More than a piece of cake: Noun classifier processing in primary progressive aphasia.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical understanding of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) has been primarily derived from Indo-European languages. Generalizing certain linguistic findings across languages is unfitting due to contrasting linguistic structures. While PPA patients showed noun classes impairments, Chinese languages lack noun classes. Instead, Chinese languages are classifier language, and how PPA patients manipulate classifiers is unknown. METHODS: We included 74 native Chinese speakers (22 controls, 52 PPA). For classifier production task, participants were asked to produce the classifiers of high-frequency items. In a classifier recognition task, participants were asked to choose the correct classifier. RESULTS: Both semantic variant (sv) PPA and logopenic variant (lv) PPA scored significantly lower in classifier production task. In classifier recognition task, lvPPA patients outperformed svPPA patients. The classifier production scores were correlated to cortical volume over left temporal and visual association cortices. DISCUSSION: This study highlights noun classifiers as linguistic markers to discriminate PPA syndromes in Chinese speakers. HIGHLIGHTS: Noun classifier processing varies in the different primary progressive aphasia (PPA) variants. Specifically, semantic variant PPA (svPPA) and logopenic variant PPA (lvPPA) patients showed significantly lower ability in producing specific classifiers. Compared to lvPPA, svPPA patients were less able to choose the accurate classifiers when presented with choices. In svPPA, classifier production score was positively correlated with gray matter volume over bilateral temporal and left visual association cortices in svPPA. Conversely, classifier production performance was correlated with volumetric changes over left ventral temporal and bilateral frontal regions in lvPPA. Comparable performance of mass and count classifier were noted in Chinese PPA patients, suggesting a common cognitive process between mass and count classifiers in Chinese languages.

Using blood transcriptome analysis for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis and patient stratification.

INTRODUCTION: Blood protein biomarkers demonstrate potential for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis. Limited studies examine the molecular changes in AD blood cells. METHODS: Bulk RNA-sequencing of blood cells was performed on AD patients of Chinese descent (n = 214 and 26 in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively) with normal controls (n = 208 and 38 in the discovery and validation cohorts, respectively). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and deconvolution analysis identified AD-associated gene modules and blood cell types. Regression and unsupervised clustering analysis identified AD-associated genes, gene modules, cell types, and established AD classification models. RESULTS: WGCNA on differentially expressed genes revealed 15 gene modules, with 6 accurately classifying AD (areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve [auROCs] > 0.90). These modules stratified AD patients into subgroups with distinct disease states. Cell-type deconvolution analysis identified specific blood cell types potentially associated with AD pathogenesis. DISCUSSION: This study highlights the potential of blood transcriptome for AD diagnosis, patient stratification, and mechanistic studies. HIGHLIGHTS: We comprehensively analyze the blood transcriptomes of a well-characterized Alzheimer's disease cohort to identify genes, gene modules, pathways, and specific blood cells associated with the disease. Blood transcriptome analysis accurately classifies and stratifies patients with Alzheimer's disease, with some gene modules achieving classification accuracy comparable to that of the plasma ATN biomarkers. Immune-associated pathways and immune cells, such as neutrophils, have potential roles in the pathogenesis and progression of Alzheimer's disease.

Telephone and Teleradiology-Guided Thrombolysis Can Achieve Similar Outcome as Thrombolysis by Neurologist On-site.

BACKGROUND: Because of the limitation of on-site neurology workforce, telestroke was implemented to overcome this barrier. We explored the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) stroke thrombolysis service by telestroke when neurologist was not available on-site. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2012, we compared patients treated with IV stroke thrombolysis by telestroke in the form of telephone consultation with teleradiology, to patients treated after in-person assessment by the same team of neurologists in a regional hospital. Door-to-needle time, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and functional outcome at 3 months were prospectively collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: In all, 152 patients were treated with IV thrombolysis; 102 patients were treated with neurologist on-site; whereas 50 patients were treated by internists with telestroke. Fifty-two percent of the telemedical group achieved excellent outcome compared to 43% of the neurologist on-site group (P = .30). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rate (4.0% versus 4.9%, P = 1.0) and mortality (8.3% versus 11.9%, P = .49) were comparable. Using the multiple logistic regression analysis, age, baseline stroke severity, and extent of early ischemic change on brain computed tomography scan, are independent predictors for excellent outcome, whereas the presence of neurologist on-site is not correlated with the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated without neurologist on-site achieved similar outcome. Telephone consultation and teleradiology-guided IV stroke thrombolysis, with the support of on-site internist appeared safe and efficacious.

