DORAVIR: a French national survey of people with HIV-1 treated with an antiretroviral regimen including doravirine.

BACKGROUND: Doravirine is the latest NNRTI to be approved for the treatment of HIV-1 and has a different resistance profile from first-generation NNRTIs. Our aim was to investigate the virological efficacy of antiretroviral treatment including doravirine in people living with HIV-1 (PLWHIV), the factors associated with virological failure (VF) and those associated with the emergence of reverse transcriptase (RT) mutations in the case of VF. METHODS: A retrospective national survey of PLWHIV who were either naive or experienced on antiretroviral treatment including doravirine was conducted. VF was defined as two consecutive plasma viral loads (VLs) of ≥50 copies/mL or one VL of ≥200 copies/mL. Genotypic resistance tests were interpreted using the Stanford (v9.4.1) and ANRS (v33) algorithms. RESULTS: Of the 589 PLWHIV treated with a doravirine-containing regimen, 8.5% were naive and 91.5% had prior antiretroviral experience; 56.9% were infected with HIV-1 B subtype. Overall, 88.3% and 85.1% of participants were virologically controlled at Month (M)3 and M6 of doravirine treatment, respectively. In multivariable analysis, CRF02_AG subtype, higher zenith plasma HIV-1 RNA VL, doravirine initiation in the context of failure and baseline V179D mutation presence were associated with VF. Among 88 PLWHIV who experienced virological failure at M6, 15.9% had a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) HIV RT mutations. In multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with the occurrence of mutations was a genotypic sensitivity score that was not fully sensitive. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the largest to characterize the virological efficacy of doravirine-containing regimens in clinical practice and to identify factors associated with VF or emergence of resistance mutations that should be considered in clinical management.

HIV-1 non-group M phenotypic susceptibility in vitro to bictegravir and cabotegravir.

OBJECTIVES: HIV-1 group O (HIV-1/O) is one of the four HIV-1 groups and is endemic in Cameroon, representing 1% of HIV-1 infections in the population. Around 50% of the strains of this group naturally show a mutation (Y181C) providing them with resistance to NNRTIs and making therapeutic management more difficult. Today, the WHO recommends the use of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) as first-line treatment. Bictegravir and cabotegravir are the two most recent INSTIs. Because of the genetic polymorphism of HIV-1/O, studies are required to evaluate their phenotypic susceptibility to these two drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a phenotypic study on a large panel including 41 HIV-1/O clinical isolates and other rare non-group M HIV-1 (2 HIV-1/N and 1 HIV-1/P) to evaluate in vitro susceptibility to bictegravir and cabotegravir. RESULTS: The results showed an overall susceptibility of non-group M strains to the two drugs compared with HIV-1 group M. There was no difference between the mean (min-max) IC50 of HIV-1/M [1.86 (0.93-4.12) and 5.24 (1.76-12.41) nM for bictegravir and cabotegravir, respectively] and HIV-1/non-M [2.17 (0.03-9.47) and 4.88 (0.02-15.64) nM for bictegravir and cabotegravir, respectively]. However, we found a significant difference between IC50 values for bictegravir and cabotegravir in the whole panel (P value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown encouraging results regarding the clinical use of these drugs in HIV-1/non-M-infected patients, which will need to be confirmed with clinical data.

Factors associated with the emergence of integrase resistance mutations in patients failing dual or triple integrase inhibitor-based regimens in a French national survey.

BACKGROUND: Successful 2-drug regimens (2DRs) for HIV were made possible by the availability of drugs combining potency and tolerability with a high genetic barrier to resistance. How these deal with resistance development/re-emergence, compared with 3DRs, is thus of paramount importance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey including patients who were either naive or experienced with any 2DR or 3DR but failing integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI)-containing regimens [two consecutive plasma viral load (VL) values >50 copies/mL] was conducted between 2014 and 2019. Genotypic resistance tests were interpreted with the v28 ANRS algorithm. RESULTS: Overall, 1104 patients failing any INSTI-containing regimen (2DRs, n = 207; 3DRs, n = 897) were analysed. Five hundred and seventy-seven (52.3%) patients were infected with a B subtype and 527 (47.3%) with non-B subtypes. Overall, 644 (58%) patients showed no known integrase resistance mutations at failure. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with the emergence of at least one integrase mutation were: high VL at failure (OR = 1.24 per 1 log10 copies/mL increase); non-B versus B subtype (OR = 1.75); low genotypic sensitivity score (GSS) (OR = 0.10 for GSS = 2 versus GSS = 0-0.5); and dolutegravir versus raltegravir (OR = 0.46). Although 3DRs versus 2DRs reached statistical significance in univariate analysis (OR = 0.59, P = 0.007), the variable is not retained in the final model. CONCLUSIONS: This study is one of the largest studies characterizing integrase resistance in patients failing any INSTI-containing 2DR or 3DR in routine clinical care and reveals factors associated with emergence of integrase resistance that should be taken into consideration in clinical management. No difference was evidenced between patients receiving a 2DR or a 3DR.

Assessment of Multiplex Digital Droplet RT-PCR as a Diagnostic Tool for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Saliva Samples.

BACKGROUND: Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR on nasopharyngeal swabs is currently the reference COVID-19 diagnosis method but exhibits imperfect sensitivity. METHODS: We developed a multiplex reverse transcription-digital droplet PCR (RT-ddPCR) assay, targeting 6 SARS-CoV-2 genomic regions, and evaluated it on nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples collected from 130 COVID-19 positive or negative ambulatory individuals, who presented symptoms suggestive of mild or moderate SARS-CoV2 infection. RESULTS: For the nasopharyngeal swab samples, the results obtained using the 6-plex RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR assays were all concordant. The 6-plex RT-ddPCR assay was more sensitive than RT-qPCR (85% versus 62%) on saliva samples from patients with positive nasopharyngeal swabs. CONCLUSION: Multiplex RT-ddPCR represents an alternative and complementary tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19, in particular to control RT-qPCR ambiguous results. It can also be applied to saliva for repetitive sampling and testing individuals for whom nasopharyngeal swabbing is not possible.

Comparative Immunovirological and Clinical Responses to Antiretroviral Therapy Between HIV-1 Group O and HIV-1 Group M Infected Patients.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about impact of genetic divergence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O (HIV-1/O) relative to HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) on therapeutic outcomes. We aimed to determine if responses to standardized combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) were similar between groups despite strain divergence. METHODS: We performed an open nonrandomized study comparing the immunological, virological, and clinical responses to cART based on 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors plus 1 ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor, in naive and paired HIV-1/O vs HIV-1/M infected (+) patients (ratio 1:2), matched on several criteria. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with undetectable plasma viral load (pVL, threshold 60 copies/mL) at week (W) 48. Secondary endpoints were the proportion of patients with undetectable pVL at W24 and W96 and CD4 evolution between baseline and W24, W48, and W96. RESULTS: Forty-seven HIV-1/O+ and 94 HIV-1/M+ patients were included. Mean pVL at baseline was significantly lower by 1 log for HIV-1/O+ vs HIV-1/M+ patients. At W48, no significant difference was observed between populations with undetectable pVL and differences at W24 and W96 were not significant. A difference in CD4 gain was observed in favor of HIV-1/M at W48 and W96, but this was not significant when adjusted on both matched criteria and pVL at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate similar immunovirological and clinical response between HIV-1/O+ and HIV-1/M+ patients. They also reveal significantly lower baseline replication for HIV-1/O variants, suggesting specific virological properties and physiopathology that now need to be addressed. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00658346.

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Group O Infection in France: Clinical Features and Immunovirological Response to Antiretrovirals.

