Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Br J Haematol ; 201(4): 628-639, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36806152

RESUMO

Outcome of early treatment of COVID-19 with antivirals or anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (MABs) in patients with haematological malignancies (HM) is unknown. A retrospective study of HM patients treated for mild/moderate COVID-19 between March 2021 and July 2022 was performed. The main composite end-point was treatment failure (severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-related death). We included 328 consecutive patients who received MABs (n = 120, 37%; sotrovimab, n = 73) or antivirals (n = 208, 63%; nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, n = 116) over a median of two days after symptoms started; 111 (33.8%) had non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL); 89 (27%) were transplant/CAR-T (chimaeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) recipients. Most infections (n = 309, 94%) occurred during the Omicron period. Failure developed in 31 patients (9.5%). Its independent predictors were older age, fewer vaccine doses, and treatment with MABs. Rate of failure was lower in the Omicron versus the pre-Omicron period (7.8% versus 36.8%, p < 0.001). During the Omicron period, predictors of failure were age, fewer vaccine doses and diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (AML/MDS). Independent predictors of longer viral shedding were age, comorbidities, hospital admission at diagnosis, NHL/CLL, treatment with MABs. COVID-19-associated mortality was 3.4% (n = 11). The mortality in those who developed severe COVID-19 after early treatment was 26% in the Omicron period. Patients with HM had a significant risk of failure of early treatment, even during the Omicron period, with high mortality rate.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doenças Hematológicas , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicações , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Anticorpos Monoclonais , Antivirais/uso terapêutico
2.
Hematol Oncol ; 41(5): 904-911, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37452579

RESUMO

Despite global vaccination efforts, immunocompromized patients remain at high risk for COVID-19-associated morbidity. In particular, patients with impaired humoral immunity have shown a high risk of persistent infection. We report a case series of adult patients with B cell malignancies and/or undergoing B cell targeting therapies with persisting SARS-CoV-2 infection and treated with a combination antiviral therapy of remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, in three Italian tertiary academic hospitals. A total of 14 patients with impaired adaptive humoral immunity and prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection were treated with the dual antiviral therapy. The median age was 60 (IQR 56-68) years, and 11 were male. Twelve patients had B cell lymphoma, one patient had chronic lymphocytic leukemia and one patient had multiple sclerosis. Thirteen out of 14 patients had received prior B cell-targeting therapies, consisting of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies in 11 patients, and chimeric antigen receptor T therapy in 2 patients. The median time between diagnosis and therapy start was 42.0 (IQR 35-46) days. Seven patients had mild, 6 moderate and one severe disease. Nine patients had signs of interstitial pneumonitis on chest computed tomography scans before treatment. The median duration of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and remdesivir combination therapy was 10 days. All patients showed resolution of COVID-19-related symptoms after a median of 6 (IQR 4-11) days and viral clearance after 9 (IQR 5-11) days. Combination therapy with remdesivir and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is a promising treatment option for persistent COVID-19 in immunocompromized patients with humoral immunity impairment, worthy of prospective comparative trials.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Ritonavir , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Imunidade Humoral , Estudos Prospectivos , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antivirais/uso terapêutico
3.
Hematol Oncol ; 41(1): 16-25, 2023 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36238977

RESUMO

Main aim of this systematic review is to quantify the risk and identify predictors of clinical evolution of SARS-CoV-2 in hematological patients compared to different control populations. Two independent reviewers screened the literature assessing clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult patients with active hematological malignancies published up to June 2021. Primary outcome was COVID-19 related mortality, secondary outcomes were hospital and intensive-care admission, mechanical ventilation (MV), and thromboembolic events. Variables related to study setting, baseline patients' demographic, comorbidities, underlying hematological disease, ongoing chemotherapy, COVID-19 presentation, and treatments were extracted. A total of 67 studies including 10,061 hematological patients and 111,143 controls were included. Most of the studies were retrospective cohorts (51 studies, 76%) and only 19 (13%) provided data for a control group. A significant increased risk of clinical progression in the hematological population compared to the controls was found in terms of COVID-19 related mortality (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.77-2.54), hospitalization (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.15-3.43), intensive-care admission (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.38-2.26), and MV (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.71-2.75). The risk remained significantly higher in the subgroup analysis comparing hematological patients versus solid cancer. Meta-regression analysis of uncontrolled studies showed that older age, male sex, and hypertension were significantly related to worse clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in hematological population. Older age and hypertension were found to be associated also to thromboembolic events. In conclusion, hematological patients have a higher risk of COVID-19 clinical progression compared to both the general population and to patients with solid cancer.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Hipertensão , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Progressão da Doença
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 77(6): 1570-1577, 2022 05 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35373297

