JAK2/mTOR Inhibition Fails to Prevent Acute GVHD Despite Reduced Th1/Th17 cells: Final Phase II Trial Results.

Our phase I graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prevention trial of JAK2 inhibitor, pacritinib, (recommended phase II dose: 100mg po BID day 0 to +70) plus sirolimus and tacrolimus (PAC/SIR/TAC) demonstrated the regimen was safe and free of pan-JAK myelosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). PAC inhibits IL-6 receptor activity and pathogenic Th1/Th17 differentiation in preclinical models and the phase I trial. Herein we report on our completed phase II trial of PAC/SIR/TAC after 8/8-HLA matched alloHCT. This single-arm phase II trial (NCT02891603) was powered to determine if PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells at day +21 (primary endpoint: %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells ≤ 35%) and estimated grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100. The impact of PAC/SIR/TAC on T cell subsets, CD28 (pS6 and pH3ser10), and IL-2 receptor (pSTAT5) signal transduction was also evaluated. Eligible patients (n=28) received alloHCT for hematologic malignancies or myeloproliferative neoplasms. Reduced or myeloablative intensity conditioning was permitted. PAC/SIR/TAC met the primary endpoint, reducing %pSTAT3+ CD4+ T cells to 9.62% at day +21. Th1/Th17 cells were decreased at day +21, increasing the ratio of Tregs to Th1 and Th17 cells with PAC/SIR/TAC at RP2D PAC compared to dose level 1 PAC. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute GVHD by day +100 with PAC/SIR/TAC was similar to historic SIR/TAC values (46 v 43%). While PAC/SIR/TAC suppressed pSTAT3 and Th1/Th17 cells, the regimen did not improve acute GVHD prevention.

Plain language summary of the TRANSFORM study primary analysis results: liso-cell as a second treatment regimen for large B-cell lymphoma following failure of the first treatment regimen.

What is this summary about? People diagnosed with a disease called large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may experience return, or early relapse, of their disease within the first year after receiving and responding to their first (first-line) treatment regimen. Others may have primary refractory disease, meaning that the disease either did not respond to first-line treatment at all or only responded for a very brief period. Second (second-line) treatment includes immunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, which has the potential to cure LBCL. However, if the disease does not respond to immunotherapy, people cannot receive ASCT, and less than 30% of people are cured.Therefore, new second-line treatment options are required, such as CAR T cell therapy, which uses a person's own genetically engineered lymphocytes, also called T cells, to fight their lymphoma. In this article, we summarize the key results of the phase 3 TRANSFORM clinical study that tested if liso-cel, a CAR T cell treatment, can safely and effectively be used as a second-line treatment for people with early relapsed or primary refractory (relapsed/refractory) LBCL.A total of 184 adults with relapsed/refractory LBCL who were able to receive ASCT were randomly treated with either liso-cel or standard of care (SOC) as second-line treatment. SOC included immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT.What were the key takeaways? Almost all (97%) people in the liso-cel group completed treatment, whereas 53% of people in the SOC group did not complete treatment, mostly due to their disease not responding or relapsing, and therefore they were not able to receive ASCT. People who received liso-cel as a second-line treatment lived longer without the occurrence of an unfavorable medical event or worsening of the disease and had a better response to treatment than those who received SOC as second-line treatment. People who received liso-cel reported side effects that researchers considered to be manageable, and that were known to occur with CAR T cell treatment.What were the main conclusions reported by the researchers? Results from the TRANSFORM study support the use of liso-cel as a more effective second-line treatment compared with SOC that is safe for people with relapsed/refractory LBCL.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03575351 (TRANSFORM study) (ClinicalTrials.gov).

A Conversational Agent for Early Detection of Neurotoxic Effects of Medications through Automated Intensive Observation.

We present a fully automated AI-based system for intensive monitoring of cognitive symptoms of neurotoxicity that frequently appear as a result of immunotherapy of hematologic malignancies. Early manifestations of these symptoms are evident in the patient's speech in the form of mild aphasia and confusion and can be detected and effectively treated prior to onset of more serious and potentially life-threatening impairment. We have developed the Automated Neural Nursing Assistant (ANNA) system designed to conduct a brief cognitive assessment several times per day over the telephone for 5-14 days following infusion of the immunotherapy medication. ANNA uses a conversational agent based on a large language model to elicit spontaneous speech in a semi-structured dialogue, followed by a series of brief language-based neurocognitive tests. In this paper we share ANNA's design and implementation, results of a pilot functional evaluation study, and discuss technical and logistic challenges facing the introduction of this type of technology in clinical practice. A large-scale clinical evaluation of ANNA will be conducted in an observational study of patients undergoing immunotherapy at the University of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center starting in the Fall 2023.

JAK inhibition enhances checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

Unleashing antitumor T cell activity by checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy is effective in cancer patients, but clinical responses are limited. Cytokine signaling through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway correlates with checkpoint immunotherapy resistance. We report a phase I clinical trial of the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib with anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab in Hodgkin lymphoma patients relapsed or refractory following checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy. The combination yielded a best overall response rate of 53% (10/19). Ruxolitinib significantly reduced neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratios and percentages of myeloid suppressor cells but increased numbers of cytokine-producing T cells. Ruxolitinib rescued the function of exhausted T cells and enhanced the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in preclinical solid tumor and lymphoma models. This synergy was characterized by a switch from suppressive to immunostimulatory myeloid cells, which enhanced T cell division.

Optimizing the Post-CAR T Monitoring Period for Axicabtagene Ciloleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, and Lisocabtagene Maraleucel.

CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR T) therapies, including axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), have transformed the treatment landscape for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), showcasing significant efficacy but also highlighting toxicity risks such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The FDA has mandated patients remain close to the treatment center for four weeks as part of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy to monitor and manage these toxicities, which, while cautious, may add to cost of care, be burdensome for patients and their families, and present challenges related to patient access and socioeconomic disparities. This retrospective study across 9 centers involving 475 patients infused with axi-cel, tisa-cel, and liso-cel from 2018 to 2023, aims to assess CRS and ICANS onset and duration, as well as causes of non-relapse mortality (NRM) in real-world CAR T recipients. While differences were noted in the incidence and duration of CRS and ICANS between CAR T products, new-onset CRS and ICANS are exceedingly rare after two weeks following infusion (0% and 0.7% of patients, respectively). No new cases of CRS occurred after two weeks and a single case of new-onset ICANS occurred in the third week following infusion. NRM is driven by ICANS in the early follow-up period (1.1% until day 28), then by infection through three months post-infusion (1.2%). This study provides valuable insights into optimizing CAR T therapy monitoring and our findings may provide a framework to reduce physical and financial constraints for patients.

Clinical Practice Recommendations for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies in Follicular Lymphoma: A Collaborative Effort on Behalf of the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), accounting for nearly one-third of all NHL. The therapeutic landscape for patients with FL has significantly expanded over the past decade, but the disease continues to be considered incurable. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative in some cases. Recently, the emergence of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) FL has yielded impressive response rates and long-term remissions, but definitive statement on the curative potential of CAR-T is currently not possible due to limited patient numbers and relatively short follow up. A consensus on the contemporary role, optimal timing, and sequencing of HCT (autologous or allogeneic) and cellular therapies in FL is needed. As a result, the American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) Committee on Practice Guidelines endorsed this effort to formulate consensus recommendations to address this unmet need. The RAND-modified Delphi method was used to generate 15 consensus statements/recommendations. These clinical practice recommendations will help guide clinicians managing patients with FL. Of note, the use of bispecific antibodies in R/R FL was not in the scope of this project.

Integrative analysis of clinicopathological features defines novel prognostic models for mantle cell lymphoma in the immunochemotherapy era: a report from The North American Mantle Cell Lymphoma Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) exhibit a wide variation in clinical presentation and outcome. However, the commonly used prognostic models are outdated and inadequate to address the needs of the current multidisciplinary management of this disease. This study aims to investigate the clinical and pathological features of MCL in the immunochemotherapy era and improve the prognostic models for a more accurate prediction of patient outcomes. METHODS: The North American Mantle Cell Lymphoma Project is a multi-institutional collaboration of 23 institutions across North America to evaluate and refine prognosticators for front-line therapy. A total of 586 MCL cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 are included in this study. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was performed on the clinicopathological features, treatment approaches, and outcomes of these cases. The establishment of novel prognostic models was based on in-depth examination of baseline parameters, and subsequent validation in an independent cohort of MCL cases. RESULTS: In front-line strategies, the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was the most significant parameter affecting outcomes, for both overall survival (OS, p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS, p < 0.0001). P53 positive expression was the most significant pathological parameter correlating with inferior outcomes (p < 0.0001 for OS and p = 0.0021 for PFS). Based on the baseline risk factor profile, we developed a set of prognostic models incorporating clinical, laboratory, and pathological parameters that are specifically tailored for various applications. These models, when tested in the validation cohort, exhibited strong predictive power for survival and showed a stratification resembling the training cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of patients with MCL has markedly improved over the past two decades, and further enhancement is anticipated with the evolution of clinical management. The innovative prognostic models developed in this study would serve as a valuable tool to guide the selection of more suitable treatment strategies for patients with MCL.