Background: To obtain reliable clinical data of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 group O (HIV-1/O) infection, and immunovirological responses to combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), in a large series of 101 patients. Methods: Piecewise linear models were used to estimate CD4 count before and after cART initiation. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate time to reach clinical stage C before antiretroviral therapy (ART) and to analyze time to achieve a plasma viral load (pVL) <40 copies/mL following cART initiation. Immunovirological response was assessed at the most recent visit in patients on active follow-up. Results: Data showed a 16.6% cumulative probability of reaching stage C within 5 years following diagnosis, and a mean CD4 decrease of -30.5 cells/µL/year. cART initiation in ART-naive patients led to a mean CD4 gain of 147 cells/µL after 12 months, and to a median pVL of <40 copies/mL after 3.8 months for 89.3%. Initiation with a nonrecommended nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based vs a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor-based regimen resulted in a much smaller gain of around 100 CD4 cells/µL after 1 year. Patients on follow-up since 2007 had a median CD4 count of 498 cells/µL, and 87% had a pVL <40 copies/mL at the most recent follow-up visit. Conclusions: This work provides unique data on HIV-1/O infection, in favor of a milder natural evolution than HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) and of a highly efficient current management, based on HIV-1/M guidelines, despite genetic divergence. Studies of comparable HIV-1/M and HIV-1/O populations are needed to confirm these results.

Impact of natural polymorphisms of HIV-1 non-group M on genotypic susceptibility to the attachment inhibitor fostemsavir.

Background: Fostemsavir belongs to the new class of attachment inhibitors (AIs); it inhibits the entry of HIV into CD4+ T-lymphocytes by blocking conformational changes in gp120. This is a promising AI, but previous phenotypic data showed that genetically divergent HIV-1 group O could present natural resistance to this drug. These data were obtained from only two strains, which are not representative of the high intra-group genetic diversity. Moreover, no data are available concerning the other divergent HIV-1 groups (N and P). Objectives: To further investigate the natural genotypic susceptibility of HIV-1 groups O, N and P (HIV-1 non-M) to fostemsavir, using a large set of sequences. Methods: The frequency of eight substitutions associated with decreased susceptibility to fostemsavir (L116P, A204D, S375M/H, M426L, M434I, M475I and V506M), was investigated in 111 gp120 sequences from groups O (n = 100), N (n = 9) and P (n = 2). Results: All HIV-1 group N sequences harboured the three substitutions S375M, M426L and M434I, whereas only 1% and 10% of HIV-1 group O sequences harboured the S375H + M426L and S375H + M434I patterns, respectively. The main genetic profile of HIV-1 groups P and O combined S375H with two atypical substitutions (M426S and M434L). Five group O sequences did not display any of the eight substitutions, but had atypical residues with unknown impact. Conclusions: The genetic polymorphisms in the gp120 of HIV-1 non-M viruses support the hypothesis that these viruses could largely be resistant to inhibition by fostemsavir. Only 5% of group O strains could display full genetic susceptibility. Extensive phenotypic studies are now required.

Multiple HIV-1/M + HIV-1/O dual infections and new HIV-1/MO inter-group recombinant forms detected in Cameroon.

BACKGROUND: Due to the prevalence of HIV-1 group M and the endemicity of HIV-1 group O infections in Cameroon, patients may be infected with both viruses and/or with HIV-1/MO recombinant forms. Such atypical infections may be deleterious in terms of diagnosis and therapeutic management due to the high divergence of HIV-1/O. The aim of this study was to identify prospectively such atypical infections in Cameroon. RESULTS: Based on serological screening by env-V3 serotyping and a molecular strategy using group-specific (RT)-PCRs, we identified 10 Cameroonian patients harboring three different profiles of infection: (1) 4 HIV-1/M + O dual infections without evidence of recombinant; (2) 5 recombinants associated with one or both parental strains; and (3) 1 new recombinant form without parental strains. CONCLUSIONS: This work highlights the dynamic co-evolution of these two HIV groups in Cameroon that could lead to the emergence of a circulating recombinant form MO, and the need for accurate identification of such atypical infections for precise diagnosis, virological monitoring and therapeutic management with adapted tools.

A Multiplex PCR Approach for Detecting Dual Infections and Recombinants Involving Major HIV Variants.

