Real-world evidence of the effectiveness on glycaemic control of early simultaneous versus later sequential initiation of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

AIM: To assess the impact of the timing of initiating both basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) on reaching glycaemic control targets over 6 and 12 months in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs with an HbA1c of 9% or higher. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of the timing of initiating both basal insulin and GLP-1 RA therapies on reaching glycaemic targets (HbA1c < 7% and <8%, and ≥1% and ≥2% HbA1c reduction) over 12 months in people with markedly uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c ≥ 9%) on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs identified on the Optum Humedica database (electronic medical records; 1 January 2011 to 30 June 2017). Study cohorts were defined by the days between initiating each injectable: cohort A, 30 days or less (simultaneous initiation) and cohorts B, 31-90, C, 91-180, D, 181-270 and E, 271-360 days (sequential initiation). RESULTS: Cohort A had the best glycaemic outcomes at 6 and 12 months for all four endpoints, followed by cohort B. The likelihood of achieving an HbA1c of less than 7% did not significantly differ between cohorts A and B (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.87 [0.76-1.01]); cohorts C, D and E were significantly less likely to achieve an HbA1c of less than 7% than cohort A (0.62 [0.53-0.72]; 0.62 [0.53-0.72]; 0.63 [0.54-0.73]). CONCLUSIONS: In people with uncontrolled T2D requiring treatment with a GLP-1 RA and basal insulin, greater improvements in glycaemic control were observed when both therapies were initiated within close proximity of one another (≤90 days) compared with initiation 91-360 days apart.

Modeling the Effect of Subcutaneous Lixisenatide on Glucoregulatory Endocrine Secretions and Gastric Emptying in Type 2 Diabetes to Simulate the Effect of iGlarLixi Administration Timing on Blood Sugar Profiles.

BACKGROUND: As type 2 diabetes (T2D) progresses, intensification to combination therapies, such as iGlarLixi (a fixed-ratio GLP-1 RA and basal insulin combination), may be required. Here a simulation study was used to assess the effect of iGlarLixi administration timing (am vs pm) on blood sugar profiles. METHODS: Models of lixisenatide were built with a selection procedure, optimizing measurement fits and model complexity, and were included in a pre-existing T2D simulation platform containing glargine models. With the resulting tool, a simulated trial was conducted with 100 in-silico participants with T2D. Individuals were given iGLarLixi either before breakfast or before an evening meal for 2 weeks and daily glycemic profiles were analyzed. In the model, breakfast was considered the largest meal of the day. RESULTS: A similar percentage of time within 24 hours was spent with blood sugar levels between 70 to 180 mg/dL when iGlarLixi was administered pre-breakfast or pre-evening meal (73% vs 71%, respectively). Overall percent of time with blood glucose levels above 180 mg/dL within a 24-hour period was similar when iGlarLixi was administered pre-breakfast or pre-evening meal (26% vs 28%, respectively). Rates of hypoglycemia were low in both regimens, with a blood glucose concentration of below 70 mg/dL only observed for 1% of the 24-hour time period for either timing of administration. CONCLUSIONS: Good efficacy was observed when iGlarlixi was administered pre-breakfast; however, administration of iGlarlixi pre-evening meal was also deemed to be effective, even though in the model the size of the evening meal was smaller than that of the breakfast.

Prandial inhaled insulin plus basal insulin glargine versus twice daily biaspart insulin for type 2 diabetes: a multicentre randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Insulin therapy is often a delayed strategy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus because it is associated with weight gain, hypoglycaemia, and the need for subcutaneous injections. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin compared with twice daily biaspart insulin. METHODS: In this randomised, open-label, parallel-group study, adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and poor glycaemic control despite insulin therapy, with or without oral antidiabetes drugs, were enrolled from ten countries between Feb 23, 2006, and Aug 8, 2007. Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive 52 weeks' treatment with: prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin powder plus bedtime insulin glargine; or twice daily premixed biaspart insulin (70% insulin aspart protamine suspension and 30% insulin aspart of rDNA origin). The primary endpoint was a comparison of change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to week 52 between treatment groups; the non-inferiority margin was 0.4%. Analysis was by per protocol for non-inferiority testing of the primary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309244. FINDINGS: 334 patients were allocated to inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine, and 343 to biaspart insulin; 107 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 85 on biaspart insulin discontinued the trial. 211 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 237 on biaspart insulin were included in per-protocol analyses. Change in HbA(1c) with inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine (-0.68%, SE 0.077, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.53) was similar and non-inferior to that with biaspart insulin (-0.76%, 0.071, -0.90 to -0.62). The between-group difference was 0.07% (SE 0.102, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.27). Patients had significantly lower weight gain and had fewer mild-to-moderate and severe hypoglycaemic events on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine than on biaspart insulin. The safety and tolerability profile was similar for both treatments, apart from increased occurrence of cough and change in pulmonary function in the group receiving inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine. INTERPRETATION: This study is part of a large clinical development programme addressing the efficacy and tolerability of use of Technosphere inhaled insulin in a wide variety of patients. FUNDING: MannKind.

