Factors Impacting Maltreatment Evaluation and Reports to Child Protective Services in Pediatric Substance Exposures.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors associated with pediatric substance exposures, describe the medical evaluation, and identify factors associated with social work (SW) and hospital-based child protection team (CPT) safety assessments and reports to child protective services (CPS). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of electronic medical records for children ages 0 to 72 months presenting for accidental ingestion evaluated May 1, 2015 to May 1, 2021 at a level 1 pediatric trauma center. Cases of environmental exposures, iatrogenic medication errors, dosing errors, and allergies/adverse reactions were excluded. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics; χ 2 and multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed factors associated with two primary outcomes of interest, SW/CPT assessment and CPS report. RESULTS: Among 773 total cases of substance exposures during the studied time frame, 27% were referred to SW/CPT for further safety assessments and 15.4% were reported to CPS. Being admitted to the hospital, prescription medication or recreational/illegal/illicit substance exposures, and increasing psychosocial risk factors were found to be significantly associated with referrals. Age, race, and insurance status were not found to be associated. Toxicology screening was performed in only 24.7% of cases. Of those eligible for further imaging per hospital protocol, skeletal surveys were obtained in 5.5% of cases and head imaging was obtained in 9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variability in pediatric substance exposure assessment practices. Disparities based on demographic characteristics are uncommon. Perceived severity of condition, exposures involving recreational/illegal/illicit substances, and greater prevalence of family psychosocial adversities are associated with higher rates of SW/CPT assessment and CPS reports.

Pediatric Critical Care-Associated Parental Traumatic Stress: Beyond the First Year.

OBJECTIVES: Perform a longitudinal analysis of parental traumatic stress up to 30 months after PICU discharge. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary care children's hospitals with mixed medical/surgical/cardiac PICUs. SUBJECTS: Parents of patients unexpectedly admitted to the PICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five parents of 188 children were enrolled. Of the 195 parents who completed the 3-9-month assessments, 29 (14.8%) met posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) qualification on the PTSD Symptom Scale Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Multivariable analysis showed parents who met acute stress disorder (ASD) qualification (odds ratio [OR] 8.01; 95% CI 2.64-24.3), parents of children with Pediatric Overall Performance Category score of severe or coma at discharge (OR 5.21; 95% CI 1.65-16.4), parents who had concerns for their child's permanent injury (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.36-2.43), and parents who reported increased knowledge of child illness during admission (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.13-2.93) had increased odds of developing parental PTSD. Of the 175 parents (66%) who completed the 18-30-month assessments, 22 (12.5%) met PTSD qualification. Multivariable analysis showed parents who met ASD qualification (OR 4.19; 95% CI 1.12-15.7), parents who had a history of a family member or themselves being admitted to ICU (OR 6.51; 95% CI 1.43-29.6), and parents who had concerns of child's susceptibility to death post discharge (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.19-2.09) had increased odds of developing parental PTSD. At 18-30 months post discharge, parents who met the PTSD qualification were more likely to report a decrease in household income following discharge (OR 9.23; 95% CI 1.71-49.9). CONCLUSIONS: Parental PTSD remains a significant morbidity of PICU admission for a subgroup of parents greater than 18 months post admission. Identifiable risk factors will inform the development of targeted interventions.