Burden of paediatric Rotavirus Gastroenteritis (RVGE) and potential benefits of a universal Rotavirus vaccination programme with a pentavalent vaccine in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus is the most common cause of gastroenteritis in young children worldwide. The aim of the study was to assess the health outcomes and the economic impact of a universal rotavirus vaccination programme with RotaTeq, the pentavalent rotavirus vaccine, versus no vaccination programme in Spain. METHODS: A birth cohort was followed up to the age of 5 using a cohort model. Epidemiological parameters were taken from the REVEAL study (a prospective epidemiological study conducted in Spain, 2004-2005) and from the literature. Direct and indirect costs were assessed from the national healthcare payer and societal perspectives by combining health care resource utilisation collected in REVEAL study and unit costs from official sources. RotaTeq per protocol efficacy data was taken from a large worldwide rotavirus clinical trial (70,000 children). Health outcomes included home care cases, General Practioner (GP)/Paediatrician, emergency department visits, hospitalisations and nosocomial infections. RESULTS: The model estimates that the introduction of a universal rotavirus vaccination programme with RotaTeq (90% coverage rate) would reduce the rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) burden by 75% in Spain; 53,692 home care cases, 35,187 GP/Paediatrician visits, 34,287 emergency department visits, 10,987 hospitalisations and 2,053 nosocomial infections would be avoided. The introduction of RotaTeq would avoid about 76% of RVGE-related costs from both perspectives: euro22 million from the national health system perspective and euro38 million from the societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: A rotavirus vaccination programme with RotaTeq would reduce significantly the important medical and economic burden of RVGE in Spain.

Using triple antiplatelet therapy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome managed invasively: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel undergoing an early invasive treatment strategy. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-utility analysis were performed from a health-care system perspective, based on a Markov model with a time horizon of the patient life span. The risk of death and ischemic events was assessed using the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score. We compared three strategies: 1) routine upstream use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor to all patients before angiography, 2) deferred selective use of abciximab in the catheterization laboratory just before angioplasty, and 3) double antiplatelet therapy without GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. Both univariate sensitivity analysis and second-order probabilistic microsimulation were performed. RESULTS: In the base case (65 years old, TIMI score 3), strategy A was the most effective, with an ICER of 15,150 euros per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Strategy B was dominated by a combination of strategies A and C. The ICER was very sensitive to the age and baseline risk of the patient. According to the widely accepted cost-effectiveness thresholds, strategy A would be cost-effective only in patients with an intermediate to high TIMI score, especially within the younger age groups. The probability that strategy A was cost-effective under the base case was 91.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors upstream in high-risk NSTE-ACS patients (TIMI score > or = 3) pretreated with aspirin and clopidogrel is cost-effective, particularly in the younger age groups.

Model of excellence in Rheumatology Day Hospitals in Spain: the HD-Reumatolex project.

OBJECTIVES: Biologics have shown greater efficacy than traditional treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, although some cannot be administered on an outpatient basis. Day hospitalization requires the patient to attend the hospital for a few hours to receive those treatments that cannot be administered on an outpatient basis or that do not justify admission to hospital. Few studies have analyzed the situation of Rheumatology Day Hospitals (RDH) in Spain. The HD-Reumatolex project aims to evaluate the situation of Spanish RDHs in terms of strategy, training, management, and quality of care. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The project was based on a "model of excellence in RDH" design, which made it possible to perform a comparative analysis (benchmarking) of 21 Rheumatology Departments. The 19 criteria evaluated were divided into 3 categories: Strategic processes, Key processes, and Support processes. RESULTS: The lowest mean scores were recorded for follow-up of clinical practice guidelines/recommendations and existence of a quality plan (Strategic processes), criteria for training among RDH professionals (Support processes), and admission and discharge (Key processes). Five RDH achieved the benchmark when the position obtained by the RDH in Key processes was plotted against the one obtained in Strategic processes and Support processes. One RDH emerged as a clear leader in the comparison. CONCLUSIONS: None of the RDH obtained the total maximum score at the category level or at the total results level, thus revealing room for improvement in the attainment of excellence for all the participating centers.