Association Between Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities and Hospital Performance in Treatment and Outcomes for Patients with Colon Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in colon cancer care and outcomes by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and insurance are well recognized; however, the extent to which inequalities are driven by patient factors versus variation in hospital performance remains unclear. We sought to compare disparities in care delivery and outcomes at low- and high-performing hospitals. METHODS: We identified patients with stage I-III colon adenocarcinoma from the 2012-2017 National Cancer Database. Adequate lymphadenectomy and timely adjuvant chemotherapy administration defined hospital performance. Multilevel regression models evaluated disparities by race/ethnicity, SES, and insurance at the lowest- and highest-performance quartile hospitals. RESULTS: Of 92,573 patients from 704 hospitals, 45,982 (49.7%) were treated at 404 low-performing hospitals and 46,591 (50.3%) were treated at 300 high-performing hospitals. Low-performing hospitals treated more non-Hispanic (NH) Black, Hispanic, low SES, and Medicaid patients (all p < 0.01). Among low-performing hospitals, patients with low versus high SES (odds ratio [OR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.92), and Medicare (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96) and Medicaid (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.96) versus private insurance, had decreased odds of receiving high-quality care. At high-performing hospitals, NH Black versus NH White patients (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72-0.95) had decreased odds of receiving high-quality care. Low SES, Medicare, Medicaid, and uninsured patients had worse overall survival at low- and high-performing hospitals (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Disparities in receipt of high-quality colon cancer care occurred by SES and insurance at low-performing hospitals, and by race at high-performing hospitals. However, survival disparities by SES and insurance exist irrespective of hospital performance. Future steps include improving low-performing hospitals and identifying mechanisms affecting survival disparities.

Comparison of perioperative and histopathologic outcomes among neoadjuvant treatment strategies for locoregional gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and chemoradiation (NCRT) have demonstrated improved survival for gastric cancer. However, the optimal neoadjuvant treatment remains unclear. We sought to evaluate perioperative and histopathologic outcomes among neoadjuvant treatments for locoregional gastric cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database queried patients who received NAC or NCRT followed by resection for T2-T4 and/or node-positive gastric cancer (2006-2018). Logistic and Poisson regression assessed perioperative (30-day readmission, 30- and 90-day mortality, length of stay [LOS]) and histopathologic outcomes (pathologic complete response [PCR], margin status, and negative pathologic lymph nodes [ypN0]). Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 9831 patients, 4221 (42.9%) received NAC and 5610 (57.1%) NCRT. There were no differences in perioperative outcomes, apart from patients treated with NCRT exhibiting increased LOS (incidence rate ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.16). Patients who received NCRT were more likely to achieve PCR, margin-negative resection, and ypN0 (all p < 0.05). Median OS was 36.8 months for NAC and 33.6 months for NCRT (p < 0.001). NCRT independently predicted worse OS (vs. NAC, hazard ratio 1.10, 95% CI 1.03-1.18). CONCLUSION: NCRT was associated with better histologic tumor response although NAC was associated with improved OS. Better understanding prognostication through histologic assessment following neoadjuvant therapy is needed.

Update on Management of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 18% to 25% of all diagnosed breast cancers, and is a noninvasive, nonobligate precursor lesion to invasive cancer. The diagnosis of DCIS represents a wide range of disease, including lesions with both low and high risk of progression to invasive cancer and recurrence. Over the past decade, research on the topic of DCIS has focused on the possibility of tailoring treatment for patients according to their risk for progression and recurrence, which is based on clinicopathologic, biomolecular and genetic factors. These efforts are ongoing, with recently completed and continuing clinical trials spanning the continuum of cancer care. We conducted a review to identify recent advances on the topic of diagnosis, risk stratification and management of DCIS. While novel imaging techniques have increased the rate of DCIS diagnosis, questions persist regarding the optimal management of lesions that would not be identified with conventional methods. Additionally, among trials investigating the potential for omission of surgery and use of active surveillance, 2 trials have completed accrual and 2 clinical trials are continuing to enroll patients. Identification of novel genetic patterns is expanding our potential for risk stratification and aiding our ability to de-escalate radiation and systemic therapies for DCIS. These advances provide hope for tailoring of DCIS treatment in the near future.

Total pancreatectomy, splenectomy and remnant gastrectomy for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) after prior Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

A female patient in her 50s presented with abdominal pain, nausea and jaundice. She had a history of prior Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and her body mass index was 52.5 kg/m2 Biochemical testing revealed a total bilirubin level of 14.3 mg/dL (normal<1.2 mg/dL) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 of 38.3 units/mL (normal<36.0 units/mL). CT demonstrated a 3.2 cm pancreatic head mass, biliary and pancreatic duct dilation and cystic replacement of the pancreas. The findings were consistent with a diagnosis of mixed-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with invasive malignancy. The patient's Roux-en-Y anatomy precluded endoscopic biopsy, and she underwent upfront resection with diagnostic laparoscopy, open total pancreatectomy, splenectomy and remnant gastrectomy with reconstruction. Pathology confirmed T2N1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 1/29 lymph nodes positive and diffuse IPMN. She completed adjuvant chemotherapy. IPMNs have malignant potential and upfront surgical resection should be considered without biopsy in the appropriate clinical setting.

Contemporary Evaluation of Work-Life Integration and Wellbeing in US Surgical Residents: A National Mixed-Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: The demands of surgical training present challenges for work-life integration (WLI). We sought to identify factors associated with work-life conflicts and to understand how programs support WLI. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional national survey conducted after the 2020 American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination queried 4 WLI items. Multivariable regression models evaluated factors associated with (1) work-life conflicts and (2) well-being (career dissatisfaction, burnout, thoughts of attrition, suicidality). Semi-structured interviews conducted with faculty and residents from 15 general surgery programs were analyzed to identify strategies for supporting WLI. RESULTS: Of 7,233 residents (85.5% response rate) 5,133 had data available on work-life conflicts. 44.3% reported completing non-educational task-work at home, 37.6% were dissatisfied with time for personal life (e.g., hobbies), 51.6% with maintaining healthy habits (e.g., exercise), and 48.0% with performing routine health maintenance (e.g., dentist). In multivariable analysis, parents and female residents were more likely to report work-life conflicts (all p<0.05). After adjusting for other risk factors (e.g., duty-hour violations, and mistreatment), residents with work-life conflicts remained at increased risk for career dissatisfaction, burnout, thoughts of attrition, and suicidality (all p<0.05). Qualitative analysis revealed interventions for supporting WLI including (1) protecting time for health maintenance (e.g., therapy); (2) explicitly supporting life outside of work (e.g., prioritizing time with family); and (3) allowing meaningful autonomy in scheduling (e.g., planning for major life events). CONCLUSIONS: Work-life conflicts are common among surgical residents and are associated with poor resident well-being. Well-designed program-level interventions have the potential to support WLI in surgical residency.

Utilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Localized Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors and the Association with Survival.

BACKGROUND: For gastric GISTs, neoadjuvant imatinib is most often reserved for tumors near the gastroesophageal junction, multi-visceral involvement, or limited metastatic disease. Whether localized gastric GISTs benefit from neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unknown. We sought to examine factors associated with NAT utilization for localized gastric GISTs and evaluate implications on survival. METHODS: The National Cancer Database identified patients with localized gastric GISTs treated with NAT (2010-2020), excluding tumors extending beyond the gastric wall, located in the cardia, or with metastatic disease. Multivariable logistic regression assessed characteristics of NAT use. After 1:1 propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression assessed overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 7,203 patients, 762 (10.6%) received NAT followed by resection. On multivariable analysis, increasing tumor size was associated with NAT use (<2.0cm vs 2.0-5.0cm OR:2.03, 95%CI 1.19-3.47, p=0.010; vs >5cm OR:16.87, 95%CI 10.02-28.40, p<0.001). After propensity score matching, 1,506 patients remained. Median OS for NAT was 46.0 months vs 43.0 months for resection (p=0.059) which was independently predictive of improved survival (HR:0.89; 95%CI 0.80-0.99, p=0.041). Subgroup analysis by tumor size showed no survival differences for tumors <2.0cm or 2.0-5.0cm. Median OS was higher for tumors >5.0cm treated with NAT (NAT:45.4 months [IQR 29.5-65.9]. vs upfront resection:42.3 months [26.9-62.8]) and associated with improved survival on multivariable analysis (HR:0.88; 95%CI 0.78-0.99, p=0.040). CONCLUSION: Although patients who received NAT had improved survival, this was primarily due to tumors >5.0cm. Expanding NAT selection criteria to include localized gastric GISTs >5.0cm may improve outcomes and warrants investigation through clinical trials.