Defining Treatment-Related Adverse Effects in Patients with Glioma: Distinctive Features of Pseudoprogression and Treatment-Induced Necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Pseudoprogression (PP) and treatment-induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging cancer treatment-related effects. Both phenomena remain insufficiently defined; differentiation from recurrent disease frequently necessitates tissue biopsy. We here characterize distinctive features of PP and TN to facilitate noninvasive diagnosis and clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with glioma and confirmed PP (defined as appearance <5 months after radiotherapy [RT] completion) or TN (>5 months after RT) were retrospectively compared using clinical, radiographic, and histopathological data. Each imaging event/lesion (region of interest [ROI]) diagnosed as PP or TN was longitudinally evaluated by serial imaging. RESULTS: We identified 64 cases of mostly (80%) biopsy-confirmed PP (n = 27) and TN (n = 37), comprising 137 ROIs in total. Median time of onset for PP and TN was 1 and 11 months after RT, respectively. Clinically, PP occurred more frequently during active antineoplastic treatment, necessitated more steroid-based interventions, and was associated with glioblastoma (81 vs. 40%), fewer IDH1 mutations, and shorter median overall survival. Radiographically, TN lesions often initially manifested periventricularly (n = 22/37; 60%), were more numerous (median, 2 vs. 1 ROIs), and contained fewer malignant elements upon biopsy. By contrast, PP predominantly developed around the tumor resection cavity as a non-nodular, ring-like enhancing structure. Both PP and TN lesions almost exclusively developed in the main prior radiation field. Presence of either condition appeared to be associated with above-average overall survival. CONCLUSION: PP and TN occur in clinically distinct patient populations and exhibit differences in spatial radiographic pattern. Increased familiarity with both conditions and their unique features will improve patient management and may avoid unnecessary surgical procedures. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Pseudoprogression (PP) and treatment-induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging treatment-related effects mimicking tumor progression in patients with brain cancer. Affected patients frequently require surgery to guide management. PP and TN remain arbitrarily defined and insufficiently characterized. Lack of clear diagnostic criteria compromises treatment and may adversely affect outcome interpretation in clinical trials. The present findings in a cohort of patients with glioma with PP/TN suggest that both phenomena exhibit unique clinical and imaging characteristics, manifest in different patient populations, and should be classified as distinct clinical conditions. Increased familiarity with PP and TN key features may guide clinicians toward timely noninvasive diagnosis, circumvent potentially unnecessary surgical procedures, and improve response assessment in neuro-oncology.

Cost effectiveness of proton versus photon radiation therapy with respect to the risk of growth hormone deficiency in children.

BACKGROUND: Proton therapy in pediatrics may improve the risk/benefit profile of radiotherapy at a greater upfront financial cost, but it may prove to be cost effective if chronic medical complications can be avoided. Tools to assist with decision making are needed to aid in selecting pediatric patients for protons, and cost-effectiveness models can provide an objective method for this. METHODS: A Markov cohort-simulation model was developed to assess the expected costs and effectiveness for specific radiation doses to the hypothalamus with protons versus photons in pediatric patients. Costing data included cost of investment and the diagnosis and management of growth hormone deficiency. Longitudinal outcomes data were used to inform risk parameters for the model. With costs in 2012 US dollars and effectiveness measured in quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: Proton therapy was cost effective for some scenarios based on the difference in hypothalamic sparing. Although some scenarios were not cost effective, others were not only cost effective for proton therapy but also demonstrated that protons were cost saving compared with photons. CONCLUSIONS: The current results provide the first evidence-based guide for identifying children with brain tumors who may benefit the most from proton therapy with respect to endocrine dysfunction. Proton therapy may be more cost effective for scenarios in which radiation dose to the hypothalamus can be spared, but protons may not be cost effective when tumors are involving or directly adjacent to the hypothalamus if there is a high dose to this structure.

Geometric and dosimetric uncertainties in intracranial stereotatctic treatments for multiple nonisocentric lesions.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of geometric uncertainties of patient position on treatments of multiple nonisocentric intracranial lesions. The average distance between lesions in patients with multiple targets was determined by a retrospective survey of patients with multiple lesions. Retrospective patient imaging data from fractionated stereotactic patients were used to calculate interfractional and intrafractional patient position uncertainty. Three different immobilization devices were included in the positioning study. The interfractional and intrafractional patient positioning error data were used to calculate the geometric offset of a lesion located at varying distances from the mechanical isocenter for treatments of multiple lesions with a single arc, assuming that no intrafractional position correction is employed during an arc rotation. Dosimetric effects were studied using two representative lesions of two sizes, 6 mm and 13 mm maximum dimensions, and prescribed to 20 Gy and 18 Gy, respectively. Distances between lesions ranged from < 10 mm to 150 mm, which would correspond to a range of isocenter to lesion separations of < 10 mm to 75 mm, assuming an isocenter located at the geometric mean. In the presence of a full six degree of freedom patient correction system, the effects of the intrafractional patient positioning uncertainties were less than 1.8 mm (3.6mm) for 1σ (2σ) deviations for lesion spacing up to 75 mm assuming a quadratic summation of 1σ and 2σ. Without the benefit of a six DOF correction device, only correcting for three translations, the effects of the intrafractional patient positioning uncertainties were within 3.1 mm (7.2 mm) for 1σ (2σ) deviations for distances up to 75 mm. 1σ and 2σ deviations along all six axes were observed in 3.6% and 0.3%, respectively, of 974 fractions analyzed. Dosimetric effects for 2 mm and 4 mm offsets were most significant for the small lesion with minimum dose (Dmin) decreasing from 20 Gy to 13.6 Gy and 5.7 Gy and volume receiving the prescription (V20Gy) reducing from 100% to 57% and 16%, respectively. The dosimetric effects on the larger lesion were less pronounced with Dmin reducing from 18 Gy to 17.5 Gy and 14.2 Gy, and V18Gy reducing from 100% to 98.3% and 85.4%, for 2 mm and 4 mm offsets, respectively. In the 1σ scenario (3.6% of patients) angular uncertainties in patient positioning can introduce 1.0 mm shifts in the location of the lesion position at distances of 75 mm, compared to an isocentric treatment even with a full six DOF correction. Without the ability to correct angular positioning errors, a lesion positioned 75 mm away from the mechanical isocenter can be located in 3.6% of patients > 3.0 mm distant from the planned position. Dosimetric results depend upon the distance from isocenter and the size of the target. Single isocenter treatments for multiple lesions should be considered only when full six DOF corrections can be applied, the intrafractional immobilization precision is well quantified, and a PTV expansion is included for more distant lesions to account for unavoidable residual patient positioning uncertainties.

Cost effectiveness of proton therapy compared with photon therapy in the management of pediatric medulloblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Proton therapy has been a hotly contested issue in both scientific publications and lay media. Proponents cite the modality's ability to spare healthy tissue, but critics claim the benefit gained from its use does not validate its cost compared with photon therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of proton therapy versus photon therapy in the management of pediatric medulloblastoma. METHODS: A cost-effective analysis was performed from the societal perspective using a Monte Carlo simulation model. A population of pediatric medulloblastoma survivors aged 18 years was studied who had received treatment at age 5 years and who were at risk of developing 10 adverse events, such as growth hormone deficiency, coronary artery disease, ototoxicity, secondary malignant neoplasm, and death. Costing data included the cost of investment and the costs of diagnosis and management of adverse health states from institutional and Medicare data. Longitudinal outcomes data and recent modeling studies informed risk parameters for the model. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were used to measure outcomes. RESULTS: Results from the base case demonstrated that proton therapy was associated with higher quality-adjusted life years and lower costs; therefore, it dominated photon therapy. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, proton therapy remained the more attractive strategy, either dominating photon therapy or having a very low cost per quality-adjust life year gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis illustrated the domination of proton therapy over photon therapy in 96.4% of simulations. CONCLUSIONS: By using current risk estimates and data on required capital investments, the current study indicated that proton therapy is a cost-effective strategy for the management of pediatric patients with medulloblastoma compared with standard of care photon therapy.

