Evaluation of the efficacy of ursodiol for prevention of hepatotoxicity in patients receiving gemtuzumab ozogamicin and inotuzumab ozogamicin.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) are indicated for newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory CD33-positive acute myeloid leukemia and relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia respectively. Patients undergoing therapy with these agents are at increased risk for hepatotoxicity. Forty-nine patients received either GO or InO with concomitant ursodiol (n=14) or no ursodiol (n=35) for hepatotoxicity prophylaxis. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 2 (14%) patients in the ursodiol group compared to 15 (43%) patients in the no ursodiol group (p=0.10). Median days (17 versus 11; p=0.66) and doses (4 versus 2; p=0.28) to development of hepatotoxicity were higher in the ursodiol versus no ursodiol group. After adjusting for concomitant hepatotoxic medications and prior chemotherapy, ursodiol did not significantly reduce the incidence of hepatotoxicity. Ursodiol prophylaxis was associated with a similar incidence of hepatotoxicity compared to no ursodiol, but may delay the time to occurrence.

Assessing outcomes of adult oncology patients treated with linezolid versus daptomycin for bacteremia due to vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and severity of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus blood stream infections continue to rise and is a significant burden in the healthcare setting. Literature thus far is minimal regarding treatment outcomes in patients with malignancy and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia. Appropriate antibiotic selection is vital to treatment success due to high rates of resistance, limited antimicrobials and mortality in this patient population. We conducted this study to determine whether treatment outcomes differed between cancer patients treated with linezolid and those treated with daptomycin for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study included adult patients hospitalized on the oncology service with documented vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium or Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia who received at least 48 h of either linezolid or daptomycin as primary treatment. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-two patients received daptomycin as primary treatment, and 33 patients received linezolid as primary treatment. Twenty-six (76.5%) patients in the linezolid cohort versus 22 (71%) patients in the daptomycin cohort achieved microbiological cure (p = 0.6141). Median length of stay in days (30 vs. 42, p = 0.0714) and mortality (7/32 (20.6%) vs. 8/33 (25.8%), p = 0.6180) were also similar between the linezolid and daptomycin treated patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: No differences in microbiological cure, length of stay or mortality were identified between the groups. This study suggests that linezolid and daptomycin are each reasonable options for treating vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia in oncology patients. Further prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the optimal treatment for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteremia in this patient population.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of arsenic trioxide dosing in obese patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is the backbone of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) treatment and is dosed based on weight with no upper limit, therefore obese patients receive large doses and may be vulnerable to adverse effects and dose holdings. Twenty-seven patients receiving ATO during induction were categorized as obese (N = 16) or non-obese (N = 11) based on body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 in this retrospective study. Doses were held or modified due to composite adverse effects in 9 (56%) obese patients and 7 (64%) non-obese patients (p = 1.00). There were higher rates of dose holdings (13% versus 0%; p = .5) and dose modifications (13% versus 0%; p = .5) due to hepatotoxicity in obese versus non-obese patients. There were no differences in efficacy parameters. These data suggest that obese patients have similar overall incidence of adverse effects to ATO as non-obese patients; any difference in risk of hepatotoxicity will require clarification in a larger study.

Bilateral Angle Closure Following the Infusion of a Monoclonal Antibody to Treat Relapsing Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE: We describe a case of bilateral angle closure glaucoma following the infusion of daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody used to treat relapsing multiple myeloma. METHODS: This is an interventional case report. RESULTS: A 59-year-old woman presented with bilateral angle closure glaucoma one day following her first infusion of daratumumab. B-scan echography showed ciliochoroidal effusions in both eyes. Cycloplegia was implemented given the suspicion for drug-induced angle closure, which resulted in prompt deepening of the anterior chambers and normalization of intraocular pressures. The ciliochoroidal effusions resolved 16 days following the cessation of daratumumab. CONCLUSIONS: Daratumumab may be associated with drug-induced secondary angle closure glaucoma.