Acute kidney injury predicts mortality in very elderly critically-ill patients.

BACKGROUND: The increasing admissions of very elderly patients to intensive care units (ICUs) over recent decades highlight a growing need for understanding acute kidney injury (AKI) in this population. Although these individuals are potentially at high risk for AKI and adverse outcomes, data on AKI in this population is scarce. This study investigates the AKI incidence and outcomes of critically-ill patients aging at least 90 years. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study conducted at the Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany (2008-2020), investigates AKI incidence and outcomes between 2008 and 2020 in critically-ill patients aged ≥ 90 years. AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria using creatinine dynamics and/or urine output. Primary endpoint was overall mortality after 1 year. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, length of ICU and hospital stay. RESULTS: During the study period 92,958 critically-ill patients were treated and 1108 were ≥ 90 years. Of these, 1054 patients had available creatinine values and were included in the present study. AKI occurred in 24.4%, mostly classified as mild (17.5%). AKI was independently associated with a significant increase in overall mortality (HR 1.21, 95 %-CI: 1.01-1.46), in-hospital mortality (OR 2, 1.41-2.85), length of ICU (+2.8 days, 2.3-3.3) and hospital stay (+2.3 days, 0.9-3.7). Severity escalated these effects, but even mild AKI showed significance. Introducing urine-based criteria increased incidence but compromised mortality prediction. CONCLUSIONS: AKI is a frequent complication in very elderly critically-ill patients. Occurrence of AKI at any stage was associated with increased mortality. Predictive ability applied to AKI defined by creatinine but not urine output. Careful attention of creatinine dynamics is essential in very elderly ICU-patients.

Increased blood pressure after nonsevere COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Various sequelae have been described after nonsevere coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but knowledge on postacute effects on blood pressure is limited. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of blood pressure profiles in individuals after nonsevere COVID-19 compared with matched population-based individuals without prior COVID-19. Data were derived from the ongoing and prospective Hamburg City Health Study, a population-based study in Hamburg, Germany, and its associated COVID-19 program, which included individuals at least 4 months after COVID-19. Matching was performed by age, sex, education, and preexisting hypertension in a 1 : 4 ratio. RESULTS: Four hundred and thirty-two individuals after COVID-19 (mean age 56.1 years) were matched to 1728 controls without prior COVID-19 (56.2 years). About 92.8% of COVID-19 courses were mild or moderate, only 7.2% were hospitalized, and no individual had been treated on an intensive care unit. Even after adjustment for relevant competing risk factors, DBP [+4.7 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.97-5.7, P  < 0.001] was significantly higher in individuals after COVID-19. For SBP, a trend towards increased values was observed (+1.4 mmHg, 95% CI -0.4 to 3.2, P  = 0.120). Hypertensive blood pressures at least 130/80 mmHg (according to the ACC/AHA guideline) and at least 140/90 mmHg (ESC/ESH guideline) occurred significantly more often in individuals after COVID-19 than matched controls (odds ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.7, P  < 0.001 and odds ratio 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0, P  < 0.001, respectively), mainly driven by changes in DBP. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure is higher in individuals after nonsevere COVID-19 compared with uninfected individuals suggesting a significant hypertensive sequela.