Safety and Efficacy Comparison of Tenecteplase and Alteplase for Clinically Suspected Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes without Thrombectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Tenecteplase is a thrombolytic with higher fibrin affinity and is potentially better in clot lysis. A higher spontaneous recanalisation rate for large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes had been shown in comparison studies with alteplase. Results of the LVO studies reflect the composite effect of the thrombolytic and thrombectomy, as patients would be treated by thrombectomy had they not been recanalised by intravenous thrombolysis alone. Thrombectomy is not readily available in many parts of the world. Our study aimed to compare the outcomes of suspected LVO patients treated with tenecteplase versus alteplase only, without the confounding effect of thrombectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective review. Data of patients given tenecteplase from May 2020 to August 2023 and those given alteplase 0.9 mg/kg from January 2019 to August 2023 were retrieved. Due to fluctuation in supply of tenecteplase during the COVID pandemic, some LVO patients were given alteplase. Patients with anterior circulation, clinically suspected LVO strokes (defined as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥6, plus cortical signs or hyperdense vessel sign), with thrombolysis given within 4.5 h of stroke onset were analysed. Patients with thrombectomy done were excluded. Safety and efficacy outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were 245 tenecteplase-treated patients treated between May 1, 2020, and August 31, 2023, and 732 patients were treated with alteplase between January 1, 2019, to August 31, 2023. Out of these, 148 tenecteplase patients and 138 alteplase 0.9 mg/kg patients fulfilled the study criteria. The symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage rate was non-significantly lower in the tenecteplase group (2.1% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.13). There were no significant differences in the rate of ≥8-point NIHSS improvement (23.6% vs. 23.7%, p = 1) or the ≥4-point improvement (40.5% vs. 40.7%, p = 1) at 24 h. At 3 months, 21.6% of tenecteplase patients had good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale [mRS] 0-2), compared to 26.3% in the alteplase group (p = 0.40). CONCLUSION: In this pragmatic study of clinically suspected anterior circulation LVO patients without thrombectomy, outcome solely reflects the effects of tenecteplase. Tenecteplase showed comparable safety and efficacy to alteplase, but the result should be interpreted with caution in view of its small sample size and non-randomised study design.

The efficacy and safety of the Chinese herbal medicine Di-Tan decoction for treating Alzheimer's disease: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia in the elderly. It is estimated that the global prevalence of dementia will rise from 24.3 million in 2005 to 81.1 million in 2040. AD has a devastating impact on sufferers, caregivers, their communities and the healthcare system in general. "Di-tan decoction" (DTD) is a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula frequently used to treat symptoms that are now defined as AD in clinical treatment. However, the existing evidence for recommending DTD in clinical practice derives from studies that were methodologically flawed. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of DTD in AD patients based on a rigidly randomized controlled trial. It will provide critical information on sample size and treatment regimen for conducting a full-scale clinical trial of DTD later. METHODS/DESIGN: This study will be a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, add-on trial. After a 2-week run-in period, eligible patients with mild to moderate AD will be recruited and given either DTD or placebo twice daily for 24 weeks with follow-up 6 weeks after the last treatment. An increase of four points or greater on the scores of Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAD-cog) will be considered as a positive primary outcome. Total scores of the ADAD-cog, the Chinese version of Mini-Mental State Examination (C-MMSE), and the Chinese version of the Disability Assessment for Dementia (C-DAD) score will be used as secondary outcomes. Adverse events will also be reported. DISCUSSION: This randomized trial will be the first rigorous empirical study on the efficacy of DTD for treating cognitive symptoms in AD patients. Its success will justify and warrant a large-scale clinical trial to further consolidate the evidence for DTD's efficacy in treating AD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR-TRC-12004548 , Date of registration: 22 November 2012).