The Management of Opioid-Induced Constipation in Cancer and Advanced Illness: A Meta-Analysis.

CONTEXT: Constipation is a common problem among patients with cancer. By some accounts, about 60% of cancer patients experience constipation. There is limited empirical evidence of the clinical effectiveness of pharmacologic agents in opioid-induced constipation in advanced diseases. OBJECTIVES: We sought to quantitatively summarize the therapeutic effectiveness of the pharmacologic means of managing opioid-induced constipation. METHODS: Randomized control trials (RCTs) identified from medical literature databases that reported quantitative measures of the effect of pharmacotherapeutic agents to treat opioid induced constipation in patients with cancers and other advanced illnesses were included in this study. A conventional random effects meta-analysis was conducted including >3 trials with the same exposure and outcome assessed, and a network-meta-analysis was conducted for all placebo-controlled trials. RESULTS: Eighteen studies that examined the effect of various pharmacotherapeutic agents were included. The medications were Methylnatrexone (N = 5), Naldemedine (N = 5), other conventional agents (N = 4) and herbal medicines (N = 4). In conventional meta-analysis, methylnaltrexone increased the proportion achieving rescue-free laxation by 2.68 fold (95% CI: 1.34, 5.37; P = 0.0054) within 4 hours of the administration compared to placebo. In network meta-analysis, the pooled RR of the pharmacotherapeutic agents on rescue-free bowel movements as 2.26 (95% CI: 1.52, 3.36) for methylnaltrexone, 1.58 (95% CI: 0.94, 2.66) for naldemedine, and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.45, 1.23) for polyethylene glycol, compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Methylnatrexone and Naldemedine have currently shown promise in randomized trials concerning opioid-induced constipation in cancer and advanced illness. It is imperative that future research ascertain not just the relative therapeutic efficacy but also the cost-benefit analyses of these newer regimens with more commonly used and accessible laxatives.

Two-Year-Span Breast Cancer Screening Uptake in Japan after the COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Association with the COVID-19 Vaccination.

There is limited information on whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with decreased breast cancer screening uptake and if COVID-19 vaccination was associated with an increase in screening uptake. Our study explored the uptake of breast cancer screening in Japan after the COVID-19 pandemic and assessed its association with the COVID-19 vaccination. We analyzed data from the Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS), a web-based prospective cohort survey, and we included 6110 women without cancer history who were aged 40 to 74 years that participated in the 2012 and 2022 surveys. We examined the regular breast cancer screening uptake before and after the pandemic and employed a multivariable Poisson regression model to seek any association between COVID-19 vaccination and screening uptake. Of 6110, 38.2% regularly participated in screening before the pandemic and 46.9% did so after the pandemic. Individuals unvaccinated due to health reasons (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.29-0.77, p = 0.003) and for other reasons (IRR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.62-0.86, p < 0.001) were less likely to undergo screening compared to fully vaccinated individuals. There was no long-term decrease in breast cancer screening uptake after the pandemic in Japan. Vaccination was linked to increased uptake, but there was no dose relationship.