Outcomes Following Major Oncologic Operations for Non-AIDS-Defining Cancers in the HIV Population: A Matched Comparison to the General Population.

INTRODUCTION: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients are living longer due to the availability of antiretroviral therapies, and non-AIDS-defining cancers are becoming more prevalent in this patient population. A paucity of data remains on post-operative outcomes following resection of non-AIDS-defining cancers in the HIV population. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was utilized to identify patients who underwent surgical resection for malignancy from 2005 to 2015 (HIV, N = 52,742; non-HIV, N = 11,885,184). Complications were categorized by international classification of disease (ICD)-9 diagnosis codes. Cohorts were matched on insurance, household income, zip code and urban/rural setting. Logistic regression assessed whether HIV was an independent predictor of post-operative complications. RESULTS: Descriptive statistics found HIV patients to have an increased rate of complications following select oncologic surgical resections. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression found HIV to only be an independent predictor of complications following pulmonary lobectomy (p = 0.011; OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.29-6.73). Length of stay was statistically longer following colectomy (2.61 days, 95% CI 1.98-3.44) in those with HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are hypothesis generating and highlight the potential safety of major cancer surgery in the HIV population. However, care providers need be cognizant of the potential increased risk of post-operative complications following pulmonary lobectomy and the potential for increased length of stay. These findings are an initial insight into quality of care and outcomes metrics on HIV patients undergoing major cancer operations.

Effect of lamotrigine on cognitive complaints in patients with bipolar I disorder.

BACKGROUND: This analysis describes the effects of bipolar I disorder on self-reported neurocognitive measures and remediation of these deficits with lamotrigine therapy. METHOD: Data were derived from 2 clinical trials designed to assess the efficacy of lamotrigine as maintenance therapy for recently manic (N = 349) or depressed (N = 966) patients (DSM-IV criteria). During the 8- to 16-week open stabilization phase, patients received lamotrigine as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy (target dose = 200 mg/day, minimum dose = 100 mg/day) while other psychotropic drugs were discontinued. The Medical Outcomes Study Cognitive Scale (MOS-Cog) and the AB-Neurological Assessment Scale (AB-NAS) were used to measure cognitive functioning at baseline and at the end of the open-label phase. To examine the relationship between depressive and manic symptomatology, initiation of lamotrigine, and cognitive functioning, correlational analyses and analyses of covariance were conducted. RESULTS: Bipolar patients in both trials had significant cognitive impairment; however, it was much greater in index episode depressed bipolar patients compared with index episode manic patients. In both studies, substitution of lamotrigine for other psychotropic medications significantly improved the mean scores from baseline to the end of the open-label phase on the MOS-Cog and the AB-NAS (p < .0001). Among patients who took lamotrigine as monotherapy, the mean MOS-Cog score also improved significantly versus baseline (+32.2, or 81%, for depressed patients, p < .0001; and +19.9, or 35%, for manic patients, p < .0001). Mean AB-NAS scores (-19.7, or -55%, for depressed patients, p < .0001; and -7.2, or -32%, for manic patients, p = .0062) showed similar improvement. Cognitive impairment was significantly correlated with depression symptom severity based on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores (p < .0001). After controlling for change in mood, age, gender, baseline score, duration of illness, and duration of use of other psychotropics, a significant improvement in cognition was observed during the open-label phase when lamotrigine was used as monotherapy/adjunctive therapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment with lamotrigine as monotherapy and as adjunctive therapy was associated with improved cognitive functioning and reduced neurocognitive side effects, regardless of index mood polarity.

Assessing antipsychotic effectiveness in dementia with the factor structure of the Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (PGDRS).

OBJECTIVE: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) impact patient functioning, caregiver burden, and transition to structured living environments. The purpose of this study was to use the derived factor structure of the Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (PGDRS) to retrospectively assess short-term antipsychotic effectiveness. SETTING AND MEASUREMENT: A principal components factor analysis was conducted with PGDRS admission ratings for a large national sample of hospitalized dementia patients (N = 2747). Changes in calculated factor scores (admission to discharge) were used to compare effectiveness for a subset of patients treated with one of three antipsychotic agents: haloperidol, olanzapine, or risperidone. RESULTS: A four-factor solution accounted for almost 60% of rating variance. Factors were interpreted as disruptive overactivity, thought/communication disorder, interpersonal aggressiveness, and destructiveness. Medication effects (adjusting for group differences) were found for only the Interpersonal Aggressiveness factor. Improvement in this factor score was significantly greater in the olanzapine group. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that these four PGDRS factors can provide a useful framework for symptom assessment and for targeted treatment.

