Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet ; 403(10445): 2751-2754, 2024 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795714

RESUMO

On June 24, 2022, the US Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization marked the removal of the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, introducing a complex ethical and legal landscape for patients and providers. This shift has had immediate health and equity repercussions, but it is also crucial to examine the broader impacts on states, health-care systems, and society as a whole. Restrictions on abortion access extend beyond immediate reproductive care concerns, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the ruling's consequences across micro and macro levels. To mitigate potential harm, it is imperative to establish a research agenda that informs policy making and ensures effective long-term monitoring and reporting, addressing both immediate and future impacts.


Assuntos
Decisões da Suprema Corte , Saúde da Mulher , Humanos , Feminino , Estados Unidos , Gravidez , Saúde da Mulher/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Direitos da Mulher/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/ética
2.
Lancet ; 403(10445): 2747-2750, 2024 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795713

RESUMO

The Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court decision, which revoked the constitutional right to abortion in the USA, has impacted the national medical workforce. Impacts vary across states, but providers in states with restrictive abortion laws now must contend with evolving legal and ethical challenges that have the potential to affect workforce safety, mental health, education, and training opportunities, in addition to having serious impacts on patient health and far-reaching societal consequences. Moreover, Dobbs has consequences on almost every facet of the medical workforce, including on physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and others who work within the health-care system. Comprehensive research is urgently needed to understand the wide-ranging implications of Dobbs on the medical workforce, including legal, ethical, clinical, and psychological dimensions, to inform evidence-based policies and standards of care in abortion-restrictive settings. Lessons from the USA might also have global relevance for countries facing similar restrictions on reproductive care.


Assuntos
Decisões da Suprema Corte , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Aborto Induzido/legislação & jurisprudência , Aborto Induzido/ética , Aborto Legal/legislação & jurisprudência , Pessoal de Saúde , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Estados Unidos , Saúde da Mulher
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(12): 324-7, 2015 Apr 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25837243

RESUMO

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, with 52% of deaths caused by cancers of the lung and bronchus, female breast, uterine cervix, colon and rectum, oral cavity and pharynx, prostate, and skin (melanoma). In the 1930s, uterine cancer, including cancer of the uterine cervix, was the leading cause of cancer deaths among women in the United States. With the advent of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test in the 1950s to detect cellular level changes in the cervix, cervical cancer death rates declined significantly. Since this first cancer screening test, others have been developed that detect the presence of cancer through imaging procedures (e.g., mammography, endoscopy, and computed tomography) and laboratory tests (e.g., fecal occult blood tests).


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/tendências , Previsões , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Humanos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
Detalhe da pesquisa