RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Women are at risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Traditionally, patients who undergo laparoscopic gynaecological surgery are only allowed to initiate oral intake after return of bowel function, including bowel sounds or passage of flatus or stool. The present study was designed to assess the effect of liberal oral intake immediately after discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) on PONV incidence in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. METHODS: In total, 174 patients (aged 20-64 years) were randomly assigned to the traditional and liberal groups. In the traditional group, patients were allowed to initiate oral intake 6 h after discharge from the PACU. In the liberal group, patients were allowed oral intake immediately after discharge from the PACU. The primary outcome was the incidence of PONV 48 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included ileus incidence, total dose of postoperative opiate (sufentanil) use, time to postoperative first flatus (FFL), first out-of-bed mobilisation and the duration of postoperative hospitalisation stay. RESULTS: Incidence of PONV was not significantly different between both groups (32.18% vs. 33.33%, p = 0.872). Time to FFL in the liberal group was significantly shorter than that in the traditional group (14.82 ± 0.91 h vs. 17.50 ± 0.96 h, p = 0.024). The postoperative pain score at 48 h after surgery was significantly lower in the liberal group than that in the traditional group (2.48 ± 0.17 vs. 3.20 ± 0.19, p = 0.008) without an increase in sufentanil use (89.32 ± 1.02 µg vs. 89.92 ± 1.16 µg, p = 0.702). No ileus occurred in either group. When considering the time of actually return to regular diet, initiating regular diet no more than 6 h after discharge from PACU significantly shortened the time to first out-of-bed mobilisation (11.18 ± 1.01 h vs. 15.05 ± 0.70 h, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that liberal oral intake after discharge from the PACU in patients aged 20-64 years who underwent gynaecological surgery is safe and beneficial and supports the rationale for a more liberal diet regime postoperatively.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Sufentanil , Humanos , Feminino , Flatulência , Método Duplo-Cego , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/etiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: New evidence-based fasting guidelines have been published in recent years. However, while water and solid food fasting times before anesthesia are recommended to be 2 and 6 hours, respectively, these times are often longer in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the awareness and implementation of the fasting guideline recommendations among nurses and anesthesiologists, as well as evaluate the actual fasting durations in patients in a tertiary hospital. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was used. METHODS: Questionnaires were designed to collect the knowledge of fasting time among registered anesthesiologists and nurses. Data on the instructed and actual fasting durations among patients scheduled for elective surgery were evaluated. FINDINGS: Approximately half of the nurses indicated that solid food fasting durations were shorter than 6 hours or longer than 8 hours, and two-thirds indicated that clear fluid fasting durations were shorter than 2 hours or longer than 4 hours. However, in clinical practice, nurse-instructed fasting durations were longer than what they knew was optimal. The anesthesiologists also prescribed longer fasting durations than the minimum fasting duration recommended. The actual fasting durations of the patients were significantly longer than the nurse-instructed fasting durations for solid food (13.41 ± 2.64 vs 9.87 ± 2.20 hours, P < .001) and clear fluids (10.27 ± 3.67 vs 8.98 ± 2.90 hours, P < .001). The nurse-instructed durations were significantly longer than the anesthesiologist-instructed durations according to the statements of patients (9.87 ± 2.20 vs 9.00 ± 2.00 hours for solid food, P < .001; 8.98 ± 2.90 vs 6.15 ± 3.25 hours for clear fluids, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Excessive fasting durations were observed among patients. Anesthesiologists and nurses must work together to ensure that updated fasting instructions are implemented in routine clinical practice.
Assuntos
Jejum , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Estudos Transversais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Humanos , Centros de Atenção TerciáriaRESUMO
The anti-cancer role of local anesthetics has garnered attention in recent years because increasing evidence show that local anesthetics reduce the risk of tumor metastasis and recurrence. Angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels, is fundamental for tumor growth and metastasis. The role of local anesthetics on tumor angiogenesis still remains unknown. Using human lung tumor-associated endothelial cell (HLT-EC) and angiogenesis models, our work shows that ropivacaine at the clinically relevant concentration is active against multiple biological functions of HLT-EC but not lung tumor cells. Ropivacaine inhibits HLT-EC capillary network formation, growth and survival. The anti-angiogenic activity of ropivacaine is further confirmed in in vivo angiogenesis mouse model. Mechanistically, we show that ropivacaine inhibits HLT-EC mitochondrial respiration via specifically targeting mitochondrial respiratory complex II. As a consequence of mitochondrial respiration inhibition, we observe the energy depletion, oxidative stress and damage in HLT-EC after ropivacaine exposure. Additionally, an antioxidant agent completely reverses the inhibitory effects of ropivacaine, suggesting that oxidative stress is required for the action of ropivacaine in HLT-EC. Interestingly, mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress induced by ropivacaine is sodium channel-independent. Our work demonstrates the potent inhibitory effects of ropivacaine in lung tumor angiogenesis by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction. These findings provide significant insight into the potential mechanisms by which local anaesthetics may negatively affect tumor reoccurrence and metastasis.