The Distance between the Pylorus and Left Vagus Nerve during Sleeve Gastrectomy.

The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can be performed with or without antral preservation (distance from the pylorus <50 mm). The objective of this study was to evaluate the distance between the pylorus and the end of the left vagus nerve in order to determine whether it could be used as a constant anatomical landmark to start gastric transection. This was a prospective, nonrandomized study of 120 patients undergoing SG from January to October 2018. The distance measurement between pylorus and vagus nerve was performed at the beginning of the SG. The primary endpoint was the distance between the beginning of the pylorus and the end of the second branch of the vagus nerve on the upper edge of the antrum. The secondary endpoints was the correlation factors between the preoperative data and the position of the end of the vagus nerve. A total of 120 patients, with a mean body mass index of 42.2 kg/m2 , underwent primary SG. The mean distance between pylorus and the end of the vagus nerve was 50.4 mm (35-64) on the upper part of the antrum. When considering the inferior part of the antrum, the minimum distance was 50 mm. No correlations were found between preoperative data and distance measurements. The vagus nerve can be considered as a constant and reliable anatomical landmark for performing SG with antral preservation. However, no correlation was found between the preoperative data and the location of the end of the vagus nerve. Clin. Anat. 33:562-566, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Differences in Alimentary Glucose Absorption and Intestinal Disposal of Blood Glucose After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bariatric procedures, such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), are the most effective approaches to resolve type 2 diabetes in obese individuals. Alimentary glucose absorption and intestinal disposal of blood glucose have not been directly compared between individuals or animals that underwent RYGB vs VSG. We evaluated in rats and humans how the gut epithelium adapts after surgery and the consequences on alimentary glucose absorption and intestinal disposal of blood glucose. METHODS: Obese male rats underwent RYGB, VSG, or sham (control) operations. We collected intestine segments from all rats; we performed histologic analyses and measured levels of messenger RNAs encoding the sugar transporters SGLT1, GLUT1, GLUT2, GLUT3, GLUT4, and GLUT5. Glucose transport and consumption were assayed using ex vivo jejunal loops. Histologic analyses were also performed on Roux limb sections from patients who underwent RYGB 1-5 years after surgery. Roux limb glucose consumption was assayed after surgery by positron emission and computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: In rats and humans that underwent RYGB, the Roux limb became hyperplasic, with an increased number of incretin-producing cells compared with the corresponding jejunal segment of controls. Furthermore, expression of sugar transporters and hypoxia-related genes increased and the nonintestinal glucose transporter GLUT1 appeared at the basolateral membrane of enterocytes. Ingested and circulating glucose was trapped within the intestinal epithelial cells of rats and humans that underwent RYGB. By contrast, there was no hyperplasia of the intestine after VSG, but the intestinal absorption of alimentary glucose was reduced and density of endocrine cells secreting glucagon-like peptide-1 increased. CONCLUSIONS: The intestine adapts differently to RYGB vs VSG. RYGB increases intestinal glucose disposal and VSG delays glucose absorption; both contribute to observed improvements in glycemia.

Sleeve Gastrectomy Combined with the Simplified Hill Repair in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity and Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease: Preliminary Results in 14 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to report our initial experience with a novel technique which addresses morbid obesity and gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) simultaneously by combination of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and simplified laparoscopic Hill repair (sLHR). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of LSG+sLHR patients >5 months postoperatively includes demographics, GERD status, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, body mass index (BMI), excess BMI loss (EBMIL), complications and GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. LSG+sLHR surgical technique: posterior cruroplasty,  standard LSG, fixation of the esophagogastric junction to the median arcuate ligament. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent LSG+sLHR [12 women and 2 men, mean (range) age 47 years (27-57), BMI 41 kg/m2 (35-65)]. Five patients had previous gastric banding (GB). All had symptomatic GERD confirmed by gastroscopy and/or upper-gastrointestinal contrast study, two with chronic cough, 10 took PPI daily. Twelve had hiatus hernia and two patulous cardia at surgical exploration. Associated interventions were three GB removals and one cholecystectomy. Postoperative complication was one surgical site infection. Follow-up of all patients at median 12.5 months (5-17) is as follows: symptomatic GERD 3/14 patients, chronic cough 0/14, daily PPI use in 1/14, mean EBMIL 68% (17-120), satisfaction 93%, mean GERD-HRQL score 3,28/50 (0-15), with 4 patients 0/50, occasional bloatedness in 2 patients and dysphagia not reported. CONCLUSION: The novel technique which combines LSG with sLHR is feasible, safe and can be associated with GB removal. Preliminary results showed patient satisfaction, high remission rate of preexisting GERD, decrease in PPI use and unimpaired weight loss. Further evaluation is necessary in a controlled and staged manner to establish the technique's real effectiveness.

Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Predictive Factors for Weight Loss and Band Removal After More than 10 Years' Follow-Up in a Single University Unit.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss and overall outcomes following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) are more variable than with other bariatric procedures. Our aim was to investigate the predictive value of certain parameters in a cohort of 794 patients with 10 years' minimum follow-up after LAGB. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 794 patients undergoing LAGB performed by the authors between April 1996 and December 2004. We collected patients' data on weight loss and band-related complications and performed logistic regression modelling and calculated Kaplan-Meier curves for band preservation. RESULTS: The follow-up rate at 10 years was 90.4%. The mean follow-up duration was 15.1 years (range, 120-228 months). Overall band removal with or without conversion or replacement was required in 304 (38.2%) patients. The mean survival time of the band was 148.4 months (95% confidence interval: 138.3-167.4), and there was no difference in the rate of removal by operative technique (p = 0.7). The highest rate of band removal occurred in female patients (p = 0.05), those with BMI > 50 kg/m2 (p = 0.005) and in those <40 years of age (p = 0.04). For patients with the band in situ, the success rate was significantly lower in patients with initial BMI > 50 kg/m2. Conversely, differences in success rate were not statistically significant for age (using 50 years as the cut-off), technique or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of removal occurred in women, younger patients and those with BMI > 50 kg/m2. Regardless of these criteria, the rate of band removal for complications rose over time. Patients should be informed of the high risk of the need for band removal long-term.

Abdominoplasty after massive weight loss. Safety preservation fascia technique and clinical outcomes in a large single series-comparative study.

Introduction: Weight loss after bariatric surgery causes very important modifications to the patient's silhouette. Abdominal fat and skin excess reduction are associated with several complications. The most frequent are seroma and hematoma whereas major complications, such as pulmonary embolism, are less frequent. This study aimed to describe our technical procedure for abdominoplasty in patients with massive weight loss after bariatric surgery. Methods: In total, 196 patients were included. All patients who underwent abdominoplasty classic (group A) and abdominoplasty with the preservation and lift of Scarpa fascia (group B) and with umbilical transposition between May 2018 and May 2021 were included. Patients with concomitant correction of ventral hernia were excluded. Demographic and operative data were analyzed according to comorbidities and postoperative complications. Results: There were 160 (81.6%) women. The mean age was 43.6 years; the mean weight was 86.7 kg; and the mean BMI was 28.6 kg/m2. Five patients (2.5%) presented postoperative seroma. Four patients (2%) presented partial dehiscence/skin necrosis one of them requiring a revision. Finally, 26 patients presented a postoperative complication, with an overall incidence of 12.6%. The average postoperative hospital stay was 3.6. The rates of seroma were significantly higher in men, patients with a BMI > 30 kg/m2, and aged >50 years. Conclusion: Preserving Scarpa Fascia during surgical post-bariatric patient procedures reduces the seroma formation and the scar complication and reduces the tension of the inguinal-pubic region with correction of our deformation after weight loss. Improves reducing the drain and reducing seroma incidence suction and hospital stay.

