Duration of intrapartum antibiotics for group B streptococcus on the diagnosis of clinical neonatal sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Infants born to mothers who are colonized with group B streptococcus (GBS) but received <4 hours of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) are at-risk for presenting later with sepsis. We assessed if <4 hours of maternal IAP for GBS are associated with an increased incidence of clinical neonatal sepsis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of women-infant dyads undergoing IAP for GBS at ≥37-week gestation who presented in labor from January 1, 2003 through December 31, 2007 was performed. Infants diagnosed with clinical sepsis by the duration of maternal IAP received (< or ≥4-hours duration) were determined. RESULTS: More infants whose mothers received <4 hours of IAP were diagnosed with clinical sepsis, 13 of 1,149 (1.1%) versus 15 of 3,633 (0.4%), P = .03. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that treatment with ≥4 hours of IAP reduced the risk of infants being diagnosed with clinical sepsis by 65%, adjusted relative risk 0.35, CI 0.16-0.79, and P = .01. CONCLUSION: The rate of neonatal clinical sepsis is increased in newborns of GBS colonized mothers who receive <4 hours compared to ≥4 hours of IAP.

The Use of EZ Derm® in Partial-Thickness Burns: An Institutional Review of 157 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the use of EZ Derm® (Molnlycke Health Care, US, LLC, Norcross, GA) on partial-thickness burns. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records from patients presenting to the Tampa General Regional Burn Center from January 1, 2008, through January 1, 2012, was conducted. A hospitalwide list of patients was generated on the basis of the presence of charge codes for EZ Derm®. All encounters that did not pass through the Burn Unit were excluded. Applicable charts were reviewed for basic patient characteristics, burn characteristics, outcomes, and complications. Complications were defined as premature separation of EZ Derm®, deviation from a flat fully epithelized wound at the time of final EZ Derm® separation and hypertrophic/keloid scaring. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were identified and met the study criteria. Eighteen complications were reported from 16 of the 157 patients. Complications were attributed to positioning (2/133 = 1.5%), infection (4/133 = 3.0%), incomplete epithelialization at time of separation (3/133 = 2.2%), need for additional excision and grafting (6/133 = 4.5%), hypertrophic scaring (2/60 = 3.3), and cryptogenic (1/133 = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: EZ Derm® has proven to be a robust wound dressing that provides cost-effective, consistent durable wound coverage with minimal complications that resolve without long-term sequela.