Prognostic relevance of demographic factors in cardiac magnetic resonance-proven acute myocarditis: A cohort study.

Aim: Acute myocarditis (AM) is a heterogeneous condition with variable estimates of survival. Contemporary criteria for the diagnosis of clinically suspected AM enable non-invasive assessment, resulting in greater sensitivity and more representative cohorts. We aimed to describe the demographic characteristics and long-term outcomes of patients with AM diagnosed using non-invasive criteria. Methods and results: A total of 199 patients with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-confirmed AM were included. The majority (n = 130, 65%) were male, and the average age was 39 ± 16 years. Half of the patients were White (n = 99, 52%), with the remainder from Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups. The most common clinical presentation was chest pain (n = 156, 78%), with smaller numbers presenting with breathlessness (n = 25, 13%) and arrhythmias (n = 18, 9%). Patients admitted with breathlessness were sicker and more often required inotropes, steroids, and renal replacement therapy (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.01, respectively). Over a median follow-up of 53 (IQR 34-76) months, 11 patients (6%) experienced an adverse outcome, defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Patients in the arrhythmia group had a worse prognosis, with a nearly sevenfold risk of adverse events [hazard ratio (HR) 6.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.87-26.00, p = 0.004]. Sex and ethnicity were not significantly associated with the outcome. Conclusion: AM is highly heterogeneous with an overall favourable prognosis. Three-quarters of patients with AM present with chest pain, which is associated with a benign prognosis. AM presenting with life-threatening arrhythmias is associated with a higher risk of adverse events.

Progestogen-only pill associates with false-positive aldosterone/renin ratio screening test.

Aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) is commonly used to screen for primary hyperaldosteronism (Conn's disease). A number of drugs can alter ARR measurements, thus requiring omission before testing. However, hormonal agents such as the combined oral contraceptive (COCP) or progestogen-only pill (POP) are not listed for omission. A 20-year-old woman was referred to the endocrinology team, following investigations for syncope by her cardiologist, when ARR was found to be elevated. She was taking POP (Cerelle®) while having ARR measured. After omitting POP for four weeks, plasma aldosterone concentration was reduced by 52% (from 560 pmol/L to 271 pmol/L, reference range: 100-450 pmol/L), plasma renin concentration increased by 253% (from 3.6 mU/L to 12.7 mU/L, reference range: 5.4-30 mU/L) and ARR reduced from 156 to 21 (-86.5%) (reference range: <80 suggests Conn's unlikely). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of POP-related false-positive ARR screening for primary hyperaldosteronism. Omission of POP should, therefore, be considered in women undergoing ARR measurement.

Changing trends in the use of novel oral anticoagulants and warfarin for treating non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of thromboembolism by novel oral anticoagulants is increasing, whilst use of vitamin K antagonists is on the decline. We assessed changes in the use of these anticoagulants in treating non-valvular atrial fibrillation between 2014 and 2018. METHODS: One-hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients (95 men, 67 women) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, mean age 72.3 years (standard deviation = 11.0), underwent cardiac assessment in a single cardiac unit. Use of anticoagulants at the time of investigation was documented: overall 83 (51.2%) patients were prescribed novel oral anticoagulants and 79 (48.8%) warfarin treatment. Trends in treatment rates with either anticoagulant class over time were characterised by calculating the average annual percentage change using a Joinpoint Regression Program 4.7.0.0. RESULTS: There were diverging trends in anticoagulant treatment from 2014 to 2018 without join points: yearly increase in novel oral anticoagulant treatment (41.9, 45.5, 53.7, 53.1 and 72.7%, average annual percentage change = 16.2%, 95% confidence interval = 5.8% to 27.5%, p < 0.001), and decrease in warfarin treatment (57.1, 54.5, 46.3, 46.9 and 27.3%, average annual percentage change = -14.4%, 95% confidence interval = -25.2% to -2.1%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Changing trends in treatment with anticoagulants for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation observed within less than two years provide important information to healthcare services to estimate future pharmaco-economic costs for such treatments.

Sex differences in the agreement between left ventricular ejection fraction measured by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and by echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is generally measured by echocardiography but is increasingly available with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. With myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, the threshold of LVEF below which there is a risk for myocardial infarct or sudden cardiac death is higher for women (51%) than for men (43%). We tested the hypothesis that such a sex difference may also occur with echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. METHODS: Four hundred and four men, mean age = 67.7 ± SD = 12.3 yr; 339 women, 67.7 ± 11.7 yr had separate myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography examinations within six months. A subset of 327 of these patients (181 men, 68.8 ± 12.1 yr; 146 women, 66.4 ± 12.1 yr) had examinations within one month and were additionally analysed as this sub-group. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography were used to measure LVEF at rest and their agreement (neither considered as a reference method) was assessed by Bland-Altman plots: LVEF difference (myocardial perfusion scintigraphy minus echocardiography ) against average LVEF ( MPS + Echo 2 ). RESULTS: Of patients who had myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and echocardiography performed within six months, mean LVEF difference = +1.1% (95% limits of agreement: -19.3 to +21.6) in men but +10.9% (-10.7 to +32.5) in women. LVEF difference diverged from zero marginally in men (mean difference = +1.1, 95%CI = +0.1 to +2.1, p = 0.028) but more in women (+10.9, +9.8 to +12.1, p < 0.001). The LVEF difference correlated with average LVEF itself in both men (r = 0.305, p < 0.001) and women (r = 0.361, p < 0.001), and with age in women (r = 0.117, p = 0.031). Similar results were observed for the subset. CONCLUSIONS: Caution should be taken when interpreting LVEF measured by different techniques due to their wide limits of agreement and systematic bias, more markedly in women.