RESUMO
While occupation began as the central concept of occupational therapy at the dawn of the profession, the use of occupation throughout the therapy process, including assessment, has wavered in recent decades. Occupation is defined as meaningful and purposeful activities that individuals do to occupy their time and attention. The use of occupation-based assessments is vital to establishing care with an occupational focus. The purpose of this paper is to review the outcome assessment tools commonly used in the burn literature to evaluate hand function and critique the presence of occupation in each assessment using the Occupation-Based Practice Assessment (OBPA). Knowledge of the occupational nature of assessments is important to the delivery of an occupational therapy evaluation comprised of a battery of assessments inclusive of discrete measures of movement as well as performance-based tools to represent the person from an occupational perspective. Many outcome measures used in upper extremity burn rehabilitation are discrete in nature and do not measure occupations of clients. The Suitcase Packing Activity (SPA) may be a viable addition to an assessment battery to address this essential need.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Inhalation injury is a major risk factor for mortality in burn patients via 3 primary mechanisms: airway edema and obstruction, hypoxemic respiratory failure, and pneumonia. Currently, the mainstay of treatment is supportive care to include early intubation, lung-protective or high-frequency-percussive mechanical ventilation, nebulized heparin, and aggressive pulmonary toilet. Despite these treatments, a subset of these patients progress to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) for which rescue options are limited. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old woman was found down in a house fire. On admission to the burn intensive care unit, she was diagnosed with grade 3 smoke inhalation injury. Cutaneous thermal injury was absent. By hospital day 2, she developed worsening hypoxemia and hypercapnia despite maximal ventilatory support. She was placed on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). She received an average of 2.2 hours of direct rehabilitation a day and completed out-of-bed modalities over 90% of total hospital days. After 159 hours, she was decannulated, and by hospital day 18, she was discharged home on supplemental oxygen. CONCLUSION: Current literature regarding ECMO in inhalation injury is limited, but a growing body of evidence suggests that treatment of severe smoke inhalation injury should include ECMO for those who fail conventional therapy.