Understanding Reasons for Treatment Discontinuation, Attitudes and Education Needs Among People Who Discontinue Type 2 Diabetes Treatment: Results from an Online Patient Survey in the USA and UK.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires long-term treatment to achieve and maintain glycaemic control; however, up to 50% of people with T2DM discontinue treatment by 1 year. It is therefore important to understand the patient perspective of therapeutic adherence and persistence. METHODS: An online questionnaire was presented to people with T2DM in the USA and UK on PatientLive®, a platform of Carenity, an online patient community. Those who discontinued at least one T2DM treatment within the last 6 months answered open-ended questions aimed to assess the reasons for discontinuation, how discontinuation could have been prevented, and what would have improved the experience with the discontinued treatment. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed on respondents' answers to these questions. RESULTS: Oral antidiabetics were the most commonly discontinued treatments (93/161), followed by insulin (40/161) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (13/161). Main reasons for treatment discontinuation overall were side effects (57/161), mostly gastrointestinal side effects and weight gain. The second most reported reason was drug efficacy issues (42/161). Key factors stated to prevent discontinuation were an improved care pathway (45/161) and more efficacious treatments with fewer side effects (41/161). In the USA, treatment cost played an important role in discontinuation (14/89) and discontinuation prevention (12/89). More information about T2DM and associated treatments (56/161), help with T2DM management (24/161), and increased and informative patient-physician interaction (12/161) would have been helpful for many respondents in both countries, while some patients noted that no additional information would have been useful to improve their understanding and experience with their T2DM treatment (64/161). CONCLUSIONS: These results emphasise the need for focused medical education and improved communication to enhance patient experience and prevent treatment discontinuation. Understanding of attributes preferred by people with T2DM can help improve therapeutic adherence and outcomes with current medications, and guide development of future therapies.

Glycemic Control Following GLP-1 RA or Basal Insulin Initiation in Real-World Practice: A Retrospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Injectable therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and basal insulin (BI) are well-established agents for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to investigate real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs or BI in adults with T2D poorly controlled on oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults with T2D from the US Optum Humedica® database and UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, who initiated either injectable between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016. Baseline characteristics, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change, and cumulative percentage reaching HbA1c < 7% in 24 months after initiation were analyzed in four patient cohorts. RESULTS: In the US and UK databases, respectively, 20,836 and 5508 patients initiated GLP-1 RAs and 60,598 and 5083 initiated BI. Baseline mean HbA1c at initiation ranged between 8.8% and 10.3% across all cohorts. In all cohorts, a decrease of HbA1c occurred 3-6 months after initiation. The cumulative percentage of patients reaching HbA1c < 7% showed the greatest probability in the first 12 months (15-40% of patients across cohorts at 12 months), particularly in the first 6 months after initiation. The probability of reaching glycemic control diminished after the second quarter. The proportion of patients reaching HbA1c < 7% in both GLP-1 RA and BI cohorts at 12 months was < 25% if baseline HbA1c was ≥ 9%. CONCLUSIONS: For adults with T2D inadequately controlled on OADs, this analysis reveals an unmet clinical need. Initiation of first injectable therapy did not occur until HbA1c was considerably above target, when control is harder to achieve. Results suggest that in individuals with baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0%, only a minority are likely to achieve an HbA1c < 7% with a GLP-1 RA or BI alone.

Probability of Achieving Glycemic Control with Basal Insulin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Real-World Practice in the USA.

