Asthma control in Brazil: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To explore asthma control in patients undergoing pharmacotherapy on studies in the last 20 years in Brazil. Asthma is a chronic airway inflammation disease with a high prevalence worldwide. Even with a variety of drug treatment improvements, attaining asthma control is challenging, since it should have a personalized approach. In Brazil, studies on the prevalence of asthma control are scarce and usually from a small sample size. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review was performed to assess asthma control in Brazilian population. Terms related to "asthma", "asthma control" and "Brazil" were used in the search strategies in PubMed, BVSalud, Embase and Cochrane Library, including Brazilian Journal of Allergy and Immunology as data sources. A narrative synthesis was performed to report key outcome. STUDY SELECTIONS: In total, 23 studies were included. Most of them were conducted in the Southeastern and Northeast regions, in a short duration. RESULTS: Pediatric and non-pediatric population were assessed, with a higher proportion of female. In pediatric population, those with poorly controlled asthma usually had severe or persistent disease. In elderly, an increased asthma severity was found, although proper treatment might be effective. Most studies (70%) also described exacerbations, hospitalizations (48%), quality of life (39%), and emergency visits (30%). Despite heterogeneity of outcomes and population, studies show an important prevalence of uncontrolled asthma even in patients being treated, with better disease control with treatment improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Studies in Brazil have shown that asthma control remains a challenge and there is still a need for improvement on disease management.

Risk assessment validation in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: Data from a Southern Brazil registry (RESPHIRAR study).

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a severe and progressive disease characterized by increased pulmonary vascular resistance, ultimately leading to right heart failure and death. Registries are a valuable tool in the research of rare conditions such as PAH. Moreover, the risk assessment strategy has been validated in European and North American registries and has been reported to provide an accurate prediction of mortality and the clinical advantage of reaching low-risk status. However, there is no available data from Brazil. Thus, the aim of the present study was to describe the characteristics of a sample of PAH from Southern Brazil and to retrospectively validate the risk assessment at our population. The RESPHIRAR is a retrospective and multicentric registry on pulmonary hypertension. With a join collaboration from nine centers in Southern Brazil, demographics, clinical presentation, and hemodynamics data of PAH were collected between 2007 and 2017. Moreover, the REVEAL 2.0 and REVEAL 2.0 Lite risk assessments were validated in our population. Overall, 370 PAH patients were included in the present study. Patients were predominantly female (78.5%) and had a mean age of 41.8 ± 18.8 years. Most patients (33.4%) had idiopathic PAH, 30.2% had PAH associated with congenital heart disease, and 23.5% had PAH associated with connective tissue disease. The low-risk group showed significantly lower mortality than the intermediated- or high-risk group at diagnosis (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our data suggest that REVEAL 2.0 and REVEAL 2.0 Lite risk assessments can predict mortality risk in PAH patients in Southern Brazil.

Prevalence of the eosinophilic phenotype among severe asthma patients in Brazil: the BRAEOS study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of the eosinophilic and allergic phenotypes of severe asthma in Brazil, as well as to investigate the clinical characteristics of severe asthma patients in the country. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of adult patients diagnosed with severe asthma and managed at specialized centers in Brazil. The study was conducted in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 385 patients were included in the study. Of those, 154 had a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 and 231 had a blood eosinophil count of ≤ 300 cells/mm3. The median age was 54.0 years, and most of the patients were female, with a BMI of 29.0 kg/m2 and a history of allergy (81.6%). The prevalence of patients with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 was 40.0% (95% CI: 35.1-44.9), and that of those with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 and a history of allergy was 31.9% (95% CI: 27.3-36.6). Age and BMI showed positive associations with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 (OR = 0.97, p < 0.0001; and OR = 0.96, p = 0.0233, respectively), whereas the time elapsed since the onset of asthma symptoms showed an increased association with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 (OR = 1.02, p = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: This study allowed us to characterize the population of severe asthma patients in Brazil, showing the prevalence of the eosinophilic phenotype (in 40% of the sample). Our results reveal the relevance of the eosinophilic phenotype of severe asthma at a national level, contributing to increased effectiveness in managing the disease and implementing public health strategies.

