RESUMO
Combining cryoablation and immunotherapy presents a promising approach to revert immunosuppressive responses to solid tumors. However, challenges such as postablated residual tumors and insufficient immune activity contribute to recurrence after cryo-immunotherapy. Herein, we investigated metallic supra-structured cryo-nanocatalyst (MSCN), which features numerous ice nucleation sites and interspace loading of therapeutic agents. MSCN elevates the freezing point and enhances ice nucleation, facilitating effective ice formation during cryotreatment. MSCN-loaded tumor cells showed a 2-fold increase in cryo-cytotoxicity and undergo osmotic-related cell damage, primarily necroptosis rather than other regulated cell death mechanisms. In prostate cancer models, RNA sequencing reveals that MSCN-cryoablation promoted antitumor inflammatory pathways, including necroptosis, compared to cryoablation alone. Additionally, following programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) upregulation postcryoablation, synergistic effects with PD-L1 blockade were confirmed. Given the interspace of MSCN for aPD-L1 loading, we compared the intratumoral delivery of PD-L1 blockade against systemic injection. Enhanced necrosis and necroptosis from MSCN-cryoablation and PD-L1 blockade effectively eradicated tumors and triggered antitumor and memory immune responses locally and systemically. Lastly, a spatial landscape of tumor-infiltrating immune cells was analyzed to gain insight into heterogeneous tumor responses, leading to the limitations of conventional focal ablation techniques. Our findings highlight the potential of advanced cryo-immunotherapy using cryo-nanocatalysis to promote ice formation and necroptosis, stimulating antitumor immunogenic responses.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is used for the diagnosis of primary hyperaldosteronism. Technical difficulties with right adrenal vein (RAV) catheterization can lead to erroneous results. Our purpose was to delineate the location of the RAV on pre-procedural CT imaging in relation to the location identified during AVS and to report on the impact of successful RAV cannulation with and without the use of intra-procedural CT scanning. METHODS: Retrospective case series including patients who underwent AVS from October 2000 to September 2022. Clinical and laboratory values were abstracted from the electronic medical record. Successful cannulation of the RAV was defined as a selectivity index > 3. RESULTS: 110 patients underwent 124 AVS procedures. Pre-AVS CT imaging was available for 118 AVS procedures. The RAV was identified in 61 (51.7%) CT datasets. Biochemical confirmation of successful RAV cannulation occurred in 98 (79.0%) of 124 AVS procedures. There were 52 (85.2%) procedures in which the RAV was identified on pre-AVS CT and there was biochemical confirmation of successful RAV sampling. Among these 52 procedures, the RAV was localized during AVS at the same anatomic level or within 1 vertebral body level cranial to the level identified on pre-AVS CT in 98.1% of cases. The rate of successful RAV cannulation was higher in patients who underwent intra-procedural CT (93.8% versus 63.9%), P < 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-AVS and intra-procedural CT images provide an invaluable roadmap that resulted in a higher rate of accurate identification of the RAV and successful AVS procedures; in particular, search for the RAV orifice during AVS can be limited to 1 vertebral body cranial to the level identified on pre-AVS CT imaging and successful cannulation can be confidently verified with intra-procedural CT.