INTRODUCTION: Basal insulin (BI) plays an important role in treating type 2 diabetes (T2D), especially when oral antidiabetic (OAD) medications are insufficient for glycemic control. We conducted a retrospective, observational study using electronic medical records (EMR) data from the IBM® Explorys database to evaluate the probability of achieving glycemic control over 24 months after BI initiation in patients with T2D in the USA. METHODS: A cohort of 6597 patients with T2D who started BI following OAD(s) and had at least one valid glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) result recorded both within 90 days before and 720 days after BI initiation were selected. We estimated the changes from baseline in HbA1c every 6 months, the quarterly conditional probabilities of reaching HbA1c < 7% if a patient had not achieved glycemic control prior to each quarter (Q), and the cumulative probability of reaching glycemic control over 24 months. RESULTS: Our cohort was representative of patients with T2D who initiated BI from OADs in the USA. The average HbA1c was 9.1% at BI initiation, and decreased robustly (1.5%) in the first 6 months after initiation with no further reductions thereafter. The conditional probability of reaching glycemic control decreased rapidly in the first year (26.6% in Q2; 17.6% in Q3; 8.6% in Q4), and then remained low (≤ 6.1%) for each quarter in the second year. Cumulatively, about 38% of patients reached HbA1c < 7% in the first year; only approximately 8% more did so in the second year. CONCLUSION: Our study of real-world data from a large US EMR database suggested that among patients with T2D who initiated BI after OADs, the likelihood of reaching glycemic control diminished over time, and remained low from 12 months onwards. Additional treatment options should be considered if patients do not reach glycemic control within 12 months of BI initiation. FUNDING: Sanofi Corporation.

Technosphere insulin technology.

The ideal prandial insulin would possess characteristics of the insulin response profile seen in healthy individuals without diabetes. Approximating the early-phase insulin response that is lost in diabetes is challenging for injected insulins, especially achieving rapid insulin absorption and a favorable duration of metabolic effect. Technosphere (MannKind Corp., Valencia, CA) inhalation powder is a novel delivery platform that enables large peptides to be delivered via the pulmonary route. Technosphere Insulin (TI), a formulation of regular human insulin, has been specifically designed to facilitate efficient transport via the inhaled route. TI is rapidly absorbed (time to maximum effect of approximately 15 min) and has a rapid onset of action. The metabolic effect of TI peaks approximately 1 h after administration, substantially earlier than what has been reported for other insulins. The majority of the glucose-lowering activity of TI is delivered in the first 3 h. In preliminary studies, TI was well tolerated. Phase 3 studies are under way to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of TI in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties of a Novel Inhaled Insulin.

Advances in insulin treatment options over recent decades have markedly improved the management of diabetes. Despite this, glycemic control remains suboptimal in many people with diabetes. Although postprandial glucose control has been improved with the development of subcutaneously injected rapid-acting insulin analogs, currently available insulins are not able to fully mimic the physiological time-action profile of endogenously secreted insulin after a meal. The delayed onset of metabolic action and prolonged period of effect induce the risk of postprandial hyperglycemia and late postprandial hypoglycemia. A number of alternative routes of insulin administration have been investigated over time in an attempt to overcome the limitations associated with subcutaneous administration and to provide an improved time-action insulin profile more closely simulating physiological prandial insulin release. Among these, pulmonary insulin delivery has shown the most promise. Technosphere® Inhaled Insulin (TI) is a rapid-acting inhaled human insulin recently approved by the FDA for prandial insulin therapy. In this article we discuss the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of TI, and, based on key studies performed during its clinical development, the implications for improved postprandial glucose control.

Persistence with rapid-acting insulin and its association with A1C level and severe hypoglycemia among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the persistence with rapid-acting insulin (RAI) and its association with clinical outcomes among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: This observational, retrospective cohort study analyzed RAI persistence and its association with change in glycated hemoglobin A1c and risk of severe hypoglycemia among elderly (≥65 years) Medicare beneficiaries with T2D who added RAI to their basal insulin regimen. RESULTS: Among T2D patients with >1 RAI prescriptions (n = 3927), only 21% were persistent. Baseline factors positively associated with RAI persistence (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]) were: age ≥75 vs. 65-74 years: 1.20 (1.01-1.43); use of ≥3 oral antidiabetes drugs: 1.63 (1.16-2.28); cognitive impairment: 1.34 (1.03-1.73); and A1C >9.0%: 1.58 (1.15-2.17). Elderly T2D patients having emergency department visits (0.73 [0.59-0.91]) and higher RAI out-of-pocket costs (≥$75 vs. $0 - <$6.40: 0.56 [0.44-0.70]) were less likely to be persistent. Persistent RAI users had a significantly higher reduction in A1C (beta coefficient [standard error]): -0.24 (0.10) and lower odds of severe hypoglycemia (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]): 0.73 (0.53-0.99). CONCLUSION: Among elderly T2D patients, persistence with RAI added to basal insulin was associated with improved glycemic control and lower risk of severe hypoglycemia. Despite treatment effectiveness, RAI persistence was poor and might be improved by reducing RAI out-of-pocket costs.