Modernization of safety environment for a dedicated beamline for proton ocular therapy.

BACKGROUND: Proton therapy is an effective treatment for ocular melanoma, and other tumors of the eye. The fixed horizontal beamline dedicated to ocular treatments at Massachusetts General Hospital was originally commissioned in 2002, with much of the equipment, safety features, and practices dating back to an earlier implementation at Harvard Cyclotron in the 1970s. PURPOSE: To describe the experience of reevaluation and enhancement of the safety environment for one of the longest continuously operating proton therapy programs. METHODS: Several enhancements in quality control had been introduced throughout the years of operation, as described in this manuscript, to better align the practice with the evolving standards of proton therapy and the demands of a modern hospital. We spotlight the design and results of the failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), and subsequent actions introduced to mitigate the modes associated with elevated risk. The findings of the FMEA informed the specifications for the new software application, which facilitated the improved management of the treatment workflow and the image-guidance aspects of ocular treatments. RESULTS: Eleven failure modes identified as having the highest risk are described. Six of these were mitigated with the clinical roll-out of a new application for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Others were addressed through task automation, the broader introduction of checklists, and enhancements in pre-treatment staff-led time-out. CONCLUSIONS: Throughout the task of modernizing the safety system of our dedicated ocular beamline, FMEA proved to be an effective instrument in soliciting inputs from the staff about safety and workflow concerns, helping to identify steps associated with elevated failure risks. Risks were reduced with the clinical introduction of a new IGRT application, which integrates quality management tools widely recognized for their role in risk mitigation: automation of the data transfer and workflow steps, and with the introduction of checklists and redundancy cross-checks.

Immobilization precision of a modified GTC frame.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and quantify the interfraction reproducibility and intrafraction immobilization precision of a modified GTC frame. The error of the patient alignment and imaging systems were measured using a cranial skull phantom, with simulated, predetermined shifts. The kV setup images were acquired with a room-mounted set of kV sources and panels. Calculated translations and rotations provided by the computer alignment software relying upon three implanted fiducials were compared to the known shifts, and the accuracy of the imaging and positioning systems was calculated. Orthogonal kV setup images for 45 proton SRT patients and 1002 fractions (average 22.3 fractions/patient) were analyzed for interfraction and intrafraction immobilization precision using a modified GTC frame. The modified frame employs a radiotransparent carbon cup and molded pillow to allow for more treatment angles from posterior directions for cranial lesions. Patients and the phantom were aligned with three 1.5 mm stainless steel fiducials implanted into the skull. The accuracy and variance of the patient positioning and imaging systems were measured to be 0.10 ± 0.06 mm, with the maximum uncertainty of rotation being ±0.07°. 957 pairs of interfraction image sets and 974 intrafraction image sets were analyzed. 3D translations and rotations were recorded. The 3D vector interfraction setup reproducibility was 0.13 mm ± 1.8 mm for translations and the largest uncertainty of ± 1.07º for rotations. The intrafraction immobilization efficacy was 0.19 mm ± 0.66 mm for translations and the largest uncertainty of ± 0.50º for rotations. The modified GTC frame provides reproducible setup and effective intrafraction immobilization, while allowing for the complete range of entrance angles from the posterior direction.

A fast double template convolution isocenter evaluation algorithm with subpixel accuracy.