The cocirculation of different HIV types and groups can lead to dual infections and recombinants, which hinder diagnosis and therapeutic management. We designed two multiplex PCRs (mPCRs) coupled with capillary electrophoresis to facilitate the detection of such infections. The first, MMO2, targets three variants (HIV-1/M, HIV-1/O, and HIV-2), and the second, MMO, targets HIV-1/M and HIV-1/O. These mPCRs were validated on DNA and RNA extracts from 19 HIV-1/M, 12 HIV-1/O, and 13 HIV-2 cultures and from mixtures simulating dual infections. They were then assessed with DNA and RNA extracts from samples of 47 clinical monoinfections and HIV-1/M+O dual infections or infections with HIV-1/MO recombinants. Both mPCRs had excellent specificity. Sensitivities ranged from 80 to 100% for in vitro samples and from 58 to 100% for clinical samples, with the results obtained depending on the material used and the region of the genome concerned. Sensitivity was generally lower for DNA than for RNA and for amplifications of the integrase and matrix regions. In terms of global detection (at least one target gene for each strain), both mPCRs yielded a detection rate of 100% for in vitro samples. MMO2 detected 100% of the clinical strains from DNA and 97% from RNA, whereas MMO detected 100% of the strains from both materials. Thus, for in vitro and clinical samples, MMO2 was a useful tool for detecting dual infections with HIV-1 and HIV-2 (referred to as HIV-1+HIV-2) and HIV-1/M+O, and MMO was useful for detecting both MO dual infections and MO mosaic patterns.

A Pan-HIV Strategy for Complete Genome Sequencing.

Molecular surveillance is essential to monitor HIV diversity and track emerging strains. We have developed a universal library preparation method (HIV-SMART [i.e.,switchingmechanismat 5' end ofRNAtranscript]) for next-generation sequencing that harnesses the specificity of HIV-directed priming to enable full genome characterization of all HIV-1 groups (M, N, O, and P) and HIV-2. Broad application of the HIV-SMART approach was demonstrated using a panel of diverse cell-cultured virus isolates. HIV-1 non-subtype B-infected clinical specimens from Cameroon were then used to optimize the protocol to sequence directly from plasma. When multiplexing 8 or more libraries per MiSeq run, full genome coverage at a median ∼2,000× depth was routinely obtained for either sample type. The method reproducibly generated the same consensus sequence, consistently identified viral sequence heterogeneity present in specimens, and at viral loads of ≤4.5 log copies/ml yielded sufficient coverage to permit strain classification. HIV-SMART provides an unparalleled opportunity to identify diverse HIV strains in patient specimens and to determine phylogenetic classification based on the entire viral genome. Easily adapted to sequence any RNA virus, this technology illustrates the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for viral characterization and surveillance.

Mutation in the Hepatitis E Virus Polymerase and Outcome of Ribavirin Therapy.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) can lead to chronic infection in solid-organ transplant patients. Ribavirin is efficient for treatment of chronically infected patients. Recently, the1634R mutation in the HEV polymerase has been associated with treatment failure. However, it is unclear if this mutation can be used as a prognostic marker of treatment outcome. We studied the prevalence of the 1634R mutation in the HEV polymerase of patients starting ribavirin therapy, the influence of the 1634R variants on the viral response, the frequency of the 1634R mutation in patients whose treatment failed, and its impact on ribavirin retreatment. We analyzed pretreatment samples from 63 solid-organ transplant patients with chronic hepatitis E using deep sequencing; 42 patients had a sustained virologic response (SVR), and 21 were non-SVR patients. We detected the 1634R variant by deep sequencing in 36.5% (23/63) of the patients (proportions, 1.3 to 100%). The 1634R variant was detected in 31.0% (13/42) of baseline plasma samples from patients with SVR and in 47.6% (10/21) in the other patients (P = 0.2). The presence of this mutation did not influence the initial decrease in viral RNA. Lastly, a second prolonged ribavirin treatment led to SVR in 70% of the patients who initially did not have SVR, despite the presence of the 1634R variant. We conclude that the presence of the 1634R variant at ribavirin initiation does not lead to absolute ribavirin resistance. Although its proportion increased in patients whose treatment failed, the presence of the 1634R variant did not compromise the response to a second ribavirin treatment.

In vitro replicative potential of an HIV-1/MO intergroup recombinant virus compared to HIV-1/M and HIV-1/O parental viruses.

