Feasibility of the MELD score as a screening tool for pharmacists to identify patients with impaired hepatic function at hospital admission.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Hepatic impairment (HI) is a known risk factor for drug safety. The MELD score (Model-for-endstage-liver-disease), calculated from serum creatinine, bilirubin and International Normalized Ratio (INR), is a promising screening tool corresponding to Child-Pugh Score (CPS) for drug adjustment. We tested the feasibility of MELD as an automatic screening tool accounting for correct calculation, interfering factors (IF) and detection of patients corresponding to CPS-B/C potentially requiring drug adjustment. METHODS: We retrospectively calculated MELD for a 3-month cohort of surgical patients and assessed need for adjustment of MELD parameters to standard values. IF for INR (oral anticoagulants) and serum creatinine (renal insufficiency (RI; eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m²); as well as drugs elevating creatinine levels (DECL)) and the number of patients with MELD scores corresponding to CPS-B/C were analysed. For MELD ≥7.5, liver and bile diagnoses were recorded. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of 1183 patients, MELD was calculable for 761 (64%; median 7.5, range 6.4-36.8). Parameters had to be adjusted for 690 (91%) patients. IF of parameters were RI in 172 (23%), INR-elevating drugs in 105 (14%) and DECL in 33 (4%) patients. Of 335 (44%) patients with MELD ≥7.5, 122 (36%) had documented liver or bile diagnoses. MELD 10-<15 (corresponding to CPS-B) was found for 105 (14%), MELD ≥15 (corresponding to CPS-C) for 66 (9%) of the 761 patients with a calculated MELD. Referred to all patients, drug adjustments due to possible HI were recommendable for 14% of patients with suspected CPS-B/C. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: MELD is a feasible screening tool for HI as a risk factor for drug safety at hospital admission when appropriately considering correct parameter adjustment and RI and INR-elevating drugs as IF. Further evaluation of sensitivity and specificity is needed.

Antimitochondrial Rather than Antinuclear Antibodies Correlate with Severe Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

INTRODUCTION: A proportion of patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) present with autoantibodies, which has led to the current concept of autoimmune-like DILI. However, no standardized definition exists and the clinical relevance has not been studied in detail yet. METHODS: 143 patients with DILI enrolled in a prospective study were analyzed. DILI diagnosis was based on the monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cell test and supported by Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) and expert adjudication. Testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) was performed using immunofluorescence. ANA titers ≥1:100 were considered positive and ≥1:400 clinically relevant; AMA positivity was considered at titers ≥1:100. RESULTS: 67% exhibited ANA ≥1:100 and 29% ANA ≥1:400; 10% were AMA positive. There was no significant correlation between the ANA titers and the causative drug, while AMA positive patients had taken nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs more frequently. No difference was seen regarding clinical characteristics or laboratory parameters in patients with ANA ≥1:400, while patients with positive AMA presented with higher aminotransferases, bilirubin, and international normalized ratio. Significantly higher proportions of patients with ANA ≥1:400 or AMA positivity exhibited elevated immunoglobulin G levels. AMA positivity but not elevated ANA titers correlated with a higher proportion of Hy's law positivity. CONCLUSION: A closer look in a causality proven DILI cohort provided no evidence that presence of ANA titers is specific for DILI by a certain medication. AMA rather than ANA positivity was related to a more pronounced liver injury.

Monocyte-Derived Hepatocyte-Like Cell Test: A Novel Tool for in vitro Identification of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Patients with Herbal or Dietary Supplements.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced liver injury caused by herbal and dietary supplements (HDS) has been an increasingly important phenomenon in recent years. Diagnosis is the major challenge. Definite causality assessment, especially in patients with concomitant prescription medicine or other potential causes of liver injury, can be impossible. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the usefulness of an in vitro test on the basis of peripheral monocytes of the individual patients in patients with acute liver injury consuming HDS. METHOD: Patients with acute liver injury who had been prospectively recruited by the University Hospital Munich (LMU, Munich) and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) and who took at least 1 HDS were selected for this analysis. Diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) was based on local expert adjudication, Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) score, and course of the disease and was supported by the monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cell test. RESULTS: We identified 47 patients with liver injury and intake of at least 1 HDS: 32 (68%) were diagnosed with DILI. HDS was determined as the causative agent in 28 out of those 32 patients. The MH cell test could correctly identify 29 out of those 32 DILI cases and showed false positive results in only 2 out of the 15 non-DILI patients. The MH cell test therefore reached a sensitivity and specificity of 90.6 and 86.7%, respectively, in patients with acute liver injury and HDS intake. CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide evidence that the MH cell test can be a useful tool to identify the role of HDS in causing DILI and therefore support causality assessment in patients consuming HDS.

