A prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of intraoperative ventilation with high oxygen content on the extent of postoperative pneumocephalus in patients undergoing craniotomies.

Purpose of the article: To determine whether intraoperative ventilation with pure oxygen during the last stage of surgery reduces the occurrence and volume of postoperative pneumocephalus when compared to conventional air/oxygen mixture in patients undergoing craniotomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: prospective randomized single-blinded study to compare the rate of occurrence and volume of postoperative pneumocephalus in patients undergoing craniotomy receiving intraoperative ventilation with pure oxygen (Group B) versus a conventional air/oxygen 1:1 mixture (Group A) during the last stage of surgery. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02722928, protocol number 2015H0032. RESULTS: One hundred patients were randomized into group 'A' and group 'B'. Seventy patients were included in the final analysis with 39 patients allocated in group 'A' and 31 patients in group 'B'. Median and IQR were used for postoperative penumocephalus volume. Group A: 9.65 [3.61-23.20]; Group B: 7.06 [2.70-20.1]. Our study showed no prophylactic effect on postoperative pneumocephalus volume when using mechanical ventilation with higher oxygen concentrations than the standard FiO2 during the last stage of surgery in patients undergoing craniotomy (p = .47). No statistical difference was found in SICU LOS between groups (median 1,380 min [group A] versus 1,524 min [group B]; p = .18). CONCLUSION: The use of intraoperative mechanical ventilation with pure oxygen was not associated with a prophylactic effect on the occurrence and extent of postoperative pneumocephalus in our patient setting. Published literature describing the extent of postoperative pneumocephalus is limited or highly variable among institutions.

"Low-field" intraoperative MRI: a new scenario, a new adaptation.

AIM: To describe the adaptation of Cruces University Hospital to the use of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (ioMRI), and how the acquisition and use of this technology would impact the day-to-day running of the neurosurgical suite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With the approval of the ethics committee, an observational, prospective study was performed from June 2012 to April 2014, which included 109 neurosurgical procedures with the assistance of ioMRI. These were performed using the Polestar N-30 system (PSN30; Medtronic Navigation, Louisville, CO), which was integrated into the operating room. RESULTS: A total of 159 procedures were included: 109 cranial surgeries assisted with ioMRI and 50 control cases (no ioMRI use). There were no statistical significant differences when anaesthetic time (p=0.587) and surgical time (p=0.792) were compared; however, an important difference was shown in duration of patient positioning (p<0.0009) and total duration of the procedure (p<0.0009) between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of ioMRI is necessary for most neurosurgical suites; however, a few things need to be taken into consideration when adapting to it. Increase procedure time, the use of specific MRI-safe devices, as well as a checklist for each patient to minimise risks, should be taken into consideration.

Pre-injury neuro-psychiatric medication use, alone or in combination with cardiac medications, may affect outcomes in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent review of older (≥45-years-old) patients admitted to our trauma center showed that more than one-third were using neuro-psychiatric medications (NPMs) prior to their injury-related admission. Previously published data suggests that use of NPMs may increase patients' risk and severity of injury. We sought to examine the impact of pre-injury NPM use on older trauma patients' morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective record review included medication regimen characteristics and NPM use (antidepressants-AD, antipsychotics-AP, anxiolytics-AA). Hospital morbidity, mortality, and 90-day survival were examined. Comparisons included regimens involving NPMs, further focusing on their interactions with various cardiac medications (beta blocker - BB; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker - ACE/ARB; calcium channel blocker - CCB). RESULTS: 712 patient records were reviewed (399 males, mean age 63.5 years, median ISS 8). 245 patients were taking at least 1 NPM: AD (158), AP (35), or AA (108) before injury. There was no effect of NPM monotherapy on hospital mortality. Patients taking ≥3 NPMs had significantly lower 90-day survival compared to patients taking ≤2 NPMs (81% for 3 or more NPMs, 95% for no NPMs, and 89% 1-2 NPMs, P < 0.01). Several AD-cardiac medication (CM) combinations were associated with increased mortality compared to monotherapy with either agent (BB-AD 14.7% mortality versus 7.0% for AD monotherapy or 4.8% BB monotherapy, P < 0.05). Combinations of ACE/ARB-AA were associated with increased mortality compared to ACE/ARB monotherapy (11.5% vs 4.9, P = 0.04). Finally, ACE/ARB-AD co-administration had higher mortality than ACE/ARB monotherapy (13.5% vs 4.9%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Large proportion of older trauma patients was using pre-injury NPMs. Several regimens involving NPMs and CMs were associated with increased in-hospital mortality. Additionally, use of ≥3 NPMs was associated with lower 90-day survival.

