Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Noncardioembolic Ischemic Stroke: A Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have reported that the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke; however, this finding may be the result of a confounding by indication. We examined the association using different approaches to minimize such potential bias. METHODS: A nested case-control study was carried out in a Spanish primary health-care database over the study period 2001 to 2015. Cases were patients sustaining an ischemic stroke with no sign of cardioembolic or unusual cause. For each case, up to 5 matched controls (for exact age, sex, and index date) were randomly selected. Antidepressants were divided in 6 pharmacological subgroups according to their mechanism of action. The current use of SSRIs (use within a 30-day window before index date) was compared with nonuse, past use (beyond 365 days) and current use of other antidepressants through a conditional logistic regression model to obtain adjusted odds ratios and 95% CI. Only initiators of SSRIs and other antidepressants were considered. RESULTS: A total of 8296 cases and 37 272 matched controls were included. Of them, 255 (3.07%) were current users of SSRIs among cases and 834 (2.24%) among controls, yielding an adjusted odds ratio of 1.14 (95% CI, 0.97-1.34) as compared with nonusers, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.77-1.13) as compared with past-users and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.58-0.93) as compared with current users of other antidepressants. No relevant differences were found by duration (≤1, >1 year), sex, age (<70, ≥70 years old) and background vascular risk. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SSRIs was not associated with an increased risk of noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. On the contrary, as compared with other antidepressants, SSRIs appeared to be protective.

Effect of Neuro-Adaptive Electrostimulation Therapy versus Sham for Refractory Urge Urinary Incontinence Due to Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Single-Blinded Trial.

This randomized clinical trial evaluates the success rate of neuro-adaptive therapy (NAT), applied with a specific neuro-adaptive regulator device, the Self-Controlled Electro Neuro-Adaptive Regulation (SCENAR), versus a sham for urge incontinence due to an overactive bladder (OAB). From February 2019 to May 2021, 66 patients were recruited. All subjects were randomized 1:1 at the first intervention visit to the NAT or sham procedure. Inclusion criteria were females between 18 and 80 years old with leakages due to an overactive bladder with unresponsiveness to medical therapy. Subjects were scheduled to receive up to eight weekly 20 min intervention sessions to obtain a complete (CR) or partial response (PR). Patients with no response after three sessions were considered as a failure. The primary end point of this trial was to assess the efficacy of NAT compared to an inactive sham intervention, evaluated 1 month after the last session. Analysis showed 23 (70%) patients responded (20 complete and 3 partial response) in the NAT group compared to 16 (48%) patients (all complete response) in the placebo arm (p = 0.014). Significant differences were maintained after the intervention, with persistent response at 3 months in 19 (58%) patients after active treatment and 14 (42%) after the placebo (p < 0.001), and at 6 months in 18 (55%) vs. 11 (33%) (p = 0.022), respectively. The number of sessions to achieve CR was similar in both arms, with 4.3 ± 1.9 in NAT and 3.9 ± 1.8 in the sham group (NS). Significant differences were observed between both groups for patients' satisfaction (p = 0.01). The binary model selected age as a predictor of response at the last follow-up. The odds ratio indicates that each year of increase in age, the probability of a positive response to treatment at 6 months decreases 0.95 (95% CI 0.9-0.99) times (p = 0.03). In conclusion, this pilot randomized trial gives evidence that neuro-adaptive electrostimulation is effective to treat refractory urge urinary incontinence due to OAB. The security and long-term efficacy of this treatment merits further evaluation. Moreover, its favorable profile and the economic advantages of the device make the evaluation of this promising technique mandatory in a primary therapeutic scenario.

Risk of Ischemic Stroke Associated with Calcium Supplements and Interaction with Oral Bisphosphonates: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Conflicting results about the association of calcium supplements (CS) with ischemic stroke (IS) have been reported. We tested this hypothesis by differentiating between CS alone (CaM) and CS with vitamin D (CaD) and between cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic IS. We examined the potential interaction with oral bisphosphonates (oBs). A nested case-control study was carried out. We identified incident IS cases aged 40-90 and randomly sampled five controls per case matched by age, sex, and index date. Current users were compared to non-users. An adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% CI were computed through conditional logistic regression. Only new users were considered. We included 13,267 cases (4400 cardioembolic, 8867 non-cardioembolic) and 61,378 controls (20,147 and 41,231, respectively). CaM use was associated with an increased risk of cardioembolic IS (AOR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.21-2.90) in a duration-dependent manner, while it showed no association with non-cardioembolic IS (AOR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.74-1.50); its combination with oBs increased the risk of cardioembolic IS considerably (AOR = 2.54; 95% CI: 1.28-5.04), showing no effect on non-cardioembolic. CaD use was not associated with either cardioembolic (AOR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.88-1.31) or non-cardioembolic IS (AOR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.84-1.13) but showed a small association with cardioembolic IS when combined with oBs (AOR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.03-1.76). The results support the hypothesis that CS increases the risk of cardioembolic IS, primarily when used concomitantly with oBs.