Early ALT response to corticosteroid treatment distinguishes idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury from autoimmune hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) and idiopathic autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are competing diagnoses in patients with acute liver injury (ALI) and drug intake. In absence of unequivocal markers, scores like RUCAM and AIH are used to distinguish both entities. However, in some cases the diagnosis remains ambiguous. Our aim was to identify a simple parameter to discriminate DILI and AIH shortly after starting corticosteroid treatment. METHODS: For the current analysis, 44 patients with ALI who took at least one drug and who received corticosteroids were included and comprised 22 DILI and 22 AIH cases. Scores of AIH and RUCAM were calculated at initial presentation, the final diagnosis was made from analysing the course of disease. Changes in the serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations after starting corticosteroid treatment were determined and compared between the DILI and AIH groups. RESULTS: Fifty-nine per cent of patients (n = 26) were correctly classified at presentation by AIH score and RUCAM respectively. However, in one-third (n = 13) of the 44 patients, results were inconclusive and five other patients were misclassified. The decrease in ALT levels 1 week after the initiation of steroid therapy was significantly more pronounced in patients with the final diagnosis of DILI than in AIH patients (accuracy 77%). This difference was also observed in the 18 initially misclassified or inconclusive cases (accuracy 83%). CONCLUSION: Short-term response of ALT to corticosteroid therapy helps to differentiate DILI and AIH. This finding may be helpful in treatment decision for patients with inconclusive diagnostic scores.

Development and Validation of a Test to Identify Drugs That Cause Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) is one of the most challenging diagnoses in hepatology. It is frequently impossible to identify the agent that has caused iDILI in patients who take multiple medicines. We developed an in vitro method to identify drugs that cause liver injury in patients, based on drug toxicity to monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells from patient blood samples. We then collected data on patients who were re-exposed to drugs found to be toxic in the MH test to validate test performance. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of patients referred to the University Hospital in Munich, Germany, with acute liver injury believed to be caused by medications (300 patients were enrolled in the study and we present data from 40 patients with iDILI and re-exposure to implicated drugs). We collected data from patients on medical history, laboratory test and imaging results, findings from biopsy analyses, and medications taken. Blood samples were collected from all patients and MH cells were isolated and cultured for 10 days. MH cells were then incubated with drugs to which each patient had been exposed, and toxicity was measured based on release of lactate dehydrogenase. Agents found to be toxic to MH cells were considered as candidates for the cause of liver injury. Patients were followed up for up to 6 months after liver injury and data on drug re-exposures and subsequent liver damage within the following 3 to 24 months were associated with findings from MH tests. RESULTS: Our test identified 10 drugs that were toxic to MH cells from 13 patients (amoxicillin/clavulanate to cells from 2 patients; diclofenac to cells from 2 patients; methylprednisolone to cells from 2 patients; and atorvastatin, metamizole, pembrolizumab, piperacillin/tazobactam, moxifloxacin, duloxetine, or sertraline each to cells from 1 patient). Thirteen patients had a recurrence of liver injury after inadvertent re-exposure to a single drug, and the MH test correctly identified 12 of the 13 drugs that caused these liver re-injury events. All 86 drugs that were not toxic to MH cells in our assay were safely resumed by patients and were not associated with liver re-injury in 27 patients. Therefore, the MH test identifies drugs that cause liver injury with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity (1 false-negative and 12 true-positive results). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a test to identify drugs that cause liver injury in patients based on their toxicity to MH cells isolated from patients with DILI. We validated results from the assay and found it to identify drugs that cause DILI with 92.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The MH cell test could be a tool to identify causes of iDILI, even in patients taking multiple medications. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT 02353455.