Genetic recombination is one of the major evolution processes of HIV-1. Despite their great genetic divergence, HIV-1 groups M and O can generate HIV-1/MO intergroup recombinants. The current description of 20 HIV-1/MO unique recombinant forms suggests a possible benefit of the recombination. The aim of this work was to study in vitro the replicative potential of HIV-1/MO recombinant forms. This analysis was based on a simple recombination pattern, [Ogag/pol-Menv], harboring a breakpoint in Vpr. A chimeric infectious molecular clone, pOM-TB-2016 was synthesized from HIV-1/M subtype B and HIV-1/O subgroup T and recombinant viruses were obtained by transfection/co-culture. To compare the replicative potential of these viruses, two markers were monitored in culture supernatants: Reverse Transcriptase (RT) activity and P24 antigen concentration. The results showed a superiority of the group M parental virus compared to group O for both markers. In contrast, for the recombinant virus, RT activity data did not overlap with the concentration of P24 antigen, suggesting a hybrid behavior of the recombinant, in terms of enzyme activity and P24 production. These results highlighted many hypotheses about the impact of recombination on replicative potential and demonstrated again the significant plasticity of HIV genomes and their infinite possibility of evolution.

In vitro phenotypic susceptibility of HIV-1 non-group M to CCR5 inhibitor (maraviroc): TROPI-CO study.

The susceptibility of genetically divergent HIV-1 strains (HIV-1 non-M) from groups O, N, and P to the CCR5 co-receptor antagonist, maraviroc (MVC), was investigated among a large panel of 45 clinical strains, representative of the viral genetic diversity. The results were compared to the reference strains of HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) with known tropism. Among the non-M strains, a wide range of phenotypic susceptibilities to MVC were observed. The large majority of HIV-1/O strains (40/42) displayed a high susceptibility to MVC, with median and mean IC50 values of 1.23 and 1.33 nM, respectively, similar to the HIV-1/M R5 strain (1.89 nM). However, the two remaining HIV-1/O strains exhibited a lower susceptibility (IC50 at 482 and 496 nM), in accordance with their dual/mixed (DM) tropism. Interestingly, the two HIV-1/N strains demonstrated varying susceptibility patterns, despite always having relatively low IC50 values (2.87 and 47.5 nM). This emphasized the complexity of determining susceptibility solely based on IC50 values. Our study examined the susceptibility of all HIV-1 non-M groups to MVC and correlated these findings with virus tropism (X4, R5, or DM). The results confirm the critical significance of tropism determination before initiating MVC treatment in patients infected with HIV-1 non-M. Furthermore, we advocate for the consideration of additional parameters, such as the slope of inhibition curves, to provide a more thorough characterization of phenotypic susceptibility profiles. IMPORTANCE: Unlike HIV-1 group M, the scarcity of studies on HIV-1 non-M groups (O, N, and P) presents challenges in understanding their susceptibility to antiretroviral treatments, particularly due to their natural resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The TROPI-CO study logically complements our prior investigations into integrase inhibitors and anti-gp120 efficacy. The largest panel of 45 non-M strains existing so far yielded valuable results on maraviroc (MVC) susceptibility. The significant variations in MVC IC50 reveal a spectrum of susceptibilities, with most strains displaying R5 tropism. Notably, the absence of MVC-resistant strains suggests a potential therapeutic avenue. The study also employs a robust novel cell-based phenotropism assay and identifies distinct groups of susceptibilities based on inhibition curve slopes. Our findings emphasize the importance of determining tropism before initiating MVC and provide crucial insights for selecting effective therapeutic strategies in the delicate context of HIV-1 non-M infections.

HIV-1 Non-Group M Strains and ART.

To eliminate HIV infection, there are several elements to take into account to limit transmission and break viral replication, such as epidemiological, preventive or therapeutic management. The UNAIDS goals of screening, treatment and efficacy should allow for this elimination if properly followed. For some infections, the difficulty is linked to the strong genetic divergence of the viruses, which can impact the virological and therapeutic management of patients. To completely eliminate HIV by 2030, we must therefore also be able to act on these atypical variants (HIV-1 non-group M) which are distinct from the group M pandemic viruses. While this diversity has had an impact on the efficacy of antiretroviral treatment in the past, recent data show that there is real hope of eliminating these forms, while maintaining vigilance and constant surveillance, so as not to allow more divergent and resistant forms to emerge. The aim of this work is therefore to share an update on the current knowledge on epidemiology, diagnosis and antiretroviral agent efficacy of HIV-1 non-M variants.

