Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Heart Lung ; 64: 31-35, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37988854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Ventilation configurations are of great clinical importance for adequate outcomes in mechanically ventilated patients, and they may even be used as specific physical therapy techniques. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of lung hyperinflation through mechanical ventilation (HMV) with HMV plus flow bias optimization regarding respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and volume of secretion. METHODS: Patients mechanically ventilated > 24 h were included in this randomized crossover clinical trial. The following techniques were applied: HMV alone (control group) and HMV plus flow bias optimization (intervention group). RESULTS: The 20 included patients underwent both techniques, totaling 40 collections. A total of 52 % were women, the mean age was 60.8 (SD, 15.7) years, and the mean mechanical ventilation time was 4.3 (SD, 3.0) days. The main cause of mechanical ventilation was sepsis (44 %). Expiratory flow bias in optimized HMV was higher. than conventional HMV (p < 0.001). The volume of tracheal secretions collected was higher during optimized than conventional HMV. (p = 0.012). Significant differences in peak flow occurred at the beginning of the technique and a there was a significant decrease in respiratory system resistance immediately and 30 min after applying the technique in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: The volume of tracheal secretions collected was higher during optimized HMV, and, HMV with flow bias optimization resulted in lower respiratory system resistance and flow peaks and produced expiratory flow bias.


Assuntos
Respiração Artificial , Ventiladores Mecânicos , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Respiração Artificial/efeitos adversos , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Mecânica Respiratória , Pulmão , Higiene
2.
Physiother Res Int ; 27(2): e1936, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35060664

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Manual hyperinflation (MHI) or with a mechanical ventilator (VHI) are alternatives in bronchial hygiene therapy, in recent years several studies have emerged with the objective of verifying the effectiveness and safety of the techniques. OBJECTIVE: Systematically review and analyze the most recent studies in the literature on MHI and VHI, compare both techniques and demonstrate their effectiveness in bronchial hygiene therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: We conducted this systematic review based on the PICO strategy and used the databases Ovid, LILACS, CINAHL, Pubmed and CENTRAL. Search, selection and analysis of randomized controlled trials on MHI, VHI or comparing both techniques. We performed a comparison on secretion elimination, static and dynamic compliance, oxygenation and clinical outcomes. The studies were analyzed by two independent evaluators. RESULTS: Nine articles were selected comparing MHI with usual care, demonstrating improved compliance in the MHI group, but with no impact on secretion removal. Four studies compared VHI with usual care, with three showing increased secretion elimination and compliance in the HVM group. Another four articles compared MHI with VHI but none of the studies showed superiority in terms of elimination of secretion and three studies found improvement in static compliance. CONCLUSION: Both techniques have proven to be effective alternatives to bronchial hygiene therapy.


Assuntos
Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Respiração Artificial , Adulto , Humanos , Pulmão , Respiração Artificial/métodos , Ventiladores Mecânicos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa