Overexpression of the alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase in MDCK cells increases influenza virus sensitivity to neuraminidase inhibitors.

No reliable cell culture assay is currently available for monitoring human influenza virus sensitivity to neuraminidase inhibitors (NAI). This can be explained by the observation that because of a low concentration of sialyl-alpha2,6-galactose (Sia[alpha2,6]Gal)-containing virus receptors in conventional cell lines, replication of human virus isolates shows little dependency on viral neuraminidase. To test whether overexpression of Sia(alpha2,6)Gal moieties in cultured cells could make them suitable for testing human influenza virus sensitivity to NAI, we stably transfected MDCK cells with cDNA of human 2,6-sialyltransferase (SIAT1). Transfected cells expressed twofold-higher amounts of 6-linked sialic acids and twofold-lower amounts of 3-linked sialic acids than parent MDCK cells as judged by staining with Sambucus nigra agglutinin and Maackia amurensis agglutinin, respectively. After transfection, binding of a clinical human influenza virus isolate was increased, whereas binding of its egg-adapted variant which preferentially bound 3-linked receptors was decreased. The sensitivity of human influenza A and B viruses to the neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir carboxylate was substantially improved in the SIAT1-transfected cell line and was consistent with their sensitivity in neuraminidase enzyme assay and with the hemagglutinin (HA) receptor-binding phenotype. MDCK cells stably transfected with SIAT1 may therefore be a suitable system for testing influenza virus sensitivity to NAI.

Influenza virus infection is not affected by serum amyloid P component.

BACKGROUND: Binding of serum amyloid P component (SAP) to its ligands, including bacteria, chromatin and amyloid fibrils, protects them from degradation, is anti-opsonic and anti-immunogenic. SAP thereby enhances the virulence of pathogenic bacteria to which it binds. However SAP also contributes to host resistance against bacteria to which it does not bind. Human SAP has been reported to bind to the influenza virus and inhibit viral invasion of cells in tissue culture. We therefore investigated a possible role of SAP in either host resistance or viral virulence during influenza infection in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical course of mouse adapted influenza virus infection, the host antibody response, and viral replication, were compared in wild type mice, mice with targeted deletion of the SAP gene, and mice transgenic for human SAP. The effects of reconstitution of SAP deficient mice with pure human SAP, and of a drug that specifically blocks SAP binding in vivo, were also studied. Binding of mouse and human SAP to immobilized influenza virus was compared. RESULTS: The presence, absence, or availability for binding of SAP in vivo had no significant or consistent effect on the course or outcome of influenza infection, or on either viral replication or the anti-viral antibody response. Mouse SAP bound much less avidly than human SAP to influenza virus. CONCLUSIONS: In marked contrast to the dramatic effects of SAP deficiency on host resistance to different bacterial infections, mouse SAP apparently plays no significant role during infection of mice with influenza virus. Human SAP binds much more avidly than mouse SAP to the virus, but also had no effect on any of the parameters measured and is therefore unlikely to be involved in human influenza infection.

Management of influenza in households: a prospective, randomized comparison of oseltamivir treatment with or without postexposure prophylaxis.

We determined the efficacy of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) and treatment of ill index cases with oseltamivir, in an attempt to prevent influenza transmission in households, in a study conducted in 277 households with 298 index cases (62% with laboratory-confirmed influenza) and 812 contacts aged > or =1 year. Contacts were randomized by household to receive treatment (5 days; n=402), if illness developed, or PEP for 10 days (n=410), and the number of households with at least 1 contact developing laboratory-confirmed influenza was measured. PEP provided a protective efficacy of 58.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.6%-79.6%; P=.0114) for households against proven influenza and 68.0% (95% CI, 34.9%-84.2%; P=.0017) for individual contacts, compared with treatment of index cases alone. No oseltamivir-resistant variants were detected in treated index cases or contacts. PEP of household contacts of those with influenza reduces the secondary spread of influenza in families when the initial household case is treated.