Influence of radiant exposure and material shade on the degree of conversion and microhardness of a resin-based composite.

This in vitro study evaluated the influence of radiant exposure and material shade on the degree of conversion (DC) and microhardness of a resin-based composite (RBC). Sixty-four RBC specimens in shades A1E (enamel) and A4D (dentin) were light cured at a calibrated exitance of 1000 mW/cm2 for 5, 10, 15, or 20 seconds, resulting in radiant exposure levels of 5, 10, 15, or 20 J/cm2. The DC was determined using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (n = 3 per shade per exposure level). The Knoop hardness number (KHN) was measured on the top and bottom surfaces of each specimen (n = 5 per shade per exposure level). Data were analyzed using 2- and 3-way analyses of variance and post hoc Tukey tests (α = 0.05). The RBC shade did not affect the DC (P = 0.860), and the lowest DC values were achieved with an exposure level of 5 J/cm2 (P < 0.001). The shade did not affect the KHN on the top surface, but the radiant exposure level did, with the application of 5 J/cm2 resulting in significantly lower values (P < 0.05). For the bottom surface, shade A1E showed significantly higher KHN values than A4D (P < 0.001). An increase in the radiant exposure led to increased DC and KHN for both shades of RBC until reaching a saturation point of 10 J/cm2 for A1E and the top surface of A4D. The darker and more opaque shade was not adequately polymerized at a 2-mm depth, even when the highest radiant exposure level was applied.

Changes in irradiance and energy density in relation to different curing distances.

The present study aimed to assess the influence of curing distance on the loss of irradiance and power density of four curing light devices. The behavior in terms of power density of four different dental curing devices was analyzed (Valo, Elipar 2, Radii-Cal, and Optilux-401) using three different distances of photopolymerization (0 mm, 4 mm, and 8 mm). All devices had their power density measured using a MARC simulator. Ten measurements were made per device at each distance. The total amount of energy delivered and the required curing time to achieve 16 J/cm(2) of energy was also calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests (p < 0.05). The curing distance significantly interfered with the loss of power density for all curing light devices, with the farthest distance generating the lowest power density and consequently the longer time to achieve an energy density of 16 J/cm(2) (p < 0.01). Comparison of devices showed that Valo, in extra power mode, showed the best results at all distances, followed by Valo in high power mode, Valo in standard mode, Elipar 2, Radii-Cal, and Optilux-401 halogen lamp (p < 0.01). These findings indicate that all curing lights induced a significant loss of irradiance and total energy when the light was emitted farther from the probe. The Valo device in extra power mode showed the highest power density and the shortest time to achieve an energy density of 16 J/cm(2) at all curing distances.

Changes in irradiance and energy density in relation to different curing distances

The present study aimed to assess the influence of curing distance on the loss of irradiance and power density of four curing light devices. The behavior in terms of power density of four different dental curing devices was analyzed (Valo, Elipar 2, Radii-Cal, and Optilux-401) using three different distances of photopolymerization (0 mm, 4 mm, and 8 mm). All devices had their power density measured using a MARC simulator. Ten measurements were made per device at each distance. The total amount of energy delivered and the required curing time to achieve 16 J/cm2 of energy was also calculated. Data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s tests (p < 0.05). The curing distance significantly interfered with the loss of power density for all curing light devices, with the farthest distance generating the lowest power density and consequently the longer time to achieve an energy density of 16 J/cm2 (p < 0.01). Comparison of devices showed that Valo, in extra power mode, showed the best results at all distances, followed by Valo in high power mode, Valo in standard mode, Elipar 2, Radii-Cal, and Optilux-401 halogen lamp (p < 0.01). These findings indicate that all curing lights induced a significant loss of irradiance and total energy when the light was emitted farther from the probe. The Valo device in extra power mode showed the highest power density and the shortest time to achieve an energy density of 16 J/cm2 at all curing distances.