Association of oral bisphosphonates with cardioembolic ischemic stroke: a nested case-control study.

Background: Bisphosphonates have been reported to increase the risk of atrial fibrillation. Therefore, it is conceivable that they may increase the risk of cardioembolic ischemic stroke (IS). However, most epidemiological studies carried out thus far have not shown an increased risk of IS, though none separated by the main pathophysiologic IS subtype (cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic) which may be crucial. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that the use of oral bisphosphonates increases specifically the risk of cardioembolic IS, and explored the effect of treatment duration, as well as the potential interaction between oral bisphosphonates and calcium supplements and anticoagulants. Methods: We performed a case-control study nested in a cohort of patients aged 40-99 years, using the Spanish primary healthcare database BIFAP, over the period 2002-2015. Incident cases of IS were identified and classified as cardioembolic or non-cardioembolic. Five controls per case were randomly selected, matched for age, sex, and index date (first recording of IS) using an incidence-density sampling. The association of IS (overall and by subtype) with the use of oral bisphosphonates within the last year before index date was assessed by computing the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their 95% CI using a conditional logistic regression. Only initiators of oral bisphosphonates were considered. Results: A total of 13,781 incident cases of IS and 65,909 controls were included. The mean age was 74.5 (SD ± 12.4) years and 51.6% were male. Among cases, 3.15% were current users of oral bisphosphonates, while among controls they were 2.62%, yielding an AOR of 1.15 (95% CI:1.01-1.30). Of all cases, 4,568 (33.1%) were classified as cardioembolic IS (matched with 21,697 controls) and 9,213 (66.9%) as non-cardioembolic IS (matched with 44,212 controls) yielding an AOR of 1.35 (95% CI:1.10-1.66) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.88-1.21), respectively. The association with cardioembolic IS was clearly duration-dependent (AOR≤1 year = 1.10; 95% CI:0.82-1.49; AOR>1-3 years = 1.41; 95% CI:1.01-1.97; AOR>3 years = 1.81; 95% CI:1.25-2.62; p for trend = 0.001) and completely blunted by anticoagulants, even in long-term users (AOR>1 year = 0.59; 0.30-1.16). An interaction between oral bisphosphonates and calcium supplements was suggested. Conclusion: The use of oral bisphosphonates increases specifically the odds of cardioembolic IS, in a duration-dependent manner, while leaves materially unaffected the odds of non-cardioembolic IS.

Statins and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Population-Based Case-Control Study and Synthesis of the Epidemiological Evidence.

(1) Background: The pleiotropic effects of statins may explain a chemoprotective action against colorectal cancer (CRC). Many studies have tested this hypothesis, but results have been inconsistent so far. Moreover, few have examined statins individually which is important for determining whether there is a class effect and if lipophilicity and intensity may play a role. (2) Methods: From 2001-2014, we carried out a study comprised of 15,491 incident CRC cases and 60,000 matched controls extracted from the primary healthcare database BIFAP. We fit a logistic regression model to compute the adjusted-odds ratios (AOR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis. (3) Results: Current use of statins showed a reduced risk of CRC (AOR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.83-0.91) not sustained after discontinuation. The association was time-dependent, starting early (AOR6months-1year = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76-0.96) but weakened beyond 3-years. A class effect was suggested, although only significant for simvastatin and rosuvastatin. The risk reduction was more marked among individuals aged 70 or younger, and among moderate-high intensity users. Forty-eight studies were included in the meta-analysis (pooled-effect-size = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.86-0.93). (4) Conclusions: Results from the case-control study and the pooled evidence support a moderate chemoprotective effect of statins on CRC risk, modified by duration, intensity, and age.