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The novel carbapenem/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam has been developed for the treatment of infections due to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). Herein, we describe the in vivo evolution of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam resistance in longitudinal intra-patient Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains isolated from a patient following ceftazidime/avibactam-based treatments. METHODS: WGS analysis was performed on KPC-Kp strains isolated at different times and during antimicrobial treatments from the same patient. Genome assemblies were performed using a hybrid approach using Illumina iSeq 100 and Minion Oxford Nanopore platforms. Subpopulation analysis and allele frequency determination was performed by mapping Illumina reads to blaKPC. RESULTS: During antimicrobial treatment, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam was observed following 16 days of antimicrobial therapy. WGS results showed that all KPC-Kp exhibited a low SNP rate of divergence, belonged to ST512 and shared similar antimicrobial resistance and porin gene patterns. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the first ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp strain harboured a blaKPC-53 gene in a Tn4401 transposon moved from IncFII(K) to a 43 kb IncX3 plasmid, while a imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam-resistant strain exhibited two copies of the Tn4401 transposon in IncFII(K) and IncX3 plasmids, resulting in an increased blaKPC copy number. Of note, frequency analysis demonstrated that imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam-resistant KPC-Kp consisted of mixed subpopulations harbouring blaKPC-40 and blaKPC-53 alleles. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the in vivo evolution of genetic rearrangement conferring resistance to imipenem/relebactam in a patient with KPC-Kp infection and treated with different ceftazidime/avibactam-based treatments. The rapid development of mutations and the high adaptability of its genome highlight the potential threat of KPC-Kp.


Assuntos
Ceftazidima , Infecções por Klebsiella , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/farmacologia , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Cilastatina , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Imipenem/farmacologia , Imipenem/uso terapêutico , Klebsiella , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , beta-Lactamases/genética
5.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 41(9): 1203-1206, 2022 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35915273

RESUMO

Objective of this study was to assess the appropriate treatment duration for enterococcal central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). This observational, retrospective, multicenter study conducted between 2011 and 2019 enrolled all hospitalized patients with monomicrobial enterococcal CLABSI. Those with infective endocarditis and non-survivors at least 7 days from index blood culture (BC) were excluded. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. We enrolled 113 patients, of whom 59% were male, median age was 64 (SD ± 15) and median Charlson's index score 5 (IQR 3-8). Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium were found in 51% and 44% of cases, respectively. Median treatment duration was 11 days (IQR 6-17), and 32% of patients (n = 36) received ≤ 7 days. Characteristics of patients receiving more or less than 7 days of treatment were similar. Central line was removed in 82% (n = 93) of cases within a median of 3 days (1-8). At both uni- and multivariate analysis, duration of antibiotic treatment > 7 days was not associated with 30-day mortality [HR 0.41 (95% CI, 0.13-1.24), p = 0.12] even after adjustment with propensity score [HR 0.47 (95% CI 0.17-1.26), p = 0.13]. A 7-day treatment course appears to be safe in non-complicated enterococcal CLABSIs.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Duração da Terapia , Enterococcus , Enterococcus faecalis , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(11): e3606-e3614, 2021 12 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32719848