Cognitive self-assessment scales in surgical settings: Acceptability and feasibility.

Pre-existing cognitive impairment is associated with poor surgical outcomes, long hospital stays, and increased morbidity and mortality. This necessitates the use of screening tools to evaluate preoperative cognitive status in elderly surgical patients. Given the growing population of older adults and increased prevalence of cognitive impairment, it is necessary to investigate whether staff-administered or self-administered cognitive screening examinations provide more sensitive information about pre-existing (preoperative) cognitive status. Self-administered Gerocognitive Screening Examination (SAGE) was developed out of the need for a cognitive self-assessment scale in the clinic. At our institution, SAGE was given to 189 elderly surgical patients to evaluate baseline cognitive status, and preliminary results are promising that self-assessment scales are both feasible and acceptable in the surgical setting.

Recruitment manoeuvres in anaesthesia: How many more excuses are there not to use them? / Maniobras de reclutamiento en anestesia: ¿qué más excusas para no usarlas?

Pulmonary recruitment manoeuvres (RM) are intended to reopen collapsed lung areas. RMs are present in nature as a physiological mechanism to get a newborn to open their lungs for the first time at birth, and we also use them, in our usual anaesthesiological clinical practice, after induction or during general anaesthesia when a patient is desaturated. However, there is much confusion in clinical practice regarding their safety, the best way to perform them, when to do them, in which patients they are indicated, and in those where they are totally contraindicated. There are important differences between RM in the patient with adult respiratory distress syndrome, and in a healthy patient during general anaesthesia. Our intention is to review, from a clinical and practical point of view, the use of RM, specifically in anaesthesia.

Apoptosis in murine cardiac grafts.

Apoptosis, or the induction of programmed cell death, is a mechanism commonly used by cytotoxic T cells to cause target cell lysis. We evaluated the frequency and distribution of apoptotic cells in DBA/2-->DBA/2 heterotopic cardiac isografts, acutely rejecting DBA/2-->C57BL/6 cardiac allografts, and accepted, 60 day DBA/2-->C57BL/6 allografts from mice treated with anti-CD4 Mab (GK1.5) or gallium nitrate (GN). Apoptosis was identified in histologic sections via TUNEL analysis of nuclear DNA fragmentation. We observed the following. (1) Cardiac isografts display no detectable TUNEL+ cells. (2) Rejecting cardiac allografts display rare (<1% of nucleated cells/field), diffuse TUNEL+ cells, peaking on day 3 and declining to 50% of peak by the day of rejection (approximately day 10), and TUNEL+ cells were localized to regions of cellular infiltrate rather than myocyte regions. (3) Accepted cardiac allografts display relatively high numbers of TUNEL+ cells localized in and around the large cardiac arteries (about 20% of nucleated cells/periarterial field). These arteries often showed evidence of transplant vascular sclerosis characteristic of chronic allograft rejection. While a few TUNEL+ cells were found in the arterial tissue, most were observed in the periarterial cellular infiltrate. Similar frequencies and distributions of TUNEL+ cells were observed in grafts that were accepted due to treatment with the anti-CD4 mAb GK 1.5 or gallium nitrate. In general, apoptosis did not correlate with graft failure or parenchymal cell damage, suggesting that cytotoxic T cell-mediated destruction of graft tissues is rare in cardiac allografts. While apoptosis does not appear to be indicative of acute rejection, the characteristic periarterial clustering of apoptosis in accepted grafts may be indicative of immunoregulatory processes that maintain graft acceptance or repair processes that promote chronic vascular remodeling.

