Bispecific antibodies and autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies for treatment of hematological malignancies.

In recent years, the therapeutic landscape for hematological malignancies has markedly advanced, particularly since the inaugural approval of autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy in 2017 for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Autologous CAR-T therapy involves the genetic modification of a patient's T cells to specifically identify and attack cancer cells, while bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) function by binding to both cancer cells and immune cells simultaneously, thereby triggering an immune response against the tumor. The subsequent approval of various CAR-T therapies and BsAbs have revolutionized the treatment of multiple hematological malignancies, highlighting high response rates and a subset of patients achieving prolonged disease control. This review explores the mechanisms underlying autologous CAR-T therapies and BsAbs, focusing on their clinical application in multiple myeloma, ALL, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We provide comprehensive insights into their individual efficacy, limitations concerning broad application, and the potential of combination therapies. These upcoming strategies aim to propel the field forward, paving the way for safer and more effective therapeutic interventions in hematological malignancies.

Immune prognostic score predicts the risk of infection and survival outcomes in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies.

The Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) and CAR-HEMATOTOX (CAR-HT) score identify multiple myeloma (MM) patients at high risk for immune-mediated toxicity and early mortality with cellular immunotherapy. However, their association with outcomes in patients receiving T-cell redirecting bispecific antibodies (bsAb) is unclear. This multi-centre retrospective study examines the association of baseline GPS and CAR-HT scores with outcomes in 126 MM patients treated with bsAb. Overall, 19% were identified as GPS high risk but did not experience increased toxicity or mortality. Conversely, high-risk CAR-HT patients had a higher incidence of infections and inferior survival, suggesting a need for aggressive infection mitigation strategies.

Perspectives on the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

The treatment of multiple myeloma has evolved significantly over the past few decades with the development of novel therapeutics. The introduction of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and high-dose chemotherapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has led to improved response rates and survival outcomes. The use of bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is currently under study, and early results are showing promise. Although outcomes for patients with MM have improved with the development of new treatments, there remains a subset of patients with high-risk disease who have a particularly poor prognosis. Therefore, it is critical that future clinical trials focus on developing new therapies specifically for high-risk multiple myeloma. Here we review the literature and provide guidance on treating patients with multiple myeloma for practicing oncologists.

Evaluating early intervention in smoldering myeloma clinical trials: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), an asymptomatic precursor of multiple myeloma (MM), carries a variable risk of progression to MM. There is little consensus on the efficacy or optimal timing of treatment in SMM. We systematically reviewed the landscape of all clinical trials in SMM. We compared the efficacy of treatment regimens studied in SMM to results from these regimens when used in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), to determine whether the data suggest deeper responses in SMM versus NDMM. METHODS: All prospective interventional clinical trials for SMM, including published studies, meeting abstracts, and unpublished trials listed on ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 1, 2023, were identified. Trial-related variables were captured, including treatment strategy and efficacy results. Relevant clinical endpoints were defined as overall survival (OS) and quality of life. RESULTS: Among 45 SMM trials identified, 38 (84.4%) assessed active myeloma drugs, while 7 (15.6%) studied bone-modifying agents alone. Of 18 randomized trials in SMM, only one (5.6%) had a primary endpoint of OS; the most common primary endpoint was progression-free survival (n = 7, 38.9%). Among 32 SMM trials with available results, 9 (28.1%) met their prespecified primary endpoint, of which 5 were single-arm studies. Six treatment regimens were tested in both SMM and NDMM; 5 regimens yielded a lower rate of very good partial response rate or better (≥VGPR) in SMM compared to the corresponding NDMM trial (32% vs 63%, 43% vs 53%, 40% vs 63%, 86% vs 89%, 92% vs 95%, and 94% vs 87%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this systematic review of all prospective interventional clinical trials in SMM, we found significant variability in trial design, including randomization status, primary endpoints, and types of intervention used. Despite the statistical limitations, comparison of treatment regimens revealed no compelling evidence that the treatment is more effective when introduced early in SMM compared to NDMM.

The changing spectrum of infection with BCMA and GPRC5D targeting bispecific antibody (bsAb) therapy in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma.