2021 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of severe asthma.

Advances in the understanding that severe asthma is a complex and heterogeneous disease and in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of asthma, with the identification of different phenotypes and endotypes, have allowed new approaches for the diagnosis and characterization of the disease and have resulted in relevant changes in pharmacological management. In this context, the definition of severe asthma has been established, being differentiated from difficult-to-control asthma. These recommendations address this topic and review advances in phenotyping, use of biomarkers, and new treatments for severe asthma. Emphasis is given to topics regarding personalized management of the patient and selection of biologicals, as well as the importance of evaluating the response to treatment. These recommendations apply to adults and children with severe asthma and are targeted at physicians involved in asthma treatment. A panel of 17 Brazilian pulmonologists was invited to review recent evidence on the diagnosis and management of severe asthma, adapting it to the Brazilian reality. Each of the experts was responsible for reviewing a topic or question relevant to the topic. In a second phase, four experts discussed and structured the texts produced, and, in the last phase, all experts reviewed and approved the present manuscript and its recommendations.

Prevalence of the eosinophilic phenotype among severe asthma patients in Brazil: the BRAEOS study / Prevalência do fenótipo eosinofílico em pacientes com asma grave no Brasil: o estudo BRAEOS

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the prevalence of the eosinophilic and allergic phenotypes of severe asthma in Brazil, as well as to investigate the clinical characteristics of severe asthma patients in the country. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of adult patients diagnosed with severe asthma and managed at specialized centers in Brazil. The study was conducted in 2019. Results: A total of 385 patients were included in the study. Of those, 154 had a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 and 231 had a blood eosinophil count of ≤ 300 cells/mm3. The median age was 54.0 years, and most of the patients were female, with a BMI of 29.0 kg/m2 and a history of allergy (81.6%). The prevalence of patients with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 was 40.0% (95% CI: 35.1-44.9), and that of those with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 and a history of allergy was 31.9% (95% CI: 27.3-36.6). Age and BMI showed positive associations with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 (OR = 0.97, p < 0.0001; and OR = 0.96, p = 0.0233, respectively), whereas the time elapsed since the onset of asthma symptoms showed an increased association with a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3 (OR = 1.02, p = 0.0011). Conclusions: This study allowed us to characterize the population of severe asthma patients in Brazil, showing the prevalence of the eosinophilic phenotype (in 40% of the sample). Our results reveal the relevance of the eosinophilic phenotype of severe asthma at a national level, contributing to increased effectiveness in managing the disease and implementing public health strategies.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar a prevalência dos fenótipos eosinofílico e alérgico da asma grave no Brasil e investigar as características clínicas dos pacientes com asma grave no país. Métodos: Estudo transversal com pacientes adultos com diagnóstico de asma grave atendidos em centros especializados no Brasil. O estudo foi realizado em 2019. Resultados: Foram incluídos no estudo 385 pacientes. Destes, 154 apresentavam contagem de eosinófilos no sangue > 300 células/mm3 e 231 apresentavam contagem de eosinófilos no sangue ≤ 300 células/mm3. A mediana da idade foi de 54,0 anos, e a maioria dos pacientes era do sexo feminino, com IMC de 29,0 kg/m2 e história de alergia (81,6%). A prevalência de pacientes com contagem de eosinófilos no sangue > 300 células/mm3 foi de 40,0% (IC95%: 35,1-44,9), e a daqueles com contagem de eosinófilos no sangue > 300 células/mm3 e história de alergia foi de 31,9% (IC95%: 27,3-36,6). A idade e o IMC apresentaram associações positivas com contagem de eosinófilos no sangue > 300 células/mm3 (OR = 0,97, p < 0,0001 e OR = 0,96, p = 0,0233, respectivamente), ao passo que o tempo decorrido desde o início dos sintomas de asma apresentou associação aumentada com contagem de eosinófilos no sangue > 300 células/mm3 (OR = 1,02, p = 0,0011). Conclusões: Este estudo possibilitou a caracterização da população de pacientes com asma grave no Brasil, mostrando a prevalência do fenótipo eosinofílico (em 40% da amostra). Nossos resultados revelam a relevância do fenótipo eosinofílico da asma grave em nível nacional, contribuindo para aumentar a eficácia no manejo da doença e na implantação de estratégias de saúde pública.