Treatment of mice with anti-CD3 mAb induces endothelial vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression.

In vivo treatment of mice with anti-CD3 mAb causes polyclonal T cell activation and cytokine release. Since several cytokines are known to alter expression of MHC molecules and adhesion molecules on endothelia, we hypothesized that anti-CD3 mAb treatment should result in activation of vascular endothelia. In previous studies, we established that vascular endothelial cells in murine heterotopic cardiac grafts can develop at least 2 stable inflammatory phenotypes: cardiac allograft endothelia characteristically develop reactivity with MECA-32 mAb (undefined endothelial epitope) and M/K-2 mAb (murine vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1]), whereas cardiac isografts develop reactivity with MECA-32, but not M/K-2 mAb. We now report that a single treatment of cardiac isograft recipients with the anti-CD3 mAb 145-2C11 caused expression of VCAM-1 on all cardiac isograft endothelia, including the microvascular endothelia. In contrast, expression of endothelial VCAM-1 in the native heart of the isograft recipient was limited to patchy areas of larger arteries. This patchy, arterial pattern of VCAM-1 expression was observed in lung, liver, kidney, and thymus of all mice treated with 145-2C11, whether or not they were implanted with a cardiac isograft, and was dissociated from expression of MECA-32 mAb reactivity. Hence, treatment of mice with anti-CD3 mAb causes systemic endothelial activation (VCAM-1 expression), and endothelial cells of recently implanted cardiac isografts appear to be hypersensitive to induction of VCAM-1 by anti-CD3 mAb treatment. Further studies showed that (1) treatment with 145-2C11 F(ab)'2 fragments did not induce endothelial activation, (2) intravenous pretreatment with pentoxifylline eliminated all endothelial effects of 145-2C11 treatment, (3) induction of endothelial activation by 145-2C11 mAb always paralleled the expression of adverse physiologic symptoms, and (4) mice exhibit strain-specific differences in endothelial responses to 145-2C11 treatment. We propose that anti-CD3 mAb treatment causes simultaneous activation of circulating T cells and systemic vascular endothelial cells which may facilitate systemic lymphocyte-endothelial interactions, and may explain the rapid disappearance of T cells from the circulation that is associated with anti-CD3 treatment in mouse and man.

Prolonged murine cardiac allograft acceptance: characteristics of persistent active alloimmunity after treatment with gallium nitrate versus anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody.

We have treated DBA/2-->C57BL/6 murine cardiac allograft recipients with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody or with gallium nitrate to promote long-term (>60 days) allograft survival. Within this period, all grafts developed histologic evidence of ongoing vascular and parenchymal tissue remodeling, including interstitial fibrosis and neointimal hyperplasia, which are characteristic of chronic allograft rejection. To evaluate residual alloimmunity associated with the pharmacologic avoidance of acute graft rejection and the development of chronic tissue remodeling, we subjected these graft recipients to a battery of histologic and immunologic tests. Similar test results were obtained for graft recipients treated with either of the two immunosuppressive agents. All long-surviving allografts displayed histologic evidence of ongoing microvascular endothelial activation and interstitial leukocytic infiltration. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analyses demonstrated intragraft expression of mRNAs for interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor, interferon-gamma, and transforming growth factor-beta. All recipients had limiting dilution analysis-detectable, graft-reactive cytolytic T lymphocytes and helper T lymphocytes in their spleens and grafts, and all produced high titers of graft-reactive alloantibodies. In general, these observations indicate that (1) a similar immune status is achieved in long-surviving allografts and their recipients when either anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody or gallium nitrate was used for antirejection therapy, (2) this immune status is characterized by continuous, long-term inflammatory and immune processes that are qualitatively similar to those observed during acute allograft rejection, and (3) no specific immune responses developed selectively in long-term graft recipients to account for the avoidance of acute graft rejection or the development of chronic tissue remodeling in the graft.

Patterns of inflammatory vascular endothelial changes in murine liver grafts.

