Les pratiques des professionnels de santé assurant le suivi gynécologique en Pays de la Loire.

INTRODUCTION: In France, four health care categories ensure primary care gynecological follow-up: general practitioners (GP), medical gynecologists, obstetrician gynecologists and midwives. PURPOSE OF RESEARCH: To describe private health professionals’ ensuring gynecological follow-up in Pays de la Loire (France) in 2018, as well as their respective activities. RESULTS: Our study population was composed of 3764 health professionals, a majority of those being GP. Proportion of aged 60 or older GP in Loire-Atlantique was 25.5%, this proportion was higher in Sarthe (49%). 80% of medical gynecologists were at least 60 years of age and mainly settled in Loire-Atlantique and Maine-et-Loire. Obstetrician gynecologists were older in Mayenne, Sarthe and Vendée. Midwives were relatively younger: 71% were under 50 years of age.On a regional basis, 1 658 155 medical consultations, for any type of gynecological reasons, were identified. Among them, 41.3% were done by GP, 24.3% by gynecologists and 34.4% by midwives. GPs aged 60 or older who represented 30.5% of all GP in Pays de la Loire ensured 26.3% of GP gynecological follow-up, with wide departmental discrepancies. CONCLUSIONS: Medical gynecologist specialty is unequally distributed within the Pays de la Loire area and many professionals are aged 60 or older. Inadequate access to healthcare in this specific field due to the lack of healthcare professional will be soon problematic. Obstetrician gynecologist specialty is better spread, due to care facility locations. A larger volume of activities is taken on by midwives, whereas a wider range of activities is carried out by physicians, according to medical classification.

Impact at two years of an intervention on empowerment among medical care teams: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial in a large French university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Empowerment of hospital workers is known as a key factor of organizational performance and occupational health. Nevertheless, empowering workers remains a real challenge. As in many traditional organizations, hospitals follow a bureaucratic model defined by a managerial culture of control and a stratified organization, which at once weaken professionals' mastery of their work and hinder their commitment and performance. Based on the existing literature this protocol describes a new managerial and organizational transformation program as well as the study design of its effect on worker empowerment in a large French public hospital. The project is funded by the French Ministry of Health for a total of 498,180 €. METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted in a French university hospital complex (CHU). The CHU comprises 12 sub-centers (SC) with about 20 care units and 1000 employees each. Randomization is performed at SC level. The intervention lasts 12 months and combines accompaniment of healthcare teams, frontline managers and SC directors to empower first-line professionals in the experimental SC. Quantitative outcome measurements are collected over 2 years during mandatory check-ups in the occupational medicine department. The primary outcomes are structural and psychological empowerment, motivational processes, managerial practices, working conditions, health and performance. Mixed linear modeling is the primary data analysis strategy. DISCUSSION: The protocol was approved by the CHU health ethics committee. The results of the analysis of the intervention effects will be reported in a series of scientific articles. The results will contribute to reflection on prevention and management policies, and to the development of Workplace Quality-of-Life. If the intervention is a success, the system will warrant replication in other SCs and in other health facilities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on July 4, 2019 (NCT04010773).

Breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of a decision aid on mammography screening uptake: study protocol.

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is the primary cancer among women. The World Health Organization recommends a bilateral screening mammogram every 2 years for women aged 50 to 74 years. However, it has been shown that there is an absence of information about the benefits and risks of screening. Shared medical decision-making is important to ensure patients are involved in the decision process. Decision aids can facilitative this decision-making process. This article presents a protocol to evaluate the effect of a decision aid on participation rates in the French organized BC screening program. Methods and analysis: Design and setting. The design is a 2 arm randomized controlled study, performed in the Pays de la Loire region (French West Coast). Randomization will be based on general medicine practices (Primary Care). Participants: Women aged between 50 and 74 years, eligible for BC screening. In this region, there are 75000 women, and 2800 general practitioners eligible for recruitment. Intervention: In the « Decision aid for organized cancer screening ¼ arm, the intervention will distribute invitation letters to eligible women combined with the provision of decision aid to these women and their general practitioners and an incentive to implement shared medical decision-making. In the « Standard organized cancer screening ¼ arm, only the screening invitation will be sent to eligible women. Primary endpoint: BC screening participation rates will be assessed after an 18-month follow-up period. Statistical analysis: In this non-inferiority trial, the percentage of women who are up-to-date with their screening at 18 months after the intervention will be compared across arms using a generalized mixed linear model. Discussion: The research team expect to demonstrate that providing a better explanation of the benefits and risks of BC screening is not at odds with screening participation. The study results should help policy makers thinking about implementing shared medical decision-making within the framework of organized BC screening programs in the future. Ethics and dissemination: On 6 December 2021, the protocol received a favorable opinion from the French Committee for the Protection of Persons (2021-A01583-38). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT05607849. (Version 1, November 7, 2022; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05607849). The study findings will be used for publication in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presentations in scientific meetings.

Interrater Agreement Between Critical Care Providers for Background Classification and Seizure Detection After Implementation of Amplitude-Integrated Electroencephalography in Neonates, Infants, and Children.

PURPOSES: Amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) has been widely developed in neonatal intensive care unit, but few studies focused on pediatric intensive care unit. Furthermore, reliability of aEEG under real-life conditions is unknown. METHODS: Participants were nurses from a 12-bed pediatric intensive care unit in a referral university hospital in France. Amplitude EEG was implemented after standardized training, including e-learning course, individual feedback and bedside teaching concerning monitoring installation, background classification patterns recognition, artefact analysis, and seizure detection. The primary judgment criterion was the agreement (Cohen Kappa) between nurses and aEEG experts for the detection of abnormal aEEG traces (moderately or severely altered background pattern according to Hellström-Westas classification and/or seizure activity). RESULTS: During the study period, 196 consecutives traces from 79 patients were analyzed by 51 nurses. According to expert's classification, 53% of traces were abnormal, including 17.5% of severely abnormal traces (severely altered traces and/or seizure activity) and 14% exhibiting seizure activity. Moderate agreement between experts and nurses was found for detection of any abnormal trace (k = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.67). Substantial agreement was found for severely altered traces (k = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57-0.85). Finally, fair agreement was found for seizure detection (irrespective of background classification, k = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.25-0.54). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that aEEG monitoring may be implemented in routine nursing care in pediatric intensive care unit. Further training courses are needed to enhance nurses' skill in detecting seizures activity at the bedside.