Impact of symptomatic upper respiratory tract infections on insulin absorption and action of Technosphere inhaled insulin.

OBJECTIVE: Uncomplicated, acute upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) occur in patients with diabetes at a similar frequency to the general population. This study (NCT00642681) investigated the effect of URTIs on the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of Technosphere inhaled insulin (TI) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a phase 2 study conducted in patients who developed a URTI while being treated with TI in a phase 3 study (N=20, mean age 50 years, 60% men). Patients underwent two 4-hour meal challenges, during which blood samples were drawn to measure serum fumaryl diketopiperazine (FDKP; the excipient representing an essential part of TI), serum insulin, serum C-peptide, and plasma glucose. The primary outcome was the ratio of serum FDKP area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 240 min (AUC0-240 min) during URTI and after clinical resolution of URTI symptoms (≥15 to ≤45 days). RESULTS: No significant differences in PK parameters were seen during URTI versus post-URTI for FDKP. The ratio of serum FDKP AUC0-240 min during URTI and post-URTI was 1.1 (SD 0.6), p=0.4462. Plasma glucose concentrations during each 4-hour meal challenge were similar, showing small non-significant differences. No adverse events, including hypoglycemia, occurred during meal challenge visits. CONCLUSIONS: Development of an active, symptomatic URTI during treatment with TI had no significant impact on the PK/PD properties of TI, suggesting that no adjustment in prandial insulin dosing is needed. However, if patients are unable to conduct proper inhalation, they should administer their prandial insulin subcutaneously. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00642681; Results.

Rapid Acting Insulin Use and Persistence among Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Patients Adding RAI to Oral Antidiabetes Drug Regimens.

We examined the real-world utilization and persistence of rapid acting insulin (RAI) in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes who added RAI to their drug (OAD) regimen. Insulin-naïve patients aged ≥65 years, with ≥1 OAD prescription during the baseline period, who were continuously enrolled in the US Humana Medicare Advantage insurance plan for 18 months and initiated RAI were included. Among patients with ≥2 RAI prescriptions (RAIp), persistence during the 12-month follow-up was assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified factors affecting RAI use and persistence. Of 3734 patients adding RAI to their OAD regimen, 2334 (62.5%) had a RAIp during follow-up. Factors associated with RAIp included using ≤2 OADs; cognitive impairment, basal insulin use during follow-up; and higher RAI out-of-pocket costs ($36 to <$56 versus $0 to $6.30). Patients were less likely to persist with RAI when on ≤2 OADs versus ≥3 OADs and when having higher RAI out-of-pocket costs ($36 to <$56 versus $0 to $6.30) and more likely to persist when they had cognitive impairment and basal insulin use during follow-up. Real-world persistence of RAI in insulin-naïve elderly patients with type 2 diabetes was very poor when RAI was added to an OAD regimen.

Improving Efficacy of Inhaled Technosphere Insulin (Afrezza) by Postmeal Dosing: In-silico Clinical Trial with the University of Virginia/Padova Type 1 Diabetes Simulator.

BACKGROUND: Technosphere(®) insulin (TI), an inhaled human insulin with a fast onset of action, provides a novel option for the control of prandial glucose. We used the University of Virginia (UVA)/Padova simulator to explore in-silico the potential benefit of different dosing regimens on postprandial glucose (PPG) control to support the design of further clinical trials. Tested dosing regimens included at-meal or postmeal dosing, or dosing before and after a meal (split dosing). METHODS: Various dosing regimens of TI were compared among one another and to insulin lispro in 100 virtual type-1 patients. Individual doses were identified for each regimen following different titration rules. The resulting postprandial glucose profiles were analyzed to quantify efficacy and the risk for hypoglycemic events. RESULTS: This approach allowed us to assess the benefit/risk for each TI dosing regimen and to compare results with simulations of insulin lispro. We identified a new titration rule for TI that could significantly improve the efficacy of treatment with TI. CONCLUSION: In-silico clinical trials comparing the treatment effect of different dosing regimens with TI and of insulin lispro suggest that postmeal dosing or split dosing of TI, in combination with an appropriate titration rule, can achieve a superior postprandial glucose control while providing a lower risk for hypoglycemic events than conventional treatment with subcutaneously administered rapid-acting insulin products.