Bariatric Surgery Should Be Proposed in Certain Septuagenarian Patients with Obesity.

Bariatric surgery (BS) is rarely performed on patients aged 70 and over, due to the fear of adverse effects, particularly related to sarcopenia. We examined the outcome of obese patients who underwent BS after the age of 69 in the French population. Operated subjects were matched with non-operated obese patients (n = 1307 in each group after matching). We showed that BS was associated with a reduction in mortality and no increase in the risks of rehospitalization or fracture events.

Endoscopy management of sleeve gastrectomy stenosis: what we learned from 202 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Gastric sleeve stenosis (GSS) is described in 1%-4% of patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of endoscopy in the management of stenosis after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using a standardized approach according to the characteristic of stenosis. SETTING: Retrospective, observational, single-center study on patients referred from several bariatric surgery departments to an endoscopic referral center. METHODS: We enrolled 202 patients. All patients underwent endoscopy in a fluoroscopy setting, and a systematic classification of the type, site, and length of the GSS was performed. According to the characteristics of the stenosis, patients underwent pneumatic dilatation or placement of a self-expandable metal stent or a lumen-apposed metal stent. Failure of endoscopic treatment was considered an indication for redo surgery, whereas patients with partial or complete response were followed up for 2 years. In the event of a recurrence, a different endoscopic approach was used. RESULTS: We found inflammatory strictures in 4.5% of patients, pure narrowing in 11%, and functional stenosis in 84.5%. Stenosis was in the upper tract of the stomach in 53 patients, whereas medium and distal stenosis was detected in 138 and 11 patients, respectively, and short stenosis in 194 patients. A total of 126 patients underwent pneumatic dilatation, 8 self-expandable metal stent placement, 64 lumen-apposed metal stent positioning, and 36 combined therapy. The overall rate of endoscopy success was 69%. CONCLUSION: GSS should be considered to be a chronic disease, and the endoscopic approach seems to be the most successful treatment, with a prolonged positive outcome of 69%. Characteristics of the stenosis should guide the most suitable endoscopic approach.

Staple Line Intrathoracic Migration After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Correlation between Symptoms, CT Three-Dimensional Stomach Analysis, and 24-h pH Monitoring.

PURPOSE: Migration of the staple line is the definition of sliding hiatus hernia in sleeve gastrectomy patients. The main aim was to determine the frequency and measurement of intrathoracic staple line migration and its correlation with GERD symptoms and pH monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective clinical trial including all patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy more than 1 year previously. All the patients underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging, and migration of the proximal end of the suture above the level of the hiatus was measured in mm. All the patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were assessed using the GERD impact scale (GIS), and wireless 24-h esophageal pH and symptom association monitoring (SAP) were carried out. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative staple line migration was performed. RESULTS: Between March 2018 and December 2018, 194 patients were evaluated (mean age 45.1 ± 11.2 years; 161 females); 88/194 (45.4%) presented an average intrathoracic migration of 16.2 ± 6.9 mm. Thirty-eight of 194 (19.5%) patients presented symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. There was a significant relationship between staple line intrathoracic migration and postsleeve GERD symptomatology (p = 0.0004, OR = 4.25 [1.92-9.39]). However, there was no significant correlation between positive 24-h pH monitoring and intrathoracic migration of the staple line (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: A migration greater than 17 mm was strongly correlated with postsleeve GERD symptoms but not with positive 24-h pH monitoring.

Sleeve gastrectomy as a rescue of failed gastric banding: comparison of 1- and 2-step approaches.

