Effect of Motor Imagery on Corticomotor Excitability and Pain Status in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been defined by the American College of Rheumatology in 1987 as a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by joint swelling, joint tenderness, and destruction of synovial joints leading to severe disability and premature mortality. There is a paucity of literature assessing corticomotor excitability in RA patients. This study aimed to assess the effect of motor imagery on corticomotor excitability and pain status in RA patients. The specific objectives were to study the effect of motor imagery on corticomotor excitability and pain status in RA patients. We also wanted to compare the corticomotor excitability between RA patients with healthy controls. The correlation between the measures of corticomotor excitability and pain status in RA patients has also been done. METHODS: The study was designed as a pilot clinical trial with a case-control design. Forty participants were recruited for the study. Twenty RA patients were recruited from the Department of Rheumatology and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PMR), AIIMS, New Delhi, and 20 healthy controls. Testing was performed at the Pain Research & rTMS Lab, Department of Physiology, AIIMS, New Delhi. The study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee, AIIMS New Delhi, and registered in the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI). For the subjective assessment of pain, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, WHO-Quality of Life Brief questionnaire (WHO-QOL-BREF), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain Scale were used. For the objective assessment of pain, hot and cold pain thresholds were assessed using thermo-tactile quantitative sensory testing (QST) using the method of limits and corticomotor excitability using a transcranial magnetic stimulation device. All participants were also asked to perform motor imagery tasks which consisted of a metronome-paced thumb opposition paradigm.  Results: The resting motor threshold (RMT) decreased significantly after motor imagery when compared to the mental calculation group. The amplitude of motor evoked potential (MEP) and QST parameter value was comparable in both the groups before and after motor imagery and mental calculation. RMT was found to be significantly higher whereas MEP values were found to be significantly lower in RA compared to controls. CONCLUSION: We conclude that patients suffering from RA have decreased corticomotor excitability compared to controls. Motor imagery was effective in improving corticomotor excitability in these patients and can be used as rehabilitation in RA to relieve their pain.

Fever in a returning traveler: A case and literature review of melioidosis.

Burkholderia pseudomallei is an aerobic, motile, non-spore-forming gram-negative bacillus found in tropical endemic environments that causes the disease melioidosis. Melioidosis displays a diversity of clinical presentations ranging from septic shock to chronic latent infection, often with characteristic abscesses in multiple organs. Melioidosis is an opportunistic infection, with risk factors, including diabetes, alcohol use, chronic lung disease, and chronic renal disease, and these risk factors increase the severity of disease (Wiersinga et al., 2006) [1]. In this case report, we illustrate a case of a 32 year old man with several risk factors and recent travel to an endemic region presenting with melioidosis. Our case demonstrates the challenges in obtaining a diagnosis in a non-endemic location, highlights a complex presentation of this disease, and describes the multifaceted clinical management required to care for this patient. As global travel increases, there is an increased need for clinician awareness of this disease in non-endemic regions.

COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplantation: Disease Severity and Clinical Update.

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are a complex, immunocompromised population in whom greater coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality has been reported compared with the general population. METHODS: We examined a retrospective cohort of 58 SOT recipients with first-wave COVID-19, comparing patients with severe and nonsevere illness. Additionally, SOT recipients are compared with general patients with first-wave COVID-19. RESULTS: Organs transplanted included 38 kidneys, 8 livers, 5 hearts, and 3 pancreases. Average SOT recipient age was 57.4 years; 62% were male; 46.6% were African American 36.2% were white. Comorbidities included hypertension (86%), chronic kidney disease (86%), diabetes mellitus (50%), coronary artery disease (26%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14%). Twenty patients had severe COVID-19 (34.5%) and 38 had nonsevere disease (65.5%). Severe disease was more common in older SOT recipients with comorbidities and was associated with cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, C-reactive protein >10 mg/L, and platelet count <150/µL. Sex, race, body mass index, time from transplant, baseline immunosuppression, and diagnosis month did not differ among those with severe and nonsevere COVID-19. Seventy percent of SOT recipients were hospitalized vs 27.2% of general patients with COVID-19 and inpatient SOT recipients had a higher mechanical ventilation rate. Though a trend toward longer length of stay, higher intensive care unit admission, and greater inpatient mortality was observed (19.5% vs 14.8%), these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has greatly impacted SOT recipients. One-third of our SOT recipients seen during the first wave had severe illness with associated standard risk factors for poor outcome. Compared with general first-wave patients, more SOT recipients were hospitalized, although inpatient COVID-19 mortality did not significantly differ.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Nurse Practitioners on Hospitalized Patient Outcomes.

The role of advanced practice providers has expanded in the hospital setting. However, little data exist examining the impact of these providers. Our purpose was to determine the effect of adding nurse practitioners in a complementary role on the quality and efficiency of care of hospitalized patients. A retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients admitted by private physicians (without house staff or non-physician providers) to a general medical-surgical unit in an academic medical center. The admissions department allocated patients as beds became available and nurse practitioners were assigned to patients until their caseload was reached. Outcomes included length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, admission costs, 30-day readmissions, transfer to a more intensive care level, and discharge order time. Of the 382 patients included in this study, 263 were assigned to the nurse practitioner group. Hospital mortality was lower in the nurse practitioner group [OR 0.11 (95% CI 0.02-0.51)] as was transfer to more intensive care level [OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.20-0.75)]; however, the nurse practitioner group had longer length of stay (geometric mean = 5.80 days for nurse practitioners, 3.63 days for no nurse practitioners; p < 0.0001) and higher cost per patient (geometric mean = USD 6631 vs. USD 5121; p = 0.005). The results were unchanged when models were adjusted for potential confounders. Adding nurse practitioners can yield improved clinical outcomes (lower hospital mortality and fewer transfers to intensive care), but with a potential economic expense (longer hospital stays and higher costs).