Characterizing behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) among geropsychiatric inpatients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this database analysis was to determine if, upon hospital admission, particular behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) could be linked to patient characteristics, levels of cognitive or clinical functioning, and/or type of residence before hospitalization. METHODS: Sampled were geropsychiatric inpatients with a primary DSM-IV discharge diagnosis of dementia, who participated in the Mental Health Outcomes, Inc. CQI+(SM) measurement program between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 1999 and who had admission data on all study variables and dementia subtype diagnosis at discharge (N = 2256). BPSD clusters were derived from the 16 behavioral items of the Psychogeriatric Dependency Rating Scale (PGDRS). Subgroups were formed on (1) level of cognitive impairment, (2) depressive symptoms, (3) independence of prior residence, (4) age, (5) gender, (6) race, (7) dementia subtype, and (8) prior psychiatric hospitalization. The relationship of these variables to presence of each PGDRS item was explored with Chi-Square Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID). A random sample (75% of the patient sample) was used to create the model, with the remaining 25% used for cross-validation. Binary multiple logistic regression was employed to obtain odds ratios for variables significantly related (at < or = 0.01) to PGDRS items. RESULTS: The sample was 66% female, with an average age of 81. The regression analysis revealed that cognitive functioning was significantly associated with 12 of 16 PGDRS items. Odds ratios indicated a 7% to 36% increase in odds of observing the target BPSD for a 3-point difference in MMSE. Also, living in a "dependent" environment (eg, nursing home) before hospitalization was significantly associated with 10 behaviors. Odds of displaying four (active aggression, disruptive behavior, noisy behavior, and verbal aggression) more than doubled for those admitted from a dependent living environment versus an independent one. Finally, age was related to only 1 PGDRS item (socially objectionable behavior). CONCLUSIONS: Findings help identify particular behaviors of dementia associated with being admitted to acute care from a restricted environment such as a nursing home. Treatments effectively targeting these BPSD may impact the intensity and costs of services required.

Evaluation of the migraine treatment sumatriptan/naproxen sodium on blood pressure following long-term administration.

Anti-inflammatory and pain therapies have been associated with blood pressure (BP) destabilization. Hence, the effects on BP of sumatriptan/naproxen sodium in fixed-dose combination, sumatriptan 85 mg, and naproxen sodium 500 mg administered intermittently for the acute treatment of migraine attacks were assessed. Patients with migraine with or without aura and no history of hypertension were randomized to sumatriptan/naproxen sodium (n=135), sumatriptan (n=136), or naproxen sodium (n=136) to treat migraine attacks for 6 months in a double-blind, parallel-group trial. Following a treated migraine attack, patients performed 2 consecutive days of self-measured BPs beginning ≥24 hours after the last dose of study medication and transmitted them by a transtelephonic modem. The primary end point was the change from baseline in self-measured BP at 6 months. Changes in self-measured BP from baseline to 6 months for sumatriptan/naproxen sodium were -2.1/-1.5 mm Hg (95% confidence intervals, -3.4 to -0.8 for systolic and -2.6 to -0.3 for diastolic). Mean changes from baseline in self-measured BP did not differ among the 3 treatment groups. Additional categorical analyses did not show increases from baseline with sumatriptan/naproxen sodium relative to either of the monotherapy groups. Intermittent acute migraine treatment with sumatriptan/naproxen sodium for up to 6 months was associated with clinically insignificant decreases in self-measured BP that were similar to those with sumatriptan or naproxen alone in normotensive patients with migraine.

Incidence and time course of subsyndromal symptoms in patients with bipolar I disorder: an evaluation of 2 placebo-controlled maintenance trials.

BACKGROUND: Subsyndromal symptoms in bipolar disorder can cause significant functional impairment and are associated with relapse. METHOD: In this post hoc analysis from 2 randomized, double-blind, 18-month, placebo-controlled maintenance trials for bipolar I disorder (both trials were conducted between August 1997 and August 2001 and used DSM-IV criteria), the incidence, time course, and impact of pharmacotherapy on subsyndromal symptoms were examined. RESULTS: Subsyndromal symptoms occurred in approximately 25% of all visits. Compared with placebo (54.8%), a significantly higher mean percentage of visits in remission were observed with lamotrigine treatment (63.0%, p = .020) but not with lithium treatment (60.0%, p = .165). The median time to onset of subsyndromal symptoms for lamotrigine (N = 223), lithium (N = 164), and placebo (N = 188) was 15, 15, and 9 days, respectively. Compared with placebo, both lamotrigine and lithium significantly delayed the time from randomization to onset of subsyndromal symptoms (p = .046, lamotrigine vs. placebo; p = .033, lithium vs. placebo; p = .763, lamotrigine vs. lithium) and the time from onset of subsyndromal symptoms to subsequent mood episode (p = .037, lamotrigine vs. placebo; p = .023, lithium vs. placebo; p = .845, lamotrigine vs. lithium). Agreement between the polarities of the first-observed subsyndromal symptom and subsequent intervention for mood episode was statistically significant (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Subsyndromal symptoms are common during maintenance treatment and appear to be associated with relapse into an episode of the same polarity. Both lithium and lamotrigine delayed the onset of subsyndromal symptoms and the time from onset of subsyndromal symptoms to subsequent relapse. Further study to assess whether treatment intervention can minimize subsyndromal symptoms or prevent relapse is encouraged.