PURPOSE: To design a fast Winston Lutz (fWL) algorithm for accurate analysis of radiation isocenter from images without edge detection or center of mass calculations. METHODS: An algorithm has been developed to implement the Winston Lutz test for mechanical/ radiation isocenter agreement using an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). The algorithm detects the position of the radiation shadow of a tungsten ball within a stereotactic cone. The fWL algorithm employs a double convolution to independently find the position of the sphere and cone centers. Subpixel estimation is used to achieve high accuracy. Results of the algorithm were compared to (1) a human observer with template guidance and (2) an edge detection/center of mass (edCOM) algorithm. Testing was performed with high resolution (0.05 mm/px, film) and low resolution (0.78 mm/px, EPID) image sets. RESULTS: Sphere and cone center relative positions were calculated with the fWL algorithm for high resolution test images with an accuracy of 0.002 +/- 0.061 mm compared to 0.042 +/- 0.294 mm for the human observer, and 0.003 +/- 0.038 mm for the edCOM algorithm. The fWL algorithm required 0.01 s per image compared to 5 s for the edCOM algorithm and 20 s for the human observer. For lower resolution images the fWL algorithm localized the centers with an accuracy of 0.083 +/- 0.12 mm compared to 0.03 +/- 0.5514 mm for the edCOM algorithm. CONCLUSIONS: A fast (subsecond) subpixel algorithm has been developed that can accurately determine the center locations of the ball and cone in Winston Lutz test images without edge detection or COM calculations.

Dosimetric Comparison of Proton Versus Photon Radiosurgery for Treatment of Pituitary Adenoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the dosimetric differences in stereotactic radiosurgery between use of passively scattered protons (PSRS) versus photons (XSRS) for pituitary adenomas. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine patients with pituitary adenomas were selected among patients receiving single-fraction proton stereotactic radiosurgery (PSRS) between 2016 and 2017. These cases were replanned with XSRS using volumetric-modulated arc therapy with 2.5 mm and 5 mm multileaf collimators (2.5XSRS and 5XSRS, respectively). PSRS was planned with a dedicated single scattering stereotactic proton unit delivered via 3 equally or unequally weighted isocentric fields. XSRS plans were created with optimization to spare organs at risk. Plans were generated using the original total treatment dose delivered in 1 fraction. RESULTS: Plans were evaluated for target volume dosimetry and estimated clinical toxicity. There was no significant difference in clinical target volume V100%, V95%, V90% or homogeneity index between treatment modalities. PSRS offered lower maximum dose (Dmax) to organs at risk and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) compared with 5XSRS and 2.5XSRS, respectively, for critical structures including optic nerve (right, Dmax 4.18, 5.32, 5.41; EUD 3.35, 4.08, 4.20) and hypothalamus (Dmax 1.71, 3.94, 3.77; EUD 0.94, 2.47, 2.39; P < .05 for PSRS vs 5XSRS and 2.5XSRS). The projected risk of secondary tumors in excess of baseline was lowest for PSRS plans (PSRS 5.28, 5XSRS 12.93, 2.5XSRS 12.66 cases per 10,000 patient-years; P = .008 for PSRS vs 5XSRS, PSRS vs 2.5XSRS, and P = .77 for 5XSRS vs 2.5XSRS). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that neither modality has empirically superior dosimetry and identify potential clinical advantages as well as limitations of each technique. PSRS, 5XSRS and 2.5XSRS demonstrate comparable target volume dosimetry for pituitary adenoma. PSRS compared with XSRS modalities offers modestly decreased maximum dose and EUD to critical proximal structures and decreases risk of radiation-induced secondary tumors by more than half.

Outcome and Toxicity of Proton Therapy for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of proton radiotherapy in vestibular schwannoma. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review and volumetric MRI-analyses. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Vestibular schwannoma patients treated with protons between 2003 and 2018. INTERVENTION: Proton radiotherapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor control was defined as not requiring salvage treatment. Progressive hearing loss was defined as a decrease in maximum speech discrimination score below the 95% critical difference in reference to the pretreatment score. Hearing assessment includes contralateral hearing and duration of follow-up. Dizziness and/or unsteadiness and facial and trigeminal nerve function were scored. Patients who had surgery prior to proton radiotherapy were separately assessed. RESULTS: Of 221 included patients, 136 received single fraction and 85 fractionated proton radiotherapy. Actuarial 5-year local control rate was 96% (95% CI 90-98%). The median radiological follow-up was 4.5 years. Progressive postirradiation speech discrimination score loss occurred in 42% of patients with audiometric follow-up within a year. Facial paresis was found in 5% (usually mild), severe dizziness in 5%, and trigeminal neuralgia in 5% of patients receiving protons as primary treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Proton radiotherapy achieves high tumor control with modest side effects aside from hearing loss in vestibular schwannoma patients. Limited and heterogeneous outcome reporting hamper comparisons to the literature. Potential sequelae of radiation therapy impacting vestibular function, cognitive function, and quality of life warrant further evaluation. Subgroups that benefit most from proton radiotherapy should be identified to optimize allocation and counterbalance its costs.