BACKGROUND: Series comparing gastric banding (GB) removal and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) when procedures are performed as a 1- or a 2-step approach are contradictory in their outcomes. No series comparing these approaches with midterm weight loss is available. OBJECTIVES: Compare the outcomes and weight loss of SG performed as 1- and 2-step approaches as a revisional procedure for GB failure. SETTING: University Hospital, France, public practice. METHODS: Between February 2006 and January 2017, all patients undergoing SG with a previous history of implementation of GB (n = 358) were included in this 2-center, retrospective, observational study. Revisional surgery was proposed in patients with insufficient excess weight loss (excess weight loss ≤50%) or weight regain after GB. A 1-step (1-step group, n = 270) or 2-step (2-step group, n = 88) approach was decided depending on patient's choice and/or surgeon's preference. The primary efficacy endpoint was the comparison of weight loss in the 1- and 2-step groups at the 2-year follow-up. The secondary efficacy endpoints were short-term outcomes (overall mortality and morbidity at postoperative day 30, specific morbidity, reoperation, length of hospital stay, and readmission). RESULTS: In the 1-step group, the mean preoperative body mass index before SG was 40.5 kg/m2 (27.0-69.0), while in the 2-step group, the mean preoperative body mass index was 43.5 kg/m2 (31.5-61.7). Mean operating time was 109 minutes (50-240) in the 1-step group and 78.7 minutes (40-175) in the 2-step group (P = .22). In the 1-step group, 6 conversions to laparotomy occurred, while in the 2-step group, 2 conversions to laparotomy occurred (P = .75). One death (.2%, in the 2-step group) and 39 complications (30 in the 1-step group [11.1%] and 9 in the 2-step group [10.2%]) also occurred. The mean length of hospital stay was 6.2 days in the 1-step group and 4.1 days in the 2-step group. At 2-year follow-up, mean body mass index was 32.4 kg/m2 in the 1-step group and 33.2 kg/m2 in the 2-step group (P = .15), representing excess weight losses of 61.9 and 50.1 (P = .05), respectively. The rates of revisional surgery were .7% and 2.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SG after previous GB is efficient with similar outcomes depending on the 1- or 2-step approach. The 1-step approach seems to have increased weight loss compared with the 2-step approach.

Usefulness of Gram stain examination of peritoneal fluid in postoperative peritonitis to guide empirical antibiotherapy.

PURPOSE: In postoperative peritonitis, Gram stain examination (GSE) of peritoneal fluid has been proposed as a guide for the prescription of glycopeptides and antifungal therapy in empirical antibiotherapy. No data support this approach for Gram-positive cocci. We aimed to evaluate the performance of GSE in predicting the results of the culture of peritoneal fluid. METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study, concordance between GSE and culture of peritoneal fluid was assessed for different types of microorganisms. Factors associated with concordance of the two tests were evaluated in the subpopulation of Gram-positive cocci peritonitis. RESULTS: Among the 152 episodes, the GSE was negative in 57 cases. The negative predictive value and the positive predictive value were 41% and 87% for Gram-positive cocci (GPC), 31% and 86% for Gram-negative bacilli, and 78% and 94% for fungi. GSE is not a reliable guide for the choice of empirical antibiotherapy and cannot reliably rule out the presence of GPC at culture. If we aim to achieve a high rate of adequacy, the systematic use of glycopeptide in the empirical antibiotherapy may be considered. CONCLUSION: GSE shows poor performance to predict the results of culture of peritoneal fluid in postoperative peritonitis. Avoiding covering resistant GPC cannot be based on the result of GSE.

Outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in super-super-obese patients (BMI ≥60 kg/m2): 6-year follow-up at a single university.