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the incidence of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis among intubated patients with critical COVID-19 and evaluated different case definitions of invasive aspergillosis. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study in adult patients with microbiologically confirmed COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation. All included participants underwent a screening protocol for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis with bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan and cultures performed on admission at 7 days and in case of clinical deterioration. Cases were classified as coronavirus-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) according to previous consensus definitions. The new definition was compared with putative invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (PIPA). RESULTS: 108 patients were enrolled. Probable CAPA was diagnosed in 30 (27.7%) patients after a median of 4 (2-8) days from intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly higher 30-day mortality rate from ICU admission among patients with either CAPA (44% vs 19%, P = .002) or PIPA (74% vs 26%, P < .001) when compared with patients not fulfilling criteria for aspergillosis. The association between CAPA (OR, 3.53; 95% CI, 1.29-9.67; P = .014) or PIPA (OR, 11.60; 95% CI, 3.24-41.29; P < .001) with 30-day mortality from ICU admission was confirmed, even after adjustment for confounders with a logistic regression model. Among patients with CAPA receiving voriconazole treatment (13 patients; 43%) a trend toward lower mortality (46% vs 59%; P = .30) and reduction in galactomannan index in consecutive samples were observed. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high incidence of CAPA among critically ill COVID-19 patients and its occurrence seems to change the natural course of disease.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva , Aspergilose Pulmonar , Adulto , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/diagnóstico , Aspergilose Pulmonar Invasiva/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): 1664-1676, 2021 11 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618353

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A growing body of observational evidence supports the value of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in managing infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed observational data on use and outcomes of CAZ-AVI therapy for infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify variables independently associated with 30-day mortality. Results were adjusted for propensity score for receipt of CAZ-AVI combination regimens versus CAZ-AVI monotherapy. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 577 adults with bloodstream infections (n = 391) or nonbacteremic infections involving mainly the urinary tract, lower respiratory tract, and intra-abdominal structures. All received treatment with CAZ-AVI alone (n = 165) or with ≥1 other active antimicrobials (n = 412). The all-cause mortality rate 30 days after infection onset was 25% (146/577). There was no significant difference in mortality between patients managed with CAZ-AVI alone and those treated with combination regimens (26.1% vs 25.0%, P = .79). In multivariate analysis, mortality was positively associated with presence at infection onset of septic shock (P = .002), neutropenia (P < .001), or an INCREMENT score ≥8 (P = .01); with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) (P = .04); and with CAZ-AVI dose adjustment for renal function (P = .01). Mortality was negatively associated with CAZ-AVI administration by prolonged infusion (P = .006). All associations remained significant after propensity score adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: CAZ-AVI is an important option for treating serious KPC-Kp infections, even when used alone. Further study is needed to explore the drug's seemingly more limited efficacy in LRTIs and potential survival benefits of prolonging CAZ-AVI infusions to ≥3 hours.


Assuntos
Infecções por Klebsiella , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Compostos Azabicíclicos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Estudos Retrospectivos , beta-Lactamases
8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 806, 2021 Aug 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34384380

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The management of non-fermentative gram-negative bloodstream infection (NFGN-BSI) offers numerous challenges. In this study the aim is to analyse a large cohort of patients with NFGN-BSI recruited in the northern Italy to describe epidemiology, etiological and susceptibility pattern, therapeutic management and outcome. METHODS: Multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalised at three large teaching hospitals in northern Italy in a fourth year period. RESULTS: 355 BSI episodes were analyzed, due to P. aeruginosa (72.7%), A. baumannii (16.6%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (10.7%). Overall, 21.4% of isolates were defined as DTR, highest rate among A. baumannii (64.4%). All-cause 30-day mortality rate was 17.5%. Rates of XDR or DTR A. baumannii isolation were significantly higher in non-surviving patients. Independent risk factors for 30-day mortality were: age (HR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.04, p = 0.003), septic shock (HR 2.84, 95%CI 1.67-4.82, p < 0.001) and BSI due to Acinetobacter baumannii (HR 2.23, 95%CI 1.27-3.94, p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of DTR was high in the NFGN BSI cohort analyzied, mainly among Acinetobacter baumannii episodes (64.4%). Acinetobacter baumannii is showed to be an independent predictor of mortality. These evidences marked the urgent need of new therapeutic options against this pathogen. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 79/2017/O/OssN. Approved: March14th, 2017.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii , Bacteriemia , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 23(1): e13421, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779808