Modelling of late side-effects following cranial proton beam therapy.

BACKGROUND: The limited availability of proton beam therapy (PBT) requires individual treatment selection strategies that can be based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. We developed and externally validated NTCP models for common late side-effects following PBT in brain tumour patients to optimise patients' quality of life. METHODS: Cohorts from three PBT centres (216 patients) were investigated for several physician-rated endpoints at 12 and 24 months after PBT: alopecia, dry eye syndrome, fatigue, headache, hearing and memory impairment, and optic neuropathy. Dose-volume parameters of associated normal tissues and clinical factors were used for logistic regression modelling in a development cohort. Statistically significant parameters showing high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in internal cross-validation were externally validated. In addition, analyses of the pooled cohorts and of time-dependent generalised estimating equations including all patient data were performed. RESULTS: In the validation study, mild alopecia was related to high dose parameters to the skin [e.g. the dose to 2% of the volume (D2%)] at 12 and 24 months after PBT. Mild hearing impairment at 24 months after PBT was associated with the mean dose to the ipsilateral cochlea. Additionally, the pooled analyses revealed dose-response relations between memory impairment and intermediate to high doses to the remaining brain as well as D2% of the hippocampi. Mild fatigue at 24 months after PBT was associated with D2% to the brainstem as well as with concurrent chemotherapy. Moreover, in generalised estimating equations analysis, dry eye syndrome was associated with the mean dose to the ipsilateral lacrimal gland. CONCLUSION: We developed and in part validated NTCP models for several common late side-effects following PBT in brain tumour patients. Validation studies are required for further confirmation.

Stereotactic Radiation as Salvage Therapy for Recurrent Rathke Cleft Cysts.

BACKGROUND: Rathke cleft cysts (RCCs) are sellar-based cystic lesions that are often found incidentally but occasionally become symptomatic with significant visual and/or endocrine deficits. The standard of treatment is surgery, but rare cases of multiply recurrent RCCs can be refractory to surgical drainage, leading to significant morbidity. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the safety and feasibility of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) as salvage therapy in multiply recurrent RCCs refractory to surgical drainage. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review at a single institution was conducted to identify and describe patients with multiply recurrent RCCs refractory to surgical drainage who underwent SRT. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2015, 6 patients (5 female) who underwent SRT for recurrent RCCs were identified. A total of 4 presented with visual deficits, and 2 presented with endocrine dysfunction and severe headaches prior to their initial drainage. All patients had initial postoperative improvement but then developed multiple, symptomatic recurrences. Median number of surgical drainage procedures prior to radiotherapy was 3. A total of 3 patients underwent LINAC-based SRT, and 3 had proton-based SRT. Treatment doses were 45 Gy over 25 fractions (n = 5) and 50.4 Gy over 28 fractions (n = 1). Median follow-up after radiation therapy was 69 mo (range 24-154 mo). In the follow-up period, stabilization of the RCC was achieved, although 2 patients required additional drainage procedures. Only 1 patient developed new hypothyroidism and hypoadrenalism after SRT. CONCLUSION: In rare cases of multiply recurrent RCCs refractory to repeat surgical drainage, stereotactic fractionated radiation therapy is a safe and effective salvage therapy.

Proton therapy for head and neck paragangliomas: A single institutional experience.