BACKGROUND: Among the population of morbidly obese people, super-super-obese (SSO) individuals (body mass index >60 kg/m2) present a treatment challenge for bariatric surgeons. OBJECTIVES: To compare the long-term outcomes between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and to evaluate the efficacy of SG as a stand-alone bariatric procedure for SSO patients. SETTING: University hospital, Paris, France. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data outcomes of 210 SSO patients who underwent SG or RYGB between January 2000 and December 2011. The 6-year follow-up data were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Follow-up data at 6 years were collected for 57.1% and 52.1% of patients in the SG group and RYGB groups, respectively. Both procedures were effective at promoting weight loss. Most weight loss was achieved at 24 months with both procedures. The average percent excess weight loss and change in body mass index of SG versus RYGB showed no significant differences at the 4-year follow-up. Except for sleep apnea, RYGB showed slightly better resolution of the evaluated co-morbidities. The composite endpoint of major short-term adverse events (<30 d) occurred in 11.7% of patients with RYGB and 6.4% of those with SG (P = .02). Postoperative complications were seen in 26% of RYGB patients and 16.1% of SG patients. CONCLUSIONS: SG as a primary procedure for SSO patients remains effective even though RYGB achieves better midterm outcomes. SG can be proposed as the primary-option p+rocedure. Further investigations are needed to identify the ideal procedure for patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Comparison of Repeat Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Case of Weight Loss Failure After Sleeve Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Few series are available on the results of repeat sleeve gastrectomy (re-SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) performed to manage the failure of primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The objective of this study was to compare the short- and medium-term outcomes of re-SG and RYGB after SG. MATERIAL & METHODS: Between January 2010 and December 2017, patients undergoing re-SG (n = 61) and RYGB (n = 83) for failure of primary SG were included in this study. Revisional surgery was proposed for patients with insufficient excess weight loss (EWL ≤ 50%) or weight regain. The primary endpoint was the comparison of weight loss in the re-SG group and the RYGB group at the 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were overall mortality and morbidity, specific morbidity, length of stay, weight loss, and correction of comorbidities. RESULTS: The mean interval between SG and re-SG was 41.5 vs. 43.2 months between SG and RYGB (p = 0.32). The mean operative time was 103 min (re-SG group) vs. 129.4 min (RYGB group). One death (1.7%; re-SG group) and 25 complications (17.4%; 9 in the re-SG group, 16 in the RYGB group) were observed. At the 1 year, mean body mass index was 31.6 in the re-SG group and 32.5 in the RYGB group (p = 0.61) and excess weight loss was 69.5 vs. 61.2, respectively (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Re-SG and RYGB as revisional surgery for SG are feasible with acceptable outcomes and similar results on weight loss on the first postoperative year.

Severe Chronic Kidney Disease Is Associated with a Lower Efficiency of Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and a relative contraindication for renal transplantation. Bariatric surgery (BS) is an option to address this issue but we hypothesize that severe CKD is associated with a loss of efficacy of BS which could justify recommending it at an earlier stage of the CKD. METHODS: A retrospective study (n = 101 patients) to test primarily for differences in weight loss at 6 and 12 months according to estimated glomerular filtration rate categories (eGFR < 30 including patients on dialysis, 30-60, 60-90, and ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m2) was performed with multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, age, BMI, surgical procedure, and diabetes. We used a second method to confirm our hypothesis comparing weight loss in patients with stage 4-5 CKD (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, n = 17), and matched controls with eGFR ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m2. RESULTS: In the first comparison, the multivariate analysis showed a significant positive association between eGFR and weight loss. However, after exclusion of the subgroup of patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, the difference between groups was no more significant. In addition, percent total weight loss (%TWL) was significantly lower in patients with severe CKD compared to controls: - 15% vs - 23% at 6 months (p < 0.01); - 17% vs - 27% at 12 months (p < 0.01). The percent excess weight loss at 1 year reached 47% in patients with stage 4-5 CKD and 68% in controls subjects (p < 0.01). Surgery was a success at 12 months (weight loss > 50% of excess weight) in 38% of advanced CKD and 88% of controls (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of BS was reduced in patients with advanced CKD. These results support early BS in patients with early-to-moderate CKD.

Correction to: Establishing a Reproducible Murine Animal Model of Single Anastomosis Duodenoileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy (SADl-S).

The first and last names of the authors were inverted in the original article. They are displayed correctly here.