RESUMO

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may be associated with worse outcome in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. We performed a prospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19, from March 15 to April 30, 2020, at two tertiary hospitals in Emilia-Romagna Region. SOT recipients were compared with non-SOT patients. Primary endpoint was all-cause 30-day mortality. Relationship between SOT status and mortality was investigated by univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis. Patients were assessed from COVID-19 diagnosis to death or 30-day whichever occurred first. Study cohort consisted of 885 patients, of them 24 SOT recipients (n = 22, kidney, n = 2 liver). SOT recipients were younger, had lower BMI, but higher Charlson Index. At admission they presented less frequently with fever and respiratory failure. No difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (19% vs 22.1%) was found; however, there was a trend toward higher rate of respiratory failure (50% vs 33.1%, P = .07) in SOT recipients. Superinfections were more represented in SOT recipients, (50% vs 15.5%, P < .001). At multivariate analysis adjusted for main covariates, there was no association between SOT and 30-day mortality HR 1.15 (95% CI 0.39-3.35) P = .79. Our data suggest that mortality among COVID-19 SOT recipients is similar to general population.


Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/mortalidade , Transplante de Órgãos , Fatores de Risco , Transplantados , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 23(1): 9-36, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38145925

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major issue in healthcare, since it is often associated with endocarditis or deep site foci. Relevant morbidity and mortality associated with MRSA-BSIs forced the development of new antibiotic strategies; in particular, this review will focus the attention on fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline/ceftobiprole), that are the only ß-lactams active against MRSA. AREAS COVERED: The review discusses the available randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies conducted on safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline/ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs. Finally, a proposal of MRSA-BSI treatment flowchart, based on fifth-generation cephalosporins, is described. EXPERT OPINION: The use of anti-MRSA cephalosporins is an acceptable choice either in monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs due to their relevant effectiveness and safety. Particularly, their use may be advisable in combination therapy in case of severe infections (including endocarditis or persistent bacteriemia) or in monotherapy in subjects at higher risk of drugs-induced toxicity with older regimens. On the contrary, caution should be taken in case of suspected/ascertained central nervous system infections due to inconsistent data regarding penetration of these drugs in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissues.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Endocardite , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Ceftarolina , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Endocardite/tratamento farmacológico
11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37327873

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infectious disease pandemics and epidemics pose significant global threats, and the risk of emerging infectious diseases has increased because of factors such as international connections, travel, and population density. Despite investments in global health surveillance, much of the world remains unprepared to manage infectious disease threats. OBJECTIVES: This review article discusses the general considerations and lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of epidemic preparedness. SOURCES: Non-systematic search on PubMed, scientific society websites, and scientific newspapers (performed in April 2023). CONTENT: Key factors for preparedness include robust public health infrastructure, adequate allocation of resources, and effective communication between stakeholders. This narrative review emphasizes the need for timely and accurate dissemination of medical knowledge, as well as addressing the challenges of misinformation and infodemics. It also highlights the importance of quick availability of diagnostic tests and vaccines, ensuring equitable access to these technologies. The role of scientific coordination in developing treatment strategies and the safety and mental well-being of healthcare workers are discussed. Lastly, it should be emphasized the need for medical training, multidisciplinary teams, new technologies and artificial intelligence, and the active role of infectious disease physicians in epidemic preparedness efforts. IMPLICATIONS: From clinicians' perspective, healthcare authorities play a crucial role in epidemic preparedness even by providing resource management plans, ensuring availability of essential supplies and training, facilitating communication, and improving safe infection management.

12.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 29(5): 654.e1-654.e4, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716999

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based treatments have been associated with the emergence of resistance in KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) isolates after antimicrobial exposure. Here, we evaluated the CAZ-AVI resistance development in KPC-Kp isolated from patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based therapy. METHODS: We enrolled adult patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based regimens between January 2020 and January 2021. Carbapenemase-producing isolates collected from clinical samples and rectal swabs were evaluated for CAZ-AVI resistance development after antimicrobial exposure. KPC-Kp developing CAZ-AVI resistance and parental susceptible strains were genomically characterized. Whole genome sequencing was performed by using the Illumina iSeq100 platform and genomes were analyzed for antimicrobial-resistance genes, plasmid and porins sequences. RESULTS: We enrolled 90 patients treated with CAZ-AVI-based therapy and 62.2% (56/90) of them were colonized by KPC-producers before CAZ-AVI-based treatment and 6.6% acquired colonization during therapy. Six (6.6%) patients developed infections because of resistant KPC-Kp after CAZ-AVI exposure and 3 (3.3%) of them developed CAZ-AVI resistance in the rectum. Development of resistance among KPC in the rectum occurred after 32 (IQR, 9-35) days of therapy and after 30 (IQR, 22-40) days in clinical specimens. Genetic analysis demonstrated that the development of CAZ-AVI resistance was associated with mutated blaKPC-3 (blaKPC-31, blaKPC-53, blaKPC-89, and blaKPC-130) and phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a close genomic relationship between KCP-Kp collected from rectum and clinical samples of the same patient. DISCUSSION: Antimicrobial exposure induce a higher incidence of CAZ-AVI resistance development in the blood and respiratory tract than in the rectum (6.7% vs. 3.3%) of CAZ-AVI-treated patients and genome analysis showed that resistance was associated with mutated blaKPC-3 variants.


Assuntos
Ceftazidima , Infecções por Klebsiella , Adulto , Humanos , Ceftazidima/farmacologia , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Estado Terminal , Filogenia , Combinação de Medicamentos , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , beta-Lactamases/genética , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Klebsiella/microbiologia
13.
Adv Respir Med ; 91(3): 224-238, 2023 May 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37366804

RESUMO

A substantial increase in broad-spectrum antibiotics as empirical therapy in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has occurred over the last 15 years. One of the driving factors leading to that has been some evidence showing an increased incidence of drug-resistant pathogens (DRP) in patients from a community with pneumonia, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Research has been published attempting to identify DRP in CAP through the implementation of probabilistic approaches in clinical practice. However, recent epidemiological data showed that the incidence of DRP in CAP varies significantly according to local ecology, healthcare systems and countries where the studies were performed. Several studies also questioned whether broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage might improve outcomes in CAP, as it is widely documented that broad-spectrum antibiotics overuse is associated with increased costs, length of hospital stay, drug adverse events and resistance. The aim of this review is to analyze the different approaches used to identify DRP in CAP patients as well as the outcomes and adverse events in patients undergoing broad-spectrum antibiotics.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Pneumonia , Humanos , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico
14.
Front Microbiol ; 14: 1287522, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38274761

RESUMO

Background: Group A Streptococcus (GAS) causes multiple clinical manifestations, including invasive (iGAS) or even life-threatening (severe-iGAS) infections. After the drop in cases during COVID-19 pandemic, in 2022 a sharp increase of GAS was reported globally. Methods: GAS strains collected in 09/2022-03/2023 in two university hospitals in Milan, Italy were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical/epidemiological data were combined with whole-genome sequencing to: (i) define resistome/virulome, (ii) identify putative transmission chains, (iii) explore associations between emm-types and clinical severity. Results: Twenty-eight isolates were available, 19/28 (67.9%) from adults and 9/28 (32.1%) from pediatric population. The criteria for iGAS were met by 19/28 cases (67.9%), of which 11/19 (39.3%) met the further criteria for severe-iGAS. Pediatric cases were mainly non-invasive infections (8/9, 88.9%), adult cases were iGAS and severe-iGAS in 18/19 (94.7%) and 10/19 (52.6%), respectively. Thirteen emm-types were detected, the most prevalent being emm1 and emm12 (6/28 strains each, 21.4%). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of emm1.0 and emm12.0 strains revealed pairwise SNP distance always >10, inconsistent with unique transmission chains. Emm12.0-type, found to almost exclusively carry virulence factors speH and speI, was mainly detected in children and in no-iGAS infections (55.6 vs. 5.3%, p = 0.007 and 66.7 vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001, respectively), while emm1.0-type was mainly detected in severe-iGAS (0.0 vs. 45.5%, p = 0.045). Conclusions: This study showed that multiple emm-types contributed to a 2022/2023 GAS infection increase in two hospitals in Milan, with no evidence of direct transmission chains. Specific emm-types could be associated with disease severity or invasiveness. Overall, these results support the integration of classical epidemiological studies with genomic investigation to appropriately manage severe infections and improve surveillance.