Variations of whole blood viscosity using Rheolog-a new scanning capillary viscometer.

BACKGROUND: Whole blood viscosity (WBV) values identify subjects at high risk for initial or recurrent cardiovascular events. However, these measurements have been limited to specialized centers. A new type of viscometer, Rheolog, was designed to overcome the difficulties encountered in WBV measurements using the standard rotational viscometer in a clinical environment. METHODS: We evaluated the 14-day variability of WBV measured by Rheolog in a single-center study of 24 healthy male subjects aged 18-75 years. WBV was measured through an 11-h period on study days 1, 8, and 14. An additional fasting WBV test was performed on study days 3, 5, and 11. RESULTS: Average morning measurements were higher than afternoon measurements at all shear rates. Both inter- and intraindividual variations were higher in the morning than later in the day, but the differences between pooled mean values were not significant. Interindividual variations at fasting were higher than the pre-meal or overall variations. There was a small nonsignificant increase in mean viscosity following each meal. CONCLUSION: WBV measurements using Rheolog have potential for clinical application because of the convenience and low variability of measurements over time.

Coverage of prandial insulin requirements by means of an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin.

Barriers to the use of prandial insulin regimens include inadequate synchronization of insulin action to postprandial plasma glucose excursions as well as a significant risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain. Technosphere® insulin (TI) is an inhaled ultra-rapid-acting human insulin that is quickly absorbed in the alveoli. With a time to maximum plasma drug concentration of approximately 14 min and a time to maximum effect of 35 to 40 min, TI more closely matches the postprandial insulin concentrations seen in nondiabetic individuals. Studies have shown that long-term administration of prandial TI in combination with long-acting basal insulin results in reductions in hemoglobin A1c comparable to conventional subcutaneously injected prandial insulins but with improved control of early postprandial BG. Furthermore, TI has been associated with less weight gain and a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, which may enhance patient satisfaction and acceptability of insulin therapy. This review discusses the clinical properties of TI and proposes strategies for optimal use.

Technosphere insulin effectively controls postprandial glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: This pilot trial was designed to determine if an optimal dose of Technosphere(®) insulin (TI) inhalation powder (MannKind Corp., Valencia, CA) could be used regardless of variation in meal carbohydrate (CHO) content. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In total, eight subjects (seven men, one woman) with type 2 diabetes were enrolled. Subjects underwent dose optimization meal challenge (MC) visits (100% CHO) and MCs with varied CHO meal contents (50%, 200%, and 0% calculated CHOs). Primary end point was change in postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions. Baseline demographics were 60±7 years of age, diabetes duration of 12.3±4.27 years, hemoglobin A1c (A1C) of 7.82±1.04%, and body mass index of 31.3±5.48 kg/m(2). RESULTS: Maximum mean PPG excursions for the nominal 100% CHO meals were -13±15 mg/dL for breakfast (B) and -14±15 mg/dL for lunch (L), similar to those after 50% CHO meals (B, -17±16 mg/dL; L, +14±10 mg/dL). The largest excursions occurred during 200% CHO meals and remained below American Diabetes Association targets (B, +19±16 mg/dL; L, +32±29 mg/dL). During 15 of the MCs, subjects took their usual TI dose and then had no meal (0% CHO). For the 0% CHO MCs, the largest mean PPG excursion were -33±9 mg/dL at 60 min (B) and -31±10 mg/dL at 60 and 90 min (L). Mean A1C dropped from 7.82±1.04% at the Week 1 visit to 6.18±0.46% (P=0.00091) at the Week 19 visit. CONCLUSIONS: Results in eight patients suggest that once an optimal dose of TI is determined, type 2 diabetes patients can ingest meals with a wide range of CHO content or even skip meals without severe hypoglycemia. During this pilot study TI therapy improved A1C by -1.63% (P=0.00091) during 19 weeks of treatment.

Inhaled Technosphere insulin in comparison to subcutaneous regular human insulin: time action profile and variability in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed time action profile and within- and between-subject variability of inhaled Technosphere Insulin (TI) compared with subcutaneous regular human insulin (sc RHI). METHODS: Thirteen subjects with type 2 diabetes (age 56 +/- 7 years, body mass index 30.4 +/- 3.0 kg.m(-2); hemoglobin A1c 6.9 +/- 0.9%; mean +/- SD) participated in this six-period crossover isoglycemic glucose clamp study. In randomized order, each subject received three single doses of TI and sc RHI on separate study days. RESULTS: Inhalation of TI resulted in a higher maximum serum insulin concentration (858 vs 438 pmol.liter(-1); p = 0.0001) and shorter intervals to maximum insulin concentration (17 vs 135 minutes; p = 0.0001) than sc RHI. Overall, 48 units of TI and 24 units of sc RHI provided comparable 3-hour insulin exposure (INS area under the curve(0-3 h) 55.8 vs 60.0 nmol.min.liter(-1), respectively). Time to maximum metabolic effect was shorter (79 vs 293 minutes; p < 0.0001), and percentage of glucose disposal during the first 3 hours was higher for TI compared with sc RHI (59 vs 27%). Within-subject variabilities of insulin exposure following inhalation of TI for 2 and 3 hours and end of study period were 19, 18, and 16% as compared with 27, 25, and 15% after sc RHI injection (p = not significant). CONCLUSION: Technosphere Insulin has a more rapid onset of action than sc RHI. About 60% of the glucose-lowering effect of TI occurs during the first 3 hours after application. In contrast, <30% of the glucose-lowering effect of sc RHI occurs in this period. Technosphere Insulin demonstrated a lower intrasubject variability during the 3-hour postprandial period, without reaching statistical significance.

Efficacy and safety of Technosphere inhaled insulin compared with Technosphere powder placebo in insulin-naive type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with oral agents.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Technosphere insulin with Technosphere powder as placebo in insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients whose diabetes was suboptimally controlled with oral antidiabetic agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients (n = 126) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of therapy with Technosphere insulin or Technosphere powder after lifestyle education on nutrition, exercise, and instructions on inhaler use. The primary efficacy outcome was change in A1C from baseline to study end, and the secondary efficacy outcome was area under the curve for postprandial glucose levels during a meal test at treatment weeks 4, 8, and 12. RESULTS: A1C reduction from a mean baseline of 7.9% was greater with Technosphere insulin than with Technosphere powder (-0.72 vs. -0.30%; P = 0.003). Postprandial glucose excursions were reduced by 56% with Technosphere insulin compared with baseline, and maximal postprandial glucose levels were reduced by 43% compared with Technosphere powder. Incidences of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, cough, and other adverse events were low in both groups. Body weight was unchanged in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Technosphere insulin was well tolerated and demonstrated significant improvement in glycemic control with clinically meaningful reductions in A1C levels and postprandial glucose concentrations after 12 weeks of treatment.

Randomized forced titration to different doses of technosphere insulin demonstrates reduction in postprandial glucose excursions and hemoglobin A1c in patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus have impairments in early insulin release, resulting in increased postprandial glucose excursions and suboptimal glycemic control. Studies with Technosphere Insulin (TI) indicate that it has rapid systemic absorption and a short duration of glucose-lowering activity, making it well suited for controlling postprandial glucose levels. METHODS: The goal of this phase 2b, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to characterize the dose response of four different doses (equivalent to 3.6, 7.3, 10.9, and 14.6 U subcutaneous regular human insulin) of prandial TI or Technosphere powder alone administered before each of three meals daily, in combination with insulin glargine over an 11-week treatment period, in patients with type 2 diabetes and suboptimal glycemic control. RESULTS: The study enrolled 227 patients. In all dose groups, TI demonstrated statistically significant dose-dependent reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) versus baseline (-0.4, -0.5, -0.5, and -0.6 for 3.6, 7.3, 10.9, and 14.6 U equivalents, respectively; p < 0.05 in all groups), as well as versus placebo or Technosphere powder alone (-0.40, -0.67, -0.70, and -0.78 for 3.6, 7.3, 10.9, and 14.6 U equivalents, respectively; p < 0.04 in all groups). It reduced the postprandial maximum glucose concentration within each treatment group (statistically significant in all but the TI 3.6 U-equivalent group) and reduced the postprandial area under the glucose curve (statistically significant for the TI 10.9 and 14.6 U-equivalent groups) versus placebo. There were no cases of severe hypoglycemia, while mild/moderate hypoglycemia was observed most frequently in the highest dosage groups, as expected. Rates of cough were low and comparable among all groups. No clinically relevant changes in pulmonary function tests, body weight, or high-resolution computerized axial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, over 11 weeks, TI plus basal insulin glargine is well tolerated and results in dose-dependent reductions in postprandial glucose and HbA1c levels.