In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy to optimize the spaghetti technique for defining surgical margins of lentigo maligna.

BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM) is a therapeutic challenge for surgeons because of its location in aesthetic areas and the difficulty in determining margins. OBJECTIVE: To investigate a new procedure combining the "spaghetti" technique described by Gaudy-Marqueste and colleagues in 2011 with in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) to define the margins of LM more accurately and allow strict histologic control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with LM of the head underwent a RCM-guided delineation of the margins followed by the "spaghetti" technique. RESULTS: The excision of the first "spaghetti" in a tumor-free area was obtained in 28 of 33 patients. In the other five cases, persistence of LM foci was found in <5% of the length of spaghetti. The average number of pieces of "spaghetti" was 1.2 (range 1-3). Definitive histologic examination of the lesion showed a minimum average margin of 2.7 mm. Follow-up in 27 patients after an average of 10 months (range 4-25 months) did not show any recurrence. CONCLUSION: This procedure allows accurate definition of the surgical margins of LM, with a low rate of multiple excisions, sparing tissue in functional and aesthetic areas. These results should be confirmed on the basis of a larger series with longer follow-up.

[Smoking and alcohol cessation programs in patients with head and neck cancer]. / Accompagnement des dépendances à l'alcool et au tabac des patients atteints d'un cancer des voies aérodigestives supérieures.

Most head and neck cancers are associated with smoking and alcohol exposure. Smoking and alcohol cessation (ASC) is associated with improved quality of life, cancer therapy efficacy, decreased treatment-related and cardiovascular risks, and is expected to decrease the risk of second primary tumor. It is therefore a high priority in the plan of care. However, results of current ASC programs are disappointing and understanding the reasons of this is critical. We started a qualitative study in 6 academic centers including 3 university hospitals, one regional hospital and one comprehensive cancer center. We first interviewed surgeons and care givers involved in the management of head and neck cancers. Poor communication between stakeholders, absence of alignment of care goals between patients, surgeons and other caregivers, and low level of understanding by patients of the benefits of ASC were felt to represent frequent obstacles to successful outcome. More work is ongoing within the context of our IHNPACT umbrella protocol to identify hurdles associated with successful ASC.