Desire for Core Tastes Decreases After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Single-Center Longitudinal Observational Study with 6-Month Follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) modifies gastrointestinal substances that control hunger and satiation via the brain-gut axis. A potential mechanism implicated in weight loss is the shift in food preferences. Our aim was to assess changes in taste preferences and their relationship to weight loss. METHODS: This is a prospective longitudinal observational study in 100 consecutive LSG patients. Questionnaire with photographs of tastes was administered before surgery, at postoperative (PO) day 6 and PO month 6. Participants asked to rate each item in terms of desire to consume on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Preoperative demographics are as follows: 77 women/23 men, mean age 40.8 ± 12 years, and mean BMI 42.46 ± 6.7 kg/m2. Mean 6-month PO % total body weight loss (%TBWL): 24 ± 6.2%. Preferences for bitter, salty, umami, fatty, sour, spicy, and sweet decreased significantly from baseline to PO day 6 (p < 0.001) and to PO month 6 (p < 0.002). Preferences of water (4.22) did not change significantly; red wine (1.8) and cigarettes (1.86) decreased significantly at PO day-6, but returned to baseline range at PO month 6. The highest changes of preferences in 6 months were observed for fatty (delta = 1.58) and sweet (delta = 0.95), (p < 0.002). Preference for salty at 6 months negatively correlated with %TBWL (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: LSG seems to be associated with a rapid and sustained decrease in preferences for all core tastes, detectable already at PO day 6. Preferences for sweet and fatty food undergo the highest decline, whereas preferences of water, red wine, and cigarette remain unchanged. The decrease in salty preference seems to correlate with 6-month %TBWL. Further studies are needed on the long-term impact of taste changes after LSG.

Classification, surgical management and outcomes of patients with gastrogastric fistula after Roux-En-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Gastrogastric fistula (GGF) is a known complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass that can lead to marginal ulceration (MU) and failure of weight loss. OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience with GGF management and propose a classification of GGF based on its anatomic location. SETTING: University hospital, France. METHODS: After internal review board approval, data from all patients with a GGF were reviewed. GGF was classified as type 1 when located in the proximal part of the gastric pouch and type 2 when located near the gastrojejunostomy. RESULTS: Nine patients developed a GGF (.5%). GGF symptoms included epigastric pain (78%), vomiting (11%), gastrointestinal bleeding (11%), and weight regain (44%). Upper contrast study identified GGF in all patients. Upper endoscopy confirmed GGF in 6 patients, all with type 2. Eight patients required revisional surgery. Patients with type 1 GGF (n = 3) had excision of the fistulous tract. Patients with type 2 GGF (n = 5) had associated revision of the gastrojejunostomy. Mean operative time was significantly longer for type 2 GGF. The mean follow-up was 43 months, with no patient lost. One patient developed a recurrent MU requiring iterative revision. After that, all revisional patients were symptom free and the mean body mass index was 35.3±9.5 kg/m². CONCLUSION: Weight regain and epigastric pain with or without associated MU are the most common signs of GGF. Combining upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and contrast study is the best method to confirm the diagnosis. Surgical treatment should be tailored to both GGF location and status of the gastrojejunostomy. Based on its anatomic location, GGF classification could serve as a working basis to compare different surgical approaches.

Contribution of Computed Tomographic Imaging to the Management of Acute Abdominal Pain after Gastric Bypass: Correlation Between Radiological and Surgical Findings.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of first interpretations of computed tomographic (CT) images and blind interpretation using predefined CT signs in patients with previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and acute abdominal pain. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with RYGBP who underwent surgical exploration from January 2009 to December 2014 for acute abdominal pain in our university institution, excluding patients without CT scan and comparing initial CT imaging interpretation with surgical findings. Two blinded radiologist specialists in bariatric imaging evaluated the CT images for seven previously reported CT signs. We then calculated the sensitivity and specificity of these signs and Cohen's kappa inter-observer agreement for diagnosing internal hernia. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had a recorded CT scan. The original CT interpretation showed that 26/64 (40%) patients had an accurate diagnosis. Cohen's kappa coefficient for concordance between surgical exploration and first interpretation was 0.26. The image review showed an accurate diagnosis was obtained in 51/64 patients (79.6%) and 48/64 (75%) patients for the first and second reader, respectively (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.67; 95% confidence interval = 0.52-0.76). The most prevalent sign indicating internal hernia was whirling of the mesentery (sensitivity = 82-91%; specificity = 79-93.1%). CONCLUSIONS: CT is an important diagnostic tool for skilled readers for managing acute abdominal pain in patients with previous RYGBP. Experience in the abdominal and bariatric imaging and the use of predetermined CT image signs provided a high degree of accuracy and confidence. A low threshold for surgical exploration remains the gold standard of appropriate treatment.

Comparison of marginal ulcer rates between antecolic and retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Marginal ulcer can be a serious complication after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of marginal ulcer between the antecolic and the retrocolic technique, in a large cohort of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a near 10-year period, 1,142 patients underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. The antecolic and the retrocolic technique were used in respectively 572 and 570 consecutive patients. All procedures were performed using a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy. RESULTS: Patients were followed for 18 to 99 months (mean 48.8 months). During follow-up, 46 patients developed a marginal ulcer (4 %), 32 in the antecolic group (5.6 %) and 14 in the retrocolic group (2.5 %). Nineteen patients (3.3 %) in the antecolic group and eight patients in the retrocolic group (1.4 %) developed early marginal ulcer (i.e., within 3 months after surgery). The mean time to onset of anastomotic ulcer symptoms after surgery was 11 months (range 0.25-72). Forty-four patients were submitted to medical treatment, and 35 patients (79.5 %) had complete resolution of their symptoms. CONCLUSION: Patients with an antecolic Roux limb develop significantly more marginal ulcers (p = 0.007) and early marginal ulcer (p = 0.033) than the patients with a retrocolic Roux limb. The antecolic technique seems to be a risk factor for appearance of marginal ulcer.

Gastrojejunostomy stricture rate: comparison between antecolic and retrocolic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure is an effective treatment for morbid obesity. One of the most frequent complications after this operation is the appearance of a gastrojejunal anastomotic stricture. Mechanisms underlying the development of such complication are unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present retrospective study was to compare the rates of gastrojejunostomy stricture between the antecolic and retrocolic technique in a large cohort of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity, with the same gastrojejunal anastomotic technique. SETTING: University Hospital, France. METHODS: From November 2000 to March 2012, 1500 patients underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The antecolic and the retrocolic technique were used in respectively 572 and 928 consecutive patients. All procedures were performed using a circular stapled gastrojejunostomy and absorbable sutures. RESULTS: There was no significant difference with respect to gender, age, body mass index, and obesity related co-morbidities between both groups. Patients were followed for 24-146 months (mean 67.5 mo). Fifty-one patients developed a gastrojejunal stricture (3.4%), 37 in the antecolic group (6.5%) and 14 in the retrocolic group (1.5%). The difference was significant (P< .0001). The mean time to onset of gastrojejunal stricture symptoms after surgery was 1 month, ranging from 1 to 3 months. All patients were successfully treated using Savary-Gilliard dilatators. All patients with a gastrojejunal stricture were followed up for a minimum of 36 months. No recurrence was observed and no revisional surgery was needed. Weight loss was similar in patients who developed an anastomotic stricture compared with those without stricture. In the antecolic group internal hernia occurred in 12 of the 110 with no closure of mesenteric defects and in 8 of the 462 (1.7%) with defects closed. In the retrocolic group, 11 patients (1.2%) developed an internal hernia. CONCLUSIONS: A significant lower gastrojejunal stricture rate was observed in the retrocolic group, with no increased risk of internal hernia, when mesenteric defects were closed. The antecolic technique seems to be a risk factor for gastrojejunal stricture development after laparoscopic gastric bypass.