Feasibility and impact on diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions under real-time direct vision by Iriscope®.

Introduction Interventional pneumology plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs), offering a minimally invasive approach with a low risk of complications. Iriscope® is a novel device that provides a direct and real-time image of PPLs. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the feasibility and impact of Iriscope® in diagnosing PPLs by analyzing its ability to directly visualize lesions and support accurate sampling during radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) combined with rEBUS. Methods A single-center prospective study was conducted from December 2022 to October 2023 on patients with suspicious PPLs. The diagnostic approach involved either rEBUS alone or in combination with ENB. In all cases, an additional novel technique called Iriscope® (Lys Medical, Charleroi, Belgium) was also applied. Iriscope® findings of each lesion were evaluated individually by three expert interventional pulmonologists. Results Seventy PPLs suspected of malignancy were included in the study. The PPLs underwent examination by ENB combined with rEBUS (55) or by rEBUS alone (15). Diagnosis was obtained in 68.6% (48/70) of cases. Iriscope® provided a direct, real-time view of 57.1% (40/70) of PPLs with a positive predictive value of 92.5% (37/40). This technique was able to visualize 72% (39/54) of malignant lesions, while only 6.1% (1/16) of benign lesions showed pathologic changes. The most common findings observed with Iriscope® were: Mucosal thickening and infiltration (92,5%), increased capillary vascularization (82%), pale or grayish mucosa (72,5%), obstruction with accumulation of secretions (50%) and cobblestone mucosa (15%). Conclusion Iriscope® is a promising technique in the diagnostic process of PPLs, providing real-time pathologic imaging that facilitates accurate sampling. Further studies are needed to evaluate success rate of Iriscope-mediated repositioning and to establish predictive patterns for malignant or even benign diseases.

Bronchoscopist's perception of the quality of the single-use bronchoscope (Ambu aScope4™) in selected bronchoscopies: a multicenter study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services.

BACKGROUND: The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated. METHODS: To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis. RESULTS: The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 min. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores > 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score. CONCLUSIONS: The aScope4™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images.

Learning curves and association of pathologist's performance with the diagnostic accuracy of linear endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA): a cohort study in a tertiary care reference centre.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the learning curves and the influence of the pathologist's performance on the endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration's (EBUS-TBNA's) diagnostic accuracy in a real-world study. DESIGN/SETTING: Cohort study conducted in a tertiary care university hospital (single centre) with patients referred for EBUS-TBNA. PARTICIPANTS/INTERVENTION: We initially evaluated 376 patients (673 lymph nodes), 368 (660 lymph nodes) of whom were recruited. The inclusion criterion was EBUS-TBNA indicated for the study of mediastinal or hilar lesions. The exclusion criteria were the absence of mediastinal and hilar lesions during EBUS confirmed by a normal mediastinum and hilum on chest CT (except in cases of mediastinal staging of cancer) and lost to follow-up. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnostic accuracy and related outcomes. METHODS: We included patients from a prospectively constructed database. We performed a logistic regression multivariate analysis to adjust for potential confounders of the association between pathologist performance and EBUS-TBNA accuracy. The Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) analysis was used to assess pathologists' performance and learning curves. RESULTS: Most indications for EBUS were suspicion of malignancy, including intrathoracic tumours (68.3%), extrathoracic tumours (9.8%) and cancer staging (7.0%). The patients' mean age was 63.7 years, and 71.5% were male. Overall EBUS-TBNA accuracy was 80.8%. In the multivariate logistic regression model, the factors independently associated with EBUS-TBNA accuracy included certain pathologists (ORs ranging from 0.16 to 0.41; p<0.017), a lymph node short-axis diameter <1 cm (OR: 0.36; 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62; p<0.001), and the aetiology of lymph node enlargement (ORs ranging from 7 to 37; p<0.001). CUSUM analysis revealed four different learning curve patterns, ranging from almost immediate learning to a prolonged learning phase, as well as a pattern consistent with performance attrition. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologists' proficiency conditioned EBUS-TBNA accuracy. This human factor is a potential source of error independent of factors conditioning tissue sample adequacy.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.

Since the publication of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial study, lung volume reduction (LVR) has been considered a therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced obstructive lung disease. The high complication rate of surgical LVR has led to the development of bronchoscopic LVR (BLVR). Of the currently available BLVR alternatives, coils and unidirectional endobronchial valves lead the list. The choice of each device depends on emphysema characteristics and presence of collateral ventilation. Evaluation of these patients at centers with expertise in interventional pulmonology and management of BLVR is strongly recommended.