esôfago , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/epidemiologia , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/terapia , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to determine the rate of hospital readmission within 30 days of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and its impact on mortality, morbidity, and health care use in the United States. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmission Database for the year 2014 (data on 14.9 million hospital stays at 2048 hospitals in 22 states). We collected data on hospital readmissions of 203,220 adults who were hospitalized for urgent non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage and discharged. The primary outcome was rate of all-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes were reasons for readmission, readmission mortality rate, morbidity (shock and prolonged mechanical ventilation) and resource use (length of stay and total hospitalization costs and charges). Independent risk factors for readmission were identified using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: The 30-day rate of readmission was 13%. Only 18% of readmissions were due to recurrent non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. The rate of death among patients readmitted to the hospital (4.7%) was higher than that for index admissions (1.9%) (P < .01). A higher proportion of readmitted patients had morbidities requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation (1.5%) compared with index admissions (0.8%) (P < .01). A total of 133,368 hospital days was associated with readmission, and the total health care in-hospital economic burden was $30.3 million (in costs) and $108 million (in charges). Independent predictors of readmission were Medicaid insurance, higher Charlson comorbidity score, lower income, residence in a metropolitan area, hemorrhagic shock, and longer stays in the hospital. Older age, private or no insurance, upper endoscopy, and prolonged mechanical ventilation were associated with lower odds for readmission. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of patients hospitalized for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 13% are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge. Readmission is associated with higher mortality, morbidity, and resource use. Most readmissions are not for recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding.
Assuntos
Doenças do Esôfago/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Choque Hemorrágico/epidemiologia , Gastropatias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População UrbanaRESUMO
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Gallstones are the leading cause of acute pancreatitis in developed countries. National and international guidelines recommend that a cholecystectomy should be performed during the index hospitalization for acute gallstone pancreatitis. We aimed to delineate the national trends for same-admission cholecystectomy and ERCP for acute gallstone pancreatitis over the last ten years. METHODS: We used the 2004, 2009 and 2014 National Inpatient Sample database including patients with a principal diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and a secondary diagnosis of choledocholithiasis or cholelithiasis. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years and elective admission. Primary outcome was the trend in incidence rate of same admission cholecystectomy from 2004 to 2014. The secondary outcomes were: 10-year trend in 1) Incidence of gallstone pancreatitis, 2) proportion of gallstone pancreatitis compared to all other etiologies of acute pancreatitis, 3) incidence rate of same-admission ERCP, 4) length of hospital stay, and 5) total hospitalization costs and charges. RESULTS: The proportion of admissions during which a same-admission cholecystectomy was performed decreased from 48.7% in 2004 to 46.9% in 2009 to 45% in 2014 (trend pâ¯<â¯0.01). During the same time interval, the percentage of admissions during which an ERCP was performed decreased from 25.1% to 18.7% (Trend pâ¯<â¯0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to the guidelines for same-admission cholecystectomy for patients admitted with acute gallstone pancreatitis have been declining over the past decade. On the other hand, decline in rate of ERCP in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis and no signs of cholangitis demonstrates adherence to guidelines in this regard.
Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/tendências , Colecistectomia/tendências , Cálculos Biliares/terapia , Pancreatite/terapia , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/estatística & dados numéricos , Colecistectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Cálculos Biliares/epidemiologia , Cálculos Biliares/etiologia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite/complicações , Pancreatite/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND GOALS: We examined the interaction between race, insurance, and important outcomes in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH). STUDY: Adults with NVUGIH were selected from the National Inpatient Sample. PRIMARY OUTCOME: in-hospital mortality. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: treatment modalities [esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), early EGD, and endoscopic or radiologic therapy], and resource utilization (length of hospital stay and total hospitalization charges). RESULTS: Mortality was similar for Medicare and private insurance [adjusted odds ratios (aOR): 1.15 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90 to 1.47), P=0.24], but higher for under/uninsured patients [aOR: 1.84 (CI: 1.42 to 2.40), P<0.01]. Compared with Medicare, patients with private insurance had more EGDs [aOR: 1.35 (CI: 1.23 to 1.48), P<0.01], early EGDs [aOR: 1.29 (CI: 1.21 to 1.38), P<0.01], and endoscopic [aOR: 1.19 (CI: 1.11 to 1.27), P<0.01], or radiologic therapy [aOR:1.35 (CI: 1.06 to 1.71), P=0.01]. Patients who were under/uninsured had less EGDs [aOR: 0.84 (CI: 0.76 to 0.91), P<0.01] or endoscopic therapy [aOR: 0.74 (CI: 0.68 to 0.81), P<0.01], but similar odds of early EGD [aOR: 0.95 (CI: 0.88 to 1.02), P=0.13] or radiologic therapy [aOR: 1.01 (CI: 0.75 to 1.37), P=0.75]. Compared with whites, blacks had lower [aOR: 0.73 (CI: 0.58 to 0.93), P=0.01] and Native Americans higher mortality [aOR: 2.60 (CI: 1.57 to 4.13), P<0.01]. Blacks were less likely [aOR: 0.86 (CI: 0.79 to 0.94), P<0.01] and Asians more likely [aOR: 1.24 (CI: 1.05 to 1.47), P=0.01] to have EGDs. Both blacks and Hispanics had lower, whereas Asians had higher early EGD rates. Patients with private insurance had lower total charges [adjusted mean difference: -$2761 (CI: -$4617 to -$906), P<0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: Insurance and race have independent effects on NVUGIH mortality, therapeutic modalities used, and resource utilization. Black and under/uninsured patients have the worst outcomes.
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiologia , Preços Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoas sem Cobertura de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
GOALS: To quantify in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH) the relationship between obesity and mortality, disease severity, treatment modalities, and resource utilization. BACKGROUND: NVUGIH is the most common gastrointestinal emergency. STUDY: Adults with a principal diagnosis of NVUGIH were selected from the 2014 National Inpatient Sample. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were hemorrhagic shock, prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV), upper endoscopy [esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)], radiologic treatment, surgery, length of hospital stay (LOS), and total hospitalization costs and charges. Confounders were adjusted for using multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 227,480 admissions with NVUGIH were included, 11.70% of whom were obese. Obese and nonobese patients had similar odds of mortality (aOR: 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.12; P=0.30), EGD within 24 hours of admission (aOR: 0.95; CI: 0.89-1.01; P=0.10), radiologic treatment (aOR: 1.06; CI: 0.82-1.35; P=0.66), and surgery (aOR: 1.27; CI: 0.94-1.70; P=0.11). However, obese patients had higher odds of shock (aOR: 1.30; CI: 1.14-1.49; P<0.01), PMV (aOR: 1.39; CI: 1.18-1.62; P<0.01), undergoing an EGD (aOR: 1.27; CI: 1.16-1.40; P<0.01), needing endoscopic therapy (aOR: 1.18; CI: 1.09-1.27; P<0.01), a longer LOS (0.31 d; CI: 0.16-0.46 d; P<0.01), higher costs ($1075; CI: $636-$1514; P<0.01), and higher charges ($4084; CI: $2060-$6110; P<0.01) compared with nonobese patients. CONCLUSIONS: Obesity is not an independent predictor of NVUGIH mortality. However, obesity is associated with a more severe disease course (shock and PMV), higher rates of EGD and endoscopic therapy use, and significant increases in resource utilization (hospital LOS, total hospitalization costs, and charges).
Assuntos
Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade/complicações , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/mortalidade , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/fisiopatologia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Lower extremity revascularization for critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains a subject of clinical equipoise. Readmissions and repeat lower extremity revascularization increase the cost of care and decrease the value of initial treatment. This study examines readmissions and repeat inpatient revascularization and major amputation up to 1 year after initial open and endovascular lower extremity revascularization. METHODS: The 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was reviewed. The NRD provides all subsequent readmissions of any hospitalization for the calendar year. A cohort of patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization in January only was selected based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Patients were divided into open and endovascular groups. Readmissions for repeat lower extremity revascularization (RFR) were identified based on procedural codes. Open and endovascular lower extremity revascularization were compared in terms of patient characteristics as well as readmissions, RFR, major amputation, and inpatient mortality at 1 year. Risk-adjusted outcomes accounting for differences in age, gender, income, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were derived using regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 1,668 open and 1,410 endovascular lower extremity revascularizations. Patients in the endovascular group were significantly older (P < 0.01), more likely to be women (P < 0.01), and had higher CCI (P < 0.01). Patients undergoing endovascular lower extremity revascularization had significantly higher readmission rate (49 vs. 33.7, P < 0.01) and higher mortality (10.4 vs. 5.3, P < 0.01). Readmitted patients after endovascular lower extremity revascularization had significantly higher mean number of repeat readmissions compared to open lower extremity revascularization (2.49 ± 0.12 vs. 2.13 ± 0.08, P = 0.01). There was no difference in RFR (P = 0.82) or major amputation (P = 0.19). Open revascularization was independently associated with decreased readmission (odds ratio = 0.55 [0.43-0.71]) compared to endovascular. However, there was no significant association between the type of lower extremity revascularization and major amputation or RFR. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular lower extremity revascularization for CLI is performed on older and sicker patients and seems to be associated with increased readmission at 1 year compared to open lower extremity revascularization. Regardless of the initial modality of treatment, patients are likely to undergo at least 1 revascularization during readmissions.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Isquemia/cirurgia , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Readmissão do Paciente , Doença Arterial Periférica/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Amputação Cirúrgica , Estado Terminal , Bases de Dados Factuais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/mortalidade , Isquemia/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The physician workforce at teaching hospitals differs compared to non-teaching hospitals, and data suggest that patient outcomes may also be dissimilar. Delirium is a common, costly disorder among hospitalized patients and approaches to care are not standardized. OBJECTIVE: This study set out to explore differences in healthcare outcomes between teaching and non-teaching hospitals for patients admitted with delirium. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We used the 2014 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) hospitalized in acute-care hospitals in the USA with delirium (defined with ICD-9 code) were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were discharge status and several measures of healthcare resource utilization: length of stay, total hospitalization costs and multiple procedures performed. RESULTS: In 2014, out of 57 460 adult patients admitted to hospitals with delirium, 58.4% were hospitalized at teaching hospitals and the remainder 41.6% at non-teaching hospitals. The in-hospital mortality of delirium patients in teaching hospitals was 1.33% (95% CI 1.08%-1.63%), and 1.26% (95% CI 0.97%-1.63%) in non-teaching hospitals. The mean total hospital costs were $7642 (95% CI 7384-7900) in teaching hospitals, and $6650 (95% CI 6460-6840) in non-teaching hospitals. After adjustment for confounders, total hospitalization costs were statistically significantly different between the hospitals types-with non-teaching providing less expensive care. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with delirium admitted to non-teaching hospitals had comparable clinical and process outcomes achieved at lower costs. Further research can be conducted to explore the contextual issues and reasons for these differences in healthcare costs.