There is a paucity of granular data on infection risk with B-cell maturation antigen (BMCA) and GPRC5D bispecific antibodies (bsAb) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The aim of our multi-institutional study was to characterize the incidence, etiologies, and risk factors of infections from the start of therapy to the last follow-up or 90 days after study exit. A total of 66 patients received BCMA bsAb monotherapy, 15 GPRC5D bsAb monotherapy, and 15 GPRC5D bsAb combination therapy with daratumumab and/or pomalidomide. While the infection rate per 100 days was 0.57 for BCMA bsAb, it was 0.62 for GPRC5D bsAb combination and 0.13 for GPRC5D bsAb monotherapy; P=0.05. The proportion of infections that were grade ≥3 was higher in the BCMA bsAb group compared to the GPRC5D groups (58% vs. 36%; P=0.04). Grade 5 events were observed in 8% (n=8) of the patients, all treated with BCMA bsAb. The 9 month cumulative incidence of any grade of infection was similar in the BCMA and GPRC5D-combination groups (57% and 62%) and significantly higher than in the GPRC5D-mono group (16%); P=0.012. The cumulative incidence of grade ≥3 infections was highest in the BCMA group reaching 54% at 18 months; P=0.06. Multivariate analysis showed that BCMA bsAb therapy or GPRC5D combination therapy, history of previous infections, baseline lymphopenia, and baseline hypogammaglobulinemia were significantly associated with a higher risk of grade ≥3 infections. Our results indicate that BCMA bsAb and GPRC5D-combination therapies in RRMM are associated with higher cumulative incidence of infection and grade ≥3 infection compared to GPRC5D bsAb mono.

Concomitant deletion of the short arm (del(1p13.3)) and amplification or gain (1q21) of chromosome 1 by fluorescence in situ hybridization are associated with a poor clinical outcome in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Chromosome 1 abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM) are increasingly recognized as high risk-defining features. The authors report the prognostic value of del(1p13.3) by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) at enrollment in subjects treated on total therapy clinical trials 2-6. METHODS: FISH probes were generated from specific BAC DNA clones for the AHCYL1 gene locus (1p13.3) and the CKS1B locus (1q21). RESULTS: A total of 1133 patients were included in this analysis. Although del(1p13.3) was detected in 220 (19.4%) patients, 1q21gain or 1q21amp were observed in 300 (26.5%) and 150 (13.2%) patients, respectively. Concomitant del(1p13.3) with 1q21 gain or amp was observed in 65 (5.7%) and 29 (2.5%) patients, respectively. There was enrichment of high-risk features such as International Staging System (ISS) stage 3 disease and gene expression profiling (GEP)70 high risk (HR) in the group with del(1p13.3). Presence of del(1p13.3) confers inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). On multivariate analysis, the presence of ISS stage 3 disease, GEP70 HR, 1q21gain, and 1q21amp were independent predictors of PFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: The PFS and OS of patients with combined abnormalities of del (1p13.3)/1q21gain or amp was significantly worse compared to del(1p13.3) alone and 1q21gain or 1q21 amp alone, which identifies a subset of patients with poor clinical outcomes.

Time-to-event surrogate end-points in multiple myeloma randomised trials from 2005 to 2019: A surrogacy analysis.

Use of surrogate end-points such as progression-free survival (PFS) and other time-to-event (TTE) end-points is common in multiple myeloma (MM) clinical trials. This systematic review characterises all published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in MM using PFS or other TTE end-points between 2005 and 2019 and assesses strength of surrogacy of PFS for overall survival (OS). The association between OS hazard ratios (HRs) and PFS HRs was evaluated with linear regression, and the coefficient of determination with Pearson's correlation. We identified 88 RCTs of which 67 (76%) used PFS as the primary/co-primary end-point. One trial indicated whether progression was biochemical or clinical. Of the variance in OS, 39% was due to variance in PFS. Correlation between PFS and OS was weak (0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38-0.78). In newly diagnosed MM, 43% of the variance in OS was due to changes in PFS. The correlation between PFS and OS was weak (0.65, 95% CI 0.30-0.84). In relapsed/refractory MM, 58% of the variance in OS was due to changes in PFS. Correlation between PFS and OS was medium (0.76, 95% CI 0.42-0.91). We demonstrate that PFS and progression characteristics are characterised poorly in MM trials and that PFS is a poor surrogate for OS in MM.

