[MEDICAL EDUCATION IN COVID-19 CRISIS DAYS - REFLECTIONS AND INSIGHTS, ON-LINE CLINICAL LEARNING RESOURCES].

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic is a demonstration of an unforeseen event that disrupts normal life routine and greatly affects medical training. With its outbreak, clinical studies in medical schools were discontinued throughout the country, and the pre-clinical studies channeled into online learning, like all other university teaching activities. Since similar situations occurred in most western countries, a methodological approach of online teaching is required - principles, goals and implementation, with reference to the tension between the duty of care versus the duty of maintaining the clinician's and student's health. In this paper we will present the dilemmas faced by the various medical education institutions in the world, along with the ways of coping and the experience gained from similar situations - including in Israel. We will discuss the techno-pedagogical principles that are at the heart of online teaching, demonstrate the experience gained in Israel and around the world, and offer a framework for comprehensive discussion for situations that threaten medical education learners. Finally, we will provide a list of online teaching resources for clinical teaching (that are mostly free and can be readily used by medical education faculties).

Medical students as health coaches: Implementation of a student-initiated Lifestyle Medicine curriculum.

BACKGROUND: By 2020, the World Health Organization predicts that two-thirds of all diseases worldwide will be the result of lifestyle choices. Physicians often do not counsel patients about healthy behaviors, and lack of training has been identified as one of the barriers. Between 2010 and 2014, Hebrew University developed and implemented a 58-h Lifestyle Medicine curriculum spanning five of the 6 years of medical school. Content includes nutrition, exercise, smoking cessation, and behavior change, as well as health coaching practice with friends/relatives (preclinical years) and patients (clinical years). This report describes this development and diffusion process, and it also presents findings related to the level of acceptance of this student-initiated Lifestyle Medicine (LM) curriculum. METHODS: Students completed an online semi-structured questionnaire after the first coaching session (coaching questionnaire) and the last coaching session (follow-up questionnaire). RESULTS: Nine hundred and twenty-three students completed the coaching questionnaire (296 practices were with patients, 627 with friends /relatives); and 784 students completed the follow-up questionnaire (208 practices were with patients, 576 with friends /relatives). They reported overall that health coaching domains included smoking cessation (263 students), nutrition (79), and exercise (117); 464 students reported on combined topics. Students consistently described a high acceptance of the curriculum and their active role in coaching. Further, most students reported that they were eager to address their own health behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: We described the development and acceptance of a student-initiated comprehensive LM curriculum. Students perceived LM as an important component of physicians' professional role and were ready to explore it both as coaches and in their personal lives. Thus, medical school deans might consider developing similar initiatives in order to position medical schools as key players within a preventive strategy in healthcare policy.