Influenza Vaccination and Risk of Ischemic Stroke: A Population-Based Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between influenza vaccination in the general population and risk of a first ischemic stroke (IS) during pre-epidemic, epidemic and post-epidemic periods. METHODS: A nested case-control study was carried out in a Spanish primary care database over 2001-2015. Subjects aged 40-99 years with at-least 1-year registry and no history of stroke or cancer were selected to conform the source cohort, from which incident IS cases were identified and classified as cardioembolic or non-cardioembolic. Five controls per case were randomly selected, individually matched with cases for exact age, sex and date of stroke diagnosis (index date). A patient was considered vaccinated when he/she had a recorded influenza vaccination at least 14 days before the index date within the same season. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed through a conditional logistic regression. Pneumococcal vaccination was used as a negative control. RESULTS: From a cohort of 3,757,621 patients, we selected 14,322 incident IS cases (9,542 non-cardioembolic and 4,780 cardioembolic) and 71,610 matched controls. Of them, 41.4% and 40.5%, respectively, were vaccinated yielding a crude OR of 1.05(95%CI:1.01-1.10). Vaccinated subjects presented a higher prevalence of vascular risk factors, diseases and comedication than non-vaccinated and, after full adjustment, the association of influenza vaccination with IS yielded an AOR of 0.88(95%CI:0.84-0.92) was found, appearing early (AOR15-30 days=0.79;95%CI:0.69-0.92) and slightly declining over time (AOR>150 days=0.92;95%CI:0.87-0.98). A reduced risk of similar magnitude was observed with both types of IS, in the three epidemic periods and in all subgroups analyzed (men, women, subjects below and over 65 years of age, and subjects with intermediate and high vascular risk). By contrast, pneumococcal vaccination was not associated with a reduced risk of IS (AOR=1.08;95%CI:1.04-1.13). DISCUSSION: Results are compatible with a moderate protective effect of influenza vaccine on IS appearing early after vaccination. The finding that a reduced risk was also observed in pre-epidemic periods suggests that either the "protection" is not totally linked to prevention of influenza infection, or it may be partly explained by unmeasured confounding factors.

Risk of ischaemic stroke among new users of glucosamine and chondroitin sulphate: a nested case-control study.

Background: Several studies have reported that the use of chondroitin sulphate (CS) and glucosamine may reduce the risk of acute myocardial infarction. Although it is thought that this potential benefit could be extended to ischaemic stroke (IS), the evidence is scarce. Objective: To test the hypothesis that the use of prescription glucosamine or CS reduces the risk of IS. Design: Case-control study nested in an open cohort. Methods: Patients aged 40-99 years registered in a Spanish primary healthcare database (BIFAP) during the 2002-2015 study period. From this cohort, we identified incident cases of IS, applying a case-finding algorithm and specific validation procedures, and randomly sampled five controls per case, individually matched with cases by exact age, gender and index date. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed through a conditional logistic regression. Only new users of glucosamine or CS were considered. Results: A total of 13,952 incident cases of IS and 69,199 controls were included. Of them, 106 cases (0.76%) and 803 controls (1.16%) were current users of glucosamine or CS at index date, yielding an AOR of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54-0.82) (for glucosamine, AOR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.39-0.77; and for CS, AOR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.60-0.99). The reduced risk among current users was observed in both sexes (men, AOR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.49-0.98; women, AOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.85), in individuals above and below 70 years of age (AOR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.53-0.89 and AOR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.41-0.85, respectively), in individuals with vascular risk factors (AOR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.39-0.74) and among current/recent users of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (AOR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55-0.92). Regarding duration, the reduced risk was observed in short-term users (<365 days, AOR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.48-0.78) while faded and became nonsignificant in long-term users (>364 days AOR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.57-1.31). Conclusions: Our results support a protective effect of prescription CS and glucosamine in IS, which was observed even in patients at vascular risk. Mini abstract: Our aim was to analyse whether the use of glucosamine or chondroitin sulphate (CS) reduces the risk of ischaemic stroke (IS). We detected a significant decrease.

Risk of acute myocardial infarction among new users of chondroitin sulfate: A nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the use of chondroitin sulfate (CS) or glucosamine reduces the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Case-control study nested in a primary cohort of patients aged 40 to 99 years, using the database BIFAP during the 2002-2015 study period. From this cohort, we identified incident cases of AMI and randomly selected five controls per case, matched by exact age, gender, and index date. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed through a conditional logistic regression. Only new users of CS or glucosamine were considered. RESULTS: A total of 23,585 incident cases of AMI and 117,405 controls were included. Of them, 89 cases (0.38%) and 757 controls (0.64%) were current users of CS at index date, yielding an AOR of 0.57 (95%CI: 0.46-0.72). The reduced risk among current users was observed in both short-term (<365 days, AOR = 0.58; 95%CI: 0.45-0.75) and long-term users (>364 days AOR = 0.56; 95%CI:0.36-0.87), in both sexes (men, AOR = 0.52; 95%CI:0.38-0.70; women, AOR = 0.65; 95%CI:0.46-0.91), in individuals over or under 70 years of age (AOR = 0.54; 95%CI:0.38-0.77, and AOR = 0.61; 95%CI:0.45-0.82, respectively) and in individuals at intermediate (AOR = 0.65; 95%CI:0.48-0.91) and high cardiovascular risk (AOR = 0.48; 95%CI:0.27-0.83), but not in those at low risk (AOR = 1.11; 95%CI:0.48-2.56). In contrast, the current use of glucosamine was not associated with either increased or decreased risk of AMI (AOR = 0.86; 95%CI:0.66-1.08). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support a cardioprotective effect of CS, while glucosamine seems to be neutral. The protection was remarkable among subgroups at high cardiovascular risk.

Prescription prevalence of low dose aspirin in primary prevention in the Spanish population, trends over time and associated factors. / Prevalencia de prescripción del ácido acetilsalicílico a dosis bajas en prevención primaria en población española, evolución temporal y factores asociados.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (LD-ASA) in primary prevention is a matter of controversy, but its magnitude is unknown in Spain. The aim of the study was to estimate the proportion of patients who are prescribed LD-ASA for primary prevention and to identify their characteristics. METHODS: In a sample from the primary care database BIFAP we obtained the proportion of persons with prescriptions of LD-ASA over the period 2002-2015, excluding patients with any previous record of occlusive vascular disease, atrial fibrillation or cancer. The proportions were standardized to the Spanish population aged 40-99 years old. We identified the factors associated with the use of LD-ASA through a logistic regression and estimated its prevalence of use according to the presence of such factors. RESULTS: The sample included 102,850 subjects; of which 6,198 were users of LD-ASA. The standardized prevalence of prescription was 2.21% at the start of the period and 3.57% at the end, and increased with age. The factors with the strongest associations were diabetes (OR=3.26; 95%CI: 3.07-3.47), dyslipidaemia (OR=2.08; 1.96-2.21), heart failure (OR=2.02; 1.72-2.37), and hypertension (OR=1.78; 1.67-1.90). Among diabetic patients older than 70 years with hypertension and dyslipidaemia, the prevalence of LD-ASA prescription was 33.7%. CONCLUSIONS: The prescription of LD-ASA for primary prevention in Spain over the study period was low in the general population, but high in older diabetic patients with additional risk factors. After years of controversy, it is time to realign the use of this drug in primary prevention according to recent guidelines.

Population-based case-control study: chemoprotection of colorectal cancer with non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and other drugs for pain control.

BACKGROUND: Inflammation and overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) have been described to play a key role in the progression from nonpathologic intestinal mucosa to colorectal cancer (CRC). AIMS: To assess the chemoprotective effect of non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs) under different patterns of use in a Mediterranean population and to explore the potential effect of symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis (SYSADOAs; chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine) and metamizole (or dipyrone), also reported to influence COX-2 activity. METHODS: We performed a case-control study nested in a cohort extracted from the primary care database, BIFAP. From 2001 to 2014, we included 15 491 incident cases and 60 000 random controls. To estimate the association between the drugs of interest and CRC, we built logistic regression models to compute the adjusted-odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: NA-NSAIDs use was associated with a reduced risk of CRC (AOR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.63-0.71) and increased linearly with duration of treatment (p for trend <0.001). The effect diminished upon discontinuation but persisted statistically significant up to 1 year. All individual NA-NSAIDs examined showed a decreased risk. The concomitant use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) had no impact on the protective effect of NA-NSAIDs; AORPPI + NSAID  = 0.64; 0.58-0.71. SYSADOA use was associated with a reduced risk (0.79; 0.69-0.90) but disappeared after the exclusion of NSAID users during the previous 1 or 3 years (0.85; 0.70-1.04 and 1.00; 0.76-1.31 respectively). Metamizole did not show a chemoprotective effect. CONCLUSIONS: NA-NSAID use is associated with a duration-dependent risk reduction of CRC not shared by SYSADOAs or metamizole.

Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction Among New Users of Allopurinol According to Serum Urate Level: A Nested Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that allopurinol reduces the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in hyperuricemic patients and to assess whether the effect is dependent on dose, duration and serum uric acid (SUA) level attained after treatment. METHODS: Nested case-control study over the period 2002-2015. From a cohort of patients aged 40-99 years old, we identified incident AMI cases and randomly selected five controls per case, matched for exact age, sex and index date. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% CI were computed through unconditional logistic regression. Only new users of allopurinol were considered. RESULTS: A total of 4697 AMI cases and 18,919 controls were included. Allopurinol use was associated with a reduced risk of AMI mainly driven by duration of treatment (AOR ≥180 days = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.60-0.84). Among long-term users (≥180 days), the reduced risk was only observed when the SUA level attained was below 7 mg/dL (AOR<6 mg/dL = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.49-0.82; AOR6-7mg/dL = 0.64; 95%CI:0.48-0.84); AOR>7mg/dL = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.75-1.46; p for trend = 0.001). A dose-effect was observed but faded out once adjusted for the SUA level attained. The reduced risk of AMI occurred in both patients with gout and patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm a cardioprotective effect of allopurinol which is strongly dependent on duration and SUA level attained after treatment.