Cessação do tabagismo: revisão dos diferentes métodos / Tobacco cessation: a review of different methods

Objetivos: O artigo revisa os métodos de tratamento atualmente mais indicados para cessação do tabagismo. Métodos: Uma busca nas bases Medline/Pubmed e Lilacs foi realizada com termos referentes a cessação do tabagismo, produtos utilizados para cessar o tabagismo e taxa de abstinência. Foram selecionadas revisões sistemáticas e ensaios clínicos em texto completo, publicados nos últimos 5 anos, em língua inglesa ou portuguesa, tendo como participantes humanos adultos. Após análise foram incluídos 10 artigos para revisão. Resultados: Em relação à terapia comportamental, o emprego de aconselhamento telefônico teve pior desfecho em comparação aos contatos pessoais (p=0.01) e à combinação de ambos (p=0.01). A abordagem proativa favorece a taxa de abstinência (p<0.001). O incentivo financeiro, no entanto, não teve efeitos sobre a taxa de abstinência a longo prazo (p=0.95). Quanto à terapia farmacológica, a bupropiona (OR 1.84) e a vareniclina (OR 2.88), isoladamente, aumentaram a taxa de abstinência comparadas ao placebo, tendo a vareniclina demonstrado resultados superiores (OR 1.57). A Terapia de Reposição Nicotínica combinada com bupropiona ou nortriptilina não resultou em aumento na taxa de abstinência quando comparada à Terapia de Reposição de Nicotina em monoterapia (OR 0.99). A nortriptilina também aumentou a taxa de abstinência, com poucos efeitos adversos (RR 2.03). A associação de bupropiona e vareniclina gerou maior taxa de abstinência em um mês comparada à monoterapia com vareniclina (p=0.029). Não houve diferença significativa entre Terapia de Reposição de Nicotina por goma comparada ao adesivo transdérmico em relação à redução do tabagismo (p>0.05). Conclusões: Diversos medicamentos são eficazes e estão disponíveis para auxílio à cessação do tabagismo. Deve-se avaliar o contexto clínico de cada paciente, ofertando a terapia mais adequada a cada caso. Abordagens proativas e motivacionais, além da facilitação do acesso aos recursos de tratamento também melhoram as taxas de abstinência.

Aims: This article aims to present a review of tobacco cessation methods currently most indicated in order to update health professionals. Methods: It was performed a search in Medline/Pubmed and Lilacs using terms referring to smoking cessation, smoking cessation products and Abstinence Rate. Systematic reviews and clinical trials in full text articles, published in the last five years in English or Portuguese, having human adults as participants, were selected. After analysing adequacy to the subject, 10 articles were included to be reviewed. Results: Regarding to non-pharmacological therapies, telephone counselling showed worse results in comparison to personal therapy (p=0.01) and also comparing to the combination of them (p=0.01). Besides, a proactive approach enhances abstinence rate when compared to usual approach (p<0.001). Cash incentive did not result in a higher abstinences rates in long term when compared to control group (p=0.95). In relation to pharmacological therapy, bupropion (OR 1.84) and varenicline (OR 2.88), separately, increased abstinence rate in comparison to placebo, although varenicline showed superior results (OR 1.57). Nicotine Replacement Therapy in combination with bupropion or nortriptilin did not result in a higher abstinence rate when compared to Nicotine Replacement Therapy as monotherapy (OR 0.99). Nortriptilin enhances abstinence rate, with little adverse events (RR 2.03). Combination of bupropion and varenicline resulted in an increased abstinence rate in one month in comparison to varenicline as single therapy (p=0.029). There was no significant difference between Nicotine Replacement Therapy with nicotine gum and patch in relation to smoking reduction (p>0.05). Conclusions: Many medications were found to be effective and are available for smoking cessation. Clinical context of each patient should be evaluated, offering the most appropriate therapy. Proactive approaches and simplified access to resources also improve abstinence rates.