Predictors of Cytomegalovirus Recurrence Following Cessation of Posttransplant Prophylaxis.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is associated with a poor prognosis after lung transplantation, and donor and recipient CMV serostatus is a risk factor for reactivation. CMV prophylaxis is commonly administered in the first year following transplantation to reduce CMV infection; however, the risk factors for long-term reactivation remain unclear. We investigated the timing and risk factors of CMV infection after prophylactic administration. METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of the institutional lung transplantation database from June 2014 to June 2022. Data on patient characteristics, pretransplantation laboratory values, postoperative outcomes, and CMV infection were collected. Donor CMV-IgG-positive and recipient CMV-IgG-negative groups were defined as the CMV mismatch group. RESULTS: During the study period, 257 patients underwent lung transplantation and received a prophylactic dose of valganciclovir hydrochloride for up to 1 y. CMV infection was detected in 69 patients (26.8%): 40 of 203 (19.7%) in the non-CMV mismatch group and 29 of 54 (53.7%) in the CMV mismatch group (P < 0.001). CMV infection after prophylaxis occurred at a median of 425 and 455 d in the CMV mismatch and non-CMV mismatch groups, respectively (P = 0.07). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that preoperative albumin level (odds ratio [OR] = 0.39, P = 0.04), CMV mismatch (OR = 15.7, P < 0.001), and donor age (OR = 1.05, P = 0.009) were significantly associated with CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: CMV mismatch may have increased the risk of CMV infection after lung transplantation, which decreased after prophylaxis. In addition to CMV mismatch, low preoperative albumin level and donor age were independent predictors of CMV infection.

Use of letermovir for cytomegalovirus primary prophylaxis in lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a driver of negative outcomes after lung transplant (LTX) and primary prophylaxis (PPX) with valganciclovir (VGC) is standard-of-care. VGC is associated with myelosuppression, prompting interest in letermovir (LTV). METHODS: Adults receiving LTX between April 1, 2015, and July 30, 2022, at our institution were evaluated. Patients were excluded if low CMV risk (D-/R-), survived <90 days post-LTX, or transferred care before PPX withdrawal. Primary outcomes were leukopenia (white blood cell count [WBC] ≤ 3.0 × 109/L), severe leukopenia (WBC ≤ 2.0 × 109/L), and neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1500 cells/µL) requiring granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on PPX. Secondary outcomes included breakthrough CMV infection and post-PPX CMV infection. RESULTS: 204 patients met inclusion criteria: 175 patients on VGC and 29 patients on LTV (after VGC conversion). Most patients received bilateral LTX (62.7%) with non-lymphocyte-depleting induction (96.6%) and moderate-risk serostatus (D+/R+, 48.5%). Patients transitioned from VGC to LTV after a mean of 178 days (SD 80.8 days) post-transplant. Patients on VGC experienced significantly more leukopenia (82.3% vs. 58.6%, p = 0.008), severe leukopenia (57.1% vs. 31.0%, p = 0.016), and neutropenia requiring GCSF (70.9% vs. 51.7%, p = 0.048). Breakthrough (5.7% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.955) and post-PPX (24.6% vs. 37.9%, p = 0.199) infections were similar. A subgroup analysis of patients with high-risk serostatus showed similar trends, though did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, the incidence of leukopenia and neutropenia requiring GCSF were reduced with LTV compared to VGC. Breakthrough and post-PPX infections were not significantly different. This evidence suggests that LTV has comparable efficacy with reduced myelosuppression compared to VGC in LTX recipients, and may be an appropriate alternative for PPX.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Who Underwent Lung Transplant.

Importance: Lung transplantation is a potentially lifesaving treatment for patients who are critically ill due to COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but there is limited information about the long-term outcome. Objective: To report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS and underwent a lung transplant at a single US hospital. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant at Northwestern University Medical Center in Chicago, Illinois, between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, including 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS. The date of final follow-up was November 15, 2021. Exposures: Lung transplant. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were collected and analyzed. Outcomes of lung transplant, including postoperative complications, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and survival, were recorded. Results: Among the 102 lung transplant recipients, 30 patients (median age, 53 years [range, 27 to 62]; 13 women [43%]) had COVID-19-associated ARDS and 72 patients (median age, 62 years [range, 22 to 74]; 32 women [44%]) had chronic end-stage lung disease without COVID-19. For lung transplant recipients with COVID-19 compared with those without COVID-19, the median lung allocation scores were 85.8 vs 46.7, the median time on the lung transplant waitlist was 11.5 vs 15 days, and preoperative venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was used in 56.7% vs 1.4%, respectively. During transplant, patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS received transfusion of a median of 6.5 units of packed red blood cells vs 0 in those without COVID-19, 96.7% vs 62.5% underwent intraoperative venoarterial ECMO, and the median operative time was 8.5 vs 7.4 hours, respectively. Postoperatively, the rates of primary graft dysfunction (grades 1 to 3) within 72 hours were 70% in the COVID-19 cohort vs 20.8% in those without COVID-19, the median time receiving invasive mechanical ventilation was 6.5 vs 2.0 days, the median duration of intensive care unit stay was 18 vs 9 days, the median post-lung transplant hospitalization duration was 28.5 vs 16 days, and 13.3% vs 5.5% required permanent hemodialysis, respectively. None of the lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS demonstrated antibody-mediated rejection compared with 12.5% in those without COVID-19. At follow-up, all 30 lung transplant recipients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS were alive (median follow-up, 351 days [IQR, 176-555] after transplant) vs 60 patients (83%) who were alive in the non-COVID-19 cohort (median follow-up, 488 days [IQR, 368-570] after lung transplant). Conclusions and Relevance: In this single-center case series of 102 consecutive patients who underwent a lung transplant between January 21, 2020, and September 30, 2021, survival was 100% in the 30 patients who had COVID-19-associated ARDS as of November 15, 2021.

