Reducing biosolids from a membrane bioreactor system: Assessing the effects on carbon and nutrient removal, membrane fouling and greenhouse gas emissions.

This study presents the effects on carbon and nutrient removal, membrane fouling and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of an Oxic-Settling-Anaerobic (OSA) - Membrane Bioreactor (MBR) pilot plant fed with real wastewater. The influence of three sludge return internal ratios (IR) was investigated by testing 45, 75 and 100%. The results showed that with the increase of IR, the biological sludge production substantially decreased by 85.8% due to the combination of cell lysis and endogenous metabolism. However, a worsening of ammonia removal efficiencies occurred (from 94.5 % to 84.7 with an IR value of 45 and 100%, respectively) mostly due to the ammonia release caused by cell lysis under anaerobic conditions. The N2O emission factor increased with the rise of IR (namely, from 2.17% to 2.54% of the total influent nitrogen). In addition, a variation of carbon footprint (CF) (0.78, 0.62 and 0.75 kgCO2eq m-3 with 45, 75 and 100% IR, respectively) occurred with IR mainly due to the different energy consumption and carbon oxidation during the three periods. The study's relevance is to address the optimal operating conditions in view of reducing sludge production. In this light, the need to identify a trade-off between the advantages of reducing sludge production and the disadvantages of increasing membrane fouling and GHG emissions must be identified in the future.

Investigation of intermittent aeration and oxic settling anaerobic process combination for nitrogen removal and sewage sludge reduction.

A pilot plant with a conventional activated sludge (CAS) system with intermittent aeration (IA) was monitored. The system was configured as an Oxic Settling Anaerobic (OSA) process with the insertion of one anaerobic side-stream reactor (ASSR). The pilot plant was fed with real wastewater and an intensive experimental campaign was carried out including sludge minimization, nitrogen and carbon removal, GHG emissions and biokinetic parameters. The experimental campaign was divided into periods: Period I, II, and III. In Periods I and II, the ASSR reactor was operated with two different hydraulic retention times (HRT), 4 and 6 h, with an aeration/non-aeration ratio of 30 min/30 min. In Period III, the HRT in the anaerobic reactor was the same as in Period II. In contrast, the biological reactor's aerated/non-aerated ratio was increased to 40 min/20 min. Results demonstrated that combining IA and OSA might be effective in the reduction of excess sludge production. The yield coefficient decreased from Period I to Period II (Yobs from 0.41 to 0.25 gTSS gCOD-1, in Period I and II, respectively). Nevertheless, the HRT increase in the ASSR compromised the system performance regarding nitrification and greenhouse gas emissions and worsened the sludge settleability. However, the increase in the aeration duration was beneficial in restoring the system's nitrification and denitrification ability and carbon footprint. The lowest carbon footprint was obtained during Period III (6.8 kgCO2/d).

The effect of aeration mode (intermittent vs. continuous) on nutrient removal and greenhouse gas emissions in the wastewater treatment plant of Corleone (Italy).

The paper reports the results of an experimental study aimed at comparing two configurations of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP): conventional activated sludge (CAS) and oxic-settling-anaerobic process (OSA) with intermittent aeration (IA). A comprehensive monitoring campaign was carried out to assess multiple parameters for comparing the two configurations: carbon and nutrient removal, greenhouse gas emissions, respirometric analysis, and sludge production. A holistic approach has been adopted in the study with the novelty of including the carbon footprint (CF) contribution (as direct, indirect and derivative emissions) in comparing the two configurations. Results showed that the OSA-IA configuration performed better in total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD) and ortho-phosphate (PO4-P) removal. CAS performed better for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) removal showing a worsening of settling properties for OSA-IA. The heterotrophic yield coefficient and maximum growth rate decreased, suggesting a shift to sludge reduction metabolism in the OSA-IA configuration. Autotrophic biomass showed a reduced yield coefficient and maximum growth yield due to the negative effects of the sludge holding tank in the OSA-IA configuration on nitrification. The OSA-IA configuration had higher indirect emissions (30.5 % vs 21.3 % in CAS) from additional energy consumption due to additional mixers and sludge recirculation pumps. The CF value was lower for OSA-IA than for CAS configuration (0.36 kgCO2/m3 vs 0.39 kgCO2/m3 in CAS).