Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 36(8): 987-994, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29808254

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about the use of clinical data in cost-effectiveness models. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the appropriate use of data on clinical effectiveness in cost-effectiveness modeling studies that were published between 2001 and 2015. METHODS: Assessors rated 72 modeling studies obtained from three therapeutic areas by applying criteria defined by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation group for assessing the quality of clinical evidence: selection of clinical data (publication bias), imprecision, indirectness, inconsistency (i.e., heterogeneity), and study limitations (risk of bias). For all parameters included in the analyses, potential changes over time were assessed. RESULTS: Although three out of four modeling studies relied on randomized controlled trials, more than 60% of the modeling studies were based on clinical data with a high or unclear risk of bias, in more than 80%, a risk of publication bias was found, and in about 30%, evidence was based on indirect clinical evidence, having significantly increased over the years. Study limitations were inadequately described in more than one third of the studies. However, less than 10% of clinical studies showed inconsistency or imprecision in study results. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that the majority of economic evaluations are based on precise and consistent randomized controlled trials, their results are often affected by limitations arising from methodological shortcomings in the underlying data on clinical efficacy. Modelers and assessors should be more aware of aspects surrounding the quality of clinical evidence as considered by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation group.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício/métodos , Análise Custo-Benefício/normas , Modelos Econômicos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Viés , Humanos
2.
ISME J ; 10(7): 1642-55, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26943621

RESUMO

Transplantation experiments and genome comparisons were used to determine if lineages of planktonic Polynucleobacter almost indistinguishable by their 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences differ distinctively in their ecophysiological and genomic traits. The results of three transplantation experiments differing in complexity of biotic interactions revealed complete ecological isolation between some of the lineages. This pattern fits well to the previously detected environmental distribution of lineages along chemical gradients, as well as to differences in gene content putatively providing adaptation to chemically distinct habitats. Patterns of distribution of iron transporter genes across 209 Polynucleobacter strains obtained from freshwater systems and representing a broad pH spectrum further emphasize differences in habitat-specific adaptations. Genome comparisons of six strains sharing ⩾99% 16S rRNA similarities suggested that each strain represents a distinct species. Comparison of sequence diversity among genomes with sequence diversity among 240 cultivated Polynucleobacter strains indicated a large cryptic species complex not resolvable by 16S rRNA sequences. The revealed ecological isolation and cryptic diversity in Polynucleobacter bacteria is crucial in the interpretation of diversity studies on freshwater bacterioplankton based on ribosomal sequences.


Assuntos
Burkholderiaceae/genética , Água Doce/microbiologia , Genômica , Plâncton/genética , Burkholderiaceae/isolamento & purificação , DNA Bacteriano/genética , Ecologia , Ecossistema , Filogenia , Plâncton/isolamento & purificação , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Análise de Sequência de DNA
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa