Multidimensional predictors of negative symptoms in antipsychotic-naive first-episode psychosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite a large body of schizophrenia research, we still have no reliable predictors to guide treatment from illness onset. The present study aimed to identify baseline clinical or neurobiological factors - including peripheral brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels and amygdala or hippocampal relative volumes - that could predict negative symptomatology and persistent negative symptoms in first-episode psychosis after 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: We recruited 50 drug-naive patients with first-episode psychosis and 50 age- and sex-matched healthy controls to study brain volumes. We performed univariate and multiple and logistic regression analyses to determine the association between baseline clinical and neurobiological variables, score on the PANSS negative subscale and persistent negative symptoms after 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Low baseline serum BDNF levels (p = 0.011), decreased left amygdala relative volume (p = 0.001) and more severe negative symptomatology (p = 0.021) predicted the severity of negative symptoms at 1 year, as measured by the PANSS negative subscale. Low baseline serum BDNF levels (p = 0.012) and decreased left amygdala relative volume (p = 0.010) predicted persistent negative symptoms at 1 year. LIMITATIONS: We were unable to assess negative symptoms and their dimensions with next-generation scales, which were not available when the study was initiated. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a set of variables at baseline, including low BDNF levels, smaller left amygdala relative volume and score on the PANSS negative subscale are significant predictors of outcomes in first-episode psychosis. These findings might offer an initial step for tailoring treatments in first-episode psychosis.

COVID-19 vaccination coverage and vaccine hesitancy among people with opioid use disorder in Barcelona, Spain.

INTRODUCTION: People with substance use disorders are considered a priority group for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination as they are at elevated risk of COVID-19 and its severe complications. However, data are scarce about vaccination coverage in a real-world setting. METHODS: A descriptive study was conducted in people with opioid use disorder (OUD) from three public centres for outpatient drug addiction treatment in Barcelona, Spain, who received brief medical advice and were referred to vaccination clinic sites. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-two individuals were included: 277 (77%) were men with a mean age of 48.1 ± 8.9 years and 77% were Spanish. Most (90%) participants engaged in polysubstance use and all individuals were on opioid agonist therapy. Psychiatric comorbidity was present in 56% subjects and 32% individuals had ≥1 chronic disease, 30% had HIV and 13% hepatitis C. There were 258 fully vaccinated individuals (71%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 67, 76). Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04; 95% CI 1.01, 1.08; P < 0.01) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.11, 2.5; P < 0.01) were associated with full vaccination. The vaccination hesitancy causes cited were complacency (53, 51%), convenience (40, 39%) and confidence (11, 10%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: More than two-thirds of our sample of people with OUD were fully vaccinated. Complacency and convenience represented a significant barrier to complete vaccination among people with OUD on opioid agonist therapy referred to vaccination clinic sites. Additional measures are necessary to increase vaccination, especially for younger individuals and those with less medical comorbidity. Integrating vaccination services in drug outpatient centres could be a useful alternative.

Similar COVID-19 incidence to the general population in people with opioid use disorder receiving integrated outpatient clinical care.

INTRODUCTION: During the COVID-19 pandemic, limited access to health care augmented COVID-19 risk in subjects with opioid use disorder (OUD). The aim of the study was to compare COVID-19 incidence in individuals with OUD receiving continuous clinical care with that of the general population. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was carried out from March 2020 to March 2021 comparing COVID-19 cumulative incidence of individuals presenting an OUD receiving integrated clinical care with that of an age-reference general population, in three public outpatient treatment centers for addiction in Barcelona, Spain. RESULTS: Over the study period, 366 individuals received clinical care. Mean age: 48.2±8.9 years, 280 (76.5%) were men and 283 (77.3%) native Spanish. All subjects were on opioid agonist therapy. Prevalence of communicable diseases were: HIV infection in 109 (29.8%) and hepatitis C in 46 (12.6%). Psychiatric comorbidity was present in 207 (56.6%), and 119 (32.5%) had >1 chronic medical disease. COVID-19 WAS DIAGNOSED IN 10 PATIENTS: a cumulative incidence of 2,732 casesx100,000 people/year (C.I.95%: 1,318-4,967). There were no differences compared to the age-general population: 2,856 casesx100,000 people/year (C.I.95%: 2,830-2,880) (p=0.81). In the bivariate analysis, hypertension (5[50.0%] vs. 53[14.9%], p=0.01) and cardiovascular chronic diseases (2 [20.0%] vs. 8 [2.2%], p=0.03) were more prevalent in patients with OUD and COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with OUD who received integrated clinical care had a COVID-19 incidence comparable to the general population. Ensuring comprehensive healthcare is essential to prevent the clinical impact of COVID-19 on individuals with OUD.