BACKGROUND: Although slow growing, head and neck paragangliomas (HNPG) can cause significant morbidity. We evaluated the efficacy of proton therapy in the management of HNPG. METHODS: Retrospective review of an institutional proton therapy experience of treating patients between 1997 and 2016; 37 patients and 40 tumors were included. RESULTS: Proton therapy was delivered to a median of 50.4 Gy(RBE) (range: 45-68). Having a genetic/family predisposition for HNPG was associated with multifocal tumors (P = .02) and younger diagnosis age (P = .02). Twenty-six (70%) patients had symptom improvement posttreatment, and 65% of treated tumors showed ≥20% volumetric shrinkage. The 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates were both 97%. Grade 2 to grade 3 toxicities (54%) included subjective hearing impairment (19%), middle ear inflammation (14%), and dry mouth (8%). There were no grade 4-5 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HNPGs can be effectively and safely treated with proton therapy with excellent tumor control, successful volumetric tumor reduction, and symptomatic improvement.

Patterns of Failure Among Patients With Low-grade Glioma Treated With Proton Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Proton treatment may be a useful radiation therapy modality for long-term surviving patients with glioma to reduce normal tissue toxicities. Photon studies demonstrate that most low-grade glioma (LGG) failures occur within the radiation field, supporting the use of more conformal treatment plans, yet it is unclear whether this can be translated to proton radiation therapy (PRT). Our objective is to examine our institutional experience to determine patterns of failure in patients with LGG with respect to the volume irradiated with PRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with World Health Organization 2007 grade I to II or isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-positive mutation grade III LGG treated with PRT between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with documented local recurrences on magnetic resonance imaging after receipt of PRT underwent a comparison with the initial treatment plan dosimetry to evaluate patterns of failure. A total of 141 patients were included in the final cohort. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 46.7 months (range, 2.8-144 months), and 5-year overall survival was 84%. The median PRT dose delivered was 54 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) (range, 45-60 Gy). There were 42 failures after PRT (30%). The median time to progression after treatment was 32.7 months (range, 4.8-93.6 months). Thirty-one patients (74%) failed in-field (defined as within the 95% isodose volume), 5 patients (12%) failed out-of-field, and 5 patients (12%) had marginal failures (defined as within the 50%-95% isodose volume). The 5-year freedom from progression after PRT was 60.1% (95% confidence interval, 48.7-70.0). The 5-year cumulative incidence of overall survival was 33% among those with recurrence after PRT and 96% among those without recurrence after PRT (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Of the patients with LGG who had documented failures after PRT, most recurred within the radiation field with few marginal failures, indicating that even with PRT, which often can have steeper dose gradients, coverage is adequate. Survival was poor for patients whose tumors recurred.

Hypopituitarism After Cranial Irradiation for Meningiomas: A Single-Institution Experience.

PURPOSE: Patients undergoing cranial irradiation are at high risk for development of subsequent pituitary deficiencies. Patients with meningiomas can expect to live many years after treatment and are therefore particularly vulnerable to long-term sequalae of radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this study was to determine the rates and timing of onset of pituitary dysfunction across each hypothalamic-pituitary axis in patients with meningiomas in the sellar region. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Data from 74 patients with meningiomas in the sellar or perisellar region who underwent RT between 2001 and 2017 at a single academic center were analyzed. Dose-volume histograms were generated to determine the dose of radiation to the pituitary gland. Pituitary function tests were evaluated before and after completion of RT. RESULTS: There was a 20% risk for new hypopituitarism across any hypothalamic-pituitary axis after RT at a median follow-up of 43 months. Identified rates of dysfunction across each axis were 24% for thyroid and adrenal, 19% for growth hormone, and 10% for gonadal. Median time to develop deficiencies ranged from 11 months for growth hormone deficiency to 32 months for adrenal insufficiency. Deficiencies were likely to be correlated, with increased risk for thyroid dysfunction in patients with adrenal, gonadal, or prolactin deficiencies (P < .05). On univariate analysis, mean dose to the pituitary gland and male sex were associated with increased risk for post-RT thyroid deficiency (P = .01 and P = .004, respectively). There was no difference in rates of hypothyroidism after protons compared with photons (P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Cranial irradiation for sellar meningiomas carries a risk for subsequent hypopituitarism that appears to be dose dependent and may occur years after completion of RT. Growth hormone deficiency and gonadal dysfunction were likely underestimated here secondary to a lack of routine testing. Given the favorable tumor prognosis in this patient population, early and long-term endocrine follow-up is warranted.