Plasma cystatin C is a predictor of renal dysfunction, acute-on-chronic liver failure, and mortality in patients with acutely decompensated liver cirrhosis.

The development of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) in patients with liver cirrhosis is associated with high mortality rates. Renal failure is the most significant organ dysfunction that occurs in ACLF. So far there are no biomarkers predicting ACLF. We investigated whether cystatin C (CysC) and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) can predict development of renal dysfunction (RD), hepatorenal syndrome (HRS), ACLF, and mortality. We determined the plasma levels of CysC and NGAL in 429 patients hospitalized for acute decompensation of cirrhosis in the EASL-CLIF Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in Cirrhosis (CANONIC) study. The patients were followed for 90 days. Patients without RD or ACLF at inclusion but with development of either had significantly higher baseline concentrations of CysC and NGAL compared to patients without. CysC, but not NGAL, was found to be predictive of RD (odds ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-49.7), HRS (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.2-14.8), and ACLF (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% CI, 1.3-25.9). CysC at day 3 was not found to be a better predictor than baseline CysC. CysC and NGAL were both predictive of 90-day mortality, with hazard ratios for CysC of 3.1 (95% CI, 2.1-4.7) and for NGAL of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.5-2.4). CONCLUSION: Baseline CysC is a biomarker of RD, HRS, and ACLF and an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acutely decompensated liver cirrhosis, though determining CysC at day 3 did not provide any benefit; while NGAL is also associated with short-term mortality, it fails to predict development of RD, HRS, and ACLF. Baseline CysC may help to identify patients at risk earlier and improve clinical management. (Hepatology 2017;66:1232-1241).

Drug-induced liver injury: recent advances in diagnosis and risk assessment.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (IDILI) is a rare but potentially severe adverse drug reaction that should be considered in patients who develop laboratory criteria for liver injury secondary to the administration of a potentially hepatotoxic drug. Although currently used liver parameters are sensitive in detecting DILI, they are neither specific nor able to predict the patient's subsequent clinical course. Genetic risk assessment is useful mainly due to its high negative predictive value, with several human leucocyte antigen alleles being associated with DILI. New emerging biomarkers which could be useful in assessing DILI include total keratin18 (K18) and caspase-cleaved keratin18 (ccK18), macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor 1, high mobility group box 1 and microRNA-122. From the numerous in vitro test systems that are available, monocyte-derived hepatocytes generated from patients with DILI show promise in identifying the DILI-causing agent from among a panel of coprescribed drugs. Several computer-based algorithms are available that rely on cumulative scores of known risk factors such as the administered dose or potential liabilities such as mitochondrial toxicity, inhibition of the bile salt export pump or the formation of reactive metabolites. A novel DILI cluster score is being developed which predicts DILI from multiple complimentary cluster and classification models using absorption-distribution-metabolism-elimination-related as well as physicochemical properties, diverse substructural descriptors and known structural liabilities. The provision of more advanced scientific and regulatory guidance for liver safety assessment will depend on validating the new diagnostic markers in the ongoing DILI registries, biobanks and public-private partnerships.

Monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells for causality assessment of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.

BACKGROUND: Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) is a frequent cause of acute liver injury and a serious problem in late stage drug-development. Its diagnosis is one of the most challenging in hepatology, since it is done by exclusion and relies on expert opinion. Until now no reliable in vitro test exists to support the diagnosis of iDILI. In some instances it is impossible to determine the causative drug in polymedicated patients. AIM: To investigate if monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells might be a tool supporting clinical judgment for iDILI diagnosis and causality assessment. METHODS: This prospective study included 54 patients with acute liver injury and intake of at least one drug. Thirty-one patients were diagnosed with iDILI based on causality likelihood. MH cells were generated from every patient and in vitro toxicity of the respective drugs was assessed by lactate-dehydrogenase release. The results from MH cells and RUCAM, the most widely used scoring system as methods to support clinical judgement were compared. RESULTS: MH cells showed enhanced toxicity in 29 of the 31 patients with iDILI, similar to RUCAM score. MH cells exhibited negative results in the 23 non-DILI cases, whereas RUCAM indicated possible iDILI in six cases. Analysis of the comedications also showed superior specificity of MH cells. No MH cell toxicity of the drugs showing toxicity in patients with iDILI was observed in MH cells of healthy donors. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study in vitro testing using MH cells derived from patients with acute liver injury was able to identify patients with iDILI with an excellent sensitivity and a higher specificity than RUCAM, the most widely used current causality assessment score. Therefore, MH cells could be useful to identify the causative drugs even in polymedicated patients by adding objective data to causality assessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02353455.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Individual Cell Models.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is the most common cause of acute liver failure and accounts for the majority of regulatory actions on drugs. Furthermore, DILI is a relevant cause for project terminations in pharmaceutical development. The idiosyncratic form of DILI is especially a threat in late clinical development phases and postmarketing, respectively. Even the occurrence of only a few idiosyncratic DILI cases in late clinical development or postmarketing may suffice to terminate or withdraw an otherwise promising therapy. Despite advances in preclinical assessment of dose-dependent toxicity, idiosyncratic DILI is still a big challenge for in vitro research: it not only requires individualized models but also a huge number of tests. We have developed and investigated MetaHeps®, a technology involving hepatocyte-like cells generated from peripheral monocytes without genetic modifications. These cells exhibit several hepatocyte-like characteristics and show donor-specific activities of drug-metabolizing enzymes. With MetaHeps we have performed in vitro investigations in patients with DILI suspicion. By investigating MetaHeps derived from DILI patients we could show increased in vitro susceptibility to the drugs involved in the individual patients. MetaHeps testing could also rule out DILI and help to identify other causes of acute liver injury. Moreover, MetaHeps identified the causative agent in polymedicated patients. In conclusion, in vitro research of idiosyncratic DILI requires individual cell models which produce results comparable to the clinical situation. We suggest the MetaHeps technology as a novel tool to cope with these challenges of DILI.

The nephrotoxic Ifosfamide-metabolite chloroacetaldehyde interferes with renal extracellular matrix homeostasis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic renal proximal tubule dysfunction after therapy with the antineoplastic agent ifosfamide (IFO) is often attributed to the metabolite chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Chronic IFO-nephropathy is reported to result in tubulointerstitial fibrosis and inflammation. METHODS: To elucidate possible effects of CAA on extracellular matrix homeostasis, we investigated the action of CAA on markers of extracellular matrix (ECM) homeostasis in human proximal tubule cells (RPTEC) by use of direct ELISA for extracellular collagens and gelatin zymography. RESULTS: An increase in type III collagen and a decrease in type IV collagen abundance in the media of RPTEC could be observed after exposure to CAA in clinically relevant concentrations. CAA increased intracellular type III and decreased intracellular type IV collagen. MMP-2 activity was decreased but MMP-9 activity unchanged. The enhanced CAA-induced collagen III formation could be attenuated by the intracellular Ca(2+)-chelator BAPTA-AM, the PKA-antagonist H-89 and by extracellular acidification. CAA-induced collagen III abundance was enhanced by db-cAMP and IBMX and by protein overload. CONCLUSIONS: CAA exerts profibrotic effects on RPTEC dependent on Ca(2+) and cAMP/PKA-signaling. These effects are enhanced by additional protein burden and attenuated by acidification. © 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Hepatic Impairment as a Risk Factor for Drug Safety: Suitability and Comparison of Four Liver Scores as Screening Tools.