We have investigated the vascular endothelial phenotypes found at various times posttransplant in murine B10-->C3H liver grafts. In this model, liver allografts are spontaneously accepted, and survive indefinitely unless the recipient is first allosensitized with a skin allograft, in which case the liver allografts are rejected within five days. In our previous studies, allograft inflammation was associated with the development of vascular endothelial reactivity with the mAbs MECA-32 and M/K-2 (anti-VCAM-1). We observed that vascular endothelia in both liver isografts and allografts develop reactivity with MECA-32 mAb within two days of transplantation, indicating endothelial activation in both situations. In contrast, only the endothelia in liver allografts develop VCAM-1 expression, as detected with M/K-2 mAb. VCAM-1 was expressed in both rejecting and accepting liver allografts, demonstrating that endothelial VCAM-1 expression is indicative of ongoing graft inflammation but not necessarily graft rejection. Liver parenchymal cells did not appear to develop reactivity with either antibody under any of the conditions tested. In contrast, bile duct epithelia developed M/K-2 reactivity (VCAM-1 expression), but not MECA-32 reactivity in liver allografts, but not isografts. These data demonstrate alloantigen-dependent and alloantigen-independent patterns of endothelial behavior in murine liver grafts that are quite similar to those found in murine cardiac grafts. Further, they demonstrate that the expression of VCAM-1 by graft endothelia is not diagnostic for acute rejection of liver allografts.

Prevention of murine cardiac allograft rejection with gallium nitrate. Comparison with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody.

Gallium nitrate (GN) was evaluated for its ability to interfere with a cute rejection of DBA/2-->C57BL/6 heterotopic cardiac allografts, in comparison with the depleting anti-CD4 mAb, GK1.5. The administration of GN for 30 days (s.c. 30 mg/kg elemental gallium on days 0 and 3, 10 mg/kg every third day) resulted in >60-day graft survival in 78% (25 of 32) of the graft recipients, whereas 2 perioperative injections of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) resulted in >60-day graft survival in 58% (24 of 41) of the graft recipients. Serum gallium levels peaked at about 2000 ng/ml after 2-3 weeks of treatment and decreased to about 300 ng/ml by day 60, a level that was maintained for at least 30 more days. During the early posttransplant period, 25% of GN-treated grafts, but not anti-CD4 mAb-treated grafts, exhibited an unusual, transient reduction in graft impulse strength, suggesting a transient rejection response. Macroscopically, the long-surviving (>60 days) grafts from either treatment group exhibited none of the features of rejecting allografts. Histologically, they exhibited minor edema and rare epicardial inflammation but no tissue necrosis. However, there were vascular changes in allografts from GN-treated mice, including altered endothelial morphology, associated with moderate intimal hyperplasia and mild perivascular leukocytic infiltration. Allografts from anti-CD4 mAb-treated mice exhibited prominent neointimal hyperplasia associated with endothelial morphologic changes and prominent vascular and perivascular leukocytic infiltration. In general, both GN and anti-CD4 mAb promoted long-term allograft survival, but these allografts displayed the histopathologic signs of ongoing inflammation and chronic allograft rejection.

Prevention of acute murine cardiac allograft rejection: anti-CD4 or anti-vascular cell adhesion molecule one monoclonal antibodies block acute rejection but permit persistent graft-reactive alloimmunity and chronic tissue remodelling.

We treated C57BL/6 mouse recipients of DBA/2 cardiac allografts with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) or anti-vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 mAb to promote long-term allograft survival and subjected both the recipient animals and the long-surviving allografts to a battery of histologic and immunologic tests. The results were similar regardless of the mAb used for antirejection therapy. At all tested times after transplantation, the allografts displayed histologic evidence of ongoing microvascular endothelial activation and interstitial leukocytic infiltration. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction analyses revealed continuous intragraft expression of messenger RNA for interleukin 1, interleukin 2, interleukin 4, interleukin 6, tumor necrosis factor, interferon gamma, and transforming growth factor beta. All grafts had histologic evidence of ongoing vascular and parenchymal tissue remodeling, including interstitial fibrosis and vascular neointimal hyperplasia. The graft recipients retained limiting dilution analysis--detectable, donor-reactive cytolytic T lymphocyte, and helper T lymphocyte in their spleens and produced high liters of donor-reactive alloantibodies. Variable amounts of allogeneic microchimerism were detectable in some, but not all of the long-surviving graft recipients. In general, these observations indicate that (1) a similar immune status is achieved in long-surviving allografts and their recipients when either anti-CD4 mAb or anti-vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 mAb was used for antirejection therapy, in spite of the major differences in lineage and distribution of cells targeted by these two mAbs, (2) this immune status is characterized by continuous, long-term inflammatory and immune processes very similar to those observed during acute allograft rejection, and (3) in spite of these processes the allografts continue to function, although they invariably develop a chronic rejection-like histopathologic condition that may ultimately limit graft function. In this regard, the recipients of long-surviving allografts do not seem to be tolerant of their graft alloantigens.

Gene therapy in transplantation: pathological consequences of unavoidable plasmid contamination with lipopolysaccharide.

Experimental studies evaluated the responses of murine cardiac graft recipients to high and low levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) contaminating plasmid DNA preparations. Immediately prior to transplantation, graft recipients were transfected by injecting the quadriceps muscles with plasmids that encoded the murine interleukin (IL)-4 gene and beta-galactosidase (beta-gal) gene. Graft recipients transfected with plasmids encoding only the beta-gal gene served as negative plasmid controls. Three groups of mice were transfected with plasmids containing high levels of contaminating LPS: (a) nontransplanted C57B1/6 mice, (b) C57B1/6 cardiac isograft recipients, (c) DBA/2 (H-2d)-->C57BL/6 (H-2b) cardiac allograft recipients. Unexpectedly, graft failure within 24 h was observed in IL-4 transfected isograft and allograft recipients, but not in mice transfected with the beta-gal gene alone. However, histopathological findings, for example, vascular cell adhesion moelcule-1 (VCAM-1) expression in cardiac grafts and mononuclear lung infiltration, were remarkably similar for both treatment groups and consistent with LPS-induced pathology. LPS assays were used to evaluate four different methods of plasmid purification for degree of LPS contamination. A successful strategy for reducing levels of LPS contamination was identified and transfection experiments repeated in cardiac allograft recipients receiving LPS inoculum that were minimized and standardized (6.4 EU/mouse) for all treatment groups. Despite receiving substantially lower levels of LPS, in all treatment groups there was persistent cardiac graft endothelial cell activation manifested by VCAM-1 expression and persistent, albeit less severe, lung pathology. We found that plasmid contamination with LPS was unavoidable and that even very low levels can alter immune responses in transplant recipients confounding data interpretation. Thus, it is imperative to account for LPS contamination in experiments utilizing plasmid DNA for gene transfer, especially in experimental models of immunity and inflammation.

Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with drug-eluting stents.

Significant advancements in percutaneous treatment of coronary artery disease have been achieved with the introduction of bare metal stents. They have two major drawbacks: acute/subacute stent thrombosis, successfully managed with antiplatelet therapy immediately after stent implantation; and in-stent restenosis, prevention of which has been achieved with the development of drug-eluting stents. Drug-eluting stents have become preferred therapy for patients undergoing coronary artery intervention, though reports of late stent thrombosis have led to uncertainty about the duration of antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents placement. Much controversy remains regarding perioperative management of patients with these devices, presenting for surgery or other invasive procedures. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the changing culture of coronary artery stenting, in addition to discussing perioperative management strategies and controversies surrounding coronary stents and antiplatelet therapy. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE was conducted using as keywords: antiplatelet therapy, non-coronary surgery, drug-eluting stents, and stent thrombosis. There is no definite standard of care for the perioperative management of drug-eluting stents in patients with drug-eluting stents. However, there is a growing understanding of the importance of continuation of drug-eluting stents in the perioperative period in order to prevent stent thrombosis along with a concern about the possibility of increased bleeding. Appropriate timing of surgery after coronary artery stenting, team approach to the perioperative management of such patients with involvement of cardiologist, anesthesiologist, and surgeon, and development of an individual plan for each patient, weighing that patient's risk of thrombosis vs the risk of bleeding, could improve patient safety and optimize outcome.