Evaluation of Analytical and Clinical Performance and Usefulness in a Real-Life Hospital Setting of Two in-House Real-Time RT-PCR Assays to Track SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern.

Since the end of 2020, multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of concern (VOCs) have emerged and spread worldwide. Tracking their evolution has been a challenge due to the huge number of positive samples and limited capacities of whole-genome sequencing. Two in-house variant-screening RT-PCR assays were successively designed in our laboratory in order to detect specific known mutations in the spike region and to rapidly detect successively emerging VOCs. The first one (RT-PCR#1) targeted the 69-70 deletion and the N501Y substitution simultaneously, whereas the second one (RT-PCR#2) targeted the E484K, E484Q, and L452R substitutions simultaneously. To evaluate the analytical performance of these two RT-PCRs, 90 negative and 30 positive thawed nasopharyngeal swabs were retrospectively analyzed, and no discordant results were observed. Concerning the sensitivity, for RT-PCR#1, serial dilutions of the WHO international standard SARS-CoV-2 RNA, corresponding to the genome of an Alpha variant, were all detected up to 500 IU/mL. For RT-PCR#2, dilutions of a sample harboring the E484K substitution and of a sample harboring the L452R and E484Q substitutions were all detected up to 1000 IU/mL and 2000 IU/mL, respectively. To evaluate the performance in a real-life hospital setting, 1308 and 915 profiles of mutations, obtained with RT-PCR#1 and RT-PCR#2, respectively, were prospectively compared to next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. The two RT-PCR assays showed an excellent concordance with the NGS data, with 99.8% for RT-PCR#1 and 99.2% for RT-PCR#2. Finally, for each mutation targeted, the clinical sensitivity, the clinical specificity and the positive and negative predictive values showed excellent clinical performance. Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the emergence of variants-impacting the disease's severity and the efficacy of vaccines and therapies-has forced medical analysis laboratories to constantly adapt to the strong demand for screening them. Our data showed that in-house RT-PCRs are useful and adaptable tools for monitoring such rapid evolution and spread of SARS-CoV-2 VOCs.

Knowledge, attitudes and practices of French university students towards COVID-19 prevention-are health students better?

During the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, public health measures (PHM) were implemented to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. At university, we wondered whether health students would be more likely to comply with these safety measures against infectious disease transmission compared to other students. Thus, we collected 1 426 university students' responses to an online anonymous survey to describe their knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of COVID-19 prevention measures and to compare the opinions and practices of health students and science students at the same university of Rouen Normandy (France). A higher proportion of science students (84.6%) compared to health students (73.9%) reported knowledge of the university's COVID-19 protocol, p<0.001. However, the health students compared to science students reported a higher compliance with PHM at home (91.4% vs 88.0%) and at university (94.1% vs 91.1%). In a multiple regression analysis, after adjustment for age, sex and university department, factors associated with higher compliance with PHM were knowledge of the university's COVID-19 protocol and a high perceived efficacy of PHM. A SARS-CoV-2 PCR result was not predictive of compliance with PHM. The results of this online survey in French students show a high level of knowledge and practices of COVID-19 prevention Although their performances could still be improved by training, the good results of health students regarding knowledge, attitudes and practices are encouraging as these students could be an added backup force to fight against viral pandemics.

Performance Analysis of Three Commercial Kits Designed for RNA Quantification of HIV-1 Group O Variants.

BACKGROUND: The genetic divergence of HIV-1 group O is high relative to pandemic group M, which could impact detection and quantification of plasma RNA. Recent commercial kits for RNA quantification seem to show good performances in HIV-1/O, but discrepancies are still observed. Here, we compare the performances of 3 commercial assays for the RNA quantification of HIV-1/O. METHODS: We studied the RNA quantification of 117 clinical samples using Abbott RealTime HIV-1, Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load, or Roche Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 v2. First, we conducted a qualitative description, and second, we focused on a quantitative analysis of the results above 40 cp/mL. The degree of agreement between methods and the strength of the correlation of viral load determination were estimated using Bland-Altman plot and Passing-Bablok regression with the Spearman coefficient, respectively. RESULTS: Our 2-by-2 analysis showed that the Abbott and Cepheid assays were very close in terms of correlation and dispersion of points, whereas Roche presented higher values in the highest range of quantification (>5 log10). The Cepheid assay combined better correlation with the consensus value and a lower dispersion of values, leading to an overall better performance of quantification. The quantification was still impacted by intragroup genetic diversity with, here, 1 strain (YBF26). CONCLUSIONS: Using a new approach to compare the performances of RNA quantification between more than 2 techniques, we demonstrated that Cepheid could be the most suitable assay for HIV-1/O quantification, although the results from all assays remained strain dependent.

Virological response to integrase strand transfer inhibitor-based antiretroviral combinations in HIV-1 group O-infected patients.

: Although integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are widely used in HIV-1 group M (HIV-1/M) infections, little is known about their efficacy against genetically divergent HIV-1 group O (HIV-1/O) strains. Previous phenotypic works have demonstrated the variable susceptibility of HIV-1/O strains, depending on INSTI drugs. Clinical data are very limited and obtained from a few patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the virological success rate of an INSTI-based combination of antiretroviral therapy (cART) in a large population of HIV-1/O-infected patients, and to describe resistance-associated mutations (RAM) at virological failure. METHODS: The virological response of 39 patients receiving INSTI-based cART during their follow-up was analysed i) at the last point of the first INSTI initiation and ii) at their most recent visit. RAM analysis was performed at virological failures. Resistance interpretation was based on the French National Agency of Research on AIDS and viral hepatitis (ANRS) rules. RESULTS: Virological success at both time points of analysis was high, with more than 87% of the patients with undetectable plasma viral load. Among the six patients with virological failure, three selected RAM described for HIV-1/M resistance, and two had already RAM, before INSTI initiation. CONCLUSION: Our results show that HIV-1/O infected patients receiving INSTI-based cART presented a high rate of virological success whatever their previous lines; we have also shown that resistance rules for HIV-1/M could be considered when failure occurs. These data are of importance especially in the context of WHO recommendations for a wider use of this class.

HIV rapid screening tests and self-tests: Be aware of differences in performance and cautious of vendors.

BACKGROUND: Rapid tests for HIV testing are essential tools to achieve the 90-90-90 target of the World Health Organization. Many tests are available, some directly from websites. Evaluation of the performance of rapid tests, under close to real-life usage, is therefore needed to ensure accurate diagnosis in the context of the recommendation for their more widespread use. METHOD: Nine third- (3G) or fourth-generation (4G) rapid screening tests or self-tests (two bought on websites), were evaluated on an extensive panel of 200 HIV-negative and 312 HIV-positive samples, representative of a wide variety of clinical situations and HIV genetic diversity. A whole blood reconstitution protocol was designed to simulate real-life usage of these tests in community-based and private settings. FINDINGS: The specificity was high (98.5-100%) and sensitivity excellent (100%) for samples from patients chronically infected with the pandemic strains. The performance for infrequent situations with a major epidemiological and clinical impact, such as infection with divergent viruses or primary infection, was highly variable, depending on the test. One of the two 4G tests allowed detection of additional positive samples from early stages of infection, whereas the second (sold as a 4G test on a website) corresponded in reality to a 3G test. INTERPRETATION: Our study showed that not all tests are equal for the detection of major HIV variants or early stages of HIV infection; adding the detection of specific p24Ag improved the latter point. This study also showed, for the first time, that buying through web-based vendors can be risky, due to the varying performance of the tests and questionable sales practices. Our results are of particular importance in the context of the increasing use of rapid tests in an "outside laboratory" settings. FUND: Santé Publique France, COREVIH - Normandie, and Rouen University Hospital.