First- versus second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors in Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) are important treatment options in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). Whether second-generation BTKi are associated with improved outcomes and/or better safety profile remains unclear. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials that reported data on the outcomes of patients with WM who received either first- or second-generation BTKi in the period between January 2010 and August 2021. Studies with twenty or fewer patients were excluded. The primary outcomes were efficacy measured by response and survival data. Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis (n = 730 patients). A total of 298 patients received 1st-generation BTKi and 432 received a 2nd-generation BTKi. Pooled overall response rate (ORR) and major response rate (MRR) for both generations were similar (94.2% and 78.5% in 1st vs. 88.9% and 75.1% in 2nd, respectively). MRR for both generations was higher in MYD88 Mut/CXCR4 WT patients compared to MYD88 Mut/CXCR4 Mut patients (odds ratio [OR]: 3.9, 95% CI: 2.2 to 5.5). Pooled 18-mo progression-free survival (PFS) was similar for both generations (88.5% vs. 87.3%). Grade 3/4 atrial fibrillation was higher in 1st-generation BTKi (3.1% vs. 0.4%); however, grade-3/-4 infections and neutropenia were more frequent in 2nd-generarion BTKi (20.9% vs. 13.2%, 17.7% vs. 12%, respectively). The efficacy of 1st- and 2nd-generation BTKis is comparable. The 1st-generation BTKi were associated with a higher risk of atrial fibrillation, whereas infections and neutropenia occurred more frequently in 2nd-generation BTKi.

Industry Payments to Physicians Endorsing Drugs and Devices on a Social Media Platform.

This study evaluates adherence to industry and professional standards among physicians endorsing drugs and devices on a social media platform.

Targeting GPRC5D in multiple myeloma.

INTRODUCTION: The prognosis of multiple myeloma (MM) continues to improve. Recent progress in therapies, using immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, has greatly improved patients' outcomes. Despite these advancements, relapses still happen often, and patients can become resistant to the usual treatments. Newer treatments, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) targeting B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), have resulted in excellent outcomes in patients with limited treatment options. G protein - coupled receptor, class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D) is considered a very promising target with early results from clinical trials showing high response rates in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the efficacy and safety of CAR-T and BsAbs targeting GPRC5D in MM, focusing on talquetamab - the inaugural FDA-approved BsAb targeting GPRC5D. Talquetamab has exhibited promising response rates alongside a distinctive side effect profile. Additionally, ongoing trials examining talquetamab in combination with agents like daratumumab and teclistamab are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: We offer insights into the potential utilization of various GPRC5D-based therapies in the treatment paradigm for MM, either independently or in combination with established therapies.

Cereblon E3 Ligase Modulators Mezigdomide and Iberdomide in Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple Myeloma (MM) remains a challenging hematological malignancy despite significant advancements made during the past 2 decades. Outcomes have improved by incorporating immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies into treatment algorithms that include high dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, many patients may eventually relapse despite these innovations. Newer therapies targeting B-Cell Maturation Antigen (BCMA) offer promise for patients with relapsed or refractory disease. BCMA-targeted therapies carry notable side effects, necessitating vigilant monitoring and proactive infection prevention measures. They can also induce considerable immunosuppression, attributed to lower levels of immunoglobulins and increased susceptibility to infections. There is still a need for alternative treatment options with different mechanisms of action that can be easily administered and have a better safety profile. In addition, pomalidomide only overcomes lenalidomide refractoriness in a subset of patients. This review aims to explore 2 next-generation cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs), Mezigdomide (CC92480), and Iberdomide (CC-220). We will discuss the biological aspects of these agents, including their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and toxicity profile, and provide a comprehensive review of current literature. Special attention will be paid to ongoing and future clinical trials that provide insights into the potential of these novel therapies in the management of MM.

The Role of Vertebral Augmentation Procedures in the Management of Multiple Myeloma.

Approximately 90% of patients with multiple myeloma experience significant pain from osseous involvement during their lifetime. Untreated osseous involvement results in vertebral compression fractures, leading to negative consequences for quality of life. Vertebral augmentation procedures, including percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, offer better and faster pain control and likely lower morbidity compared with non-operative interventions. Our review provides an up-to-date summary of the indications, contraindications, timing, outcomes, and potential complications of vertebral augmentation procedures to guide practicing oncologists in effectively managing bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma.