Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Pancreato-Biliary Diseases Requiring Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

BACKGROUND: Viral infections are known to impact the pancreato-biliary system; however, there are limited data showing that the same is true of COVID-19. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can safely be performed in patients with COVID-19 infection, but outcomes of patients with COVID-19 infections and concomitant pancreatic and biliary disease requiring endoscopic intervention are unknown. AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the severity of pancreaticobiliary diseases and post-ERCP outcomes in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Patients with pancreato-biliary disease that required inpatient ERCP from five centers in the United States and South America between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2020 were included. A representative cohort of patients from each month were randomly selected from each site. Disease severity and post-ERCP outcomes were compared between COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients. RESULTS: A total of 175 patients were included: 95 COVID positive and 80 COVID negative. Mean CTSI score for the patients who had pancreatitis was higher in COVID-positive cohort by 3.2 points (p < .00001). The COVID-positive group had more cases with severe disease (n = 41) versus the COVID-negative group (n = 2) (p < .00001). Mortality was higher in the COVID-19 positive group (19%) compared to COVID-negative group (7.5%) even though the COVID-19-negative group had higher incidence of malignancy (n = 17, 21% vs n = 7, 7.3%) (p = 0.0455). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that patients with COVID infection have more severe pancreato-biliary disease and worse post-ERCP outcomes, including longer length of stay and higher mortality rate. These are important considerations when planning for endoscopic intervention. CLINICALTRIALS: gov: (NCT05051358).

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gallbladder Drainage Versus Percutaneous Drainage in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Elective Cholecystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Cholecystectomy (CCY) is the gold standard treatment of acute cholecystitis (AC). Nonsurgical management of AC includes percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PT-GBD) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD). This study aims to compare outcomes of patients who undergo CCY after having received EUS-GBD vs PT-GBD. METHODS: A multicenter international study was conducted in patients with AC who underwent EUS-GBD or PT-GBD, followed by an attempted CCY, between January 2018 and October 2021. Demographics, clinical characteristics, procedural details, postprocedure outcomes, and surgical details and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-nine patients were included: EUS-GBD in 46 patients (27% male, mean age 74 years) and PT-GBD in 93 patients (50% male, mean age 72 years). Surgical technical success was not significantly different between the 2 groups. In the EUS-GBD group, there was decreased operative time (84.2 vs 165.4 minutes, P < 0.00001), time to symptom resolution (4.2 vs 6.3 days, P = 0.005), and length of stay (5.4 vs 12.3 days, P = 0.001) compared with the PT-GBD group. There was no difference in the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open CCY: 5 of 46 (11%) in the EUS-GBD arm and 18 of 93 (19%) in the PT-GBD group ( P value 0.2324). DISCUSSION: Patients who received EUS-GBD had a significantly shorter interval between gallbladder drainage and CCY, shorter surgical procedure times, and shorter length of stay for the CCY compared with those who received PT-GBD. EUS-GBD should be considered an acceptable modality for gallbladder drainage and should not preclude patients from eventual CCY.

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-Based Brush Cytology for Tissue Diagnosis in Malignant Biliary Obstruction.

Background and objective Patients with suspected malignant biliary strictures frequently undergo endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based brush cytology and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) for establishing the diagnosis. The outcomes of these tests aid in the further management of the patient. A comparison of these two modalities in establishing the diagnosis is seldom reported. In light of this, we aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy between ERCP-based brush cytology and EUS-FNA for tissue diagnosis in malignant biliary obstruction. Our study involved a retrospective audit of all patients admitted to the Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre for EUS and ERCP from 2015 to 2019. Methodology A Comparative study was conducted in the Department of Medical Gastroenterology at the Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre over a five-year period. A total of 77 subjects who presented during the study period with biliary obstruction based on clinical presentation with altered liver function test in an obstructive pattern and evidence of biliary obstruction in the form of stricture or pancreaticobiliary mass on cross-sectional imaging were included in the study. All the patients included in the study underwent EUS and ERCP. Results The majority of the patients in the study were in the fifth decade of life with a slight female predominance. The most common CT finding was a periampullary mass with common bile duct (CBD) stricture (59.7%). In the study, EUS-FNA was more sensitive than ERCP-based tissue sampling. The overall sensitivity was 90.63% for EUS-FNA and 65.63% for ERCP sampling. EUS-FNA was found to have diagnostic accuracy of 92.63% in comparison to 71.43% for brush cytology. Conclusions Based on our findings, EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling with excellent sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. Performing EUS before ERCP in all patients with suspected malignant biliary obstruction would definitely improve diagnostic accuracy and thereby help in the management of such cases.