15.
J Fungi (Basel) ; 8(4)2022 Apr 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35448621

RESUMO

First reports of cases and case series of COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) emerged during the first months of the pandemic. Prevalence rates varied widely due to the fact that CAPA was, and still remains, challenging to diagnose in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory failure (ARF). The clinical picture and radiological findings of CAPA are unspecific and can resemble those of severe COVID-19. Hence, mycological evidence became a key component in establishing a diagnosis. However, blood tests lack sensitivity in early treatable phases of CAPA and once positive, mortality has been shown to exceed 80% despite systemic antifungal therapy. The primarily airway invasive growth in non-neutropenic patients and the late occurrence of angioinvasion in the course of disease may mainly account for these diagnostic obstacles. Testing of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is therefore crucial in the diagnostic process, but was rarely performed during the early phase of the pandemic, which potentially interfered with the accuracy of reported prevalence. Current guidelines recommend treatment of CAPA during its early airway invasive phase, which may result in some overtreatment (i.e., treatment in patients that may not develop angioinvasive infection) and adverse drug events, yet there is no viable alternative approach. Timely treatment of cases needs to be ensured for patients with mycological evidence of CAPA in the lower respiratory tract given the independent contribution of CAPA to devastating mortality rates of around 50% that have been shown in multiple studies. Here, we review the evolution of reported CAPA prevalence and the role of CAPA as an important opportunistic infection affecting COVID-19 patients in intensive care units (ICUs).

16.
Expert Rev Mol Diagn ; 22(1): 49-60, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34894965

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Pneumonia is one of the main causes of mortality associated with infectious diseases worldwide. Several challenges have been identified in the management of patients with pneumonia, ranging from accurate and cost-effective microbiological investigations, prompt and adequate therapeutic management, and optimal treatment duration. AREAS COVERED: In this review, an updated summary on the current management of pneumonia patients is provided and the epidemiological issues of infectious respiratory diseases, which in the current pandemic situation are of particular concern, are addressed. The clinical and microbiological approaches to pneumonia diagnosis are reviewed, including discussion about the new molecular assays pointing out both their strengths and limitations. Finally, the current recommendations about antibiotic treatment are examined and discussed depending on the epidemiological contexts, including those with high prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. EXPERT OPINION: We claim that rapid diagnostic tests, if well-positioned in the diagnostic workflow and reserved for the subset of patients who could most benefit from these technologies, may represent an interesting and feasible tool to optimize timing of targeted treatments especially in terms of early de-escalation or discontinuation of antibiotic therapy.


Assuntos
Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Pneumonia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Humanos , Pneumonia/diagnóstico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Prevalência
17.
Microorganisms ; 10(4)2022 Apr 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35456827

RESUMO

Novel carbapenem-ß-lactamase inhibitor combination, imipenem/relebactam (IMI-REL), has been recently approved for treatment of infections with limited or no alternative treatment options. In this study, we described the emergence of the IMI-REL-resistance in a KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strain collected from a hematological patient with no evidence of prior colonization. Interestingly, IMI-REL-resistance was associated with meropenem/vaborbactam (MER-VAB) cross-resistance but was not associated with cross-resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI). Although treatment with CAZ-AVI and gentamicin completely eradicated the infection due KPC-Kp cross-resistance to IMI-REL and MER-VAB, the patient became colonized subsequently by KPC-Kp strains susceptible to IMI-REL and MER-VAB. Whole-genome sequencing performed by hybrid approach using Illumina and Oxford Nanopore platforms demonstrated that all KPC-Kp strains isolated from hematological patient belonged to the ST512 and were clonally related. Analysis of antimicrobial and porins genes demonstrated that cross-resistance to IMI-REL and MER-VAB was associated with increased blaKPC-3 copy number and truncated OmpK35 and OmpK36 with GD134-135 insertion. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated that KPC-Kp cross-resistance to IMI-REL and MER-VAB was clonally related to a KPC-Kp resistant to IMI-REL as previously described, demonstrating the spread of this multidrug resistant clone in the hematological unit. In conclusion, the results presented in this study reported the emergence of cross-resistance to MER-VAB and IMI-REL in a KPC-Kp strain isolated from a hematological patient and highlight the potential development and diffusion of new multidrug resistance traits.

18.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 29: 386-389, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35569757

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Conditions favouring persistent enterococcal bacteraemia (p-EB) have not been fully investigated yet. The aim of our study is to analyse risk factors for p-EB and its impact on mortality. METHODS: International two-centre retrospective study of all hospitalised adults with enterococcal bacteraemia managed with follow-up blood cultures (BCs) during the period 2011-2019. Exclusion criteria were: (1) death within 72 hours from index BCs and (2) polymicrobial bacteraemia. Primary endpoint was p-EB, defined as further isolation of the same species of Enterococcus spp. from BCs after at least 72 hours of appropriate antibiotic therapy. Multivariable logistic regression model was performed to assess risk factors for p-EB. The impact of p-EB on 30-day mortality was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox regression multivariable model. RESULTS: During the study period, 244 enterococcal bacteraemia were diagnosed. P-EB were 13.5% (33/244). At multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with p-EB were hematologic malignancy (OR 4.60 [95% CI 1.32-16.00], P = 0.01), infective endocarditis (OR 7.99 [95% CI 2.20-28.9], P = 0.002), and use of daptomycin as initial treatment (OR 4.50 [95% CI 1.29-15.61], P = 0.018). Mortality rate was higher in the p-EB group (32% vs. 18%). Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that patients with p-EB were less likely to survive at 30 days from index BCs (log-rank P = 0.002). Using a Cox regression model, independent predictors of 30-day mortality were hematologic malignancy (HR 2.30 [95% CI 1.02-4.11], P = 0.043), p-EB (HR 1.93 [95% CI 0.92-4.04], P = 0.08), and septic shock (HR 5.92 [95% CI 2.17-16.30], P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: P-EB was diagnosed mainly in very fragile patients and in those receiving daptomycin as frontline therapy. P-EB may have an impact on mortality.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Daptomicina , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Adulto , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
19.
EJHaem ; 2022 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36248618

RESUMO

Efficacy of early treatment with anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection in hematologic patients is unknown. Retrospective, cohort study conducted in four Italian teaching hospitals. We included adult patients with hematologic malignancies and hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosed between November 2020 and December 2021. The principal exposure variable was administration of mAbs. The primary endpoint was clinical failure dea composite outcome of mortality and/or invasive and noninvasive ventilation within 90 days from infection onset. We included 52 patients with hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. Males were 29 (60%), median age was 62 (interquartile range [IQR] 48-70). Forty-five (86%) patients were on chemotherapy or had received chemotherapy within 30 days. MAbs were administered in 19/52 (36%) patients. Clinical failure occurred in 22 (42%) patients; 21% (4/19) in mAbs group versus 54% (18/33) in non-mAbs group (p = 0.03). Other predictors of clinical failure were older age (median [IQR] 69 [61-72] versus 58 [46-66], p = 0.001), and higher Charlson comorbidity index (median [IQR], 5 [3.25-5] versus 3 [2-5], p = 0.002). At multivariable Cox regression model, mAbs were independently associated with a significantly lower rate of clinical failure (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.85, p = 0.01), after adjusting for confounders. In conclusion, mAbs are promising for early treatment of hematologic patients with healthcare-related SARS-CoV-2 infection.

20.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(4): 461-466, 2022 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858547

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of colonization and infection with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-Ab) in the ICUs of our city hospitals before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, before-and-after, cross-sectional study to compare the rates of colonization and infection with CPE and/or CR-Ab in 2 study periods, period 1 (January-April 2019) and period 2 (January-April 2020). Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of weekly colonization and infection rates for each period were compared for the 2 study periods using Poisson regression. Weekly trends in the incidence of colonization or infection for each study period were summarized using local weighted (Loess) regression. RESULTS: We detected no significant change in either IRR and weekly trend in CPE colonization and infection during the 2 study periods. A shift from KPC to other CPE mechanisms (OXA-48 and VIM) was observed during period 2. Compared to period 1, during period 2 the IRR of colonization and infection with CR-Ab increased 7.5- and 5.5-fold, respectively. Genome sequencing showed that all CR-Ab strains belonged to the CC92/IC2 clonal lineage. Clinical strains clustered closely into a single monophyletic group in 1 of the 3 centers, whereas they segregated in 2 different clusters in the other 2 centers, which strongly indicates horizontal transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate the need to conduct infection control activities targeted against the spread of antimicrobial resistance between and within hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic, and if necessary, remodulating them according to the new organizational structures imposed by the pandemic.


Assuntos
Acinetobacter baumannii , COVID-19 , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Bactérias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pandemias , beta-Lactamases
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa