Quantitative pupillometry as a biomarker for prediction of return to play in mild traumatic brain injury: a Military Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the validity of quantitative pupillometry to predict the length of time for return to full activity/duty after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in a cohort of injured cadets at West Point. METHODS: Each subject received baseline (T0) quantitative pupillometry, in addition to evaluation with the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), Standardized Assessment of Concussion (SAC), and Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 5th Edition Symptom Survey (SCAT5). Repeat assessments using the same parameters were conducted within 48 hours of injury (T1), at the beginning of progressive return to activity (T2), and at the completion of progressive return to activity protocols (T3). Pupillary metrics were compared on the basis of length of time to return to full play/duty and the clinical scores. RESULTS: The authors' statistical analyses found correlations between pupillometry measures at T1, including end-initial diameter and maximum constriction velocity, with larger change and faster constriction predicting earlier return to play. There was also an association with maximum constriction velocity at baseline (T0), predicting faster return to play. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that that pupillometry may be a valuable tool for assessing time to return to duty from mTBI by providing a measure of baseline resiliency to mTBI and/or autonomic dysfunction in the acute phase after mTBI.

[What is the role of surgery in low back pain associated with Modic changes?] / Quel est le rôle de la chirurgie pour les lombalgies avec des changements de type Modic à l'IRM ?

Benign low back pain is frequent in the lucratively active population. Degenerative changes are considered the most frequent causes. The identification of pain generators remain challenging. Bone marrow lesions, Modic changes, are frequently associated with benign low back pain, mostly type 1. The etiology of Modic changes is unknown, both infectious and autoimmune mechanisms have been suggested. Despite the strong association of Modic changes with low back pain it is not clear whether lumbar surgery (lumbar fusion, total disc replacement) has any role in the management of these patients. We conclude that all available evidence in literature is inconclusive and future studies are needed addressing more precisely the question of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) while considering of all confounding factors influencing outcome.

Les lombalgies aspécifiques sont fréquentes. Les changements dégénératifs semblent en être la raison. Il y a une grande prévalence des changements de l'os sous-chondral, décrits par Modic sur IRM, chez les patients souffrant de lombalgies, surtout les Modic type 1. Les changements de type Modic semblent faire partie du même processus pathologique et deux étiologies, une infectieuse et l'autre auto-immune, ont été décrites. Il n'y a pas d'évidence qu'une prise en charge chirurgicale, spondylodèse ou prothétique discale, soit recommandée. Les études sont souvent rétrospectives et présentent des biais de sélection. Les futures études devraient inclure un plus grand nombre de patients et répondre à la question de la différence minimum cliniquement importante (MCID, minimal clinically important difference).

Systematic review of observational studies reveals no association between low back pain and lumbar spondylolysis with or without isthmic spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE: The hypothesis that spondylolysis (SL) and/or isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) cause low back pain (LBP) is widely accepted representing surgical indication in symptomatic cases. If SL/IS cause LBP, individuals with these conditions should be more prone to LBP than those without SL/IS. Therefore, the goal of the study was to assess whether the published primary data demonstrate an association between SL/IS and LBP in the general adult population. METHODS: Systematic review of published observational studies to identify any association between SL/IS and LBP in adults. The methodological quality of the cohort and case-control studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria (one cohort, seven case-control, seven cross-sectional). Neither the cohort study nor the two highest-quality case-control studies detected an association between SL/IS and LBP; the same is true for the remaining studies. CONCLUSIONS: There is no strong or consistent association between SL/IS and LBP in epidemiological studies of the general adult population that would support a hypothesis of causation. It is possible that SL/IS coexist with LBP, and observed effects of surgery and other treatment modalities are primarily due to benign natural history and nonspecific treatment effects. We conclude that traditional surgical practice for the adult general population, in which SL/IS is assumed to be the cause of non-radicular LBP whenever the two coexist, should be reconsidered in light of epidemiological data accumulated in recent decades.

Bilateral abducens nerve palsy following ligamentous C1-C2 distraction.

PURPOSE: Posttraumatic abducens nerve palsy is well documented following head injury, but only few case reports exist on sixth nerve palsy after cervical spine trauma. Bilateral abducens palsy following vertical C1-C2 ligamentous distraction has not been described yet. METHODS: We report two patients who sustained motor vehicle accident-related C1-C2 distraction injury and were diagnosed with posttraumatic bilateral abducens nerve palsy. RESULTS: Patients underwent surgical stabilization of the upper cervical spine and demonstrated a remarkable recovery of the sixth nerve deficit up to 1 year after injury. CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that ligamentous C1-C2 distraction leads to caudal displacement of the brainstem in relation to the cranial base causing traction injury to the abducens nerve at its entry into Dorello's canal in the cavernous sinus.

Diagnosis and management of primary pyogenic spinal infections in intravenous recreational drug users.

OBJECT: Primary spine infection secondary to intravenous drug abuse (IVDA) is a difficult clinical entity encountered by spine surgeons and infectious disease specialists. Patients tend to be noncompliant with the treatment and follow-up, and some continue to use IV recreational drugs even after the diagnosis of spine infection. The authors undertook this study to analyze the presentation, etiology, demographic characteristics, treatment, and outcome of primary pyogenic spinal infection in patients with IVDA as the major risk factor. METHODS: The medical records, radiology imaging, and laboratory results (white blood cell count, inflammatory markers, bacteriology cultures) of all patients with pyogenic spine infection and history of IVDA presenting to a tertiary care center from August 2005 through December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The department of neurosurgery database and the hospital electronic medical records of University Hospital in San Antonio were used to identify the cohort for our study. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients with spinal infection were evaluated during the study period; 102 of these patients had a history of IVDA. Their average age was 45.4 years, and only 14 (13.7%) were women. The mean laboratory values at presentation included a white blood cell count of 11.1 × 10(3) cells/µl (range 0.5-32 × 10(3) cells/µl), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of 74 mm/hr (range 9.9-140 mm/hr), and C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 67 mg/L (range 0.1-327 mg/L). Twenty-six patients (25.4%) had an associated epidural abscess. The most common organism isolated from cultures of the bone and/or blood was methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), which was found in 37 cases. A close second was methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), found in 23 cases. The most commonly involved region was the lumbar spine (24 cases [57.8%]), and most patients (69.6%) had involvement of only a single level. Eighty patients were initially treated with long-term IV antibiotic therapy, and only 22 underwent surgical intervention (24 procedures). Of the latter group, 8 patients underwent laminectomy alone while 16 required some type of instrumented stabilization. Of the patients requiring stabilization procedures, 2 (12.5%) required reoperation with extension of their surgical constructs to other levels. The average follow-up was 29.7 weeks (range 6 weeks to 3 years). CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis and management of spinal infection in patients with a history of IVDA is challenging. The data from this study show that initial laboratory values are difficult to interpret given that only a minority of these patients present with leukocytosis. Back pain was the only reliable predictor of spine infection. The authors' experience indicates that the majority of patients with spine infection and a history of IVDA can be successfully treated with IV antibiotic therapy alone.

Quantitative Pupillometry Predicts Return to Play and Tracks the Clinical Evolution of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in US Military Academy Cadets: A Military Traumatic Brain Injury Initiative Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the utility of the pupillary light reflex use as a biomarker of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted at The US Military Academy at West Point. Cadets underwent a standard battery of tests including Balance Error Scoring System, Sports Concussion Assessment Tool Fifth Edition Symptom Survey, Standard Assessment of Concussion, and measure of pupillary responses. Cadets who sustained an mTBI during training events or sports were evaluated with the same battery of tests and pupillometry within 48 hours of the injury (T1), at the initiation of a graded return to activity protocol (T2), and at unrestricted return to activity (T3). RESULTS: Pupillary light reflex metrics were obtained in 1300 cadets at baseline. During the study period, 68 cadets sustained mTBIs. At T1 (<48 hours), cadets manifested significant postconcussion symptoms (Sports Concussion Assessment Tool Fifth Edition P < .001), and they had decreased cognitive performance (Standardized Assessment of Concussion P < .001) and higher balance error scores (Balance Error Scoring System P < .001) in comparison with their baseline assessment (T0). The clinical parameters showed normalization at time points T2 and T3. The pupillary responses demonstrated a pattern of significant change that returned to normal for several measures, including the difference between the constricted and initial pupillary diameter (T1 P < .001, T2 P < .05), dilation velocity (T1 P < .01, T2 P < .001), and percent of pupillary constriction (T1 P < .05). In addition, a combination of dilation velocity and maximum constriction velocity demonstrates moderate prediction ability regarding who can return to duty before or after 21 days (area under the curve = 0.71, 95% CI [0.56-0.86]). CONCLUSION: This study's findings indicate that quantitative pupillometry has the potential to assist with injury identification and prediction of symptom severity and duration.

Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma (epithelioid sarcoma-like hemangioendothelioma, fibroma-like variant of epithelioid sarcoma) of the thoracic spine.

PURPOSE: Pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma is a soft tissue tumor found in young adults, predominantly males. The tumor has been reported in various locations in the body, including the head, neck, chest wall, abdominal wall, genital region, and extremities. Until now, there has been no indication of occurrence in the spine. METHODS: A 25-year-old male presented with spinal cord compression, due to an extradural tumor involving the third and fourth thoracic vertebrae with extension into the right pleural cavity. RESULTS: Histopathologic examination revealed a pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma, also described as epithelioid sarcoma-like hemangioendothelioma, or fibroma-like variant of epithelioid sarcoma. CONCLUSION: We describe the first occurrence of pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma in the thoracic spine. According to previous reports based on other locations, the tumor has an indolent clinical course with a small risk of metastasis, therefore complete macroscopic excision is the treatment of choice. Local recurrence may occur even with complete surgical resection, requiring close follow-up; adjuvant therapy is warranted.

A lumbar chondroma originating from the intervertebral disc.

Background: Chondromas, benign cartilaginous primary bone tumors, seldom occur in the spine. Most spinal chondromas arise from the cartilaginous parts of the vertebra. Chondromas originating from the intervertebral disc are extraordinarily rare. Case Description: A 65-year-old female experienced recurrence of low back pain and left-sided lumbar radiculopathy after microdiscectomy and microdecompression. A mass continuous with the intervertebral disc was found to be compressing the left L3 nerve root and was resected. Histologic examination revealed a benign chondroma. Conclusion: Chondromas developing from the intervertebral disc are extremely rare; we could find only 37 reported cases. Identification of these chondromas is difficult because until surgical resection they are almost indistinguishable from herniated intervertebral discs. Here, we describe a patient with residual/recurrent lumbar radiculopathy caused by a chondroma originating from the L3-4 intervertebral disc. When a patient has recurrence of spinal nerve root compression after discectomy, a chondroma arising from the intervertebral disc is an uncommon but possible etiology.

Epidemiology of cranial infections in battlefield-related penetrating and open cranial injuries.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating brain injuries are a potentially lethal injury associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We examined characteristics and outcomes among military personnel who sustained battlefield-related open and penetrating cranial injuries during military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: Military personnel wounded during deployment (2009-2014) were included if they sustained an open or penetrating cranial injury and were admitted to participating hospitals in the United States. Injury characteristics, treatment course, neurosurgical interventions, antibiotic use, and infection profiles were examined. RESULTS: The study population included 106 wounded personnel, of whom 12 (11.3%) had an intracranial infection. Posttrauma prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in more than 98% of patients. Patients who developed central nervous system (CNS) infections were more likely to have undergone a ventriculostomy ( p = 0.003), had a ventriculostomy in place for a longer period (17 vs. 11 days; p = 0.007), had more neurosurgical procedures ( p < 0.001), and have lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale ( p = 0.01) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores ( p = 0.018). Time to diagnosis of CNS infection was a median of 12 days postinjury (interquartile range, 7-22 days) with differences in timing by injury severity (critical head injury had median of 6 days, while maximal [currently untreatable] head injury had a median of 13.5 days), presence of other injury profiles in addition to head/face/neck (median, 22 days), and the presence of other infections in addition to CNS infections (median, 13.5 days). The overall length of hospitalization was a median of 50 days, and two patients died. CONCLUSION: Approximately 11% of wounded military personnel with open and penetrating cranial injuries developed CNS infections. These patients were more critically injured (e.g., lower Glasgow Coma Scale and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores) and required more invasive neurosurgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

The blood-spinal cord barrier: morphology and clinical implications.

The blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) is the functional equivalent of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in the sense of providing a specialized microenvironment for the cellular constituents of the spinal cord. Even if intuitively the BSCB could be considered as the morphological extension of the BBB into the spinal cord, evidence suggests that this is not so. The BSCB shares the same principal building blocks with the BBB; nevertheless, it seems that morphological and functional differences may exist between them. Dysfunction of the BSCB plays a fundamental role in the etiology or progression of several pathological conditions of the spinal cord, such as spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and radiation-induced myelopathy. This review summarizes current knowledge of the morphology of the BSCB, the methodology of studying the BSCB, and the potential role of BSCB dysfunction in selected disorders of the spinal cord, and finally summarizes therapeutic approaches to the BSCB.

Refractory Elevated Intracranial Pressure (ICP) in the Setting of a Traumatic Cerebral Sinus Venous Thrombosis (CSVT).

The management of patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) requires a systematic approach. After the failure of tier zero, tier one, and tier two therapies, all potential secondary causes of elevated ICP must be reviewed. Up to 28% of patients with blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI) develop cerebral sinus venous thrombosis (CSVT), among these, patients up to 55% have occlusive thrombi. A literature review revealed a dearth of specific treatment guidelines in this scenario. Here, we present one such case of refractory elevated ICP due to occlusive CSVT secondary to skull fractures. Initial CT venogram (CTV) on admission showed an occlusive CSVT; however, subsequent CTV on the post-trauma day (PTD) 4 and 6 showed non-occlusive thrombi only. The risks of worsening acute TBI-related hemorrhage with systemic anticoagulation versus the benefit of treating an occlusive CSVT are discussed here. In cases of occlusive CSVT with refractory elevated ICP and stable intracranial hemorrhage, the benefit of anticoagulation may outweigh the overall risks of hemorrhage expansion as prolonged uncontrolled ICP elevation is inevitably fatal. In this case, anticoagulation started on PTD 6, led to the resolution of ICP elevation and an excellent outcome for the patient, who was discharged to an acute rehab center, subsequently discharged home with no residual motor deficits, and was able to resume employment. Further prospective trials are necessary to develop guidelines for the management of occlusive CSVT in patients with severe TBI and to determine which patient populations are likely to benefit from early initiation of therapeutic anticoagulation.

Inhibition of astrocyte hemichannel improves recovery from spinal cord injury.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes severe disability, and the current inability to restore function to the damaged spinal cord leads to lasting detrimental consequences to patients. One strategy to reduce SCI morbidity involves limiting the spread of secondary damage after injury. Previous studies have shown that connexin 43 (Cx43), a gap junction protein richly expressed in spinal cord astrocytes, is a potential mediator of secondary damage. Here, we developed a specific inhibitory antibody, mouse-human chimeric MHC1 antibody (MHC1), that inhibited Cx43 hemichannels, but not gap junctions, and reduced secondary damage in 2 incomplete SCI mouse models. MHC1 inhibited the activation of Cx43 hemichannels in both primary spinal astrocytes and astrocytes in situ. In both SCI mouse models, administration of MHC1 after SCI significantly improved hind limb locomotion function. Remarkably, a single administration of MHC1 30 minutes after injury improved the recovery up to 8 weeks post-SCI. Moreover, MHC1 treatment decreased gliosis and lesion sizes, increased white and gray matter sparing, and improved neuronal survival. Together, these results suggest that inhibition of Cx43 hemichannel function after traumatic SCI reduces secondary damage, limits perilesional gliosis, and improves functional recovery. By targeting hemichannels specifically with an antibody, this study provides a potentially new, innovative therapeutic approach in treating SCI.

Secondary Overtriage in Patients with Complicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Observational Study and Socioeconomic Analysis of 1447 Hospitalizations.

BACKGROUND: Secondary overtriage is a problematic phenomenon because it creates unnecessary expense and potentially results in the mismanagement of healthcare resources. The rates of secondary overtriage among patients with complicated mild traumatic brain injury (cmTBI) are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of secondary overtriage among patients with cmTBI using the institutional trauma registry. METHODS: An observational study using retrospective analysis of 1447 hospitalizations including all consecutive patients with cmTBI between 2004 and 2013. Data on age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance status, GCS, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Injury Severity Score, transfer mode, overall length of stay (LOS), LOS within intensive care unit, and total charges were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, the rate of secondary overtriage among patients with cmTBI was 17.2%. These patients tended to be younger (median: 41 vs 60.5 yr; P < .001), have a lower ISS (9 vs 16; P < .001), and were more likely to be discharged home or leave against medical advice. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide evidence to the growing body of literature suggesting that not all patients with cmTBI need to be transferred to a tertiary care center. In our study, these transfers ultimately incurred a total cost of $13 294 ($1337 transfer cost) per patient.

Ratings of global outcome at the first post-operative assessment after spinal surgery: how often do the surgeon and patient agree?

Patient-orientated questionnaires are becoming increasingly popular in the assessment of outcome and are considered to provide a less biased assessment of the surgical result than traditional surgeon-based ratings. The present study sought to quantify the level of agreement between patients' and doctors' global outcome ratings after spine surgery. 1,113 German-speaking patients (59.0 +/- 16.6 years; 643 F, 470 M) who had undergone spine surgery rated the global outcome of the operation 3 months later, using a 5-point scale: operation helped a lot, helped, helped only little, didn't help, made things worse. They also rated pain, function, quality-of-life and disability, using the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI), and their satisfaction with treatment (5-point scale). The surgeon completed a SSE Spine Tango Follow-up form, blind to the patient's evaluation, rating the outcome with the McNab criteria as excellent, good, fair, and poor. The data were compared, in terms of (1) the correlation between surgeons' and patients' ratings and (2) the proportions of identical ratings, where the doctor's "excellent" was considered equivalent to the patient's "operation helped a lot", "good" to "operation helped", "fair" to "operation helped only little" and "poor" to "operation didn't help/made things worse". There was a significant correlation (Spearman Rho = 0.57, p < 0.0001) between the surgeons' and patients' ratings. Their ratings were identical in 51.2% of the cases; the surgeon gave better ratings than the patient ("overrated") in 25.6% cases and worse ratings ("underrated") in 23.2% cases. There were significant differences between the six surgeons in the degree to which their ratings matched those of the patients, with senior surgeons "overrating" significantly more often than junior surgeons (p < 0.001). "Overrating" was significantly more prevalent for patients with a poor self-rated outcome (measured as global outcome, COMI score, or satisfaction with treatment; each p < 0.001). In a multivariate model controlling for age and gender, "low satisfaction with treatment" and "being a senior surgeon" were the most significant unique predictors of surgeon "overrating" (p < 0.0001; adjusted R (2) = 0.21). Factors with no unique significant influence included comorbidity (ASA score), first time versus repeat surgery, one-level versus multilevel surgery. In conclusion, approximately half of the patient's perceptions of outcome after spine surgery were identical to those of the surgeon. Generally, where discrepancies arose, there was a tendency for the surgeon to be slightly more optimistic than the patient, and more so in relation to patients who themselves declared a poor outcome. This highlights the potential bias in outcome studies that rely solely on surgeon ratings of outcome and indicates the importance of collecting data from both the patient and the surgeon, in order to provide a balanced view of the outcome of spine surgery.

No publication bias in industry funded clinical trials of degenerative diseases of the spine.

Industry sponsorship of clinical research of degenerative diseases of the spine has been associated with excessive positive published results as compared to research carried out without industry funding. We sought the rates of publication of clinical trials of degenerative diseases of the spine based on funding source as a possible explanation for this phenomenon. We reviewed all clinical trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov relating to degenerative diseases of the spine as categorized under six medical subject heading terms (spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, spondylolysis, spondylosis, failed back surgery syndrome, intervertebral disc degeneration) and with statuses of completed or terminated. These collected studies were categorized as having, or not having, industry funding. Published results for these studies were then sought within the clinicaltrials.gov database itself, PubMed and Google Scholar. One hundred sixty-one clinical trials met these criteria. One hundred nineteen of these trials had industry funding and 42 did not. Of those with industry funding, 45 (37.8%) had identifiable results. Of those without industry funding, 17 (40.5%) had identifiable results. There was no difference in the rates of publication of results from clinical trials of degenerative diseases of the spine no matter the funding source.

Conjugate eye deviation due to traumatic striatal-subthalamic lesion.

We report the case of a 22-year-old man after severe cranial trauma, who was noted to have conjugate eye deviation (CED) to the left. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan demonstrated a lesion in the left (ipsilateral) striatal-subthalamic region. The involvement of supranuclear fibres from the left frontal eye field (FEF) traveling to the right parapontine reticular formation (PPRF) could explain this clinical finding. Alternatively, involvement of deep brain nuclei, such as the striatum and the subthalamic nucleus, could be responsible for this phenomenon. This neurological presentation is unusual after severe cranial trauma.

Short Segment Spinal Instrumentation With Index Vertebra Pedicle Screw Placement for Pathologies Involving the Anterior and Middle Vertebral Column Is as Effective as Long Segment Stabilization With Cage Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study.

STUDY DESIGN: An in vitro, cadaveric biomechanical study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare single-segment posterior instrumentation and fracture-level screws with single/multilevel posterior fixation and corpectomy in a simulated, unstable burst fracture model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The optimal extent of instrumentation for surgical cases of non-neoplastic vertebral body pathologies remains uncertain. Although several clinical studies demonstrate advantages of short segment instrumentation with index-level screws over more extensive corpectomy and anterior-posterior techniques, a comprehensive biomechanical comparison of these techniques is currently lacking. METHODS: Six bovine spines (T11-L5) were tested in flexion, extension, lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) following simulated burst fracture at L2. Posterior instrumentation included 1 level above/below (1LF) and 2 levels above/below fracture level (2LF), intermediate or index screws at fracture level (FF), and cross-connectors above/below fracture level (CC). Anterior corpectomy devices included expandable corpectomy spacers with/without integrated screws, ACDi and ACD, respectively FORTIFY-Integrated/FORTIFY; Globus Medical, Inc., PA. Constructs were tested in the following order: (1) Intact; (2) 1LF; (3) 1LF and CC; (4) 1LF and FF; (5) 1LF, CC, and FF; (6) 2LF; (7) 2LF and CC; (8) 2LF and FF; (9) 2LF, CC, and FF; (10) 2LF and ACD; (11) 2LF, ACD, and CC; (12) 1LF and ACDi; (13) 1LF, ACDi, and CC. RESULTS: During flexion, all constructs except 1LF reduced motion relative to intact (P ≤ 0.05). Anterior support was most stable, but no differences were found between constructs (P ≥ 0.05). Every construct reduced motion in extension, though no differences were found between constructs and intact (P ≥ 0.05). During LB, all constructs reduced motion relative to intact (P ≤ 0.05); 2LF constructs further reduced motion (P ≤ 0.05). No construct returned AR motion to intact, with significant increases in 1LF and ACDi, 2LF and ACD, and 2LF, ACD, and CC (P ≤ 0.05). Cross-connectors and fracture screws reinforced each other in posterior-only constructs, providing maximum stability (P ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This biomechanical comparison study found no significant superiority of combined anterior-posterior constructs over short segment fracture screw fixation, only multilevel posterior instrumentation with and without anterior support, providing increased stability in LB. Biomechanical equivalency suggests that short segment fracture screw intervention may provide appropriate stabilization for non-neoplastic pathologies involving the anterior and middle vertebral columns. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.