Hepatic impairment (HI) influences the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs and represents an important risk factor for drug safety. A reliable screening tool for HI identification at hospital admission by pharmacists would be desirable but is currently lacking. Therefore, we tested four liver scores as potential screening instruments. We retrospectively recorded liver/bile diagnoses, symptoms and abnormalities (summarized as hepatic findings) of 200 surgical patients followed by an assessment of the relevance of these findings for drug therapy (rating). The agreement between the Model of Endstage Liver Disease (MELD), Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), Fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4), and aspartate-aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI) and the rating was quantified by Cohen's Kappa. The performance of the scores in this setting was further evaluated by their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Of 200 patients, 18 (9%) had hepatic findings relevant for drug therapy. Fair agreement was found for FIB-4 and MELD and slight agreement for APRI and NFS compared to the rating. The highest values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 41.2% (MELD), 99.3% (APRI), 66.7% (APRI), and 93.6% (MELD), respectively. Due to low performance, none of the scores can be recommended for clinical use as a single screening tool for HI at hospital admission.

Human monocyte-derived cells with individual hepatocyte characteristics: a novel tool for personalized in vitro studies.

Gender, ethnicity and individual differences in hepatic metabolism have major impact on individual drug response, adverse events and attrition rate during drug development. Therefore, there is an urgent need for reliable test systems based on human cells. Yet, the use of primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) is restricted by limited availability, invasive preparation and short-term stability in culture. All other cellular approaches proposed so far have major disadvantages. We investigated whether peripheral human monocytes after cultivation according to our novel protocol (monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells (MH cells)) can serve as an in vitro model for hepatocyte metabolism. Enzyme activities, synthesis parameters (coagulation factor VII and urea) and cytochrome (CY) P450 activities and induction were investigated. Furthermore, MH cells were compared with PHH from the same donor. Using our protocol, we could generate cells that exhibit hepatocyte-like properties: These cells show 71±9% of specific ALT activity, 41±3% of CYP3A4 activity and 65±13% of factor VII secretion when compared with PHHs. Consequently, CYP-mediated acetaminophen toxicity and drug interactions could be shown. Moreover, the investigated parameters were stable in culture over at least 4 weeks. Furthermore, MH cells retain gender-specific and donor-specific CYP activities and toxicity profiles, respectively. MH cells show quantitative and qualitative approximation to human hepatocytes concerning CYP-metabolism and toxicity. Our data support individual prediction of toxicity and CYP metabolism. MH cells are a novel tool to investigate long-term hepatic toxicity, metabolism and drug interactions.

Liver Injury Associated with Metamizole Exposure: Features of an Underestimated Adverse Event.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The potential of metamizole to cause drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has received increasing attention. We investigated the distinguishing features of a case series comprising 32 patients with suspected metamizole-induced DILI. METHODS: For the current analysis, 32 of 238 patients with DILI included in our prospective study on drugs potentially causing DILI were included. Diagnosis of DILI was based on expert opinion and RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method) score and supported by an in vitro test using monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells. RESULTS: Suspected metamizole-DILI was characterised by a female predominance, hepatocellular pattern of injury, high proportion of antinuclear antibody positivity, and predominance of eosinophilic cell infiltration and necrosis in the histopathological analysis. With 22%, a high proportion of these metamizole-associated liver injury cases developed acute liver failure, which was characterised by a longer latency of metamizole use and more pronounced liver biochemistry abnormalities at onset and peak levels. Furthermore, jaundice was a common finding in the metamizole-associated liver injury cases with 66% presenting with peak bilirubin levels of 3 mg/dL or higher, which was associated with a worse outcome and a higher frequency of acute liver failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis of a well-characterised DILI cohort further supports the potential of metamizole causing DILI and provides important features for the establishment of a signature pattern of liver injury observed in patients treated with metamizole. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02353455.

Intraperitoneal LPS amplifies portal hypertension in rat liver fibrosis.

Recent studies have shown that the risk of variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis increases with infections such as spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). In this study, we hypothesized that pretreatment with intraperitoneal LPS may escalate portal hypertension. In fibrotic livers (4 weeks after bile duct ligation, BDL), the activation of Kupffer cells (KCs) by zymosan (150 microg/ml) in the isolated non-recirculating liver perfusion system resulted in a transient increase in portal perfusion pressure. Pretreatment with intraperitoneal LPS (1 mg/kg body weight (b.w.) for 3 h) increased basal portal perfusion pressure, and prolonged the zymosan-induced increase from transient to a long-lasting increase that was sustained until the end of the experiments in BDL but not in sham-operated animals. Pretreatment with gadolinium chloride (10 mg/kg b.w.), MK-886 (0.6 mg/kg b.w.), Ly171883 (20 microM) or BM 13.177 (20 microM) reduced the maximal and long-lasting pressure increase in BDL animals by approximately 50-60%. The change in portal perfusion pressure was paralleled by a long-lasting production of cysteinyl leukotriene (Cys-LT) and thromboxane (TX) after LPS pretreatment. However, the response to vasoconstrictors was not altered by intraperitoneal LPS. Western blot analyses showed an increased Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 and MyD88 expression after LPS pretreatment. In vivo experiments confirmed that intraperitoneal LPS increased basal portal pressure, and extended the portal pressure increase produced by intraportal zymosan or by LPS infusion. In conclusion, upregulation of TLR4 and MyD88 expression in fibrotic livers confers hypersensitivity to LPS. This may lead to escalation of portal hypertension by production of TX and Cys-LT after endotoxin-induced KC activation. Therefore, LT inhibitors may represent a promising treatment option in addition to early administration of antibiotics in SBP.

Drug-Drug Combinations Can Enhance Toxicity as Shown by Monocyte-Derived Hepatocyte-like Cells From Patients With Idiosyncratic Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major cause for acute liver failure and regulatory actions on novel drugs. Individual patient characteristics are the main determinant of idiosyncratic DILI, making idiosyncratic DILI (iDILI) one of the most challenging diagnoses in hepatology. Individual drug-drug interactions might play a role in iDILI. However, the current approaches to iDILI diagnosis are focused on single drugs as causative agents. For the present analysis, 48 patients with acute liver injury who took 2 drugs and who were diagnosed as iDILI were investigated. A novel in vitro test was employed using monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like cells (MH cells) generated from these patients. iDILI diagnosis and causality were evaluated using clinical causality assessment supported by Roussel-Uclaf Causality Assessment Method. In 13 of these 48 patients (27%), combinations of drugs increased toxicity in the MH test when compared with the single drugs. Interestingly, whereas in 24 cases (50%) drug-drug combinations did not enhance toxicity, in 11 cases (23%) only the combinations caused toxicity. The incidence of severe cases fulfilling Hy's law was higher in patients with positive interactions (57% vs 43%; p = .04), with acute liver failure occurring in 40% versus 8% (p = .01). The most common drug combinations causing increased toxicity were amoxicillin/clavulanate (8 of 9 cases) and diclofenac in combination with steroid hormones (4 of 9 cases). Drug-drug interactions may influence the incidence and/or the severity of idiosyncratic DILI. MH cell testing can identify relevant drug-drug interactions. The data generated by this approach may improve patient safety. STUDY IDENTIFIER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02353455.

Proteomics Analysis of Monocyte-Derived Hepatocyte-Like Cells Identifies Integrin Beta 3 as a Specific Biomarker for Drug-Induced Liver Injury by Diclofenac.

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (iDILI) is a major cause of acute liver failure resulting in liver transplantation or death. Prediction and diagnosis of iDILI remain a great challenge, as current models provide unsatisfying results in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and prognostic value. The absence of appropriate tools for iDILI detection also impairs the development of reliable biomarkers. Here, we report on a new method for identification of drug-specific biomarkers. We combined the advantages of monocyte-derived hepatocyte-like (MH) cells, able to mimic individual characteristics, with those of a novel mass spectrometry-based proteomics technology to assess potential biomarkers for Diclofenac-induced DILI. We found over 2,700 proteins differentially regulated in MH cells derived from individual patients. Herefrom, we identified integrin beta 3 (ITGB3) to be specifically upregulated in Diclofenac-treated MH cells from Diclofenac-DILI patients compared to control groups. Finally, we validated ITGB3 by flow cytometry analysis of whole blood and histological staining of liver biopsies derived from patients diagnosed with Diclofenac-DILI. In summary, our results show that biomarker candidates can be identified by proteomics analysis of MH cells. Application of this method to a broader range of drugs in the future will exploit its full potential for the development of drug-specific biomarkers. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD008918.