Respiratory-swallow patterning and oropharyngeal swallowing impairment in patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplant.

BACKGROUND: Although swallowing impairment is prevalent following lung transplantation, baseline respiratory and swallowing characteristics are often overlooked. Respiratory disease processes may predispose lung transplant candidates to altered respiratory-swallow patterning and swallowing impairment. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included patients referred for a Modified Barium Swallow Study during lung transplant evaluation. Swallowing impairment was measured using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile and Penetration-Aspiration Scale. Respiratory plethysmographic signals synchronized with videofluoroscopy were analyzed to determine phase patterning, pause duration, and rate. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to identify linkages between respiratory and swallowing measures. KEY RESULTS: Fifty patients were included and demonstrated delayed swallow initiation (49/50), oral residue (37/50), incomplete pharyngoesophageal segment opening (35/50), and esophageal retention (43/50). Airway invasion occurred infrequently (10/50). Atypical respiratory patterning was significantly associated with impairment in pharyngeal swallow initiation (OR [95% CI] = 1.76 [1.16, 2.68], p = 0.009), laryngeal elevation (OR [95% CI] = 1.45 [1.01, 2.07], p = 0.044), and laryngeal vestibular closure (OR [95% CI] = 2.57 [1.48, 4.46], p < 0.001). Increased pause duration was associated with impaired initiation (OR [95% CI] = 2.24 [1.20, 4.16], p = 0.011), laryngeal elevation (OR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.03, 1.36], p = 0.018), laryngeal closure (OR [95% CI] = 1.28 [1.9, 1.50], p = 0.003), and tongue base retraction (OR [95% CI] = 1.33 [1.13, 1.56], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplant demonstrated impaired swallowing and phase patterning. Preliminary findings implicate the need for further evaluation of respiratory-swallow coordination and its potential role in swallowing impairment before and after lung transplantation.

Hemodynamic Responses to Provocative Maneuvers during Right Heart Catheterization.

Rationale: Current guidelines recognize the utility of provocative maneuvers during right heart catheterization to aid the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. Few studies have compared the performance of different provocation maneuvers. Objectives: To assess the hemodynamic correlation among three provocative maneuvers, including their effect on pulmonary hypertension classification. Methods: This prospective trial was conducted between October 2016 and May 2018. Adult patients underwent three provocative maneuvers during right heart catheterization: passive leg raise (PLR), load-targeted supine bicycle exercise, and rapid crystalloid fluid infusion. Patients were classified as follows: no pulmonary hypertension, precapillary pulmonary hypertension, isolated postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, combined pre- and postcapillary pulmonary hypertension, and uncategorized pulmonary hypertension. We assessed the hemodynamic changes associated with each maneuver. We also assessed whether provocative maneuvers led to hemodynamic reclassification of the patient to either postcapillary pulmonary hypertension with provocation or exercise pulmonary hypertension. Results: Eighty-five patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years, 53% women) were included. Correlation between exercise and fluid challenge was moderate to strong (0.49-0.82; P < 0.001) for changes in right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, and cardiac index from baseline. Correlation between PLR and exercise (0.4-0.65; P < 0.001) and between PLR and fluid challenge (0.45-0.6; P < 0.001) was moderate for changes in right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary arterial wedge pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac index. Hemodynamic correlation between other provocative maneuvers was poor. Depending on provocative maneuver and classification criteria, there was significant variation in the number of patients reclassified as having exercise pulmonary hypertension (3-50%) or postcapillary pulmonary hypertension with provocation (11-48%). Conclusions: Hemodynamic determinations during exercise and fluid challenge showed moderate to strong hemodynamic correlation. Moderate hemodynamic correlation was seen between PLR and exercise or fluid challenge. Although some provocative maneuvers demonstrate good hemodynamic correlation, there is inconsistency when using these maneuvers to identify patients with postcapillary or exercise pulmonary hypertension.

Everolimus induced pneumonitis in a lung transplant recipient.

Everolimus is a mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor used for the treatment of various cancers and prevention of allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. We present a case of a lung transplant recipient on everolimus who was admitted with generalized weakness, hypoxia and new onset bilateral pulmonary infiltrates on imaging. Extensive workup revealed no infectious etiology and high levels of serum everolimus levels. Her condition deteriorated over the hospital course with symptoms and signs of systemic everolimus toxicity. She was treated with high-dose steroids with significant improvement. Follow-up imaging showed resolution of infiltrates. Everolimus induced pneumonitis is seldom reported in the lung transplant literature. It is important to recognize early signs of toxicity to intervene and preserve the lung allograft.