Development and validation of NTCP models for acute side-effects resulting from proton beam therapy of brain tumours.

BACKGROUND: The limited availability of proton beam therapy (PBT) requires individual treatment selection strategies, such as based on normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). We developed and externally validated NTCP models for common acute side-effects following PBT in brain tumour patients in effort to provide guidance on optimising patient quality of life. METHODS: An exploration cohort including 113 adult brain tumour patients who underwent PBT was investigated for the following endpoints: alopecia, scalp erythema, headache, fatigue and nausea. Dose-volume parameters of associated normal tissues were used for logistic regression modelling. Statistically significant parameters showing high area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in internal cross-validation were externally validated on two cohorts of 71 and 96 patients, respectively. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations of dose-volume parameters of the skin for erythema and alopecia were found. In internal cross-validation, the following prognostic parameters were selected: V35Gy (absolute volume receiving 35 Gy) for erythema grade ≥1, D2% (dose to 2% of the volume) for alopecia grade ≥1 and D5% for alopecia grade ≥2. Validation was successful for both cohorts with AUC >0.75. A bivariable model for fatigue grade ≥1 could not be validated externally. No correlations of dose-volume parameters of the brain were seen for headache or nausea. CONCLUSION: We developed and successfully validated NTCP models for scalp erythema and alopecia in primary brain tumour patients treated with PBT.

Proton stereotactic radiotherapy for persistent adrenocorticotropin-producing adenomas.

CONTEXT: Radiation therapy is a potentially curative treatment for corticotroph adenomas refractory to surgery. Protons have an advantage over photons (x-rays) by depositing energy at the target with no exit dose, providing a lower dose to adjacent normal tissues. Until recently, proton stereotactic radiotherapy (PSR) was available at only two U.S. centers; use will increase as proton facilities are under development. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PSR for persistent Cushing's disease (CD) and Nelson's syndrome (NS). DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 38 patients (33 with CD and five with NS) treated between 1992 and 2005. PARTICIPANTS: All patients had transsphenoidal surgery without biochemical cure. Four had previous irradiation with photons. The patients with NS underwent bilateral adrenalectomy 29-228 months (median 40) before PSR. INTERVENTION: Single-fraction PSR was delivered at a median dose of 20 Cobalt Gray Equivalents (range 15-20) on 1 treatment day. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete response (CR) was defined as sustained (> or =3 months) normalization of urinary free cortisol off medical therapy. CR in NS was based on normalization of plasma corticotropin. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 62 months (range 20-136), CR was achieved in five patients (100%) with NS and 17 (52%) patients with CD. Among all patients with CR, median time to CR was 18 months (range 5-49). No secondary tumors were noted on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans, and there was no clinical evidence of optic nerve damage, seizure, or brain injury. There were 17 patients (52%) who developed new pituitary deficits. CONCLUSIONS: PSR is effective for patients with persistent corticotroph adenomas with low morbidity after a median follow-up of 62 months; longer follow-up is warranted for late radiation-related sequelae.

Radiation Safety for Pregnant Workers at a Proton Facility.

PURPOSE: To quantify radiation exposure of radiation therapy technologists (RTTs) in a proton treatment facility in comparison with a photon therapy facility, to inform and establish these specialized occupational safety guidelines. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two groups of RTTs, consisting of 12 full-time passive scattering proton RTTs and 18 full-time conventional photon RTTs, wore an additional dosimetry badge at the waist for a period of 14 weeks. The 2 groups of RTTs were given identical instructions on the proper use of the badges. To compare exposures between passive scatter and scanning beam systems, exposure rates from activated equipment in both systems were measured. RESULTS: Over the 14-week period, the mean and standard deviation background-corrected dose for the passively scattered proton RTTs was 39.9 ± 5.4 mrem. The mean and standard deviation background-corrected dose for the conventional photon RTTs was similar at 39.9 ± 9.0 mrem (P = .6). Exposure rates were lower in equipment activated in a scanning beam system in comparison with those from a passive scatter system. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation dose to passively scattered proton and photon radiation therapy technologists was similar when measured with a dosimeter worn at the waist over a period of 14 weeks. On the basis of these data, the departmental policy permits pregnant radiation workers to work in proton treatment areas, and the policy for pregnant workers does not differ between proton and photon radiation workers or between passive scatter and scanning beam systems. All employees are encouraged to limit time near and proximity to activated equipment.

The role of proton beam therapy in central neurocytoma: A single-institution experience.

PURPOSE: Central neurocytomas (CNs) are rare World Health Organization grade II tumors managed with surgery and radiation therapy. We report our experience in managing CN with proton beam therapy (PBT) when radiation therapy was used. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We identified 61 patients with pathologically diagnosed CN treated at our institution between 1996 and 2016, of which 24 met inclusion criteria. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics are reported in context of progression-free survival and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Of 24 patients identified, median age at diagnosis was 21 years (range, 14-60). Median maximal tumor diameter was 4.5 cm (range, 1.4-6.8). Eighteen (75%) patients underwent upfront surgery alone. Sixteen (67%) patients received adjuvant or salvage PBT at a median dose of 54 Gy (relative biological effectiveness). Median follow-up was 56 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 61 months. Eleven patients had disease progression with median time to progression of 22 months. Of the 5 patients with gross total resection, 4 experienced local recurrence and had MIB-1 >4% (range, 4.5-30). There was improved PFS with addition of PBT to definitive surgery (log-rank, P = .06); there was no disease progression to date. In patients who experienced disease recurrence/progression, MIB-1 <4% was associated with improved PFS (log-rank, P = .007). All patients tolerated PBT well with toxicities typical for cranial irradiation and with no grade 3+ toxicities. CONCLUSION: In our cohort, CN with elevated MIB-1 index were at increased risk for disease progression. However, adjuvant radiation therapy appears to effectively prevent failure. PBT toxicities appear to be comparable to if not less than published photon experiences.

Proton Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: A Single-Institution Analysis of 370 Patients.

PURPOSE: To report the first series of proton stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of patients with single or multiple brain metastases, including failure patterns, survival outcomes, and toxicity analysis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a single-institution, retrospective study of 815 metastases from 370 patients treated with proton SRS between April 1991 and November 2016. Cumulative incidence estimates of local failure, distant brain failure, and pathologically confirmed radionecrosis and Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival were calculated. Fine and Gray and Cox regressions were performed to ascertain whether clinical and treatment factors were associated with the described endpoints. RESULTS: The median follow-up from proton SRS was 9.2 months. The 6- and 12-month estimates of local failure, distant brain failure, and overall survival were 4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0%-5.9%) and 8.5% (95% CI 6.7%-10.6%), 39.1% (95% CI 34.1%-44.0%) and 48.2% (95% CI 43.0%-53.2%), and 76.0% (95% CI 71.3%-80.0%) and 51.5% (95% CI 46.3%-56.5%), respectively. The median survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 10.8-14.0 months) after proton SRS. The most common symptoms were low-grade fatigue (12.5%), headache (10.0%), motor weakness (6.2%), seizure (5.8%), and dizziness (5.4%). The rate of pathologically confirmed radionecrosis at 12 months was 3.6% (95% CI 2.0%-5.8%), and only target volume was associated on multivariate analysis (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.13, 95% CI 1.0-1.20). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported series of proton SRS for the management of brain metastases. Moderate-dose proton SRS is well tolerated and can achieve good local control outcomes, comparable to those obtained with conventional photon SRS strategies. Although proton SRS remains resource-intensive, future strategies evaluating its selective utility in patients who would benefit most from integral dose reduction should be explored.