Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: the STEP study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, phase-II trial.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is an important therapeutic option for brain metastases. Currently, postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRT) leads to 6-month and 1-year local control estimated at 70 and 62% respectively. However, there is an increased risk of radio-necrosis and leptomeningeal relapse. Preoperative SRT might be an alternative, providing local control remains at least equivalent. It is an innovative concept that could enable the stereotactic benefits to be retained with advantages over post-operative SRT. METHODS: STEP has been designed as a national, multicentre, open-label, prospective, non-randomized, phase-II trial. Seventeen patients are expected to be recruited in the study from 7 sites and they will be followed for 12 months. Patients with more than 4 distinct brain metastases, including one with a surgical indication, and an indication for SRT and surgery, are eligible for enrolment. The primary objective of the trial is to assess 6-month local control after preoperative SRT. The secondary objectives include the assessment of local control, radio-necrosis, overall survival, toxicities, leptomeningeal relapse, distant control, cognitive function, and quality of life. The experimental design is based on a Flemming plan. DISCUSSION: There is very little data available in the literature on preoperative SRT: there have only been 3 American single or two-centre retrospective studies. STEP is the first prospective trial on preoperative SRT in Europe. Compared to postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy, preoperative stereotactic radiotherapy will enable reduction in the irradiated volume, leptomeningeal relapse and the total duration of the combined treatment (from 4 to 6 weeks to a few days). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04503772 , registered on August 07, 2020. Identifier with the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM): N°ID RCB 2020-A00403-36, registered in February 2020. PROTOCOL: version 4, 07 December 2020.

The Recent Management of Vestibular Schwannoma Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the therapeutic management of vestibular schwannoma (VS). Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) or radiosurgery (SRS) are the two modalities available. The purpose of this article is to review the results of VS RT studies carried out over the last ten years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed with PubMed and Medline by using the words vestibular schwannoma, acoustic neuroma, radiotherapy, and radiosurgery. RESULTS: In small (<3 cm) VS, SRS offers a local control rate of >90%, which seems similar to microsurgery, with a favorable tolerance profile. Hypofractionated FSRT (three to five fractions) is a relatively recent modality and has shown similar outcomes to normofractionated FSRT. Hearing preservation may highly differ between studies, but it is around 65% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: SRS and FRST are non-invasive treatment options for VS. SRS is often preferred for small lesions less than 3 cm, and FSRT for larger lesions. However, no randomized study has compared these modalities.

Significant correlation between gross tumor volume (GTV) D98% and local control in multifraction stereotactic radiotherapy (MF-SRT) for unresected brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) should be applied with a biologically effective dose with an α/ß of 12 (BED12) ≥ 40 Gy to reach a 1-year local control (LC) ≥ 70%. The aims of this retrospective study were to report a series of 81 unresected large brain metastases treated with Linac-based multifraction SRT according to the ICRU 91 and to identify predictive factors associated with LC. METHODS: Included in this study were the first 81 brain metastases (BM) consecutively treated with Linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) multifraction SRT from 2017 to 2019. The prescribed dose was 33 Gy for the GTV and 23.1 Gy (70% isodose line) for the PTV in 3 fractions (3f). Mean BM largest diameter and GTV were 25.1 mm and 7.2 cc respectively. Mean follow-up was 10.2 months. RESULTS: LC was 79.7% and 69.7% at 1 and 2 years respectively. Significant predictive factors of LC were GTV D98% (HR = 0.84, CI 95% = 0.75-0.95, p = 0.004) and adenocarcinoma as the histological type (HR = 0.29, CI 95% = 0.09-0.96, p = 0.042) in univariate and multivariate analysis. A threshold of 29 Gy for GTV D98% was significantly correlated to LC (1-year LC = 91.9% for GTV D98% ≥ 29 Gy vs 69.6% for GTV D98% < 29 Gy (p = 0.030)), corresponding to a BED12 = 52.4 Gy. No tumor progression was observed for a BED12 ≥ 53.4 Gy, corresponding to a GTV D98% ≥ 20 Gy /1f and GTV D98% ≥ 29.4 Gy 3f. Median OS was 15 months. Symptomatic radionecrosis occurred in 4.9% of cases. CONCLUSION: The GTV D98% is a strong reproducible significant predictive factor of LC for brain SRT. Dose prescription should lead to a GTV BED12 98% ≥ 52.4-53.4 Gy to significantly improve LC, corresponding to respectively a GTV D98% ≥ 19.7-20 Gy/1f and 29-29.4 Gy/3f.